Tuesday, November 11, 2008The Mummies of Guanajuato Release Year: 1972Country: Mexico Starring: Blue Demon, Mil Mascaras, Santo, Elsa Cardenas, Juan Gallardo, Jorge Pinguino, Manuel Leal, Julio Cesar, Carlos Suarez, Patricia Ferrer Writers: Rogelio Agrasanchez, Rafael Garcia Travesi Director: Frederico Curiel Cinematographer: Enrique Wallace Music: Gustavo Cesar Carrion Producer: Rogelio Agrasanchez Also known as: Las Momias de Guanajuato; Santo vs. Las Momias One need only glance over the many titles in the lucha movie genre to see that there is a long history of enmity between Mexican wrestlers and mummies. This goes all the way back to 1964, when Elizabeth Campbell and Lorena Velazquez threw down against a pop-eyed, reconstituted Aztec warrior in their sophomore effort as The Wrestling Women, Las Luchadoras contra la Momia, and continued throughout the rest of the sixties, during which Santo, the most celebrated movie luchadore of them all, would come up against shambling bandage jockeys in films like Santo and Blue Demon vs. The Monsters and La Venganza de la Momia. But the conflict didn't really kick into high gear until 1972, when the success of a little film called The Mummies of Guanajuato (aka Las Momias de Guanajuato) guaranteed that, for the next several years, Mexican movie screens would seldom see respite from the spectacle of colorfully-garbed, masked Mexican grapplers working their moves on a seemingly endless series of inexplicably muscular mummified adversaries. The Mummies of Guanajuato was the brainchild of Mexican independent producer, distributor and writer Rogelio Agrasanchez. Now, Agrasanchez is a figure whom I have decidedly conflicting feelings toward. His wrestling films are generally emblematic of the type of haste and neglect that plagued the lucha genre during the 1970s, marked by sloppy storytelling rife with plot holes and continuity errors, lackadaisical pacing, hunger-strike production values, extremely hit-or-miss technical execution, and a patience-testing reliance on padding -- often in the form of footage lifted from other films, as well as poorly integrated musical numbers, beauty pageants, and anything else they could squeeze in -- that definitely gives the impression of films that were made on the fly with very little prior story consideration or planning. Of course, Agrasanchez was not the only Lucha filmmaker of the period who was guilty of these sins, and it should be kept in mind that this was a time during which, first of all, audience interest in the genre was waning and, second of all, government financial support for commercial Mexican films, which had been plentiful during the sixties, was at a temporary ebb due to a shift in priorities toward funding more "respectable" fare. As a result, the profitability of such films dictated a need for thrift and speed that Agrasanchez alone can't be held personally accountable for. Still, the fact is that lucha libre films were never big budget items, and what one sees occurring over the lifespan of the genre, from the dawn of the sixties to the end of the seventies, is not so much a reduction in the amount of money spent as a reduction in the amount of care put into insuring that the films were actually coherent or watchable. While an early film like Santo contra las Mujeres Vampiro seems to be the work of accomplished craftsmen determined to deliver an engaging and atmospheric example of B movie entertainment to the fullest extent that their modest means would allow, many of Agrasanchez's films seem to demonstrate a concern primarily with attaining acceptable feature-length by any means necessary while delivering the minimum number of bankable elements at the most minimal expenditure of time and resources possible. While, again, these faults were not those of Rogelio Agrasanchez alone, that is not to say that he didn't, in many other ways, put his own personal stamp upon his work in the field. And, to give the man his due, I would here like to list those contributions to Mexican wrestling cinema that are indeed uniquely Agrasanchez's own. These are elements that you can not only count on from pretty much any one of his lucha films, but that also mark those film as being distinctly his. The first of these would have to be… ...Midgets. Sure, there were midgets in lucha movies before Rogelio Agrasanchez came upon the scene -- most notably Waldo, the hunchback in Santo and Blue Demon vs. The Monsters. Furthermore, The Mummies of Guanajuato, by Agrasanchez's standards, is fairly conservative in it use of little people, limiting itself to only one in the cast. But, generally, Agransanchez's thinking seemed to be that, if you were going to have one midget, you might as well have a whole posse of them. It seemed he felt that there was something intrinsically much more thrilling about having a burly masked wrestler fighting several midgets as opposed to just one normal-sized man. The result saw the employment of a troupe of wee folk that I like to call The Agrasanchez Midgets in film after film. They wore matching superhero costumes with big "M"s emblazoned on their chests in The Champions of Justice, little moonman suits in Superzan el Invencible, rat-person costumes fashioned from fuzzy footy pajamas in The Champions of Justice Return, and appeared as fanged mini-vampires in the Mil Mascaras effort The Vampires of Coyoacan, which is probably one of the producer's most enjoyable films. Now there is nothing inherently wrong with this, of course, and, upon first encounter, you can't beat the sheer entertainment value of watching a big, musclebound lug like Mil Mascaras or Tinieblas trying to pretend that he's being taken down by a gang of clamoring homunculi. In cases where the featured wrestlers are in less than peak physical condition, I can even see the utility of such mismatched pairings. But over time it comes to seem like evidence of an absurdly obstinate aversion to opportunity when a film has athletes such as these at its disposal and dedicates most of their screen time to pitting them against opponents a sixth their size. The result is that, impressively and against the odds, these pictures often manage within ninety minutes to drain something as awesome sounding as masked-wrestler-midget-fighting of much of its novelty and entertainment value. Another hallmark of Agrasanchez's films is a reliance on musical accompaniment that is inappropriate to the point of approaching ironic commentary. In the case of The Mummies of Guanajuato, this is perpetrated by frequent lucha movie scorer Gustavo Cesar Carrion in the form of sedately jaunty organ riffs that bring to mind nothing more than heavily medicated mental patients on furlough traversing endless dazed circles around an ice skating rink. Still, Guanajuato is far from the worst offender in this regard. The soundtrack to The Champions of Justice is much more typical, seemingly comprised of the producer just letting a sub-par West Coast Jazz album side play out over all of the action, with the result that every bit of screen business -- be it Mil Mascaras hurling a midget or Blue Demon staring blankly at a cue card -- carries the same negligible dramatic weight. The Champions of Justice also represents another one of the trends that ran through Agrasanchez's lucha work, and that was his tendency to stuff his films full of as many masked wrestlers as they could possibly hold. Of course, that he would do so is not all that surprising, given that Champions -- which featured a total of six luchadores, including heavy-hitters Blue Demon and Mil Mascaras -- was one of his early successes in the genre. Audiences had seen wrestlers paired onscreen before in the several films that teamed Santo and Blue Demon, but it was Agrasanchez who made the use of small armies comprised of three or more fighters his own. Again, there is nothing inherently wrong with this. In fact it's a great idea. It's just that the half-heartedness of Agrasanchez and his crew's execution so frequently resulted in these films being so much less than the sum of their parts and, as such, fragrant of wasted opportunity. I realize that a lot of people reserve a fond place in their hearts for The Champions of Justice, but I can't help thinking that they do so as a result of being in love more with what the film promises than with what it actually delivers. The dependence of Agrasanchez on multiple wrestlers to make up his casts lead the producer to even invent new wrestlers of his own, which brings me to the last of the cinematic offenses he committed that I will comment upon here: Superzan. Superzan was a bodybuilder by the name of Alfonse Mora who Agrasanchez styled as a masked wrestler/superhero (the name was meant to suggest a combination of Superman and Tarzan) to both star in his own series of films and fill-out the bill in some of the producer's multi-wrestler extravaganzas -- such as the aforementioned Vampires of Coyoacan and the final entry in the Champions of Justice trilogy. Aside from a black hole-like lack of charisma, Superzan's biggest liability was probably his costume. While, by this time, other wrestling heroes were affecting a more casual look, wearing their street clothes, or at least a more basic wrestling ensemble, with their masks, Superzan in the field always wore a complete, head-to-toe superhero outfit complete with cape, sparkly skin-tight body suit and boots. When paired with a comparatively less flamboyant wrestler, this made him look kind of like the kid who insists on wearing his costume to the grocery store the day after Halloween. On top of this, it didn't help matters that the film meant to launch Superzan into stardom, Superzan el Invencible, is among the most lackluster and incomprehensible in Agrasanchez's body of work, so leaden with pointless filler that it stubbornly defies even the most masochistic viewer's efforts to view it to its conclusion. Now that I've spent several paragraphs ardently running Rogelio Agrasanchez's contributions to lucha cinema into the ground, let me shift gears a bit and focus on another, quite different aspect of his career in film. This occurred later in his life, when he began to take interest in the preservation of Mexican commercial cinema's history, an interest which involved him acquiring and preserving, not only many original negatives of classic films, but also countless posters, lobby cards and other examples of Mexican film-related ephemera. In the 1980s, his son, Rogelio Jr., also began to take an interest in this project, and is today the owner and curator of the Agrasanchez Film Archive in Harlingen, Texas, home to thousands of movies and pieces of memorabilia from throughout the long and varied history of Mexican film. Apropos of the diversity of its contents, the archive boasts an ethos that is refreshingly egalitarian, catering to the standard scholarly interests while at the same time reflecting an attitude that The Braniac is every bit as worthy of study as Los Olvidados. Now, to give you some idea of just how high my esteem is for efforts such as those of the Agrasanchez family, let me just say the following: Here at Teleport City, there is not a single day that passes -- not one single day -- in which we are not tortured -- tortured! -- by the fact that we will probably never be able to see the Filipino monster vs. superhero mash-up Batman Fights Dracula or the similarly tantalizing-sounding Turkish effort Killink vs. Frankenstein -- this largely due to the low premium those films' respective countries of origin placed on the preservation of their national popular cinema. On the other hand, we do not take lightly the fact that, when it comes to Mexican cinema, if we hear about a film such as, say, the science fiction/western/musical La Nave de los Monstruos, or the Sixties spy spoof Cazadores de Espias, in which a masked luchadore can be seen fighting a robot while a scantily clad Maura Monti go-go dances ringside, we can rest assured in the knowledge that sooner or later we'll probably be able to scare up a copy. Of course, I realize that this is not due to the efforts of the Agrasanchez family alone, but those efforts are emblematic of both an abiding respect for their nation's cinematic history and a forward-thinking understanding of the need for preservation of the type that makes the lives of basement-dwelling world cinema obsessives like ourselves less of the recipe for serial disappointment and despair than it otherwise might be. In fact, so deep is my appreciation for Rogelio Agrasanchez in this regard that every negative word I cast in the direction of his efforts as a filmmaker is like a dagger plunged into my own side, making the preface of this review something akin to my own little private circle of Hell. The primary reason that The Mummies of Guanajuato had the success that it did is because it marked the first time that the three biggest stars of lucha libre -- and of lucha cinema, for that matter -- had appeared onscreen together, those three stars being Santo, Blue Demon and Mil Mascaras. I've devoted a lot of words to the careers of both Santo and Blue Demon in my reviews of Santo and Blue Demon vs. The Monsters and Santo vs. Blue Demon in Atlantis, but, for those not well versed in the particulars of Mexican wrestling movies, Mil Mascaras will probably need some introduction. Like Santo and Blue Demon, Mil Mascaras (the name means "Thousand Masks") had enjoyed success in his own series of films prior to making The Mummies of Guanajuato, though, beyond that, he was separated from his costumed co-stars by some marked differences in terms of both his personal style and his career path. Mil, who was born Aaron Rodriguez in 1942, began his screen career in 1966 under the guidance of low budget independent film producer Luis Enrique Vergara. Vergara had produced popular lucha film series for both Santo and Blue Demon, but, by the time of signing Mil, had found himself without a star as a result of Santo moving on to greener paychecks and Blue suffering a debilitating injury that would keep him off the boards for a matter of months. Now, one major difference at this point between Mil and those other two stars at the dawn of their respective movie-making careers, aside from the fact that he was considerably younger, is that, unlike Santo and Blue, who began their film careers later in life and thus made films that capitalized upon the stardom that they had already achieved in the ring, Mil at the time of his screen debut was a relatively unknown up-and-comer, a fact which made Vergara casting him something of a gamble on the producer's part. As a result, Mil Mascaras was unique among lucha cinema's top stars in that his public persona had in part been established as a result of him appearing in these films, rather than the other way around. Of course, he would later go on to prove himself in the ring and, in that regard, achieve international fame that would in some ways even surpass Santo's, but that does not change the fact that, unlike his peers, he was, to some extent, a movie star first and a wrestler second, which may explain some of those differences in style that I referred to earlier. For one thing, Mil was a dedicated bodybuilder, and had a lean, chiseled physique that was a marked contrast to the stockier builds seen on many of the wrestling stars of the day. This not only made him stand out, but also fit in nicely with the superheroic persona that Vergara had crafted for him. (Mil Mascaras, his scrupulously titled debut film, even fitted him with a Captain America-like origin story, in which, left orphaned as an infant during the war, he is raised by a team of scientists to be an invincible super soldier.) Beyond that, Mil brought a rockstar-like flamboyance to his style of dress that seemed exceptionally peacock-like even within the context of the colorful world of lucha libre. This may have been the result of his chosen gimmick, which was to wear numerous masks as opposed to one distinctive one, and which might have lead him to feel the need to visually distinguish himself by other means. Still, despite the name, the number of different masks he wore numbered far less than a thousand, and was generally limited to several highly identifiable models -- my favorite being a toothy green dragon number that looks like it could have been designed by Ed "Big Daddy" Roth. The reason for Mil's signature sartorial style was more likely that he was just a big, glammy ham. And God bless him for it, because his clothes alone exponentially increase the entertainment value of any movie in which he appears. In The Mummies of Guanajuato, for instance, he spends much of his screen time wearing a pair of leopard print hotpants on top of a pair of gold lame wrestling tights, topped off with a red velvet vest with gold trim worn over a bare chest. As pimp-tastic as that may sound, it is only a distant second in splendor to the outfit he wore in the loose Mummies of Guanajuato sequel, The Mummies of San Angel, which consisted of a silver, billowy-sleeved pirate shirt paired with a vest that had his face -- in starburst, of course -- emblazoned on the back. The Mummies of Guanajuato was originally intended to be a starring vehicle for Blue Demon and Mil Mascaras alone, but doubts on Agrasanchez's part that their names would carry the necessary box office clout lead him to make the eleventh hour addition of Santo to the cast just for good measure. Mil Mascaras reacted to the resulting dimunition of his role with pragmatic stoicism, but for Blue Demon this was just another insult in a long history of rivalry with el Enmascarado de Plata, and would reportedly remain a thorn in his side for the rest of his life. To Blue's point, Agrasanchez and company were certainly less than sensitive to their top billed stars' feelings in the ham-handed manner in which they inserted Santo into the action, essentially using him as a deus ex machina who shows up at the end to save the day with relatively little effort after Blue and Mil have proven ineffective for much of the previous running time. While Santo was basically credited as a special guest star, with Blue and Mil's names above the title, the true nature of his participation can be gleaned from the title that the movie was given upon its release in Spain later the same year: Santo vs. las Momias. Now to fully understand and enjoy The Mummies of Guanajuato, one has to appreciate that the "mummies" of its title are not the kind of mummies that viewers of English language horror films are normally accustomed to, as, rather than being ancient mummies that are man-made in origin, they are naturally occurring mummies of much more recent vintage. The real Mummies of Guanajuato were corpses -- many of them casualties of a cholera epidemic that swept the city in 1933 -- that were disinterred from a cemetery in the Mexican city of Guanajuato between the years of 1896 and 1958 -- said disinterment being the result of a law that required loved ones to pay an annual grave tax in order to keep their dearly departed safely ensconced underground. Inevitably, some of those loved ones were unable or unavailable to make payment of that tax, and so up from the crypt old Aunt Paola and Uncle Gustavo came. Once those bodies were brought back into the cold light of day, it was found that many of them had undergone a natural process of mummification, the result, it has been conjectured, of soil and atmospheric conditions unique to the area. As novel as that is in itself, the thing that ended up making the real-life Mummies of Guanajuato the stuff of legend, as well as a popular tourist attraction, is the fact that many of their faces were contorted in what appeared to be horrified screams. While this has been explained away by some dull scientific types as a natural result of the skin constricting in the course of mummification, the creepier and, thus, much preferable explanation is that these particular mummies had been cholera victims who had been hastily buried before they were completely and verifiably dead. So, as fascinating as we might like to pretend that the phenomenon of naturally occurring mummification is to us, it is, understandably, this tantalizing, spook show aspect of the mummies that has kept the coins of paying customers pouring into the till of the museum in Guanajuato where they are lovingly displayed. The movie The Mummies of Guanajuato indoctrinates us into its idiosyncratically meandering and lackadaisical way with storytelling in its very opening moments, treating us to a startlingly ponderous sequence in which the camera appears to be following a tour bus in real time through the entire length of the city. Finally the bus comes to a stop at the Mummies of Guanajuato museum, at which point its party disembarks, lead by a miniature tour guide going by the name of Penguin (Jorge Pinguino, here the only little person in the cast, but otherwise a key member of the Agrasanchez Midgets in most of the other movies in which they appeared). Soon thereafter we are given a view of the actual Mummies of Guanajuato, which are every bit as creepy as advertised. After a few introductory words, Penguin then leads the group into another room where a group of "special" mummies are housed. These seven mummies, he explains, are, for reasons unknown, markedly less decomposed than the others, and he's not kidding. The muscle tone on these things is amazing. This, of course, is because they are portrayed by a group of professional wrestlers who have been mummied-up with tattered clothing and hash-faced zombie make-up. At the center of this group of special mummies is a towering figure with a droopy-eyed make-up job that looks very similar to Gary Conway's in I Was a Teenage Frankenstein. This, Penguin tells the assembled vacationers, is a former wrestler called Satan, and he is portrayed by Manuel Leal, who we last saw as the goateed Frankenstein's monster in Santo and Blue Demon vs. The Monsters, and who would also gain fame both in the ring and in a number of Agrasanchez's multi-starrer lucha movies as the masked wrestler Tinieblas. Satan, Penguin continues, lost his championship title to an identically named and masked ancestor of Santo a hundred years previous and, at that time, having allegedly made a pact with the devil, swore to return from the dead a hundred years hence to seek vengeance upon el Enmascerado de Plata's descendants and supporters. In response to this, one of the tourists innocently asks on which day Satan's curse would come due. Why, "exactly today", replies Penguin after a bit of mental calculation. Then, having neatly set up the entire plot of The Mummies of Guanajuato, he promptly moves on without a word of explanation as to the identities of the other six preternaturally burly mummies on display. The notion of the mantle of Santo being a legacy handed down from generation to generation is not unique to The Mummies of Guanajuato, and was in fact a plot element in a number of earlier Santo movies. Films like 1965's Baron Brakola and 1969's El Mundo de los Muertos even presented a Colonial era version of Santo called the Caballero Enmascarado de Plata. This character was usually simply portrayed by Santo wearing a frilly collar along with his mask, and required the wrestler to engage in some fancy rapier work in addition to his usual moves, though on occasion another actor was brought in for the role. The device was generally used just as it is in The Mummies of Guanajuato: to justify the supernatural appearance of some vengeance-seeking foe of one of Santo's ancestors in the present day, a situation whose frequent re-occurrence throughout the series gives the clear impression that Santo's forebears were not very good at settling their own scores in their own time. It probably goes without saying that, soon after Penguin drops the bomb about Satan's very imminent, if fabled, return -- and once the museum has been cleared of visitors -- the diminutive guide catches a glimpse of the hulking cadaver starting to shudder back to life. In response, he faints and lapses into druggy, fish-eye-lens-shot visions of the wrestler-mummies pawing at him hungrily, at which point the movie's action shifts to the nearby Santa Fe Inn. Here is where best friends Lina (played by 70s lucha movie fixture Elsa Cardenaz) and Alicia (Patricia Ferrer) earn their daily bread, the former as a lounge singer and the latter as a cigarette girl. Lina is Mil Mascaras' girlfriend, though, because she appears to live in Guanajuato and Mil Mascaras seems to only come through town when his fight schedule requires, I'm not sure whether she's his girlfriend girlfriend, or just, you know , his girlfriend in Guanajuato. (Oh, snap, upon a repeat pass I caught a bit I missed in which she threatens to return Mil's engagement ring, which pretty much settles that question. Sorry Lina.) Anyway, because we have just had several uninterrupted minutes of fairly solid plot development, it is now time for us to watch a musical number performed by an unidentified woman who plays absolutely no part in the rest of the film, despite the fact that we have just been introduced to a major character who is a singer. Once this is over, Penguin stumbles into the lounge in an agitated state, at which point we learn that, while we have been watching the lady sing, the plot of The Mummies of Guanajuato has moved on without us. Penguin tells us and the girls that, upon reviving from his faint, he found the body of Satan missing, and, upon follow-up, the three of them find footprints leading away from the pedestal on which it had stood. Fortunately, Blue Demon and Mil Mascaras are in town, and so the girls race with Penguin in tow to the arena where they are appearing, which affords the opportunity for a lengthy wrestling sequence in which Mil and Blue fight a tag team match against a couple of identically bearded goons. After the match, Lina, Alicia and Penguin, having made their way back to our stars' dressing room, find Blue and Mil in a much less heroic mood than they might have hoped for. It seems that both have had their memories wiped of all those encounters with vampires, werewolves, space aliens and mummies that have marked their cinematic careers up to this point, causing them to scoff at Penguin's story and instead offer all kinds of pragmatic-sounding explanations for why the mummy might be missing. This is something that happens in lucha movies from time to time, especially in those starring Santo: a sort of periodic slate-cleaning that I appreciate for the simple reason that it prevents anyone from ever being able to make reference to a Santo "universe" or "canon", which would in turn necessitate that I kill them or scream the word "no" into their ears so loudly and protractedly that they forget their own names. In any case, Blue Demon will ultimately pay for his arrogance, as later that night, when he is leaving the deserted arena, the reanimated Satan comes up and clobbers him from behind. Satan then stands ringside and has a mummy flashback to his fateful match with Santo's ancestor all those years ago, providing another opportunity for a long wrestling sequence, during which no attempt to convey period is made whatsoever. Afterward, and perhaps with the intention of working his way up gradually to fighting within his own weight class, he kills the elderly caretaker at the arena and then an old drunk guy whom he encounters on the street outside. Later, the Guanajuato police will speculate that the manner of death of these two victims -- i.e., ass kicking -- suggests that a professional wrestler might be the culprit. Now, armed with clear evidence of sinister supernatural doings afoot, Blue, Mil and the girls hit the streets -- Blue in his Alpha Romeo, and the rest in Mil's awesome green dune buggy -- to do some mummy hunting. They are not so successful in this respect, but they do come across some kind of street fare where some people in Colonial era garb are performing some kind of folk tune on traditional instruments, which enables us to take a much needed breather from what has been yet another several minutes of uninterrupted plot development. Afterward, to pick up the slack, Penguin does his part to move things along by thoughtfully phoning Blue to let him know that he is being murdered by Satan at that very moment. The group rush to Penguin's apartment, only to find that Satan has had yet one more success in his campaign to practice his wrestling skills upon only the most impossibly over-matched opponents. And it is at this point, in the aftermath of Penguin's murder, that Blue Demon makes a couple of decisions that seriously put into question his leadership skills. First of all, he determines that the group shouldn't report Penguin's death to the authorities, for the reason that "they'd think it was us", despite the fact that -- even though, by doing so, he is predicting a plot development that is still a ways off from actually happening -- there has been little reason established at this point why they would. Second of all, he fatefully rejects Mil Mascaras' suggestion that they get Santo involved, protesting that that would be exactly what the damn mummy wants. Of course, this is only a bad decision in light of how everything turns out, as it provides Blue with a mouthful of words that he will ultimately have to eat. Finally, as they make their way out of Penguin's apartment, the gang is confronted by Satan and the other six wrestler-mummies, whose resurrection is as yet and will remain unexplained. After a bit of grappling, Blue Demon declares the Mummies indestructible and orders a retreat, setting the tone for all of Mil and Blue's further encounters with the mummies over the remaining course of the movie. One of the positive aspects of The Mummies of Guanajuato is that it is one of those infrequent lucha pictures that actually tries to provide its luchadore heroes with some back-story and character development. This is done, not only by providing Mil Mascaras with a love interest, but also by introducing a subplot involving Blue Demon having a young adopted son, Julio, who comes to stay with him while he's in Guanajuato. What's most surprising about this particular tack is how effective it is. Blue actually manages to convey some genuine warmth and affection in those scenes he shares with the kid, and watching him wrestle playfully with Julio and pretend to be incapacitated by his fledgling attempt at a face-lock is both enjoyable and affecting. It just confirms all of those warm and fuzzy feelings I've always had for Blue -- forever and undeservedly the earnest and striving second banana -- and makes it all the more sad when the whole picture ends up getting jerked out from under him. Compounding The Mummies of Guanajuato's insult to Blue is the fact that it includes undoubtedly the most humiliating enactment of the time-tested "Evil Blue Demon" gimmick in his filmography. As I've mentioned in my other reviews, it became typical in those films starring both Santo and Blue Demon for an evil version of Blue Demon to be introduced -- either by way of Blue being somehow brainwashed or possessed, or via the introduction of a malevolent double -- so that fans could see Santo and Blue -- who were rivals in the ring, but allies on screen -- fight one another while still preserving their status as cinematic BFFs. Somehow this trope eventually achieved a life beyond its initial utility and began to turn up in even those films in which Blue didn't have to fight Santo, as if audiences just grew to expect it. In the case of The Mummies of Guanajuato, the trick is simply accomplished by having the evil mummy Satan sneak up and clobber Blue from behind, then steal both his mask and the clothes off his back and give them to one of his hench-mummies to carry out the impersonation. That hench-mummy then dresses up as Blue and goes out and kills some people, leading the police to suspect Blue in earnest. Soon the TV is broadcasting reports that Blue Demon is wanted and "on the run", despite the fact that he's still just hanging out with Mil at Lina and Alicia's place like he was before all this happened. As I suggested earlier, The Mummies of Guanajuato then plays out as a series of encounters between Mil and Blue and the mummies, during which the mummies manage to do considerable damage and Mil and Blue's efforts prove to have little effect whatsoever. Finally, someone behind the scenes decides that a suitable amount of running time has been achieved, and that it is time for a hastily contrived, entirely coincidence-dependent ending to be fashioned in order to wrap things up. To that end, Santo and his manager (played by his actual manager and frequent screen sidekick Carlos Suarez), while driving home from a match, just happen to decide to stop for the night in Guanajuato, pulling into the town square just as the mummies are attacking a group of townspeople. After a brief scuffle, Santo, echoing Blue's earlier sentiments, declares the mummies "undefeatable' and retreats, but soon returns to the fray, soon after to be joined in the fight by Mil and Blue. Things are looking grim for a moment, until Santo, in a moment of sudden inspiration, asks Mil to go fetch some flamethrower pistols that are sitting on the seat of his car. Mil dutifully complies, and when he gets to Santo's car -- what do you know? -- there the pistols are, right on the seat where Carlos Suarez had been sitting only moments before. Mil returns and distributes the pistols to Santo and Blue, after which the three of them open fire, quickly reducing all of the previously indestructible mummies to piles of smoking ash like so many spent Black Snakes. Everyone laughs, and Lina turns to Blue Demon and says, "You would have saved a lot of trouble if you had called Santo on time." Ouch. In terms of box office success, The Mummies of Guanajuato was a sort of last hurrah for the once lucrative lucha genre, enjoying a run in Mexico City that, at nine weeks, was longer than that of any Santo movie previous or since. As a result, a slew of sequels was spawned in its wake, none of which were able to duplicate its impact, mainly due to the fact that they were unable to feature the same assemblage of talent (Superzan was even in one of them). The popularity of the film even had consequences for the actual Mummies of Guanajuato, as the museum where they were housed saw a considerable rise in attendance as a result of the free publicity. That the film's impact was so profound is all the more impressive when you consider what an aimless, lazily-constructed mess The Mummies of Guanajuato is. You'd have to be kind of humorless, however, to also not find it to be a good bit of fun, and it is that, combined with the thrill of seeing its three heavy hitting stars sharing the screen for the first time, that I imagine accounted for its broad appeal. In fact, it is by virtue of its very shortcomings that The Mummies of Guanajuato provides a perfect example of the lucha genre's beauty and magic. It is a film that -- without the presence of Blue Demon, Mil Mascaras and Santo -- would be completely unwatchable, but that, somehow, by its inclusion of three grown men who conduct all of their affairs from behind constricting and colorfully ornamented full head masks, attains an added dimension that renders it irresistibly compelling. You could perhaps call it "surrealism" or "absurdity", but I think that, for me, the real key to these movie's allure is that, once you make the leap required to accept these improbable figures as your heroes, you have crossed a frontier in the suspension of disbelief that leaves you liberated in a state of unbounded, childlike credulity. Truly, to accept the notion that a masked wrestler in leopard print hotpants and gold lame tights is the world's best hope against a bunch of murderous mummies that all look like Hulk Hogan wearing a rubber fright mask from Walgreen's brings with it a joy of surrender paralleled by few other experiences on Earth. The Mummies of Guanajuato is helped in this regard by the fact that, in classic lucha movie tradition -- and despite the very obvious fact that no one behind the scenes was taking things very seriously at all -- everyone in front of the camera plays it completely straight throughout. At no time are you in doubt that any of our protagonists see these wrestlers in crappy zombie make-up as being anything but the gravest threat that the Earth has ever confronted. For all the fun that could be had at the expense of Blue, Santo and Mil's acting abilities, that's a pretty impressive feat, because I doubt that I, in their shoes, could have done a comparable job of keeping a straight face. In the final analysis, then, The Mummies of Guanajuato, while by no means a great film, is nonetheless an important one in the history of lucha cinema, not to mention one that's a stupid good time if you know what you're getting into. For myself, the film generates enough goodwill by virtue of its sheer goofiness that I'm willing to overlook most of its many flaws in the interest of just going along and enjoying the ride. Most of its flaws, that is, except one: and that would be the disrespect shown toward my man Blue Demon. It just pains me to think that Blue went into this project thinking that it would be a star vehicle, only to have it turn into something of a prolonged joke at his expense. And the thought that, as a result, he began each of his remaining days by mumbling bitterly into his Cornflakes about Santo and his stupid flamethrower pistols -- while admittedly funny, though in a totally rueful way -- brings me no joy at all. The man clearly deserved better. Still, I take heart in the fact that Blue Demon's film career was far from over at this point, with a number of its high points still ahead. I also take solace in those few moments in The Mummies of Guanajuato when the film, taking a break from making him the butt of its jokes, actually manages to place Blue Demon in a suitably iconic context. Such is the movie's final sequence, in which he, Santo and Mil ride smiling off into the sunset -- Blue and Santo in their respective sports cars, and Mil in his dune buggy. At that moment, all of those perhaps less than spectacular exploits that we've witnessed on the parts of our heroes over the past ninety minutes are wiped away, and we see them only as their most perfect selves: three titans of lucha cinema heading off toward the vast unknown, heartily embracing the promise of greater dangers and grander adventures ahead. It's such an inspiring image that, even though we know that said promise will ultimately be realized by way of cheesy and unconvincing monster make-up and charity haunted house-level special effects -- not to mention padded to within an inch of its life with lengthy wrestling matches and unwanted musical numbers -- we cannot help but want to follow along. Labels: Action: Luchadores, B-Masters Roundtable, Country: Mexico, Horror: Just Plain Weird, Horror: Mummies, Stars: Blue Demon, Stars: Mil Mascaras, Stars: Santo, Year: 1972 posted by Todd at 11:00 AM | 6 Comments Thursday, October 12, 2006Robot vs. The Aztec Mummy
This movie and I have a disagreeable history. I'll explain exactly why later, but it includes elements of Keith's previous complaint about the movie Matango and the vicissitudes of the pre-DVD weird cinema (black) market. And it still pisses me off to think about, despite that now, thanks to the fact that for some reason the University of Florida library has a great collection of Spanish-language horror and B films, I have finally seen the entire movie that I'm about to review.
Anyway, following in the footsteps of some more ambitious horror ventures in Mexico, as well as some more successful B ventures in the 'States, Guillermo Calderon wrote and produced a series of three movies in quick succession which attempted to Mexicanize a popular Hollywood monster: the mummy. Egyptian mummies had become the province of Hollywood and Western cinema, so Calderon apparently looked to his national backyard in coming up with the Aztec mummy for whom the films are named: The Aztec Mummy (1957), Curse of the Aztec Mummy (1957), and Robot vs. the Aztec Mummy (1958). For the record, the Aztecs didn't really have mummies. The only Mexican mummies I know of are those of Guanajuato, and as far as I know, that city and its mummies date from the colonial period at the earliest. The Inca had mummies, but Calderon probably wasn't from the Andes, and judging from the caliber of these films, he didn't have the cash to get there to do any filming either. You might also notice that the dates of the films are pretty close together. It seems that Calderon filmed these more or less one right after another, though even if each of them were feature-length and consisted of nothing but original footage, he'd still have nothing on Cuneyt Arkin, who could sometimes star in two Kara Murat films in one year on top of starring in like six others. But then, no man, mortal or otherwise, has much of anything on Cuneyt Arkin. I don't think I've ever seen the first Aztec mummy film, and I only vaguely remember the second. However, when I first saw Curse of the Aztec Mummy and Robot vs..., it was back when bootleg vhs was more or less the only way I knew of to see anything even remotely like these films, and Video Screams packed both Curse and Robot onto one vhs for me for the price of a single movie. It was good to save vhs space and money (especially money). But it was bad because it turned out that Calderon was one cheap sumbitch. Robot vs. The Aztec Mummy is but 65 minutes long. That's short enough as it is; what that number fails to tell you is that at least 45 minutes out of those are of footage from the previous two films, rationalized under the aegis of the "narrated flashback to bring other, and largely superfluous, characters up to speed on the backstory" device. It's a device rarely used, and I think that for the most part, that's because it sucks. It sucks even more if you happen to have watched one of those two films immediately previous to watching Robot, because now it's like you're watching it all over again, except this time it's more boring. The plot basically revolves around the struggles of the good Dr. Almada and his wife Flor, as well as his assistant/friend Pinacate, whose secret identity is as the crimefighting Angel, which sometimes does and sometimes doesn't come into play as having any value to the plot. They are up against the evil Dr. Krupp, who's some kind of underworld kingpin and mad scientist trying to take over... I dunno, probably the world. Right now he's after the "Aztec treasure," whatever the hell that is, and to get it he needs a special Aztec breastplate and bracelet combination which have the map somehow encrypted onto them in hieroglyphs. I might also mention that although the Aztecs had a form of writing of sorts, it was nowhere near as sophisticated as the hieroglyphs Calderon seems to have had in mind, but maybe that's beside the point. The complication for Krupp? Through hypnosis, it is discovered that Flor Almada was the Aztec maiden Xochitl in a past life whose sworn duty it was to remain a virgin until time came for her to be sacrificed. (The Aztecs usually didn't sacrifice their own people, and they usually didn't seem to care about the virginity of their sacrificial victims, but then, by the end of the 15th century they were doing a hell of a lot of different sacrifices, so I dunno, maybe that does fall in line with something they were doing in some small temple at one time.) Xochitl fell in love with the warrior Popoca and attempted to escape the city, and so the priests sacrificed her anyway and buried Popoca alive so that he would become the undead guardian of the breastplate for all time. For what it's worth, Xochitl is pronounced, as far as I know, "Zo-chee." (The "-tl" could make that more complicated, but unless you're a native speaker of archaic Nahuatl, maybe it's best to let it go silent after all.) Xochitl means "flower" in the Aztec language Nahuatl, which is a mildly amusing parallel to the name "Flor," which is "flower" in Spanish. Popoca, on the other hand, is the verb "to smoke"... either Calderón was thinking of the god of magic and darkness and I forget what else Tezcatlipoca (smoking mirror), or maybe the volcano Popocatepetl (smoking mountain), or... I dunno what. The Flor/Xochitl parallel is probably better planned than anything else in this movie. After forty minutes of narration, with occasional invigorating insertions of new footage featuring some older men sitting around in a living room and reflecting on the flashbacks, we finally get to the only part that we acquired the film to see: the robot who will eventually grapple with the eponymous mummy. It seems that Krupp assembled a bunch of metal and wiring together with a human brain (probably not the first time this was done in film, though it does predate Astro-Zombies) to create "the human robot" which, once mass-produced, will somehow be implemented in some kind of world domination scheme. Krupp heralds this robot as pure genius and "beautiful," and frankly, I don't think I can disagree. Slightly less ridiculous than the Turkish version of E.T. (for those who've seen Badi), and slightly less streamlined than your average cardboard box, this robot comes equipped with blinking lights and a human head behind glass for your viewing pleasure. And frankly, if the human robot doesn't satisfy you, then I can conceive of nothing that would. The robot lies supine on a table until Krupp slowly moves it to a more vertical position... slowly, slowly... The robot gradually becomes aware of its verticality and begins to stand upon its own two feet... slowly... Suddenly, the Aztec mummy shambles out onto the floor and lurches with reckless abandon toward the robot!... The robot languidly raises its claw hands, the mummy stretches out its own arms in that "I'm dead and going to get you!" pose... any paint that you may have applied to anything has probably dried by now, but the excitement is nevertheless building because this is why I watch movies to begin with, just to see moments like this-- ...and that was when the vhs cut off because apparently the film was five minutes too long to fit both Aztec mummy films on there. Forty minutes of watching the other movie again, then the agonizing anticipation of seeing the combatants finally enter the ring and race to meet each other like two warring slime molds... and then nothing but darkness. Five or six years later with little bitterness lost, I got to see the rest of the film... which basically ends exactly the way the title suggests, and then more or less lays to rest the whole Aztec Mummy theme. Of course, Calderon resurrected that theme again in 1964 for the Aztec Mummy's encore in Wrestling Women vs. the Aztec Mummy, but that's another story, and one which I haven't really explored. Strangely, co-director Manuel San Fernando went on to direct two Santo films, followed immediately by three Santa films, which is too odd a bit of random trivia for me not to pass on. Word has it that the butchered U.S. import print of the first film in the series is the only surviving copy, and the original has been lost. I hope that's just an internet rumor, despite that I'm not a tremendous fan of this series. Or am I? In final assessment, I guess there are some positive things which I can conclude with about this film. First of all, Calderon had a stroke of brilliance which he then adulterated and completely lost when he conceded to marketing demands--take out the flashback footage, and some of the other boring stuff where anyone who isn't robotic or undead is walking around, and you've got one hell of a film. Some films only need to be about ten minutes long--hell, two minutes, really--and Calderon said, "I'm going to shoot that film, damnit!" But then, no doubt, friends and associates talked him out of it, convincing him that he needed to pad the film out so that audiences would feel like it was a feature-length movie. Or at least, that's how I like to envision it, with Guillermo Calderon at the vanguard of B movie innovation--genius, even--before lesser minds pulled him back into inferior conventions. Second, there's another parallelism between the Aztec mummy--an automaton created by Aztec priests, using human sacrifice, to guard a sacred relic--and the Human Robot--an automaton created by Dr. Krupp, using human sacrifice, to uncover that relic. Is this some statement on the part of Calderon, using Mary Shelley as a guide in a Mesoamerican context to not only decry soulless scientific progress but compare its brutalities to those of past civilizations? Is modern technical "magic" no less dark than the religious/spiritual magic of bygone eras? Probably not, but I'm sure anyone who cares to can probably go to town on that and get it published in some kind of film journal. Have at it, folks, if for some reason you care to. Save for occasional references here and there, I think I'm done with these films... except for that magic minute-long sequence that I waited for years to see. Labels: Country: Mexico, Horror: Mummies, Science Fiction posted by Ryan at 5:12 PM | 1 Comments Thursday, September 16, 2004Blood from the Mummy's Tomb Release Year: 1971Country: England Starring: Andrew Keir, Valerie Leon, James Villiers, Hugh Burden, George Coulouris, Mark Edwards, Rosalie Crutchley, Aubrey Morris, David Markham, Joan Young. Writer: Christopher Wicking Director: Seth Holt and Michael Carreras Cinematographer: Arthur Grant Music: Tristram Cary Producer: Howard Brandy Availability: Available on DVD from Amazon. Someone must have gotten the memo and said, "Jesus, another mummy movie?" After three Hammer mummy movies, which in turn had followed some nine thousand or so Universal mummy movies featuring the vengeful bag o' rags known as Kharsis, the general consensus was that the world pretty much had all the movies it needed in which some expedition disturbs a tomb, gets yelled at by a guy in a fez, and then gets stalked by the mummy looking to avenge the desecration of the tomb. Even in as few as three films, Hammer Studio seemed to be flogging a dead...I don't know...Pharaoh or something. Though their first film, The Mummy starring Peter Cushing and Christopher Lee was spectacular, subsequent Hammer mummy movies bore essentially the same plot, and I do mean "bore." Curse of the Mummy's Tomb, the second of Hammer's mummy films, remains missing on DVD as of this writing, and thus can't be fit into the Netflix queue. However, my intention is to eventually (before year's end, anyway) do a round up of all the Hammer horror series films that are missing from Netflix so that I can plug all the holes and have a complete look. This means that just in time for Christmas, or maybe Halloween, you can look for us to bridge the gaps by reviewing Brides of Dracula, Dracula Prince of Darkness, Scars of Dracula, The Mummy's Curse, and The Evil of Frankenstein. And I guess Dracula AD 1972 if I can manage to find a copy. Hammer's third foray into mummy fun, The Mummy's Shroud, we've already discussed. Which brings us to 1971, and Hammer is in a bad state. There had been a rocky string of films, and it seemed obvious that the studio was losing its way, or had lost its way and was already flailing blindly in the darkness. Despite the dire straights in which Hammer found itself, they managed in the early 1970s to shoot a number of surprisingly good films that saw the company trying to break new ground in much the same way they had decades previous. Two of the three "Karnstein" vampire films -- Vampire Lovers and Twins of Evil are quite good films, even if their middle piece, Lust for a Vampire is somewhere more on the rotten end of things. Vampire Circus was highly enjoyable and unique. Frankenstein and the Monster from Hell wasn't the best in the series by any stretch of the imagination, but it was a serviceable film that would have been greatly improved if only the monster hadn't been so silly looking. And then there was Blood from the Mummy's Tomb. For their forth Egyptian adventure, someone at Hammer realized that no one wanted to see the same film a fourth time, especially since each subsequent mummy movie had declined considerably in quality. So certain changes were to be made. First and most obvious there was no mummy, at least not the shambling cloth-wrapped mummy one would expect. Second, the script, based on a story by Bram Stoker, did contain a curse, the violation of a tomb, and the deaths of all who entered said tomb, but there was no vengeance for the desecration. In fact, the expedition, it turns, out, was guided there purposely by the entombed princess within. And rather than being set in the usual 1860-1910 range of dates that encompass most of Hammer's gothic horrors, Blood from the Mummy's Tomb sports a modern setting. This was disastrous for the Dracula films, but it worked well for the mummy since there was no real effort to beat people over the head with funky music and bell-bottoms and guys using crazy hepcat lingo. It just meant that someone drove a car and wore a turtleneck sweater. Perhaps the most striking difference between Blood from the Mummy's Tomb and the previous two films was that it was good. Quite good, in fact. Not The Mummy good, but still plenty enjoyable, and a major high water mark for the company's often dismal output during their final decade. That Blood from the Mummy's Tomb is such a unique and enjoyable film is all the more impressive given the fact that it became known as one of those "cursed" films. It's too bad they'd already used up the "curse" title for the second film. The trouble started with Peter Cushing, who in an attempt to return some degree of prestige to the flagging mummy movies had been cast as one of the archaeologists who finds himself pitted against an ancient Egyptian princess' desire to be reincarnated using the body of his own daughter. With only a day or so of filming under his belt, however, Cushing's wife grew extremely ill and he dropped out of the production to be by her side. She died shortly thereafter, and Cushing was in no mood to be making mummy movies about dead women trying to return from the tomb. Hammer was more than willing to let their main man grieve, and so he was replaced by Andrew Keir, a fine and distinguished actor who had worked with the company on such productions as Dracula, Prince of Darkness and Viking Women, and was probably best known for playing the title character in Quatermass and the Pit. He'd also worked alongside Cushing in one of the Dr. Who movies, Dalek's Invasion Earth: 2150 AD. So even though losing Cushing was a blow, Keir was a top notch replacement who, if not possessed of as much recognition as Cushing, was still a familiar and well-respected face. Unfortunately, that wasn't the last tragedy to befall the film. Director Seth Holt, an imaginative director with a unique style, died during filming. He'd been in a state of increasingly poor health attributed largely to his weight and drinking, and it finally caught up with him. He was replaced by Michael Carreras, the son of Hammer founder James Carreras. Michael's directorial role call is not what one might call impressive. Impressively bad, perhaps, although entertaining in spots. But suffice it to say he wasn't exactly the studio's star director unless you're idea of Hammer at their best was Lost Continent and Prehistoric Women. Nepotisim? Perhaps, but I guess they figured with Curse of the Mummy's Tomb under his belt, they might as well call him in and let him direct the bits of Blood from the Mummy's Tomb that remained unfinished upon Holt's death. To Carreras' credit, his work blends seamlessly with Holt's, and there is no obvious point where the two directors' styles diverge. The story revolves around the ancient Egyptian princess Tara (the indescribably lovely Valerie Leon), who is sort of put to death in a half-assed fashion for being just being kind of all-around wicked. The method of execution seems to be to put some BBQ sauce in her nose, then cut off her hand, the reasoning being that if her body remains incomplete, then she can never rise from the tomb to inflict her evilness on society again. You'd think that rather than just chopping off a hand and throwing it to the jackals, you'd also do the head, maybe a leg. You know, make a thorough job of things. As it is, not only do they only chop off her hand, that same hand manages to kill a jackal and then go on to summon a sandstorm and rip out the throats of all the murderous priests. This movie will feature a lot of gory blood-gushing neck wounds, by the way. In terms of gore, it's quite extreme for Hammer, which I guess is an odd statement that deserves some quick clarification. In the 1950s and early 1960s Hammer was notorious for pushing the limits of what constituted acceptable onscreen gore. However, the revolution they began eventually passed them by, and by the time of Blood from the Mummy's Tomb, Hammer films seemed quaint and somewhat reserved compared to what was being pulled in other films. Blood from the Mummy's Tomb isn't a gorefest, but the gushing neck wounds are pretty extreme, and the finale of the film features a really juicy stabbing. Blood from the Mummy's Tomb was also one of the first Hammer films (Vampire Lovers, I believe, was the first) to feature nudity even though the earlier films had often been criticized for being too sexual. The nudity here is very quick, a flash of breast and rear, and apparently a body double stood in for Valerie Leon. Visions of the execution plague young Margaret (also Valerie Leon) thousands of years later. Her father was part of an expedition that unearthed the bizarre tomb of Tara, who stuns the archaeologist by being perfectly preserved and looking no older than the day she was killed. Things get weirder when they discover her corpse and severed hand still bleed, but they're not able to get too freaked out since she also seems to be working some mojo from beyond the grave that puts the archaeologists under her spell. Each of them takes one of her sacred items, and when the items are united on her birthday, her spirit will return to earth and possess Margaret. Unfortunately, Margaret is already falling under the spell of the ghostly princess - who, need I even mention, looks exactly like Margaret. See, her father gave her this big, ugly, unsightly red ring that allows Tara to dominate the mind of Margaret. The initial indication that Margaret is being possessed comes when she enthuses as to the beauty of the ring - a piece of jewelry so unspeakably ugly that not even Sammy Davis Jr. would wear it. Other characters exalt the aesthetic virtues of the ring as well, until eventually you get the idea that the script is trying desperately to make us believe in the beauty of the ring despite the obvious evidence to the contrary on screen, like how movies about brilliant writers will try to convince you of the writer's brilliance by having everyone state the writer is brilliant, even though excerpts from their writing that appear in the film suggest that the writer is, in fact, of a skill level far below that required even for an author of books whose covers are adorned by illustrations of Fabio dressed as a pirate. Although most of the members of the expedition resist Tara's demands, that just results in Valerie summoning up ghastly forces to inflict more neck wounds. Don't know what it is with this movie and neck wounds. Every death scene seems to end in a neck wound with blood a-pumping and the person clutching their throat and making the bug-eyed, "I have a neck wound!" dying face. I don't know what would have been riskier - to make another mummy movie with another mummy seeking more vengeance, or to make a mummy movie in which there is no mummy, and the story is more about possession and ghosts and psychological horror. Whatever the case, Hammer took the more original risk, and it paid off. Blood from the Mummy's Tomb is a slower paced film, as most of the mummy movies were, but because it relied more on mood and psychological tension, the movie never feels as draggy as the previous two films. And if nothing else, watching Valerie Leon stalk around in tight-fitting skimpy nightgowns is more fun than watching more cloth-wrapped lumberers lumbering about. What makes the film work, aside from it being different than any of the mummy movies that came before it, is the quality of the cast. Chris Wicking's script certainly helps, but it's the commitment of the cast that makes it work. Of course, that's the case for just about all the Hammer films, and more than a few hammy scripts were saved by the fact that the cast commits to it entirely and makes you believe. Blood from the Mummy's Tomb isn't a hammy script, but the fact that the cast is into it makes it even better. It keeps the pace feeling fast during the slower dialogue scenes. Keir was the biggest name in it. Valerie Leon had small parts in a lot of those Carry On films the British seemed to love so much, but this was one of her first starring roles. The rest of the cast is comprised of character actor stalwarts and a few attempts at injecting some new blood into Hammer. Everyone works quite well. Hammer also handles the modern setting well - certainly better, as I said in the beginning, than in their other attempt to update a series property, Dracula AD 1972. The present-day setting never intrudes on the gothic-style horror. The art direction for the Egyptian scenes is better here than it was in previous films as well, with things looking more authentic and less like brand new props. I would gamble that the leisurely pace of the film will turn off a lot of viewers, especially those expecting thrill-a-minute mummy fun. But then, I reckon those people have never been big Hammer horror fans anyway. Blood from the Mummy's Tomb isn't a scary film. It doesn't instill in the viewer a sense of dread the way Hammer films at their best do. Instead, it achieves a very dreamy/nightmarish atmosphere, disturbing but never shocking save for the parts where blood spurts out of something. It has a very continental feel to it, if you dig my meaning. And if you don't -- it lacks the clinical precision of Hammer and other British horror films and instead sports that more ephemeral Italian feel. The offbeat atmosphere fortells the even more continental approach of Hammer's final horror film, To the Devil...A Daughter, with the chief difference between this film and that one is that Blood from the Mummy's Tomb is odd and enjoyable while To the Devil...A Daughter is odd and wretched. It's a shame that Hammer didn't take more risks with unique material during the 1970s instead of going the route they went, which was to film the same things over and over but with lower budget, lesser actors, and more boobs. I mean, the more boobs part was fine, but it still shows that rather than being a trend-setter, Hammer had become a trend follower desperate to attract attention to themselves in whatever way possible. Granted the entire British film industry was in a bit of a moribund state at the time. But rocky though the 70s may have been for Hammer, Blood from the Mummy's Tomb is a stand-out that, while perhaps not keeping pace with the company at its best, certainly makes for solid b-movie material. Labels: Horror: Mummies, Netflix Diary, Studio: Hammer, Year: 1971 posted by Keith at 7:12 PM | 0 Comments Sunday, August 15, 2004Mummy's Shroud
1967, Great Britain. Starring André Morell, John Phillips, David Buck, Elizabeth Sellars, Maggie Kimberly, Michael Ripper, Tim Barrett, Richard Warner, Roger Delgado, Catherine Lacey, Dickie Owen, Toolsie Persaud, Eddie Powell. Directed by John Gilling. Buy it from Amazon
Ho hum, the mummy again. That wouldn't normally be my reaction, as I'm rather a fan of mummies and the havoc they wreak upon the living, but this entry into the Hammer compendium of vengeful Egyptian crypt guardians manages to do very little beyond eliciting a yawn. This was their third mummy movie. The second, Curse of the Mummy's Tomb remains as yet unavailable on DVD, though I do believe there is an RL Stine "Goosebumps" story with the same title. The Mummy's Shroud's problems are several, and not the least of them is the fact that it fulfills what seems to be the mummy's curse demanding that all mummy movies be more or less exactly like all other mummy movies. There is practically nothing at all on display in this film that is new or fresh. The plot is a rehash of the tried and true and terribly over-used mummy movie plot involving an expedition that disturbs a mummy's tomb only to have some mad Arab resurrect the mummy and send it out to kill those who desecrated the temple. Honestly, the things you can do with a mummy are rather limited, so the spark in the story must come from telling it in a unique fashion, or injecting some new element into the proceedings to keep them, at the very least, fresher than the cloth-swathed beast delivering terror on the screen. But there will be none of that here. The Mummy's Shroud hits the requisite points but nothing innovative with them. A far cry it is from Hammer's successful and invigorating original film, which managed to bring a new twist to Universal's classic Karloff film. Hammer should have learned a thing or two from Universal though, who followed up Karloff's masterpiece with a series of increasingly lame and lackluster sequels that offered nothing new to the formula or mythology. Instead, Hammer's cloth-wrapped feet tread down the same precarious trail.
The Mummy's Shroud, as I said, takes the story from various other mummy movies and puts it out there one more time. We begin with a painfully long prologue, narrated I believe by Peter Cushing - a fact that will only make you all the more aware of the fact that this movie is sadly bereft of Peter and could have really used him. Half the prologue takes place as the camera pans lazily over various "ancient" paintings, which is the first obvious clue that this is going to be a film rather on the cheap side of things. When we switch to actual action for the second half of the prologue, it's plagued by the same troubles I thought plagued the first film's Egyptian sets, only more so. Nothing looks the least bit convincing. Everything looks fake, lightweight, and far too clean. The difference between The Mummy's Shroud and The Mummy is that the 1959 film managed to make up for whatever short-comings manifested themselves in the Egyptian sets by boasting a tight story and great acting from the team of Cushing and Lee - and Lee without even speaking! The Mummy's Shroud doesn't have enough going for it in the story or acting department to distract from the high-school play cheapness of some of the sets. The thing about the prologue is that not only is it long, it's pretty much totally unnecessary. You could wrap it all up, so to speak, in a few quick sentences of exposition, or Peter Cushing could have simply come on and said, "Listen up, folks. It's the same old thing, really." Eventually, we get to the present or to the 1920s anyway, and once again a team of British archaeologists s raiding the tomb of a long-dead Egyptian king. Even the knife-wielding mad Arab can't dissuade them from carting out the jerky-like mummy of a young boy-king. The Arab this time around is pretty foul. In the 1959 film, there was at least an attempt to give the Arab class and sophistication and intelligence, not to mention a compelling argument against the desecration of tombs by foreign archaeologists who were frequently condescending to "the natives," treating their tombs as classrooms in ways they would never treat the tombs of whites. This time around, however, the mad Arab is all spittle and bulging eyes. And for your money, you get another mad Arab in the form of the cackling fortune-telling crone. But at least there's something memorable about those two. The greater portion of the cast, that is to say, the British portion of the cast is comprised largely of characters who exist solely so they can be killed by the mummy. Mario Bava's 1971 thriller Twitch of the Death Nerve is generally tagged as the first slasher film, but if you break slashers down to their basic components, you could say with some degree of security that, if they didn't start with this particular mummy movie, they did start in some mummy movie, and The Mummy's Shroud as about as typical a slasher film as you can get, except that instead of half naked teenagers getting killed, it's fully clothed British academics. But still, you have the unstoppable killing machine. You have the old weirdo spouting portents of doom. You have a cast of largely interchangeable and disposable characters who only exist to be killed, and you have said killings growing ever more ludicrous.
Our nominal heroes are Paul (David Buck) and Claire (Maggie Kimberly), but it doesn't take much for them to be heroes in a film populated by spittle-spurting crazed Arabs and immoral, greedy millionaires who sweat profusely. The film's best scene is the finale, in which this particular mummy does provide the film with a little originality by forsaking the usual method of mummy attack (sort of swatting people with your forearms and choking them or throwing them out a window) and just picks up an ax. You know, there are plenty of images in this world that should chill you, but one thing I sure as hell never want to see is a mummy coming after me with a big ax. I don't really even want to see a mummy without an ax coming after me. People tend to scoff at mummies as monsters because they are frequently plodding. Well, first of all, they must have missed Christopher Lee as the mummy leaping through windows and hauling undead ass across the misty British countryside. Second, the thing about mummies is that they never stop coming after you. Once you're attracted the ire of the cloth-wrapped avenger, he's always going to be looking for you. And sometimes, he'll have an ax. I guess to highlight the positive, another thing this movie does a little differently is that, at least for once, the mummy isn't swayed by the appearance of a woman who looks just like some long lost love of his.
And speaking of mummies, let's speak of the mummy. Technically, we have two mummies in the story. One remains in active and looks like mummies you might see on TV. He has no wrappings and is just a shriveled preserved corpse. This would be the body of the boy-king. Why he just got thrown in the sand with a shroud over him while his servant got to get wrapped up and properly stored I didn't quite understand. The second mummy, the servant, is the one who does the killing. Although the face was modeled after an actual mummy on display in England, the mummy itself is rather silly looking. It's bandages look more like a big jersey, and the face is too packed with "the crust of the ancients" to afford the creature any of the range displayed by Christopher Lee during his turn as the ancient Egyptian avenger. Though the idea may have been to make the mummy less of a "human" character and more of an unstoppable supernatural force, what it actually did was just make the mummy more of a dry character (sorry), and thus a lot less interesting. The one scene where we do see the mummy's eyes, we're treated to a rather unconvincing animatronic model. There is a reason people remember Christopher Lee as the mummy but not Eddie Powell. But again, a crummy mummy (again, sorry) could have been compensated for by a good script. With that absent as well, The Mummy's Shroud just collapses in on itself much like its mummy in the final scene. This movie does have a couple other decent scenes. The mummy's attack on a photographer of no importance to the story is exciting, if totally irrelevant. And his assault on the beleaguered assistant to the sweating millionaire asshole is probably the film's only emotionally engaging scene as it seems so unfair that the abused toady remains abused and then just gets offed by the mummy. Unfortunately, it's not enough to string together into a good movie, and while The Mummy's Shroud isn't a total loss, it's really the sort of film only for people like me, who are Hammer and/or mummy completists. Labels: Horror: Mummies, Studio: Hammer, Year: 1967 posted by Keith at 2:32 PM | 0 Comments Friday, August 06, 2004The Mummy Release Year: 1959Country: England Starring: Peter Cushing, Christopher Lee, Yvonne Furneaux, Eddie Byrne, Felix Aylmer, Raymond Huntley, George Pastell, Michael Ripper. Writer: Jimmy Sangster Director: Terence Fisher Cinematographer: Jack Asher Music: Franz Reizenstein Producer: Michael Carreras Alternate Title: Terror of the Mummy Availability: Buy it from Amazon Ahh, Sangster and Fisher. If you want my opinion, and you must or else you'd go read a much better website that this, that screenwriter-director team is as integral to the success of the Hammer horror films as the Cushing-Lee acting team. When you make a list of the best films Hammer produced, the Fisher-Sangster duo comes up quite frequently. The whole quartet is at it again with this, Hammer's third reimagining of a classic Universal Pictures horror icon. By now, there was no real gamble involved in the Hammer formula. Curse of Frankenstein and Horror of Dracula had proven the effort, and Hammer's only challenge now lie in maintaining the high standards set by those two films. With two Universal legends left, those being the mummy and the Wolfman, Hammer decided to go all old Egypt and bring the bandaged avenger of desecrated tombs into the Technicolor world of Hammer horror. The first two gothic horror films established a successful order to things, and Hammer saw no reason to tinker with it. Fisher directs, Sangster writes, Cushing takes the lead as a scientist, and Christopher Lee must again command the monster role without speaking a word, or at least very many words. And once again, it all works out wonderfully, though as much as I like this film, I like it less than the Frankenstein and Dracula films that preceded it. Actually, no. Scratch that. I like it less than Curse of Frankenstein and about the same as Horror of Dracula. The script is as smart as ever, and Cushing owns the film once again, but some of the ancient Egyptian sets leave a little to be desired. But we'll get to all that in due time.
The story is pretty much the same as the story in every mummy movie that has ever been made. Archaeologists disturb the tomb of a Egyptian princess, which awakens her mummy guardian (and invariably, her former doomed lover and high priest) to seek revenge on the desecraters while a guy in a fez makes ominous predictions about the fate of those who defile the tombs of the ancient ones. Yeah, that old chestnut. With these movies, it's not the newness of the story but the freshness with which you present it, and Hammer's approach is as fresh as you can get with a guy who's been dead and stuck in the wall for a thousand years. The movie takes a while to get going, but once it does get going, there's no stopping it. Sangster's dialogue is again top notch, and Cushing and crew manage to deliver it in a way that makes even the most ludicrous monster movie statements seem serious and believable. As would be the case with all of their early gothic horror films, it would have been easy to allow them to sink into the level of camp or winking self-parody. And as with the other films, Hammer refuses to indulge in what modern filmmakers can't seem to get enough of. The Mummy remains serious and seriously delivered, which makes it believable and convincing no matter how outlandish the action on screen becomes. Everything is delivered with such faith and conviction that it pulls you in, which is why these films work even when there is a lot of talking involved. In fact, the film's best scene is an exchange between Cushing's Dr. Banning and George Pastell as Mehemet, the controller of the mummy, in which they debate the merits of digging up ancient tombs, with Mehemet trying to make an impassioned argument that it's nothing more than grave robbing while Cushing attempts to egg him on in hopes that he'll get frustrated and reveal something sinister about the mummy that's been killing everyone involved with the old expedition. When the action does come, it comes fast and bloody, as Hammer has established it would. Christopher Lee's mummy may be a little stiff in the joints, but he's no lumbering slowpoke. He can move at a fair clip, smash through windows, and kick down doors. Once again, Lee is wonderful at acting in a part where not only does he not get to speak, but he is also covered up in pasty-face make-up and bandages. He does get to utter some lines in a flashback to ancient times scene, but they're little more than incantations delivered in typical ancient incantation tone. His primary tools as the mummy are his eyes, which he uses wonderfully, and his height, which allows him to tower menacingly over everyone else in the cast. Peter Cushing once again shoulders the burden of carrying the film and does so as admirably as he had in the previous two Hammer horror outings. This movie has a lot of talking in it, but Cushing is the kind of actor that can make you want to listen as he goes on about ancient curses and burial rites. It's a pretty physical role for him as well, featuring lots of mummy fighting and being flung about. Although Christopher Lee has emerged over time as the number one icon of these horror films, watching them makes you realize that Cushing, the eternal 45-year-old (he was actually 45 when made this one), was the real foundation upon which the Hammer house was built.
The supporting cast of character actors perform as they always did and generally always would. Yvonne Furneuax is great as Isobel, Doctor Banning's wife and, inevitably, the spitting image of the priestess Christopher Lee's mummy was in love with so long ago. How is it that every mummy manages to be awakened from its eternal slumber by someone who just happens to know a woman who is the spitting image of the mummy's old flame? I guess those past life regressionists are correct. I always thought it was odd that in their previous lives, everyone was an Egyptian princess or some other lofty figure instead of being just some serf or the village idiot. But given the number of times mummies come back from the dead to extract horrible revenge on tomb desecraters only to run into a double of their ancient Egyptian love, I guess there are a lot of latter-day reincarnations of princesses walking around. It's a lucky thing, too, otherwise we'd have nothing with which to distract the mummies. As the requisite "mad Arab," George Powell acquits himself well. It's a tricky role, especially by modern standards where cultural stereotyping is a more sensitive subject. However, you can't help but sympathize with Mehemet, who sees British archaeology as nothing more than pompous, condescending white men stealing the bodies and art of another culture for their own amusement. Cushing's Banning argues that it is through such acts that we learn of the past and fill in the gaps, but Mehemet remains convincing in his argument that it is more about prestige and low opinions of "the natives" than it is about filling in the gaps of history. Sympathetic though he is, when it comes time to solve the problem, he has no qualms about sending his mummy out to choke people and ruin their expensive bay windows. On a final cast note, I was almost convinced by the voice of Eddie Byrne, who plays Inspector "I deal in facts" Mulroony that it was a young Fred "Herman Munster" Gwynn. He even looks a little like Gwynn, but the voice similarities are uncanny.
Sets are, for the most part, typically top notch, though the Egyptian settings are pretty unconvincing. The tomb walls look light as cardboard, even when characters are pretending they weigh a lot, and everything is spotless clean and looks like it just came from the prop department. When recreating Victorian England, Hammer was unmatched, but they're out of their element and/or budgetary constraints with their Egyptian sets. Still, they're at least pretty, and the rest of the movie is good enough to make it not matter all that much. As is the case with both Horror of Dracula and Curse of Frankenstein, one can't help but compare it to the old Universal film. I'm a big fan of Karloff's The Mummy, and I'm a big fan of this one. I think they're different movies for different times, and I don't really see any point in trying to figure out which one is "better." Just enjoy the fact that they're both available to you on DVD. Hammer's mummy film is as brash, daring, and energetic as their previous two efforts, and as with them, it's a real treat. The studio's fate was sealed after the release of this film and it was all horror, all the time from there on out. Not a bad thing, though I'd be interested in seeing some of the studio's pre-Quatermass war films. As with Dracula and Frankenstein, several sequels followed in the footsteps of The Mummy, though none were as good as some of the Frankenstein or Dracula sequels. Hammer would also go one to try their hand at the final Universal monster, resulting in the superb Curse of the Werewolf, which because it didn't star Christopher Lee or Peter Cushing, gets less attention than the other three films, though it is no less a picture even though Oliver Reed's Wolfman is spectacularly ugly. Mummy sequels included Mummy's Shroud and Blood from the Mummy's Tomb, but none featured the Fisher/Sangster/Lee/Cushing crew again. Labels: Horror: Mummies, Netflix Diary, Stars: Christopher Lee, Stars: Peter Cushing, Studio: Hammer posted by Keith at 5:52 PM | 0 Comments |
|
![]() |