Monday, February 27, 2006Violent Naples
1976, Italy. Starring Maurizio Merli, John Saxon, Barry Sullivan, Elio Zamuto, Maria Grazia Spina, Silvano Tranquilli, Massimo Deda, Guido Alberti, Pino Ferrara. Directed by Umberto Lenzi. Written by Vincenzo Mannino.
Click here for Man with a Moustache Month Roll-Call This post brings us full circle, back to the beginning of the article and the film that sparked my initial interest in poliziottechi and the tough Italian cops with big, thick moustaches that have served as the defining characters for Teleport City's Man with a Moustache Month. If we do this again next year, maybe we'll focus on Indian or Filipino films, two national cinemas that have traditionally and still enthusiastically embrace heroes with moustaches. I didn't initially mean for this month to focus solely on poliziottechi films, but it sort of turned out to be a brief introductory history to the genre, regardless of my original intentions to also review at least one 1970s Burt Reynolds films. After all, what would a moustache month be without Burt? But one thing led to another, and I didn't want to write about Violent Naples without tracing its roots back to High Crime, or without covering Violent Rome, the first film to introduce Maurizio Merli as the quintessential poliziottechi cop. And then it seemed like good form, before moving on to Violent Naples, to touch on director Umberto Lenzi's first foray into the genre, in the form of Milano Rovente. So now, finally, we've come to the beginning again. Violent Rome was good but not great. Milano Rovente was much the same, only slightly less so. It seems inevtibale, at least looking back, that Umberto Lenzi would end up directing a poliziottechi film starring Maurizio Merli. The intersection of careers finally happened in Violent Naples, in my opinion the best of all the many poliziottechi that came out during the 1970s. This was, as I stated (I think -- perish the thought I would go back and reread my own material for confirmation), the first poliziottechi I saw, and to say it blew me away would be a mild understatement. My initial review was so half-assed, however, that I vowed on the grave of my long lost twin brother who was killed by Communist agents in Vietnam, to one day rectify the situation and rewrite the review. Also, to bring down Communism and avenge my brother's death. On the second count, I can say, "Mission accomplished." Now it is time to finally turn my attention to the first count. ![]() I started my career as a cult and obscure film aficionado by growing up on Godzilla, Mazinger, and kungfu instead of Sesame Street, Smurfs, and Disney films, though I did see a smattering of each of those as a wee one. I think it was Pinocchio that initially put me off Disney films. You see, the first film I remember seeing in a movie theater was Jaws, and I adored it. Oh ho ho! The shark is biting Quint in half? What a grand old time this is! Very shortly thereafter, I went with my mother to see a re-release of Disney's Pinocchio, and spent a considerable amount of time screeching like a banshee with a stubbed toe as I crouched and hid in the aisle, terrified beyond belief, as I was, by the big, aggressive whale. My parents then vowed to only let me see movies in which salty sea captains are bitten in half amid a vibrant splash of blood, and forever protect me from seeing things like a cartoon whale with angry eyebrows drawn on it. Years later, I still get a shudder down my spine any time I walk by a Carvel (the ice cream parlor or James) and see Fudgy the Whale staring back at me...waiting...waiting... My third movie was one of the Herbie films, but all I remember about that was a scene where they're driving across a lake or ocean and some guy is taking a shower atop Herbie. I do seem to also recall regretting that no shark showed up to bite him in half, but I hear it wasn't meant to be that kind of film. Some couple of decades after becoming conscious of my status as a film fan, it's very difficult to wow me. It's easy to please me. Hell, put a guy in a ninja suit or a go-go dancing woman on screen, and you've pretty much got my vote. Throw in some ass-kicking midgets and you got a classic. But it's been rare lately that I am totally blown away by anything anymore. Happily, we seem to be entering a golden era of truly batty films finding exposure on DVD thanks to companies like Mondo Macabro and plenty of others, and I am constantly assured by the fact that no matter what I see, there is always something else waiting in the wings to say, "You thought that was insane? Wait 'til you see this one, baby." Yes, in my dreams all weird cult films refer to me as "baby." What's your point? Umberto Lenzi's Violent Naples -- also known as Napoli Violenta and Violent Protection (not to be confused with Violent Professionals) -- is one of those films that altered my perception of cinema significantly. I'd never seen anything like it, or rather, I'd seen things like it, but never anything quite so dramatically over-the-top. Violent Naples opens with Maurizio Merli reprising his Violent Rome role as Inspector Betti, freshly transferred down to sunny, one assumes given the title, violent Naples. He isn't in Naples five minutes before he stumbles upon a group of young punk car thieves just begging him to slam a car hood on them and bounce their skulls off a windshield a couple of times. After all, he wouldn't want to show up for his first day at his new job empty-handed. The film establishes a savage tone from the opening scene and never relents in its grim study of cops and criminals gone mad. Merli's main goal, and the main plot of the film, is to bust up the protection rackets. But that doesn't stop him from beating the ass of pretty much every other type of criminal he crosses paths with. And the crime in Naples is rampant. Rapists, fencers, thieves -- you name 'em, he's probably stomping on their head and yelling such memorable lines as "You make me want to box your ears in!" A dapper bank robber (Elio Zamuto) proves to be a particularly irksome thorn in Betti's side, as every time a heist occurs, the thief walks in mere moments later to sign in with his parole officer, thus supposedly exonerating himself from any suspicion -- well, from any suspicion except Betti's, causing the grim inspector to run his own high-speed experiment through the streets of Naples to see just how quickly a man could flee the scene of a crime and make it to the police precinct. In fact, in Violent Naples world, it would seem that roughly 90% of the population of Naples is actively involved in mugging, raping, murdering, roughing up, or stealing from the other 10%, who were apparently transplanted there expressly so they could be victimized by the rest of the population. Now, I've heard plenty of stories about how everyone in Naples in a con artist, thief, and all-around criminal, but Violent Naples goes to great lengths to take the complete insanity of crumbling urban centers in the 1970s and ratchet the madness up well past the breaking point. Amid the chaos, Betti befriends a streetwise young kid, the son of a mechanic who refuses to pay protection money to the local thugs. He's even been rallying the people to stand up for themselves and not be bullied. Betti first encounters the kid when he sees him slowly crossing the street, holding up traffic, and pretending to be a cripple. When the kid gets to the other side, he laughs and flips everyone off before running merrily down the street. This delights Betti to no end. And in case you're wondering, why yes, a film like Violent Naples pretty much does guarantee that at some point, sweet sweet irony will result in the kid becoming an actual cripple. I said the movie was good; I never said it wasn't somewhat heavy-handed. Lenzi showcases a tight, relentless pace that I think remains unmatched by any film in the genre. Along with From Corleone to Brooklyn and The Cynic, The Rat, and the Fist (both also starring Maurizio Merli), this is the best film he's ever made, and as I said in the review of Milano Rovente, it's a shame Lenzi isn't known for these films instead of the slapdash splatter stuff that came later in his career. His command of mood, and his ability to infuse every scene with both tension and pathos is amazing. It's because the film takes the time to generate sympathy with the characters that the tension becomes so heightened. These aren't character studies or anything, but the script by Vincenzo Mannino wastes no time in creating archetypal characters that quickly become easy to identify with. Mannino was one of the most reliable poliziottechi screen writers, having previously worked on scripts for both Violent Rome and High Crime. Violent Naples takes the strong points from each of those films and blends them into a truly enthralling mix of outrageous action and high melodrama. He'd go on to pen the scripts for Italia Mano a Armato, which is the second film in the Commissario Betti series that began with Violent Rome (and sadly, I haven't seen it yet), and From Corleone to Brooklyn, not to mention writing the script for Ruggero Deodato's completely loopy Raiders of Atlantis. Beyond Lenzi's frantic direction and Mannino's solid script, this movie belongs to Maurizio Merli. His portrayal of the hero with a broken heart, the cop on the edge, is as picture perfect a performance as you're ever likely to see in an action film hero. Every expression, every line drips with seething rage that betrays a sorrowful belief in compassion and justice at its core. Merli gnashes his teeth, grimaces, and exudes world-weary grimness at a level that will never be matched. He always seems five seconds away from having steam shoot out his ears accompanied by the sound effect of a steam locomotive's whistle. He's over the top, but in a way that matches the material perfectly and makes you notice the many strengths while being crazy enough that you miss the weak points. It's been said that Merli took the role very seriously, that he never approached it with anything but the utmost seriousness, and the acting job definitely benefits from the force of his conviction. So into his role was Merli that he often went (they say) a bit overboard in the fight scenes as well as the dramatic scenes, throwing extras and stuntmen around with such force that more than a few injuries resulted. Another actor might have been tempted to wink at the camera from time to time, to engage in a little good-natured camping up of the material. But not Merli. From beginning to end, through all his teeth grinding and fist shaking, you have no doubt that this man believes fiercely in Commissario Betti, and that ferocity comes through in the role and propels the film. He's also helped by a superb supporting cast which includes familiar workhorse John Saxon as a seedy businessman who ends up, more or less against his will, helping Betti take down the protection rackets. Saxon is always a dependable performer, even if like most working actors he's appeared in a colossal number of stinkers. Other dependable stalwarts include Barry Sullivan as a slimy mafioso behind the protection game, Luciano Rossi, and Pino Ferarra (who also starred in a movie with one of my all-time favorite titles: Ubalda, All Naked and Warm starring my undisputed all-time favorite cult film actress, Edwige Fenech). No one lets the film down, and even our child actor is tolerable (but just barely). But let's not forget the action. Umberto Lenzi pours on the thrills thick as molasses in January, and he films and edits the action sequences with an expert hand. Violent Naples delivers an almost uninterrupted orgy of brutal violence. Fistfights, shoot-outs, car chases, tram chases, the shaking of young punks by determined police inspectors -- there's plenty of fist-shaking action to get the blood pumping. Some of the violence is, as is common for the genre, gratuitous, gruesome, and over-the-top, but none of it is of the splatter variety. Everything is possessed of that gritty 70s realism that makes even the most unbelievable moments seem perfectly acceptable and more intense than if they'd happened in a film with more vibrant colors or less grainy film stock. Free from the glitz and shiny sheen that would undermine action films in the 1980s, Violent Naples -- like many of the action films that defined the "ultra-violence" trend that began with Dirty Harry -- feels completely and believable and understated even when it's being completely fantastical and over-the-top. There's very little in the way of subtlety on display in Violent Naples. This isn't the film for understated nuance or hidden meaning. This is bloody melodrama played on the grand scale, holding nothing back. When a moment is symbolic, Violent Naples delivers it wit a heavy-handed thud to make sure you get it. But everything is played with such earnestness that it remains compelling despite the blunt delivery. The final scene marks the best moment in Merli's tragically short career (when the police film fell out of vogue in the 1980s, Merli devoted himself to physical fitness, but died at the age of 49 of a sudden heart attack during a game of tennis). Betti, disgusted with everything he has seen in Rome and Naples, decides to throw in the towel. Burned out and disillusioned, Betti turns in his badge and heads for the airport. He's sick of trying to work inside a corrupt system, one that allows you to yell the required line, "This damn system is designed to protect the guilty and punish the victims!" He's tired of the pain, the frustration, and the ultimate futility of the brutal war he wages every day. He's heading for a new life in the sun and a chance to simply relax and forget it all. Until he sees that little kid again, once again limping slowly across an intersection and wincing with pain as he holds up traffic. Only this time, he's not pretending to be maimed. Betti stares at the boy as he struggles through the crosswalk. When the light changes, Betti flashes a devastating look of battered, world-weary grimness (his signature expression) and turns the car around. Back to the precinct. Back to the fight. It's not an especially unique or unexpected sort of ending, but Merli's expression during this final moment amplifies its power considerably. Like the classical warrior with a broken heart, try as he might, he can't turn his back on a world in need. Bloodied and saddened, he must continue. And it is in this moment that the underlying compassion that fuels this and many of the best poliziottechi shines through. Because it's not about power -- Betti has had it made perfectly clear that a man like him has no power, will never have power, and will never ultimately beat those who do have the power. Betti can't turn his back on the world because, although it has broken his heart, even though the struggle may be futile, it's still worth fighting for. As he heads back into the maelstrom accompanied by the superb score from Franco Micalizzi, it's hard not to get carried away by the raw emotion of the moment. For my money, what little of it I have, action films simply don't come any better than Violent Naples. And moustaches and grim cops don't come any better than Maurizio Merli. Labels: Director: Umberto Lenzi, Poliziotteschi, Stars: Maurizio Merli, Year: 1976 posted by Keith at 3:03 PM | 1 Comments Tuesday, February 14, 2006Milano Rovente
1973, Italy. Starring Antonio Sabato, Phillipe Leroy, Antonio Casagrande, Carla Romanelli, Alessandro Sperli, Franco Fantasia, Tano Cimarosa, Marisa Mell. Directed by Umberto Lenzi. Written by Franco Enna, Ombretta Lanza, Umberto Lenzi. Purchase from Amazon.com.
Click here for Man with a Moustache Month Roll-Call Like Enzo Castellari, Umberto Lenzi is no stranger to followers of global cult and genre cinema. And like Enzo, it's a shame that Lenzi is best known for his worst films. Invariably, mentioning Lenzi is going to cause a person -- the type of person who wouldn't just say, "Who the hell are you talking about" -- to think of either Cannibal Ferox (better known to many as Make them Die Slowly or Nightmare City (also known to many as City of the Walking Dead). Though each film has its fans, and Nightmare City has zombies that wear sweater vests and can pilot huge military transport planes, neither is an especially high water mark in the history of cinema in general, or even Italian genre film in particular. Memorable? Sure. Entertaining? Well, Nightmare city sure is. But as examples of the notion that Umberto Lenzi might be anything other than a hack exploitation director whose skill level just barely managed to surpass Bruno Mattei and Claudio Fragasso, those two films aren’t going to give you a whole lot with which to work. Which is kind of a shame, because Umberto Lenzi was, for a time, a director who showed a remarkable panache for directing gritty, action-packed cop films. Poliziotteschi ended up being Lenzi's forte, but like most Italian directors, he could only settle into one genre for as long as that genre was wildly popular. As soon as box office returns and public interest waned, the entire Italian exploitation film industry would fold up camp like a bunch of Mongolian nomads in search of the greener pastures of whatever genre or subgenre caught movie-goers' fancies. During the late 1970s and into the 1980s, that meant plying one's trade in zombie and sleazy cannibal exploitation pictures. But just as zombie film auteur Lucio Fulci proved he couldn’t leave splashy horror film gore behind when he tried to make a gangster film (Contraband), Lenzi could never really divorce himself from the street crime and action with which he enjoyed so much success during the early 1970s. So you get an army of zombies that fire Uzis and develop invasion tactics in Nightmare City, and you get an excessively drawn-out big city Mafia subplot that seems like it was taken from an entirely different film and grafted onto the emerald-green gore of Make Them Die Slowly in more or less random spots. Prior to his entry into the poliziottechi genre, Lenzi was tinkering with the usual types of films, including giallo (some better than others) and the film that would serve as the kick-off for the Italian cannibal craze, Man from Deep River. In 1973, he made his first foray into the poliziottechi film, or rather, into a poliziottechi-style crime film since Milano Rovente (Gang War in Milan) is more about gangsters than cops -- something that would become fairly common, though both cop and gangster films tend to get lumped into the same category. Milano Rovente is a pretty basic film: Italian pimps with moustaches battle French drug dealers who don't have moustaches. From time to time Italian cops, also with moustaches, show up to survey the aftermath. But of course, most poliziottechi films take a very lean, basic premise and lump ten tons of convoluted insanity on top of it. ![]() Milanese pimp Toto and his partner Lino (Antonio Casagrande, whose last name is also a place many people want to live) are enjoying the sweet life as the top pimps in the fashion capitol of Italy. They also run a fruit and vegetable wholesale company on the side. The sweet life is rudely interrupted, however, when some of their ladies start turning up dead in pools and other inconvenient locations, thus cutting into their business and attracting the unwanted attention of the police. It turns out that French drug dealers lead by the imaginatively named Frenchie (I'm sure his full name was Frenchie McFrench, The Frenchest Frenchman in Frenchtown) is trying to get Toto's attention. He has a deal for the A number one pimp: let the French gang use Toto's women to distribute drugs, and vastly increase both gang's profits. If Frenchie wanted to enter into a business partnership, he probably should have picked a friendlier way than killing off Toto's best prostitutes just to get an audience with the man. Obviously, Toto isn't all that thrilled with the proposition. But Frenchie is adamant: cut them in on the action, or ignite a gang war. So Toto takes a look at himself and sees a lean, good looking Italian guy with an impressive moustache and flaired slacks that flap majestically in the wind every time he lifts his leg to kick someone's ass, so he and Lino chose the war. Which is why, I suppose, the title of this film translates to Gang War in Milan instead of Gang Cooperation in Milan, which would be more of an instructional video than an action film, something that clues in young up-and-comers in both the drug and prostitution rackets to the benefits of working together. Anyway, the French drug dealers don't have moustaches, so what use does Toto have for them? Knowing that they are outgunned, however, Lino calls in the help of Milanese gangster Billy Barone to provide some serious firepower as the Italian pimps fight for nationalistic glory and their right to smack women around and feel their boobs. On the surface, Milano Rovente isn't much of a film. It lacks the immediate emotional impact of High Crime and the over-the-top violence of Violent Rome, though it is plenty violent. But where as Castellari got a kick out of grinding human bodies beneath the hard metal and rubber of motor vehicles, and Violent Rome spent its time watching Maurizio Merli strut around down and kick everyone's ass, the violence in Milano Rovente centers largely on watching drug dealers or pimps smack women around. When the French drug dealers want to strike a blow to tough pimp Toto Cangemi (Antonio Sabato), they do it by roughing up or killing off some of Toto's hookers (yes, Wizard of Oz fans, relish that last sentence). When Toto wants to get back at Frenchie, he usually seems to do it by smacking some woman around. Beating up prostitutes just isn't cool. It's not like watching Maurizio Merli throw on his raincoat to walk down the block and box the ears of some punks on a cheap little motorbike. When the gangs finally go head to head, Umberto Lenzi showcases a steady hand in the direction. Everything is tightly plotted and paced, and there are plenty of the shoot-outs and car chases in little Fiat type cars that Italian action films demand. Antonio Sabato is a convincing bad-ass with a great moustache, and he turns in a solid performance. The main problem is that his character is pretty rotten. He's shallow, selfish, mean, and not at all heroic. He's not even a heroic anti-hero. He just kind of a scumbag, no better or worse than the drug dealers in the film; the protagonist only because the narrative has chosen to focus on him. He's not one of those pimps with a heart of gold who cares for and really protects his ladies. He'd probably be throwing them into pools himself if the French guy hadn't beat him to it. That seems to be his main beef: that there are his women to beat up and exploit and kill when they piss him off, and he's taken umbrage at some outsider stepping in and getting rough in his stead. When Toto falls for beautiful Jasmine (Marisa Mell, one of our favorite and most tragic Euro starlets, last seen around these parts in Danger: Diabolik!), he's more than willing to stab Lino in the back and jet off to Switzerland, leaving the whole mess on the shoulders of his friend. When, in the end, he discovers the price of burning your bridges and being an asshole, you can't really sympathize with him. He's a dog, and he dies a dog's death, only not one of those cute dogs or one of those dogs who travels across the Arctic tundra to save someone. So maybe not a dog. Let's just say he gets what he deserves. Still, Sabato's performance is strong and engaging even if you come to hate his character. He's not quite Stuart Whitman in Blazing Magnum despicable, but that's only because he starts out as a pimp, rather than as a cop who does things like ram hot curling irons up the arse of kungfu-powered transvestites (yeah, Blazing Magnum is really something, even without any significant moustache action). Sabato is also surrounded by a solid caste of Italian genre film regulars. Marisa Mell turns in a good performance and looks dazzling with long black hair. Lenzi's direction is steady but not outstanding. This was his first foray into the genre, and he seems in many places to be feeling things his out. This is his Titus Andronicus as I like to call these types of films -- the testing of the waters, raw and unpolished but packed with the themes and stylistic touches, albeit in cruder form, that would come to fruition in later works. The despicable protagonist seems to foreshadow Thomas Milian's grotesque thug in Almost Human, for example. Whatever the case, even this ultimate footnote in the world of the Italian crime film is light years better than any of the gorier, more sensational films that Lenzi is best known for. It wasn't completely obvious in Milano Rovente that the genre had found its signature director. It was as mean-spirited as Violent Rome without the redemption of a solid main character like Merli's Inspector Betti. And it definitely lacks both the emotional engagement and mind-blowing action of High Crime. Still, it was still decently entertaining, and Lenzi had a nice touch. The test would be to see what would happen if you took Lenzi and paired him with Maurizio Merli. What happened was Violent Naples, a film that is consistently (along with High Crime and another Lenzi-Merli vehicle, From Corleone to Brooklyn) tagged as one of the absolute best action films of the seventies. Continued... Labels: Director: Umberto Lenzi, Poliziotteschi posted by Keith at 4:55 PM | 2 Comments Friday, February 10, 2006Violent Rome
1975, Italy. Starring Maurizio Merli, Richard Conte, Silvano Tranquilli, Ray Lovelock, John Steiner, Daniela Giordano. Directed by Marino Girolami. Written by Vincenzo Mannino.
Click here for Man with a Moustache Month Roll-Call Enzo Castellari and Franco Nero, working with Dirty Harry as their inspiration, established the template for both the look and attitude of the genre that would soon become known as poliziotteschi, or simply enough, tough Italian cop films. High Crime remains one of the best poliziotteschi films, and one of the best action films of the 1970s, but it was in the wake of High Crime that the genre would find it's signature star and, eventually, it's star director. As mentioned previously, Maurizio Merli was a good-looking young actor who experienced a bit of a career boost based on the fact that he bore a decent resemblance to megastar Franco Nero. As such, whenever someone wanted to make a sequel to or a quick knock-off of a Franco Nero hit, Merli would get the call. This first happened when Nero departed the popular "White Fang" adventure series and producers decided to carry on without him. Merli inherited the part, with producers hoping that after he grew some ragged mountain man scruff and threw on a frosty parka hood, no one would notice it wasn't Franco Nero until it was too late. When High Crime broke, it was only a matter of time before someone got the bright idea to port Maurizio Merli into the type of tough cop role that movie helped create. Despite, at the time, not enjoying the same level of success as Franco Nero, Maurizio Merli was more than just some cheap knock-off Bruce Le/Bruce Li -- at least they didn't change his name to Franko Nero or Franco Niro or something. Merli was a solid actor with the same sort of rugged, dashing good looks. His moustache was at least as good as -- and quite possibly superior to -- Franco Nero's. But what really made him an excellent choice for the poliziotteschi genre were his eyes. Now bear with me for a moment as I wax philosophic about ass-kicking Italian cops from the 1970s. ![]() Although the character is often summed up simply as "the tough cop" or alternately "a cop on the edge," such simplistic descriptions conjure up, from our vantage point in the new millennium, a far shallower archetype that fails to embody or communicate the complexity that inhabited the character at its inception during the early 1970s. Keep in mind that in between the years of Dirty Harry and Inspector Belli, and where we stand now, we have a colossal wasteland known as the 80s and 90s, which took the basic concept of the good cop on the edge, drained it of any meaning, and transformed it into a bug-eyed, farcical lampoon; a stock character divorced from the vitality and meaning that it had when it was first created. After so many movies of that quality, we tend to think of them more than we think of the early progenitors of the character, when we mention the "cop on the edge," and it's easy as a result of our proximity to the low end of the bell curve, to forget that the character wasn't nearly so devoid of value, wasn't nearly as goofy and cartoonish, during the 1970s. This purer, old-school "tough cop" is a far more difficult character to portray, and it takes a class actor to understand the role, then bring it successfully to the screen. It takes understanding that the character's toughness doesn't emanate entirely from his ability to box in the ears of young punks who deserve it; the toughness, rather, is rooted not just in the character's sense of two-fisted machismo, but also in the character's sadness. The poliziotteschi protagonist is the proverbial warrior with a broken heart. He has taken on the good fight, stood up for the world, and the world has broken his heart. It has shown him the ugliest of its many sides. It has ravaged and crushed him. And still, the warrior forges on, the sadness in his heart becoming a source of inspiration. He has seen the worst in people, but his compassion, buried under anger and gruffness and frustration, compels him forward. He is a cop on the edge because he must stand at the lip of the abyss and stare into it. He carries the weight of compassion on his shoulders, and no matter how often the world breaks his heart, he soldiers on, simply because he cares. This is the mitigating factor for the poliziotteschi inspector and the poliziotteschi film in general. The cop on the edge is angry. He's bitter, perhaps even cynical. But these things are not his motivation. They are not the fire that keeps him going. It's his compassion, and his sadness, that keeps him on the street. It's easy to look at the poliziotteschi film and see little more than a glorification of brutality, vigilante justice, and right-wing paranoia -- aspects of the films that have always seemed difficult to square with the fact that many of the men writing and directing them were famously liberal in their views and presented us with cops with as much disdain for "the system" as the shaggiest of hippies. Sometimes, this dichotomy arose simply because the writer-director was goofing off, trying to make something so fantastically fascist that no one could possibly take it seriously. Other times, however, hints of fascism were disarmed to some degree by the fact that the poliziotteschi inspector wasn't fueled by a desire for authority or violence. He was fueled by an honest sense of justice and compassion for the victims, and in his quest to right the wrong, he sometimes lost focus on the lines of civility that should not be crossed. Often times, the poliziotteschi cop is as frustrated by and marginalized by the legal and political system as the thugs and terrorists he pursues. It is the sense of compassion for the innocent that keeps the inspector from tumbling over into the abyss and becoming what he has sworn to oppose. Violent Rome attempts to tackle many of these concepts, though ultimately the end philosophical result is only partially developed and never fully sorted out. This was Maurizio Merli's entry into the poliziotteschi, playing Commissario Betti, directed by seasoned pro Marino Girolami -- who happens to be the father of Enzo Castellari. Action begins with a botched public bus robbery that results in chaos and, eventually, murder -- alerting the viewer before the credits have even finished of the two things this film is going to deliver in spades: mean, nasty violence and ham-fisted melodrama. For example -- the person murdered just happens to be a newlywed, and the other half of the union is waiting to meet them at the next bus stop. Violent Rome, obviously, isn't going to be a subtle film in how it presents on-screen action and violence or in how it shamelessly manipulates emotion and sentiment. The crime introduces us to Merli's Commissario Betti, the picture-perfect poliziotteschi cop in a thick turtleneck, flared slacks, and a wide-collared trenchcoat. Like Franco Nero, he sports a bushy mane of blond hair and a thick 70s cop moustache the likes of which would make Tom of Finland swoon. As with most poliziotteschi, Violent Rome consists mostly of Maurizio Merli driving around and kicking ass. He'll box the ears of any hooligan with whom he crosses paths. Thieves? He'll beat your ass! Assholish drunken teenagers who turn to murder? He'll beat your ass twice then kick your teeth in. Rapists? He'll beat your ass three times, and then once more for good measure. Then he'll shoot you. As is also always the case, his somewhat extreme methods bring him into conflict with lawyers and police superiors, allowing him to give the requisite "These are the only methods I know/Your system stinks and protects the guilty while letting the innocents die" speech that is de rigueur for all "cop on the edge" type films, but no one can deliver the speech like Maurizio Merli. The street-level violent criminals chafe his hide plenty, but it's the decadent and corrupt officials sitting at the top, happy to let the world rot while they reap huge profits from the chaos with total disregard for how many innocent people are slaughtered in the process, that really steam Betti. Eventually, he encounters so much bureaucratic red tape and so many sleazy criminals protected by wealth and political connections that Betti simply hands in his badge and refuses to be an instrument of such a corrupt institution. In vowing to enforce the law, he thought he would be upholding justice. Instead, he was simply a cog in a machine that protected people with enough cash to buy protection while leaving everyone else hung out as food for the wolves. He joins an organization of private citizens who are just as fed up with the lack of action by the officials. Merli and his vigilante group are pretty successful in kicking the ass of criminals the cops can't or won't go after. Of particular interest to the group is a circle of thugs protected by the politically and financially powerful families. But Merli cares not for social status. No amount of money can buy your way out of having him kick your ass. The actions of the group make them prey as well as predator. In a particularly nasty scene, the aging founder of the group is beaten mercilessly and forced to watch as a gang of thugs rape his daughter. Merli's best friend is exposed as an undercover and crippled. Merli himself becomes the target of frequent assassination attempts. But then, no one figured it would be an easy fight. If it was, the police would have done it. Violent Rome is a brutal, cynical, often mean-spirited film populated by a wealth of despicable villains and set in a city where, apparently, every single street was the location of a shoot-out, mugging, or rape. It pushes the boundaries of on-screen violence and questionable taste even further than High Crime. The scene in which vigilante group Sartori (Richard Conte) is forced to watch his wife gang-raped is particularly evil, and this is the sort of movie that will let a crook gun down a group of singing school children simply because he hopes it will preoccupy the cops chasing him. Violent Rome is easily one of the meanest poliziotteschi, but the levels of naked violence it attains are so overwhelming so as to propel the film into a comic book like state where the violence ceases to have much more than a "holy crap, I can't believe they just showed that" impact. There's not enough time put into most of the characters to illicit any sort of emotional response from the brutality, so it exists more as a guilty Grand Guignol exercise in outrageous excess. Compared to High Crime, which managed to mix genuine sympathy for a character (the browbeaten commissioner) with highly effective cinematography and music to generate honest emotional involvement with the violence, Violent Rome comes across as a more over-the-top, but also clumsier study of the same territory. Part of the problem is that Violent Rome lacks a cohesive narrative. There is, somewhere, an actual case, but the movie is structured as a series of disconnected and independent episodes that have, binding them together, nothing more than the fact that they serve to make Betti madder and madder. The supporting cast is half-heartedly developed as well, with no single quality foil ever emerging to plague Merli, meaning that it lacks the tapestry of involving characters that make better poliziotteschi compelling. And, most bald-face, Girolami shamelessly rips off the ending of his son's superior film almost shot-for-shot. Violent Rome's weaknesses are evident primarily because the bar was set so incredibly high by High Crime. It was inevitable that most of the films rushing out of the gate wouldn't attain the loftly level of artistry and meaning that Castellari infused in his film. Violent Rome, had High Crime not existed, would be a solidly enjoyable and gritty action film. The direction is workmanlike, the acting is, for the most part, acceptable, and the script, while episodic, is still logical and engaging. The violence is so crazy, so mean, and so offensive at times, that almost becomes parody. Still, it's not a movie for those who are offended by a guy with a moustache and a gun beating the crap out of people. What elevates Violent Rome is Maurizio Merli. His performance as Inspector Betti is phenomenal, and it has a lot to do with why this film was a huge success -- though gratuitous ultra-violence never hurts, unless, I suppose, you are the victim of gratuitous ultra-violence. Merli's Betti is an outstanding character, and he walks the line expertly between compassionate and devastatingly grim. Although the final scene is a direct rip-off of High Crime, it manages never the less to be very effective. High Crime sets the boundaries for what little success the poliziotteschi cop may enjoy. At the end of the movie, he has perhaps busted up the criminal ring he was pursuing, killed the chief villain, but other criminals wait in the wings to fill the void without pause. And the poliziotteschi hero stands on the street and realizes that, in achieving his goal, he has lost everything. Friends, family, hope -- he has had it all taken away from him, or he has sacrificed it all. Whatever may be the case, the end result is that he is left with nothing but his broken heart. Realizing this, often while staring at the grave of a loved one, he will sigh, let his shoulders droop for a fraction of a moment, then straighten himself, tighten the belt on his overcoat, and head back to the precinct to continue the fight. Merli would continue the fight. Violent Rome, although a weaker film than High Crime, established Merli not just as a guy imitating Franco Nero, but as a megastar in his own right, who had taken a stock character and made it uniquely his own. Although what Betti does may be questionable, Merli's conviction in the character and his charisma as an actor make you believe, and they engage you in a way that the rest of the film never manages to do. As such, Violent Rome is not the best poliziotteschi, but it remains essential for a proper understanding of the genre because it introduces Maurizio Merli into the mix, and because, while not perfect, it's still a ripping good action film. So now we have the template, and we have the actor who would become the face of the poliziotteschi film. What he needed now was to hook up with the right director. Although common sense would have you assume that would mean Maurizio Merli working with Enzo Castellari, common sense would be wrong in this case. Because the genre's best director would turn out to be a guy named Umberto Lenzi. Continued... Labels: Poliziotteschi, Stars: Maurizio Merli posted by Keith at 5:39 PM | 5 Comments Tuesday, February 07, 2006High Crime
1973, Italy. Starring Franco Nero, James Whitmore, Fernando Rey, Duilio Del Prete, Silvano Tranquilli. Directed by Enzo G. Castellari. Written by Maurizio Amati, Tito Carpi, Enzo G. Castellari.
Click here for Man with a Moustache Month Roll-Call Back when Teleport City first made the big jump from print zine and BBS to the then-fledgling World Wide Web, Calvin Coolidge was still President of the United States and my writing style, fresh out of college, was somewhere considerably south of the highbrow level of refinement you regularly see on display these days. Anyone who chances across one of the old reviews in the archives will be assaulted by a fairly odious "Man, this movie rocks!" sort of idiotic enthusiasm. Cute in a teenager, perhaps, but unbecoming for a man of the world such as I have become. There are certain quintessential movies, however, that were reviewed in those heady days of youthful exuberance and limited writing skill, and slowly but surely, I've been going back and revisiting some of those films and giving them a more proper write-up using the sort of wit and verbal sophistication that regularly gets us declared as one of the ten least essential sites on the Internet, right below a website dedicated to Japanese nose bondage and mucous fetishes. Generally, the more I liked a film, the worse the eventual review was likely to be. I tended to get carried away, like a victorious sailor just home from the Pacific and in need of a little female attention. Except that overbearing joy in regards to being a hero of the Pacific usually did get the lads amorous attention from beautiful ladies, where as that same level of glee directed toward celebrating, say, Zombie 3, has exactly the opposite effect on most women. But then, I didn't sit through Zombie 3 just so I could get laid. No, I sat through The Piano just so I could get laid. And you know what? In the end, it wasn't worth it. But enough about my youthful indiscretions. Let us return to greener fields and frolic in them like jolly red-capped gnomes high on purple mushrooms. One of the films, indeed one of the entire genres that got lost in excitement upon discovering it was the gritty, violent Italian cop films from the seventies -- poliziotteschi, as they became known -- and in particular, the Umberto Lenzi-helmed thriller Violent Naples starring poliziotteschi poster boy Maurizio Merli and his imposing, bushy blond 1970s moustache. Violent Naples, which is also known as Violent Protection and Napoli Violenta, was the first of these films I'd ever seen, and to say it blew me away is a fair bit of understatement. I was ready to run down the street hooting and hollering (or hollerin', as we say down South) and singing the praises of the movie to anyone who would listen. As it turns out, most people on the street, when approached by me in that manner (I believe I was wearing a garbage bag dress and two small potato sacks for shoes), were willing to listen to me rant unintelligibly for as long as it took them to pull out their cans of pepper spray. A few years removed from my initial reaction, I can sit back and examine the movie once again. My feeling for the movie is no less enthusiastic, but being who I am today, rather than go running into the streets like some unhinged lunatic who has meaningful conversations with bits of gravel, I can sit back in the warm glow of Violent Naples, light my pipe, and engage in reserved but no less enthusiastic reflection on the many merits of the film. To begin, however, we should first look at another Maurizio Merli poliziotteschi film, 1975's Violent Rome, which introduces us to the character of bitter but compassionate police inspector Betti and serves as the film that would turn Merli, up until then little more than a bit player on the Italian film scene who specialized in appearing in films where producers hoped people would mistakenly identify him as bona fide Italian superstar Franco Nero, into an international star and the iconic face of an entire genre of film. But of course, before we can talk about Merli and Violent Rome, we have to talk about Franco Nero. In 1971, audiences were delivered the message that the freewheelin' sixties were over, and so were the innocent fifties for that matter, when long-legged Clint Eastwood stepped onto the screen as "cop on the edge" Harry Callahan in the groundbreaking crime thriller, Dirty Harry. Other tough-as-nails cops and private eyes followed in Harry's cynical footsteps, including Shaft, Serpico, and a guy named Popeye Doyle. This new generation of cop film was a marked departure from past crime films, where guys like G-Man Jimmy Stewart would walk proudly through spotless backlots dispatching ne'r-do-wells with precision shots. Callahan and his compatriots were angry, disillusioned, and cynical. Rather than existing on stylized sets and sound stages, they strode through films shot on location on the decaying and beat-up urban centers of America. Everything they encountered was grubby, seedy, and mean. Rather than going home to quaint suburban homes and beautiful, devoted wives, they went home to shabby apartments, empty rooms, or into the company of hookers, strippers, and hardened femme fatales. They were world-weary, tired, and as a result of filmmakers' general distaste for authority as was honed during the late sixties, often as disgusted and at odds with their chief, the mayor, and city hall as they were with the criminal elements who were allowed to ride roughshod over a terrified and pathetically meek public. Faced with a nightmare on both ends of the spectrum, these cops often chose to operate outside the system, since they saw no way to uphold the law or deliver justice by working within a broken system. There's an air of vigilantism in their actions -- the proverbial taking of the law into one's own hands. And the films often drew sharp criticism for what some saw as a glorification of abuse of power, the violation of civil rights, the pandering to paranoia, and the embracing of Wild West vigilante justice. But these films, often with shaggy-haired, morally ambiguous anti-heroes in bell bottoms and leather jackets, informed by Eastwood's previous work in Sergio Leone's spaghetti westerns, were anything but right-wing. In the end, bureaucrats and upstanding men of wealth and power are almost always revealed to be as vile and guilty as the common thugs on the street. And the heroes themselves are friendly with all sorts of shady underbelly characters that would drive a true blue right winger nuts. They pal around with hustlers and pimps, hookers and heroin addicts, recognizing that these people are often decent people who simply made bad decisions. The Dirty Harry cops aren't interested in busting some chump pot smoker at a club, or running some single mom in for prostitution. Their quest lies solely in bringing down the most vile criminals. The serial killers, or in many cases, the wretched scum who are protected by layers of money and power and social insulation. These were the villains the common man couldn't fight back against, and who couldn't be prosecuted within the system, because they were the system. At best, these cops are morally gray, a reflection of the exhaustion and confusion America and the world felt after emerging form years of political and social turmoil to find the world torn asunder with no clear plan on how to put it back together. Crime went out of control in many cities, and the world became intimately familiar with phrases like terrorism and hijacking as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict played itself out on the global theater during the 1972 Olympic Games in Munich. The average citizen felt trapped in their own homes while thugs and criminals, terrorists and corrupt politicians looted the world and left it all ablaze. In such a setting, it's no big mystery that people, even fairly liberal-minded people, could look at characters like these cops and identify with them. In other words, when you watch Harry Callahan grind his foot mercilessly on the serial sniper's wounded leg, you know what he's doing is wrong, but you still like that it's being done. Obviously, morally and politically, these films walk a line that is less liberal or conservative, less Republican or Democrat, and more a simple question of embracing a sort of libertarian self-reliance and eschewing of a bloated and ineffectual nanny-state that has raised a generation of people too timid to take care of themselves, and so turn to the state for everything from food to protection rather than relying on themselves. In Italy, the social and political conditions were no better than in America, and in some ways, were a good deal worse. Crime was rampant. Red Brigade terrorist attacks had the population panicked. The 1970s were a decade out of control in many ways, and perhaps even more so than New York City, Italy and Naples embodied the confusion, angst, and frustration of the world. Rome's Fiumicino Airport was seen by most of the violent criminal and terrorist element of the world as a revolving door in and out of Europe. Traffic was so heavy and security so lax that you could all but waltz through customs while holding a rocket launcher. It wasn't like Italy wasn't already known for its homegrown brand of crime; now they were the nexus point for any crackpot brigade looking to kidnap a diplomat, assassinate a judge, or blow up a building. It was in the midst of this chaos that Italian screenwriter Vincenzo Mannino wrote the movie High Crime -- aka La Polizia incrimina la legge assolve -- starring tough-as-nails Franco Nero as Vice-Commissioner Belli and directed by Italian genre film staple Enzo G. Castellari (who's directed everything from this film to 1990 Bronx Warriors). Obviously inspired by Dirty Harry, the film was a huge hit, and with the muzzle flash of a blazing Magnum, the poliziotteschi genre roared onto screens, boasting untold levels of brutal violence, flared slacks, and drooping seventies moustaches. I'm going to refer to the movie here as High Crime for the scientific reason that it's shorter to type than the original Italian title. High Crime centers around noble-but-frustrated vice cop Belli, who is on the verge of busting up one of the biggest drug smuggling rings in Genoa. Unfortunately, the ring includes several extremely powerful and prominent citizens, and Belli's boss is unwilling to pull the trigger on the operation for fear that their evidence isn't good enough. He'll be satisfied with nothing less than absolute and ironclad proof that will dismantle the cartel permanently, but Belli knows that airtight and total proof is simply not realistic in any case. ![]() Pressure comes from all sides to either wrap up or drop the case, and Belli finds himself in the middle of an ultra-violent street war declared on him by the criminal men with the most to loose. He's also struggling to take care of a young daughter and girlfriend who are supportive and proud of what he does, but at the same time are frustrated by the amount of time Belli devotes to his crusade. At the same time, Belli discovers that even though he can take care of himself in a firefight, the men against whom he's up against are more than willing to strike where he's vulnerable -- specifically, family and loved ones. High Crime is one of those rare action movie that does pretty much everything ight. Franco Nero is absolutely mesmerizing as Belli. He's pretty much at the height of both his popularity and attractiveness here, and uses his looks to convey smoldering intensity mixed with world-weariness. Although Nero commands the movie with undeniable charisma, it's not left up to him to carry the weight of the film on his shoulders. The supporting cast is equally superb, a far cry from the assembly of cardboard throw-aways that often populate the background of an action film. As Commissioner Scavino, James Whitmore could have lapsed into what quickly became the all-too-common stock character of the overbearing commissioner, sitting behind a giant desk and gnawing on a giant cigar while screaming about how the hero had crossed the line. Instead of taking this route, Scavino emerges as a particularly sympathetic character. His heart is with Belli, and he wants to take these bastards down just as bad as his number one officer. But he also knows the bureaucratic game that has to be played and knows how easy it will be for the majority of big-time players to escape scot-free unless the evidence against them is so overwhelming that no amount of political connection or wealth will be able to buy their way out. Instead of being little more than a blustering foil for Nero's more active protagonist, Scavino is a glimpse at Belli's future, a man who once burned with passion but finds himself discouraged by red tape and political maneuvering at every turn. As good as the cast may be, though, and as tight as the script is, the real star here is Enzo Castellari's direction. If you only know Castellari as the slow-motion abusing director of goofball sci-fi actioners like New Barbarians and Escape from the Bronx, then you're going to have to reassess your opinion of him when he works in the medium of the gritty cop film. Even his silliest outings during the eighties boasted a higher level of energy and insanity than the bulk of what surrounded them -- just compare the crazy action of New Barbarians to a drearier post-apocalypse movie like Exterminators from the Year 3000. High Crime is a burning example of just how good Castellari could be when his heart was in the production. The film bristles with action and, even during the dramatic scenes and exposition, there is enough tension to ensure that violence remains a lurking character even when its not making its presence directly known. But when it is making itself known? That's when the movie kicks into severe overdrive. High Crime basically operates under the presumption that Dirty Harry and Death Wish were good, but they just weren't grim enough. People in them were just too happy. High Crime overloads on brutal street violence -- not just overripe and juicy squibs, though they certainly represent themselves here, but Castellari's big pre-occupation here seems to be human-to-vehicle mayhem. The film's opening scene is an extended chase sequence which culminates in a fiery car bomb sending the mutilated remains of a potential witness hurtling from a charred and twisted vehicle with surprisingly effective special effects. From there, Castellari bounces skulls off of windshields and is more than willing to dwell in graphic detail on every shattered skull and crushed limb -- even if it belongs to a child. He doesn't delve into flat-out gore, but there is a bared-teeth, unflinching brutality to the violence that makes it far more effective than moist gore effects. Castellari keeps the pace frantic, but he understands that the key to making a movie like this exceptional is to be sure you squeeze emotion and character development into the mayhem. Exploration of character isn't exactly deep, but Castellari and crew do take the time to make sure you care about the characters, which makes the action all the more exciting (something I wish modern action films understood -- action for the sake of action, featuring players you care nothing about -- is more tedious than it is thrilling). High Crime invests actual time and energy in the characters, and that's what makes it an enduring film -- and that's why it was able to spark an entire genre. Although High Crime was inspired by Dirty Harry, High Crime itself is the movie that became the template for the glut of tough Italian cop films that followed. Franco Nero defined both the attitude and appearance that would become commonplace among subsequent protagonists, and Castellari defined the take-no-prisoners approach to portraying gruesome acts of violence. The score by Guido and Maurizio DeAngelis would also become a benchmark for later films, and G&M themselves became one of the most prolific composers of scores for Italian cop movies. High Crime put all the pieces together remarkably, and where as some "first films" that kick off a whole trend are, themselves, not very good (Sweet Sweetback, I'm looking in your direction), High Crime manages to be one of the top three or four films of the poliziotteschi genre, and one of the top films in a decade that produced pretty much the best action films ever made. As good as High Crime is, though, the genre had it's signature star and even better films waiting in the wings. Continued... Labels: Director: Enzo Castellari, Poliziotteschi, Stars: Franco Nero posted by Keith at 12:38 AM | 2 Comments Monday, February 06, 2006Man with a Moustache
The man with the moustache simply takes a swig of bourbon, looks at you from above the rim of his glass, and says, "Are moustaches out of favor with society? I didn't notice. I was too busy kicking ass and bedding hot chicks." Then he stands, his skintight tan, flared Chinos creaking against the weight of his manliness, throws on his 3/4 length brown leather jacket with the turned-up collar and oversized cinching belt at the waist, and begins to walk toward the door. Pausing suddenly, he whirls around, and his fist flies straight for your face. As you fall off your barstool, simpering and nursing a bloody lip, the man with the moustache throws your jacket at you, then kicks you to the floor.
"That's for being a wise guy," he says as he slips on his amber-colored shades and disappears into the night, leaving behind nothing but a whiff of cologne and the image, burned in your mind, of his chest hair erupting forth from the undone collar of his tight, white button-down polyester shirt. Somewhere, in the distance, a lonely wah-wah guitar wah-chaka-chaka's at the moon. MAN WITH A MOUSTACHE MONTH: ROLL CALL High Crime (Moustache: Franco Nero) Violent Rome (Moustache: Maurizio Merli) Milano Rovente (Moustache: Antonio Sabato, Sr.) Violent Naples (Moustache: Maurizio Merli) Labels: Poliziotteschi posted by Keith at 11:22 PM | 0 Comments Sunday, July 21, 2002Blazing Magnum
1976, Italy. Starring Stuart Whitman, John Saxon, Martin Landau, Tisa Farrow, Carol Laurre. Directed by Alberto de Martino.
There's this funny thing about the heroes in a film: you are supposed to like them. Oh sure, you might like him or her at first. They may be cocky, arrogant, and abrasive. Any number of negative personality traits may mar their character. But at some point in the movie something will happen that allows the hero to either show their true colors or causes a revelation that results in a character about-face and process of redemption. It's not important that we don't like the hero at the beginning of the film, so long as we like -- or at least admire them -- by the end. All things considered, it's pretty easy to churn out a likeable, if stereotypical and one-dimensional -- hero. The cliches are all time-tested, and audiences never seem to get tired of them. A catatonic chimp can write a screenplay that, if nothing else, at least gives you a generically likable hero. A few snappy come-backs, some sassing of stuffy superiors, possibly some self-sacrifice or tragic loss. Piece of cake. It is impressive then, that the Italian cop drama Blazing Magnum has managed to create a "hero" who is so unlikeable, so amazingly repugnant, that you can't help but cheer for even the most vile of criminals to get the better of this obnoxious asshole. The main cop in a poliziotteschi film is supposed to be a hard-ass. He's supposed to be tough as nails, and he isn't supposed to take shit from anyone. He doesn't let niceties stand in the way of his single-minded quest for truth, and he doesn't let the law get in the way of his pursuit of justice. At the same time, he has to be a remarkably human character -- prone to violence, anger, and indignation, yes, but also prone to sadness and melancholy. He does what he does because he so believes in humanity, that we are, despite all evidence to the contrary, worth defending. No one played this part better than the incredible Maurizio Merli, who could convey sadness -- the warrior with a broken heart -- with his eyes while he delivered beatdowns of the bad guys with his fists. Stuart Whitman, on the other hand, conveys all the depth of character and world-weary street smarts as a very small chunk of curb concrete that somehow got broken off from the rest of the curb. His character in this misanthropic but still entertaining actioner is, as I said, one of the most disgusting "heroes" ever to stumble onto the screen. He's not even an anti-hero. An anti-hero is usually hero by default because, while he may be evil, everyone else around him is even more evil. Witness Clint Eastwood in any of his spaghetti westerns, or witness Sonny Chiba in Streetfighter. But Stuart Whitman's driven cop out for revenge is so much more brutal, idiotic, and evil than even the baddest of the bad guys in this film that he becomes nearly impossible to bear. As you have no doubt surmised, Whitman is a cop on the edge who don't take no shit from no one and who rubs his superiors the wrong ways on account of his "questionable methods." You know the score with these guys. The big difference here is that you actually have to agree with the superiors on this one. The cop on the edge can always defend his action with the ol' "My methods get results!" zinger, but that doesn't even apply here, because all this cop's methods do is result in a lot of brutalized and violated innocent people. When his daughter turns up dead, Tony (Whitman) is determined to find the murderer. His first suspect is one of his daughter's college professors, played by Space: 1999's Martin Landau. It doesn't take long for Tony (Stuart Whitman) to uncover the fact that his daughter and the professor were engaged in a variety of extracurricular activities in the fields of biology and human anatomy. In order to keep a scandal from ruining his reputation, Tony figured, the professor just killed the gal. It's a pretty tenuous line of thinking, and in fact Tony has no evidence whatsoever beyond the fact that some jealous guy saw them in a mild quarrel. That doesn't stop him from breaking into Landau's house, roughing him up, shouting at him, accusing him in public, and generally taking the harassment to a level never before seen. The guy is, pure and simple, a grade-A prick. Making it all the sweeter is the fact that Landau is completely and totally innocent. Even after this revelation, even after learning that Landau never treated the girl with anything other than the utmost respect and tenderness, Tony still acts like an asshole and tries to beat the shit out of the professor before just settling on calling him a perverted asshole or something. I understand Tony's upset and all, but come on. I bet he kicked two puppies and tripped an old lady on the way home. His grating brutality directed at the innocent continues throughout the movie as he traces some clues to the posh apartment of a bunch of transvestites. These transvestites are not suspects. What Tony has uncovered is that they might have run into the killer when he might have been a customer at their hair salon at some point in their careers. Armed with this righteous truth, he blatantly violates every civil right he can think of. First he breaks into their apartment. When they show up decked out in full drag queen regalia, all they know is that some disheveled maniac with full-bodied Tim Thomerson hair has just broken into their house. When they demand he identify himself, he calls them a bunch of perverts or faggots or something and tries to kick their asses. What he doesn't realize is that these are no ordinary drag queens. These are drag queens who possess kick-ass kungfu. Even while wearing giant platform boots and tight skirts, the girls kick the shit out of Tony, who only gets the upper hand on them when he grabs a hot curling iron and rapes one of them up the bum with it. Yep, that's your hero, folks. I guess he watched Black Shampoo but failed to realize the guys who employ the same violation on poor Artie in that film were actually vile criminals, not the heroes of the film! At this point, all I could do was shake my head in amazement at the level of hatred this film spewed forth. I'm used to crummy characters, but Tony blew my mind. I'm supposed to root for this guy? Instead, as most people no doubt did, I was cheering for the drag queens to kick his ass and shut him the hell up. Come on! What the hell kind of hero rapes people in the rear with hot curling irons? People who have committed absolutely no crime and, in fact, have had crimes committed against them by some insane cop? It'd be different if the movie depicted Tony as an increasingly unstable man driven over the edge by his daughter's murder, but it's not that clever. Instead, it just expects us to think Tony's unbridled violence toward the innocent is admirable. Not one to stop there, Tony also bullies the blind girl who was his daughter's roommate, and then goes out to beat up some other guy, leading to what is easily one of the most insane, well paced, and energetic car chase sequences I've ever seen. It's truly a sight to behold, even though it ends with the guy finally crashing and then going, "Oh, that's all you wanted? Okay, sure," and giving Tony the information he wants. Right wing tendencies, even fascist undertones, are a staple of the poliziotteschi genre. In the better films, like Violent Naploi, they are handled well and a balance is struck between freedom and the desire to not be a prisoner in your own home while criminals run wild and free. Many of the films even spoof to some degree these attitudes, giving us take-no-shit cop heroes who, at the same time, are friends with prostitutes and freaks and other undesirables. It's only in more pedestrian films like Blazing Magnum that the fascism becomes annoying. I don't think, however, that this sort of film actually sets out to promote fascism. I don't think it sets out to do anything but make a fast buck. They're just painting by numbers and following the formula. Without the talent of a director like Umberto Lenzi or an actor like Maurizio Merli, the film seems a lot meaner and reactionary. But like I said, that has a whole lot more to do with simply being derivative and unimaginative than it has with wanting to promote any sort of political agenda. When confronted with a low-budget, low-intelligence poliziotteschi film like this, it's best not to read too much into the events. It's likely there is no political statement whatsoever behind the actions. They probably just wanted to make a movie with a lot of ass kicking and tough guys in it. Eventually, Tony uncovers the horrible truth about his daughter, which won't be much a shock to anyone other than Tony and John Saxon, who stars in this movie as Tony's underling. Tony's daughter was, in fact, quite insane. A murderer and aspiring urban terrorist and thief. I'm willing to bet she picked up those traits from her dear old dad. Of course, Tony still gets to kill some people, so at least that makes him feel better. Sure the guy who is eventually revealed to be the murderer is kind of a jerk, but even he can't hold a candle to Tony. After all the killing is over and done with, I think Tony stops by and calls Martin Landau an asshole one more time just to round out his dickishness, or there is some scene where Landau says, "Can I get an apology now?" and Tony says, "Yeah, I'm sorry you're such a perverted Poindexter. I'm gonna kick your testicles now!" And that's pretty much that. This is a straight-forward cop film that only strays from the tried and true formula in order to make its hero the most vile individual on the planet. Even the crazy-ass would-be criminal who runs wild and murderous with the daughter is a lot easier to like than Tony. Stuart Whitman brings to his fascist character all the charisma of a drunk, abusive uncle who corners you at Christmas and won't stop talking about skinning animals while he pounds down a bottle of Old Crow. He's not the funny uncle, or the quirky uncle, or the uncle who just comes over and watches a lot of football. He's the uncle who is most likely to actually take a swing at grandpa and stumble out of the room calling your mother a "goddamn whore." This is not a guy for whom you want to cheer. Through the entire movie, all I could was hope and pray that he would fail miserably. When he discovered his daughter was actually a killer and a nutcase, it was sort of satisfying, but the only way this movie could have dealt properly with Tony would have been to kill his ass off in some horrible and torturous fashion. On that end, it fails to deliver, and the world can sleep a little more restlessly knowing Office Tony Saita is still prowling the streets making even Harvey Keitel's character from Bad Lieutenant say, "Geez, pal, maybe you should tone it down a little." Despite the fact that this film features a main character who makes you want to take a shower, who is actually so sleazy that he'll make you want to go turn yourself in to the cops even if you didn't do anything, the film itself is actually pretty damn entertaining. The fascist leanings of the hero are so over-the-top that you can't even be offended by them after the first couple of infuriating civil rights violations. Well, maybe you can be offended by the curling iron thing, but even that is completely ludicrous. Chances are if you are the type to get offended at anything, then Italian cop films aren't your cup of tea, especially ones this totally nuts. With that established, we can simply sit back and enjoy the carnage, and this film has carnage galore. As I already mentioned, it has ass-kicking drag queen kungfu masters. That alone warrants a positive review from me. But it's also got the amazing car chase, lots of ass-kicking and two-fisted beat-downs delivered with little or no regard to whether or not the person on the receiving end actually did anything wrong, and a good pace to the proceedings. Alberto de Martino's direction is claustrophobic and gritty, nearly as uncomfortable to watch as the hero of the film, which makes it more interesting than it would otherwise be. de Martino was a workhorse director, like most of the Italian directors at the time, and made films in pretty much every genre there was, including Medusa Against the Son of Hercules, Secret Agent Double 007 starring Sean Connery's brother, Neil, and everyone's favorite, Puma Man. The cast isn't bad. They're all grizzled veterans of Italian action films. Whitman is relentless grim and unlikeable as Tony, which as I said may not be what you want from a lead character. John Saxon is hilarious as his dim-witted partner who can't seem to figure anything out and is amazed when Tony makes even the most obvious of observations. I think Saxon must say "Why didn't I think of that," about eight thousand times in this movie. Landau is more famous in retrospect, but I can't really say he was slumming it at the time. He does well enough in his role, which is to stand there and utter "Now just a minute!" as Stuart Whitman berates him endlessly. Tisa Farrow, as always, proves why she should have been the more famous of the Farrow sisters instead of ol' whats-her-name. Carol Laurre as Tony's insane killer daughter mostly just has to die, then come back in flashbacks where she screams and whirls her hair about while doing some psychedelic nude hippie dance. Were there really that many crazy-ass killer hippies out there? I admit that, being born in the early 1970s, I perhaps missed out on some of the world's wackier events, but other than Manson and his gang, I've never heard too many stories about roving bands of murderous, drug-crazed hippies roaming the streets in search of old women to victimize and squares to freak out. I don't doubt their existence; I'm just saying there were a lot more murderous hippies in the movies than maybe there were in real life, and most of the time what the movie sold as "murderous hippies" were really just bikers. I don't think your average murderous biker would appreciate being called a hippie, and maybe that's why they started killing people in the first place. I guess it's all a moot point since the killer daughter and her killer boyfriend may have drug induced freakouts but, in the end, are really more along the lines of obnoxious prep school students than they are hippies. This is a great movie to blow your mind as well as the minds of your friends, especially the more sensitive among them -- if you have sensitive friends. In a genre noted for mean-spirited misanthropy, it manages to take the hate to the next level. Tony Saita is the kind of cop who makes you wish for the liberal outlooks of, say, Benito Moussilini. Combine a remarkably unlikeable "hero" with a ton of gritty and fast-paced action, as well a some kungfu transvestites, and you have a sure-fire crowd pleaser. Labels: Horror: Giallo, Poliziotteschi, Stars: John Saxon, Stars: Stuart Whitman, Year: 1976 posted by Keith at 12:23 AM | 0 Comments Monday, June 24, 2002Cross Shot
1976, Italy. Starring John Saxon, Lee J. Cobb, Thomas Hunter, Renzo Palmer, Lino Capolicchio, Rosanna Fratello, Antonella Lualdi, Giacomo Piperno, Guido Celano, Alfredo Zammi. Directed by Stelvio Massi.
There's somethin' about John Saxon. No one can really describe it. Something, however, makes the man cool. It's easy to look at Bruce Lee or Maurizio Merli or Eddie Deezen and immediately recognize what makes them cool beyond belief, but John Saxon defies easy explanation. He's not bad looking, but he's not a knock-out of a man. He's looks sort of tough, but in the way your uncle who is big on hunting and fishing might look tough. It's a very regular guy kind of tough. Most of his movies kind of suck, and the ones that are good usually feature him in a supporting role as a minor villain or minor cop whose only job is to show to say, "Well, I'm stumped!" so the main actor looks all the more cooler when he figures things out. And yet every time I see John Saxon's name in a movie that isn't one of the Nightmare on Elm Street films, it makes me happy. Maybe it's because Saxon's toughness is a very achievable, realistic brand of toughness. Well, up until the point where we're supposed to buy him as a kungfu bad-ass and fighting equal to Bruce Lee in Enter the Dragon. But disregarding that, there's nothing unrealistic about most of the characters John Saxon plays. He is the "everyman" tough guy, and so we can all identify with him. In a similar vein, Henry Silva is very often the everyman villain. Like Henry Silva, and like many B-team action stars during the 1970s, Saxon spent a fair amount of time over in Europe, or more specifically, over in Italy, kicking as much ass as could be kicked in Italian cop films of the era. Cross Shot sees him in one of his rare starring vehicles -- he was almost always a co-star, sidekick kind of guy or criminal who was not as bad as the main criminal. Cross Shot also sees him fulfilling every single "cop on the edge" stereotype you could possibly think of. The chief comes down on him. The newspaper editor rails against his "questionable methods." He gets to give one of those, "you're system protects the guilty and punishes the innocent" speeches. In short, Cross Shot offers you everything you could possibly want from a generic cop movie, and manages to be pretty good while doing it. Saxon stars as Inspector Javocella, your standard issue tough cop who would rather beat a confession out a criminal than wait for the judicial system to screw everything up and let the guilty go free. These cops never see to realize that half the time, the reason the guilty go free is because the cops who arrested them beat them up. If they stopped beating defendants up, maybe not so many would get released because the cops beat them up while they were in custody. I don't know. Just a theory. I'm no criminologist. Javocella's arch-nemesis is the standard-issue bleeding heart newspaper editor who maybe cares about people, or maybe just wants to sell newspapers with sensational stories about police brutality. I've often wondered how many cities actually have heated wars going on between police inspectors and the newspaper editors. I guess as many as have mobs who are looking to tear down the old black community center so they can build a shopping mall. Ever wonder why these mobsters would want to be building a shopping mall in the middle of a burnt-out, crime-plagued ghetto? Sometimes I think they only used that as an excuse to pick fights with local black karate schools. Anyway, you also have Dante Ragusa, a blind, aging crime lord who is looking to prove he's still nobody to mess with. And you have his chump son who desperately wants to prove to his domineering father that he can be a good criminal and uphold the family honor in all matters relating to drugs, prostitution, extortion, and murder. His name is Nino, and he just can't do a damn thing right. You may think it's hard to try and impress your parents by playing soccer when your father was a famous European soccer player, but imagine trying to impress your father when he is a guy who rules the criminal underworld with a iron grip and slaughters all those who stand in his way. Now that's pressure. If the Ragusas would sit down and simply talk about their feelings, maybe even throw on a little "Cat's in the Cradle" by Harry Chapin, things would be better between them. Against his better judgment, Don Dante sends his twit of an offspring on a simple mission: deliver a letter of approval from a crooked senator allowing them to build a shopping center in some new part of town. No word on whether they had to face off against a black karate school or vigilante group led by an ex-football player, but I think we can assume they did. I always thought mobsters did stuff like smuggle guns and drugs, or just go around killing each other. But what I have learned in the movies, and what is probably true in real life, is that they spend most their time opening shopping malls and getting construction permits. Hell, whole episodes of The Sopranos dealt with the Mafia guys running a crooked sporting goods shop so they could get discount nylon jogging suits. Who would have thought that the preferred fashion of the men who rule the underworld would be unsightly lavender jogging suits? Those guys from the 1920s who wore those sharp suits and wingtips must hang their heads in shame. Meanwhile, a young dreamer who wants nothing more in the world than to make enough money to marry his sweetheart and get out of the city decides to join some guys in a bank robbery. This is a pretty common thing in these movies. Personally, when I've needed money, I always took a job at Toys-R-Us or a movie theater. It was mundane but easy work, and very low risk. I don't know how these lazy dreamers in the movies are always stumbling across gangs of bank robbers looking for the last member of their team, or why they accept the offer, or why the robbers would offer something as important as a spot on a bank robbery gang to some lazy nobody who spends most of his time staring out at the ocean and saying, "You know, someday I'm gonna make it." Come on, if you were going to rob a bank, would you look for hardened professionals, or would you grab the first hippie with an acoustic guitar and a head full of dreams that you ran across on the street? Naturally, the bank robbery goes terribly awry, because no one in the history of film has ever successfully robbed a bank or pulled off "the big heist." Face it, if the combined forces of Frank Sinatra, Dean Martin, Joey Bishop, Pete Lawford, Sammy Davis Jr., and Henry Silva couldn't successfully pull off a heist, what chance does some bum off the streets have? In the confusion of the botched robbery, the young guy, Antonio, panics and ends up killing a rookie cop. The robbers split up, losing all the money in the process, and Antonio ends up hijacking the first available car. Well, what are the chances that it's going to be poor Nino Ragusa's car? That guy just never gets a break, does he? Nino gets chewed out for being an idiot, Antonio is freaked out and on the run, and John Saxon strolls onto the scene to look grim and angry. He vows to catch whoever killed the young cop -- oh yeah, and this other woman the rest of the robbers killed when they threw her out of a moving car right into the path of the car behind them. Just so we can bring everyone together into one pissed off little family, the newspaper editor shows up to write obnoxious articles about how ineffectual the cops are, which allows Saxon to rail on about how they're damned if they do, damned if they don't and so on and so forth. Antonio escapes to the country and hides out in the abandoned shack of some relative. He knows the cops are after him, and since he is sensitive, he's distraught over the fact that he killed a man. Maybe he should have taken a different job than "armed bank robber" if this was a concern. Luckily, he has a gorgeous, understanding, level-headed girlfriend to comfort him. It would be much harder to cope if you were wrought with angst and guilt and came home every night to Judy Tenuda. Antonio soon figures out that he has come into possession of Ragusa's letter from the senator, and soon after that finds out that Nino and his thugs are trying to kill him. Having Nino after you is not so scary, but some of these other thugs have mustaches and sunglasses, so you know they mean business. Antonio jumps from dodging John Saxon to dodging mobsters out to kill him and retrieve the briefcase. The only friend he has is the newspaper editor, who is trying to exploit the situation as much as he trying to help Antonio stay alive. The editor figures if the mob doesn't kill Antonio, the cops will do it as revenge for their fallen comrade. They devise a number of plans to meet, and each time John Saxon sneaks around and follows them, so you'd think they's stop about the ten thousandth time they have a secret meeting interrupted by John Saxon stepping out of the shadows to yell at them. Finally, Antonio agrees to give himself up to the newspaper editor, who will then take him to the cops. Why they have this meeting in a dark, isolated alley is beyond me. You'd think if you were being chased by mobsters and were going to turn yourself in, you'd just do it at the police station instead of in a back alley full of snipers. This really makes no sense at all. Of course, John Saxon is also hiding in the shadows, waiting to arrest Antonio. This upsets Antonio, though I can't figure out why. He was going to turn himself in anyway. Well, they go ahead and do all this on the deserted street full of mob hitmen. Antonio gets it in the back, Saxon gets the hitman, and as Antonio dies in the street, he hands over the letter from the crooked senator, giving Saxon enough evidence to put Dante Ragusa away once and for all. The newspaper editor blames Saxon's violent methods for the death of poor Antonio, even though it was the mob who shot the kid, and it was the editor's stupid idea to meet in the alley instead of somewhere safe. The film ends with Saxon and crew confronting Ragusa, who immediately goes into "I'm a sick, frail old man" mode as most mob bosses do. He'll probably get off with a slap on the wrist. While Cross Shot is not the most violent or action-packed of the many poliziotteschi film, it's still a solid thriller with generic but interesting characters and a plot that keeps you glued to the set. You figure Antonio will probably get it in the end -- those innocent youths gone wrong always do -- but they make the journey there interesting, and by the end you're hoping that maybe he'll make it out alive after all. John Saxon is suitably grim and frustrated as the cop on the edge, though he doesn't pull it off with as much sympathy as Maurizio Merli. Of course, no one plays that part like Merli did in Violent Napoli. Although he doesn't really break and new ground with the archetype, John Saxon plays it convincingly and plays it well. In other words, he is good as always. The supporting cast all do well in their respective roles. Antonio and Nino Ragusa are both interesting characters with whom we can sympathize. Antonio was a lost kid who got caught up in situations that quickly spiraled out of control and turned violent -- a very familiar situation for a lot of people in Europe during the 1970s, when crime and terrorism skyrocketed, and everyone felt like society was going down in flames. Nino, on the other hand, is a wretch of a human who is insulted and degraded by his father at every turn. All he wants to do is impress his dad, to hear his father say that he did good. It never happens, of course, because Dante Ragusa would never utter a kind word and has no respect for his weak-willed son. "You've never even killed a man!" he scoffs. Nino, like everyone else in the film, is desperate for some resolution to his alienation. In many ways he reminds me of the character Nick DiSalvio from Across 110th Street -- a middle-aged mobster who has really gotten nowhere in his chosen profession. Everything DiSalvio got, he got when he married the boss's daughter, and everything Nino Ragusa has, he has because his dad is the boss, sort of like George Bush Jr. Weird to think of middle management mobsters having identity crises and struggling to make something of themselves, but I guess business is business. The newspaper editor is also a fairly typical but well-played character. He's careful not to go too over-the-top with his liberalism or take it to the extremes the character is often taken, at which time they become utterly absurd in their crusade. Here, he wants to protect the people, to stop the violence, but he's also not above exploiting it to sell papers. However, by the end he seems willing to risk his own life to help Antonio. Like Javocella and Ragusa, the editor is an ass, but not a totally irredeemable human being. The politics of Italian cop films are always a confused mess best decoded with a Rosetta Stone and secret ring found in a jar of rich, chocolaty Ovaltine. Cross Shot is interesting in that it doesn't make any calls one way or the other, but instead shows yuoth pulled asunder and destroyed by the many conflicting trens and demands of society. Finally, you have Antonio's girlfriend. She doesn't do a whole lot other than stand by Antonio in his hour of need, but she's worth noting because she serves a much greater purpose than simply being a person to be held hostage during a Mexican stand-off (which doesn't happen to her). Like the women in John Woo films, she is representative of a sort of even-headedness, a chance at redemption men could have if only they'd stop yelling and shooting at each other all the time. She's the only one that comes across as being sane more often than she's insane, and her subtle though pervasive strength makes her a memorable character in a genre where most women are nothing more than victims or gratuitous nude shots. All in all, the concentration on the drama over the action make this one interesting and worth checking out. Don't worry, though -- there's still enough action to keep you satisfied, including a particularly harrowing car chase in which a woman's head is crushed by an oncoming car, and a run in between Antonio and Nino in a deserted parking lot. John Saxon's action consists primarily of killing people or beating the shit out of them during interrogation. It's no Violent Napoli, but it's still a pretty good film. It generates a fair amount of tension and sympathy for its many characters, and it has a decent amount of that ol' poliziotteschi brutal violence. It's a good way to ease yourself into a genre that has no easing in about it, and a good way to get a look at John Saxon getting to do more than follow someone else around. Not the best, but a good entry into the genre. Labels: Director: Stelvio Massi, Poliziotteschi, Stars: John Saxon, Year: 1976 posted by Keith at 6:04 PM | 0 Comments Tuesday, January 15, 2002Convoy Buster
1978, Italy. Starring Maurizio Merli, Olga Karlatos, Massimo Serato, Nello Pazzafini, Mario Feliciani, Mimmo Palmara, Marco Gelardini, Attilio Duse. Written by Gino Capone and Teodoro Corra. Directed by Stelvio Massi.
It's rare that I will watch a supposed tough action film star and feel compelled to yell, "You da man!" In fact, I can't think of any point in my life that I would feel compelled to yell that. But I will get close in the case of Italian action star Maurizio Merli, for whom I will nod, smile, and quietly say, "You are a bad mother fucker, Maurizio." The sum total of movie stars I consider to be "bad mother fuckers" is small. Pam Grier is a bad mother fucker. Bruce Lee is a bad mother fucker. Jet Li is cool, but he's not a bad mother fucker. And you know they say that cat Shaft is a baaaad mother ... shut your mouth! They pretty much stopped making bad mother fuckers in the 1970s, with only a precious couple being made since then. By far the number one, if not only, bad mother fucker of the 1990s is Takeshi Kitano, a Japanese actor (among other things) who, in many ways, reminds me of one of the greatest bad mother fucker of them all, Maurizio Merli. Merli is best known, at least to readers of this website, as the star of one of my very favorite films, and one of the best action films ever made, Violent Napoli. In that, he played a tough as nails police inspector who beats ass on every criminal within a hundred mile radius. In Convoy Buster, he makes a dramatic departure. This time around, he plays a tough as nails police inspector who beats ass on every criminal within a two hundred mile radius. The basic lesson you learn from any of these poliziotteschi films is don't fuck with Maurizio Merli. It's like those When Animals Attack videos. If you put your head in a lion's mouth while you shove a wolverine up its ass, there's a good chance either the lion, the wolverine, or both will take your soft pink simian hide to wilderness school. Similarly, if you threaten Maurizio Merli, he will kick you in the teeth, break your nose, and look like a million bucks while he's doing it. I don't remember his character's name in this movie, and I'm too lazy to look it up, but in any poliziotteschi film, there's a 75% chance that the main character's name is Inspector Nico. Anyway, Merli plays the baddest cop in the crime-torn city of Rome, circa the mid 1970s. When he isn't beating the shit out of criminals, and it's rare that he isn't beating the shit out of at least some criminal (probably even when he is taking a shower), he spends most of the movie doing what all rogue cops are required to do, which is give angry impassioned speeches about the sorry state of police affairs and society. You can pretty much sum up each of these conversations with the following bit of dialogue. "Inspector, your methods are too controversial." "My methods get results!" "Your methods get us in trouble with the press, with citizen's groups -- do you know I was getting chewed out by the mayor all morning." "I'm sorry about your political problems. I have a bigger problem, and that's this system. Your system protects the guilty and punishes the innocent. Citizens are prisoners in their own homes while criminals and lawyers run wild." "Damnit, inspector! You go too far! You work for the judiciary system!" "I work for justice, not for the system." At which time, the inspector will walk out, leaving the beleaguered chief to eat the dust of righteousness. Slight variations may occur, but the spirit is always the same. Cliche as they may be, no one delivers the "indignant public servant" spiel as Merli. He don't take no shit from The Man. Merli always plays an interesting figure. He works for the system without being part of it. In Violent Napoli, I compared him to John Shaft or Kojak, and the comparison still stands here. Probably more like Kojak than anyone else -- the warrior with a broken heart. The man who wants to help society, to protect the innocent, but is frustrated at every turn by corruption, incompetence, politics, and bureaucracy. His role as Rome's number one ass kicker gets him on a lot of Mafia shitlists, and before too long, Merli finds he can scarcely walk down the street without someone trying to assassinate him. When he mistakenly shoots and kills an innocent man he thought was an assassin, Merli realizes he'll never be the victor in a place as twisted and corrupt as Rome. He vows to never fire his gun again, resigns his position, and leaves the city. He takes a post in a small town by the ocean, where the biggest crime seems to be the occasional drunken ass grabbing by some local louts. Once Merli kicks their asses across Europe and back, they fall into place and everything seems good. He even gets himself a fine woman. Life, it would seem, couldn't be more perfect. At least until Merli starts snooping around some strange happenings down at the fishing docks. He soon uncovers a gun smuggling operation right in the middle of his idyllic ocean hamlet and, with weary dedication to his job, realizes he must break out his ass kicking shoes one more time. The convoy he busts, incidentally, has nothing to do with Kris Kristoferson. It's the string of trucks that drive to the beach to pick up all the illegal guns. Make no mistake about it, though, if I found out there was a movie where Maurizio Merli did beat the unholy Hell out of Kris Kristoferson, I'd be first in line to see it. Convoy Buster isn't as vicious as Merli's Violent Rome but it's a better movie, and it's not as good as Violent Napoli but it's a little less brutal. Merli shines, as usual. I compared him to Takeshi Kitano earlier. Both men make similar movies and play similar characters -- tough, quiet guys who can do more acting with a simple flicker of the face or move of the eye than most stars can do with their whole body. Both men are subtle and understated, but when the time comes for fisticuffs, explode in violent whirlwinds. I think any fan of Kitano films like Violent Cop and Hana-Bi should definitely be sinking their teeth into Maurizio Merli films like Convoy Buster and Violent Napoli. Violent Napoli is his best film, and one of the bets action films of all time, but Convoy Buster runs a close second. It is packed with tons of action and violence, a fast pace, and a healthy dose of wit and charm. The message here is a somewhat bleak one. Merli leaves Rome to escape the corruption and violence only to discover it can exist anywhere so long as people are willing to turn a blind eye and put up with it. Even in victory, the inspector learns a harsh lesson and is forced to reload his gun one last time, much like Ling the swordsman in Swordsman II, who was a man who simply wanted to retire to the mountains to sing and drink but kept finding himself pulled into the petty squabbles and power struggles of the world, forced to draw the sword he swore he would never again use. One thing is certain. Put together a force including Ling, Kojak, and Maurizio Merli, and the world would be a better place. They may sigh about it and mourn the state of the troubled world, but they'll still find time to beat you silly. Labels: Country: Italy, Poliziotteschi, Stars: Maurizio Merli, Year: 1978 posted by Keith at 12:36 AM | 0 Comments Tuesday, November 20, 2001The Executioner (Henry Silva)
1974, Italy. Starring Tomas Milian, Laura Belli, Henry Silva, Gino Santercole, Anita Strindberg, Guido Alberti, Ray Lovelock. Directed by Umberto Lenzi. You know, you think you've seen it all, and then along comes something like this to make you realize the world still has so much to offer you, so much worth living for. After Violent Rome, I thought I'd seen the paramount in cinematic cynicism and poliziotteschi brutality. Ha! I was just being primed for this little baby, which like most poliziotteschi films, actually caused me to howl with wild abandon and run around the living room. I was even tempted to climb up through the skylight and do a suggestive dance on the snowy rooftop, but then I figured my Hasidic neighbors would not be as happy about that as I was. For starters, reviewing The Executioner allows us to right a fairly heinous wrong. Frankly, I'm a bit astonished that we got this far at Teleport City without ever reviewing a film featuring Henry Silva. It's something of a miracle, really, to review so many 1970s B-movie actioners and not run across Henry Silva. It's like reviewing 1970s/1980s made-for-tv movies and not mentioning Clu Gulager, or doing a website that reviews only films made for the Lifetime Network, yet never reviewing a film that either stars Meredith Baxter Berney or is about a woman who is pursued by an abusive ex-husband but no one believes her (and that woman would probably be played by Meredith Baxter Berney). Silva is one of those guys few people can name, but everyone can recognize, sort of like Al Leong and Eddie Deezen. Maybe those three should make a movie together. Boy, that sure would be something. So get this -- if Teleport City ever becomes one of those internet sensations you read about in the papers, and I become fabulously wealthy, I will take my first several million and make a movie starring Henry Silva, Al Leong, and Eddie Deezen. And you know, since I'm a relatively nice guy, I'll throw Tim Thomerson and Antonio Fargas in as well! Silva was in hundreds of films, usually playing a crazy-ass (not just crazy, but crazy-ass) villain or henchman. This is probably because, much like Christopher Walken, Henry Silva looks absolutely psycho when he does the angry face, and he looks even more psycho when he tries to look happy or sane. He's also a character who, like Tim Thomerson or even Vincent Price, can usually deliver a performance that is far better than the movie around it. With a good publicist or agent, Silva could have probably been a big star. Instead, he took damn near every role that came his way and became one of the most beloved and respected character actors in the vast realm of B-movies, which is where we want him, and where we ourselves would all be happiest. I mean, would you rather hang out with Ben Affleck and Bruce Willis, or would you rather hit the town with Henry Silva and Eddie Deezen? Whoa, there is something infinitely bizarre about the thought of a night on the town with Henry Silva and Eddie Deezen. I want that. I want that. If you want to ever get me a present, buy me a night on the town with those two. I promise I'll bring a camera. So finally, with this review, the glorious Henry Silva can take his rightful place alongside other B-grade (and lower) staples like John Saxon. Now all we have to do is get a Tim Thomerson film done, and we'll have most of the bases covered. Normally, when a recognizable American star shows up in an Italian film, it's to make a quick buck and is what we like to call "slumming." But given Silva's body of work, which include such spectacles as the mega-expensive mega-flop Mega Force, you can hardly call his career in Italy slumming. Weirdly enough, some time in the 1970s or early 1980s, this film was released theatrically in the United States and sold as a horror/monster movie! I guess if you look at murderers and thugs as monsters, then yeah, that's correct, but I don't think anyone is trying to sell The Godfather as a horror film, or Goodfellas as a monster movie. Yet this film was retitled Almost Human and sold to audiences as a scary monster movie. That's even weirder than adding the word "ninja" to kungfu movies that have no ninjas on them, just so you can cash in on the early 1980s ninja craze. Eventually, they just pissed everyone off, gave up, and the film was called The Executioner, which actually fits the bill (the original Italian title was Milano odia: la polizia non puo sparare). I knew from the credits this was going to be a good one. A violent Italian cop film starring Henry Silva and Tomas Milian (Hit Squad) and directed by my man Umberto Lenzi (Violent Napoli, Cannibal Ferox). And hey, a kick-ass score by Ennio Morricone to boot! Lenzi sure as hell knows how to make an action-packed cop film, and he didn't let me down here. Milian, clean-shaven for once, plays Guilio, a three-time loser with a vicious psycho streak. During a bank robbery, he blows away a cop for no reason in particular, which sort of pisses off his cohorts. They kick his ass and severe their ties with the nutcase. Actually, they kick his ass twice, I think, because in a poliziotteschi film, you never kick anyone's ass just once. Milian decides to start his own little gang made up of a bunch of small-time hoods who have bought into his frequent bragging. When a cop happens by one night while Guilio is stealing money out of a vending machine, he stabs the guy to death. Jeez, that's his answer for everything. The murder brings tough Milan cop Henry Silva onto the scene to survey the aftermath, which is pretty much all he does throughout the entire movie. Milian stands in the crowd that eventually gathers around the scene. After that is done, Milian and two buddies decide to kidnap a rich man's daughter and hold her for ransom. Milian steals his girlfriend's car for the job. I just have to mention a quick little something about Milian and the girlfriend. They have a love scene, and god damn it, Tomas Milian wears the same little cherry red bikini briefs that disturbed me so in Hit Squad! What is it with this guy and bright red underwear? Let me tell you something, whether you are straight, gay, bi, male female -- skimpy red underwear simply look better on women than they do on Tomas Milian. How many other movies feature Milian cavorting around in his red underwear? They should put a parental advisory sticker on these films: "Warning! Contains scenes of Tomas Milian prancing around in little red bikini briefs." He also steals some machine guns from an old guy in the usual "Actually, I don't think I will pay for them" type scene. You'd think that after about a billion gun smugglers have been shot by crazy clients, they'd stop selling them the guns and the bullets at the same time. But no, every damn time, they give them loaded guns so they can get shot instead of getting paid. A day later, Henry Silva shows up to grimly survey the scene. Guilio's gang consists of a quiet tough guy and a nervous young guy who doesn't want things to get out of control. Pretty much your standard issue gang. The kidnapping goes exactly as Guilio (Milian, remember) wants it to, in that they get to machine gun the girl's boyfriend, then chase her to a mansion in the woods where they get to torture, rape, and murder partygoers (male and female alike -- Guilio makes some snooty rich guy take a close-up look at those little red underwear). Then after they get done with the massacre-ing, they hang the corpses from the chandeliers. Obviously, this exceeds the whole "getting out of control" thing the young guy was worried about, so Guilio just feeds him some drugs. Sure enough, Henry Silva shows up after the fact to go, "Looks like our man was here." With the rich girl tied up in some old river front shack, Guilio decides to confess the multiple murders and kidnapping to his girlfriend so he can then kill her for knowing too much. He goes through friends pretty quickly. If you think that a day after her murder, Henry Silva shows up to grimly survey the scene and pronounce that it does indeed look like their man was here, well give yourself a prize. But nothing too expensive or nice, because it really wasn't that hard to figure out. When Silva finds out she was Guilio's girlfriend, he tries to think of something to connect Guilio to the kidnapping and murders. When he remembers seeing Guilio in the crowd at that totally unrelated stabbing incident, he realizes that Guilio is indeed the murderer. Yeah. Yeah, I know. If you don't really follow the train of thought there, you're probably sane but not very in touch with the whole "cop on the edge" style of investigation. Unfortunately, Guilio has an ironclad alibi. He blackmails his old pals from the bank robbery, telling them that if they don't cover for him, he'll rat on them about the bank job. If they play along and say he was with them all night, he'll give them a load of the ransom money. So they go along, but they still kick his ass anyway just because it's an Italian cop film. Guilio takes enough time out from his killing to set up the whole ransom thing. Once the old rich guy agrees to pay the ransom, Guilio kills the daughter because, well, he's crazy. The young guy protests, so Guilio kills him too. And then the quiet tough guy protests Guilio killing the young guy, so, you guessed it, Guilio kills him too. He then grabs some of the ransom money and, shoots Henry Silva in the leg, and disappears into the night without anyone ever actually seeing him. So there you go. The cops have absolutely zero evidence against Guilio. He has an alibi and absolutely nothing to connect him to the kidnapping and murders. His girlfriend was dead, but she was drowned in a car wreck (which he forced, of course), so there's not even anything to connect that death to all the murders. Silva being convinced that Guilio's being in the crowd gathered around the murdered cop makes him inarguably guilty of the other crimes is, at best, totally insane and off-the-wall. The cops have absolutely no reason at all to even have the slightest suspicion about Guilio. So what happens? Silva limps up to Milian, who is minding his own business at a sidewalk cafe, and blows him away. The end! No, really! I swear! Every shred of common sense, not to mention evidence, screamed that Guilio was innocent, but Silva shoots his ass dead anyway. Why? Because it's a poliziotteschi film, that's why! I knew that, at some point, Silva would blow Guilio away. Poliziotteschi films are downbeat and violent, but the criminal always gets wasted in the end. There was no question that Silva was going to eventually kill Guilio, but I thought they would at least make some sort of effort to make Guilio appear guilty. But no, even though we all know he's a murdering bastard, the cops don't have any reason at all to suspect him. I mean, they could have had one of his girlfriend's friends identify him as having been in her car the day she was killed. They could have found the machine gun. Something to make them think he might be guilty. They find nothing, but Henry Silva kills him anyway because he was in the crowd at that cigarette machine incident, thus proving beyond any shadow of a doubt that he was also the mastermind of a series of brutal murders and kidnapping. Well, unless you are a sane person possessed of taste, you can't help but love a movie with sort of cockeyed reasoning. And if you were one of the aforementioned sane people with taste, it's hardly likely you'd be patronizing a website devoted to weird personal stories, punk rock music, and films about midget spies, murderous cops, and kungfu fighters. So with your Teleport City passport firmly in hand, you are invited to partake in the relentlessly violent, totally ridiculous smorgasbord of death-dealing that is The Executioner. It's not as good as Lenzi's Violent Napoli, but it's still a wild trip. The politics come in the form of some speeches Milian's character makes about how unfair it is that fat cats sit perched atop a mountain of wealth while the rest of us grovel in the mud for some meager scraps. Of course, that doesn't really make Guilio a likable or a sympathetic villain in the least. He's vile the whole way through, which, in this era of smarmy politically correct villains with no guts, is pretty nice. And nothing politically ever really justifies Silva's actions in the end. It's not like his investigation was sabotaged by bureaucrats or corrupt officials. I think he got to give the whole "cop on the edge" speech about how the system protects the guilty, but that's actually required by law in a film like this. Basically, his character was pissed that Milian pulled off the more or less perfect crime, even though he picks Milian out as the guilty one at more or less random. But hey, no one ever accused the Italians of making sense, at least not by our standards (ummm, as if Armageddon made any damn sense). What they do make, or at least what Umberto Lenzi has made here, is a brutal, violent, wildly entertaining action film that is sure to offend many, and generally, if a film is offensive, it gets our seal of approval. The logic is so inane and the motivation so absurd that we can't help but approve of everything that happened with the exception of once again seeing Tomas Milian in his little red underwear. So what lesson can we walk away from this movie having learned? Don't linger around in the crowd gathered round dead cops. If Henry Silva walks toward you with his hand inside his coat, don't wait around to see what he's going to do. That we are all equally as likely to be shot by Henry Silva? Don't be in a gang with Tomas Milian. Honestly, the political and social content of this film is so wildly skewed that it fails to really make any sense. A police state is bad but criminals are worse? You would think with all the speeches about how |