Monday, June 30, 2008Geetaa Mera Naam Release Year: 1974Country: India Starring: Sadhana Shivdasani, Sunil Dutt, Feroz Khan, Ramesh Dio, Helen, Achala Sachdev, Jankidas, Manmohan, Keshto Mukherjee, Rajendra Nath, Muran, Mehmood Jr. Writers: R.K. Nayyar, Madan Joshi Director: Sadhana Shivdasani Cinematographer: Pratap Sinha Music: Laxmikant Shantaram Kudalkar, Pyarelal Ramprasad Sharma Producers: Atam Prakash, R.K. Nayyar The character of the high-kicking female badass was fairly commonplace in Asian cinema by 1974, especially in films coming out of Hong Kong and Japan. But in Bollywood, not so much. In fact, until recently, the only such character in a seventies Bollywood film I would be able to name off the top of my head would be the one played by Zeenat Aman in the original Don. Still, the 1974 film Geetaa Mera Naam puts just such a character front and center, talking tough, sticking it to the man, and dealing out whoopass to all comers without a thought of depending on male chivalry for her fortunes. Just what would it take to get a film focusing on such a character made in the Bollywood of the early seventies? Well, in the case of Geetaa Mera Naam, it probably didn't hurt that the film's director was a woman, and that that woman was also the movie's star -- a star who intended Geetaa Mera Naam to be her farewell to her audience after a short-lived but eventful career as a beloved screen icon. Achieving stardom at the dawn of the sixties, Sadhana Shivdasani -- often billed at the time as simply "Sadhana" -- staked out a place as one of the defining glamour girls of that decade, inspiring trends with the sophisticated fashions she wore on screen, as well as the distinctive, Audrey Hepburn-inspired hairstyle that would come to be known as the "Sadhana Fringe". Her dual role in the 1964 hit Woh Kaun Thi? (Who Was She?), an atmospheric mystery unusual at the time for its supernatural overtones, cemented her image as an exotic woman of mystery, and would influence many of the roles that she was to take from that point on. As the decade came to a close, Shivdasani, still at the peak of her enormous popularity, was stricken with a disfiguring thyroid condition, and was forced to withdraw for a time from the limelight. After successful treatment, she returned to making films, but by 1974 had found that the demands of her profession were beginning to wear on her. Wanting to leave the industry while still on top of her game, and on her own terms, she decided -- with the support of her husband, director R.K. Nayyar, as producer -- to take the reigns of her cinematic swan song by assuming the role of director as well as lead actress. As she would later say, "I wanted to be remembered as a heroine". It's clear that Sadhana Shivdasani could have made any film she wanted at this point in her career. The fact that she chose to make Geetaa Mera Naam (Geetaa is My Name), to me, makes it even more tragic that she wouldn't go on to direct more. Though not without a degree of unfulfilled promise, the film strikes enough of a balance between over-ripe melodramatic cheese and lurid exploitation excess to make it an outstanding example of the exuberant madness that was 1970s masala cinema. To further distinguish it, Shivdasani and Nayyar (who also scripted) loaded Geetaa with a level of overt kink and perverse psychosexual overtones that had to be fairly boundary-pushing by the conservative standards of its day. Or any day, for that matter, given that it's lip-kissing-averse Bollywood we're talking about here. In addition to being kinky, trashy, sappy, kitschy and pulpy in fine measure, Geetaa Mera Naam is also yet another example of a film made in the "lost and found" mold so popular in its era, and as such begins by introducing us to the family whom fate will soon tear asunder. The widow Saraswati really does have quite a brood on her hands and, as the film opens, she has taken her twin baby girls, Geetaa and Kavita, and her two young boys, Suraj and Chandu, to the village fair. The boys, as any ten year old boys with an overburdened mother too exhausted to police them might, quickly get down to the business of getting tattoos, but Suraj soon becomes preoccupied with a stuffed monkey that one of the nearby vendors is selling. It's one of those creepy fabric animals with a plastic, caucasian-flesh-colored face of the kind apparently designed to provide baby boomer children with a lifetime of nightmares. Suraj begs his mother to buy the monkey for him and, after some protest, she relents. Unfortunately, Suraj doesn't get the chance to enjoy his monkey in peace, because no sooner is it in his hands than he is swept away by a gang of marauding bandits on horseback. As Saraswati runs after the fleeing bandits with Geetaa in arm, the fairground breaks out in pandemonium, and the other children are lost in the fracas. After the credit sequence, we are brought up to date on how and where Saraswati's children, now grown to adulthood, have ended up. Chandu, it turns out, was found by a kindly couple who, after looking around the fairground for his mom a bit, simply decided to take him home and raise him as their own -- which makes me nostalgic for those days before Amber Alerts when the policy was pretty much "finders keepers" as far as lost children were concerned. Chandu has grown up to be a righteous and by-the-book police inspector. This makes him one of Geetaa Mera Naam's moral anchors, but also not a very interesting person, so it's no surprise that we don't see a lot of him as the film progresses. For her part, Kavita -- now known as Neeta -- has not fared quite so well in terms of her adoptive parents, as when we meet those parents they are in the process of selling Neeta for unwholesome purposes to an underworld figure named Mohan. Neeta, a virtuous schoolmarm, is totally taken by surprise that her parents would do such a thing, which is a little surprising in itself, given that her parents are so obviously a pair of greedy slimebags. You'd think Neeta would have had ample opportunity to notice this over the course of living with them for give-or-take thirty years. As for Suraj, his life among the bandits has lead to him meeting adulthood as Johnny, the leader of what is -- judging from his lavish-if-eccentrically-appointed lair -- a very successful international smuggling ring. Despite the name change, it's quite easy to identify Johnny as Suraj, because, in one of Geetaa Mera Naam's many deliciously crackbrained touches, he carries that same stuffed monkey from the fairgrounds with him literally at all times. In this sense the monkey serves as a more disturbingly psychologically revealing version of Ernst Blofeld's Persian cat, and Johnny can often be seen stroking its head distractedly as all manner of depravity plays out at his bidding. Johnny's numerous foot soldiers -- who, when not busy smuggling, serve as models for an array of colorful neckwear -- sit in rows alongside the walls of the space-age assembly hall that makes up the centerpiece of his lair, and when one of them displeases him, Johnny flicks a switch which tips that minion's chair back, dumping him into a waiting vat of molten wax, after which the underperforming toady appears in one of the glass cases lining the wall as a glistening wax statue. Johnny is far from a soulless killer, however, and on those occasions when his high standards have driven him to take a human life, he does penance by having a brawny, leather-trussed and handlebar-mustached lackey named Sheru lash him repeatedly across the bare back with a whip. Now, you would be right in wondering how Johnny can effectively command a successful international smuggling operation when he is so obviously fucking out of his mind, which is why it's fortunate he has at his side his longtime friend and trusted right-hand man Raja, who keeps him on a relatively even keel while himself tending to some to the day-to-day unpleasantries that such an operation entails. Appropriately, the cast of Geetaa Mera Naam is well-stocked with co-stars from Sadhana's previous films. Sunil Dutt, in fact, had been her leading man no less than three times, including in one of her biggest hits, Waqt (which also featured Achala Sachdev, the actress who here plays Saraswati), so it's no real surprise that he was handed the meaty role of Johnny. Dance queen Helen, who plays Raja's conniving girlfriend Savitri, was an even more frequent player in Sadhana's films, though, given her prolific output, that might have been as much a statistical inevitability as it was the result of any special relationship between the two. Finally, for the role of Raja, Sadhana and Nayyar cast her co-star from 1965's Arzoo: that he-man among he-men, Feroz Khan, a choice which, if you're familiar with Khan's work at all, guarantees you that Geetaa Mera Naam will not be light on testosterone-drenched mayhem. I used to think of Amitabh Bachchan as being, by default, the king of 1970s Bollywood action cinema. But the problem with that concept is those pesky acting chops of his. Because of his range and versatility, Bachchan could play drama and comedy as well as action, and often did each separately, in addition to often combining all of them within one picture. Because of this, his name doesn't have quite the branding effect that today an American star's like, say, Steven Seagal does. This is because of the looming potential for one of Amitabh's films to actually be different from the one that preceded it -- despite it being marketed very similarly due to the bank riding on his "Angry Young Man" image at the time. In the case of Feroz Khan, on the other hand, there were apparently just three things that the actor did -- or cared to do -- well: punching people, taking his shirt off, and being hairy. And if you invest your time in any Feroz Khan film made between 1970 and 1980, the chances are astronomically high that that is precisely what you are going to get. The man is simply the living trademark for seventies Bollywood at its most two-fisted and funkily furious. Furthermore, evidence suggests that he was very much a player in forging that association, because when he finally got the chance to direct his own film in 1980, what he made was Qurbani, arguably one of the greatest -- and not to mention most absurdly, insanely macho -- action films in Bollywood history. And Feroz's fists do indeed see a lot of action in Geetaa Mera Naam, as does his chest see a lot of open air, most memorably in a scene where Helen -- reclining with him on his round, revolving bed -- undoes his zippered shirt with her teeth. All this made me wonder if female audiences at the time really wanted to see Feroz's lushly-carpeted upper torso as much as he wanted to show it to them. However, it may just have been that it wasn't their fantasies that were being addressed. After all -- to put it in a more contemporary framework -- Feroz is nothing if not the ideal to which consumers of Axe Body Spray desperately aspire, despite them being separated by several musky gene pools from ever attaining it. Perhaps then it is the deepest fantasy of all men to go shirtless whenever they please, and to do so with greater frequency the more hirsute they are, proving their dominance by forcing the women around them to behold their lush topiary in all its magnificence. If this is indeed the case, then the Feroz Khan of Geetaa Mera Naam is truly living the dream. Anyway, back in Geetaa Mera Naam's more civilized quarters, we find that upright police inspector Chandu, not surprisingly, is pining to bring Johnny and his gang to justice, but is hamstrung from doing so by a complete lack of evidence. Meanwhile, the paths of Johnny and Neeta (played by Sadhana in one half of yet another dual role) are about to cross with fateful results. It seems that Mohan, in addition to being a defiler of virtuous young schoolmarms, is also a business rival of Johnny's and, as masala movie logic would have it, ends up on the receiving end of a well-timed dagger in the back from Johnny at the very moment that Neeta is fighting off his unwelcome advances. As Johnny slips away unseen, Neeta is arrested for Mohan's murder and thrown in jail. It is at this point that we meet up with the last of the adult versions of Saraswati's children to be accounted for, Geetaa (also Sadhana), who is being let out of Jail just as Neeta is being thrown into it -- though without either one seeing the other. A switchblade-wielding, small time ne'er-do-well and street brawler, Geetaa is just getting off a short stint in stir for what Chandu describes as "bullying" some poor fellow who had the sac to hit on her. To mark her exit, the inspector deals out a boilerplate "yours is a path to ruin" speech, and Geetaa, clad in the first of many redder-than-red outfits that will make the most of the film's highly-saturated comic book color scheme, deals out some fairly boilerplate J.D. attitude in return. Geetaa then hits the streets, and is immediately set upon by some of Mohan's men, who have mistaken her for Neeta. The thugs drive her to a construction site with nefarious intentions, and are there joined by more of their number, though it quickly becomes clear that they had not counted on the power of Geetaa's daintily applied sort-of kung fu. To make things worse for the hoods, Raja just happens to drive by at that moment and, knowing a stone fox in a jam when he sees one, joins in the fight himself. Now this would probably be a good time to point out that, while I love Geetaa Mera Naam, there are a lot of instances in which I give it points more for what it attempts than for what it actually achieves. While Sadhana is good at the tough girl posturing that her badass streetfighter role requires, when it comes to actually selling the action, Sue Shihomi or Angela Mao she is not. In fact, she's pretty atrocious. As sexist as I know it will sound, the only way I can think of to best describe it is to say that, throughout Geetaa's fight scenes, she appears far more preoccupied with not breaking a nail or heel than she is with defending herself against any mortal threat. (Though, of course, any of my own attempts at athleticism could easily be described in the same terms.) A scene in which she has to run while firing a pistol, in particular, crosses into the territory of self parody. Certainly, Feroz Khan isn't any more convincing, but, in contrast, he's typically spirited in his commitment, doing all kinds of gymnastics and pointless jumps while throwing his fists around -- and he even does a little high bar action in the aforementioned construction site brawl that prefigures Pran's Gymkata-prefiguring moves in Don a couple years later. And while it can definitely be said that the fight choreography -- by the ironically named Mohammed Ali -- is partially to blame, in the final analysis I'd have to conclude that Sadhana, as an action star, is a great romantic lead. To my mind, though, that doesn't really hurt the film, because adequately staged fight sequences would only serve to make Geetaa Mera Naam that much less weird, and would in effect sap it of its very essence. Anyway, having been introduced to Feroz Khan's shirtless chest, Geetaa hits the streets once again, only to be mistaken for Neeta by a group of Neeta's young students. Getting the clue that something unusual is afoot, she has the kids lead her to the jail, where she finally meets Neeta face to face. Gaetaa's mother confirms that Neeta is indeed her long lost twin and, armed with that knowledge, Geetaa vows to make it her mission to clear her sister's name. Suspecting Johnny's involvement in Mohan's death, she approaches Raja and asks to be made a member of the gang. Raja resists at first, but later, when a rival crook tries to immolate a bound Raja, Johnny and monkey on a makeshift pyre, Neeta comes to the rescue (in the process setting off a gas explosion that sends Johnny's enemies' graphically-realized flaming body parts whizzing through the air), and as a result is as good as made. An initiation ceremony follows that involves Geetaa holding her hand over a flame G. Gordon Liddy-style while reciting a loyalty oath, and concludes with Geetaa and Johnny mixing the blood from their sliced fingers. Geetaa Mera Naam is the type of film that never risks leaving anything to audience interpretation -- at points voiceovers are provided to let us hear the anguished thoughts that the characters' extravagantly anguished expressions already make abundantly clear -- and this blood ritual provides one of many occasions for the soundtrack to chime in with a musical refrain about how "blood will recognize blood" (a sentiment which basically sums up the message of all "lost and found" films). Now a member of the gang, Geetaa finds herself immersed in the shirt optional (for the guys, of course), pleather-clad, rotating bed-riding and oh-my-god-you-can-totally-drink-a-highball-while-floating-in-the-pool high life that the denizens of the underworld according to Geetaa Mera Naam inhabit. As with many of the most entertaining masala films of Geetaa's era, this is visualized by way of hyperbolic costume design and art direction that, in setting out to give the film's predominantly working class audience a tantalizing glimpse of a world of impossible glamour and decadence, creates caricatures of seventies style that go way beyond anything seen in even the most savage contemporary parodies of that era. Finally, after performing various small-time assignments for the gang, Geetaa is recruited, along with Raja, to take part in a daring train robbery that for some reason is plotted out using a toy train and a kewpie doll. The robbery does not go as planned, however, and Raja (who I think was represented by the kewpie doll) is wounded, surviving only due to Geetaa's ministrations. Thus saved by Geetaa a second time, Raja, who is now falling for Geetaa, pledges his indebtedness to her. In response, Geetaa comes clean about her plan to tie Johnny to Mohan's killing and clear her sister's name. This affords Feroz Khan the opportunity to model a series of those aforementioned extravagantly anguished facial expressions as he mulls over whether he should betray his best friend or the woman he loves. Meanwhile, Helen's Savitri is none too pleased about being replaced by Geetaa as Raja's arm candy of choice, and sets out to expose her rival's duplicity to Johnny. When she succeeds in her plan, the stage is set for Geetaa Mera Naam's most astonishing sequence, and for one of the most "I can't believe what my eyes are seeing" song picturizations I've seen in all my long history of indiscriminately devouring these films. The song is "Haan Mujhe Maar Daalo", and it occurs at the moment when Raja and Geetaa return to Johnny's lair, only to find a Johnny who is wised up, wrathful and all too ready to deal out punishment. What follows is that whip-wielding brute Sheru stalking a white-mini-and-go-go-boots-clad Sadhana around the confines of the lair, lashing her mercilessly as she mimes the word of the song through grimaces of pain. At the same time, on the opposite end of the hall, Helen, clad in a spangly chorus girl get-up, dances in a giant bubble bath-filled sauna equipped with disco lights, mirrored walls and its own waterfall. But Helen's is no solo act in this instance, for dancing with her is a paunchy, pompadoured gentlemen in a clingy, beige polyester bodysuit that, with the addition of a wide belt to complete the ensemble, looks remarkably like one of the uniforms from Space: 1999. Such a physique and outfit would not seem conducive to lustful, serpentine writhing, but that is exactly what this fellow does, and to quite disturbing effect. As these carnal undulations progress, the gestures become more violent, with the man slapping Helen, pulling her hair, and pushing her to the ground as, all the while, she wears an expression of pained ecstasy. The song's refrain is "There is life in death, death in life", and we see both Sadhana and Helen alternately miming the words. But in Sadhana's case it is a mournful yet resigned acceptance of life's tragic nature, while in Helen's case it's a dark celebration of eroticized violence. It's quite remarkable really, and despite the unbelievable bounty of kitsch that it delivers, still manages to be startlingly powerful on an emotional level. And here I was about to go on my standard riff about how I don't really get the music of Laxmikant-Pyarelal. The duo scored dozens upon dozens of pictures during the seventies, and it's true that the small sampling of those I've seen have yet to provide me with evidence of just why they were so widely employed. That's not to say that I think that their scores are bad; its just that they come off as very humdrum and conservative when compared to the wild genre-blending work that composers like R.D. Burman and Kalyanji-Anandji were doing at the time. Not only that, but, to my ears, L-P don't have the gift for infectious melody that those other greats have. Of course, that might just be a matter of these ears of mine being white, Western ones, because Laxmikant-Pyarelal's music sounds like it draws a lot more on traditional Indian themes than that of Burman and Kalyanji-Anandji, who made their mark partially through their incorporation of Western pop styles into their compositions. Whatever the case, Geetaa Mera Naam seemed to me to be the type of film that screamed out for the funky-ass Kalyanji-Anandji treatment, and because of that I approached L-P's score with both trepidation and lowered expectations. That said -- and upon second listening -- I have to say that the team rose to the challenge and delivered their best score that I've heard so far, built on slinky, minor key melodies, pulsing tabla rhythms, and augmented by staccato stabs of reverbed guitar. In fact, all but one of Geetaa's songs (a Sound of Music style number featuring Neeta and her schoolchildren) are good, and there is even one great one. That would be the pounding, oh-so-manly "Mohabbat Hi Mohabbat", as great a musical showcase for Feroz Khan as there could possibly be. And in its visualization we get to see Feroz mime the song while joyfully doing all of the things he does best: beating guys up, wooing babes, swinging from vines and...well, and also feeding some monkeys. (Interestingly, despite all the monkeys in this movie, there weren't any overt references to Hanuman that I noticed.) One of the things I like about Geetaa Mera Naam is that it gives lip service to pieties without affording much screen time to the pious themselves. In so doing it distinguishes itself as that rare masala film that demonstrates an understanding of just how deeply boring such characters are. As I stated earlier, the character of Chandu, the morally irreproachable policeman played by Ramesh Deo, disappears from the movie for long stretches at a time, and is never around long enough to overstay his welcome when he does show up. Likewise, while it is Neeta's fate that sets the whole plot of the film in motion, we never see Neeta herself again after her jailhouse reunion with Geetaa and her mother -- not even to see her enjoy the freedom that has been so hard won by Geetaa at the movie's conclusion. No, this is undisguisedly a movie about those who live on the other side of the law. And why wouldn't it be, anchored as it is by a performance as commitedly maniacal as Sunil Dutt's? Still, in order to wrap things up, the virtuous must be brought back onto the stage, and so a climax is contrived that brings not only Chandu and Geetaa, Neeta, Johnny and Chandu's wheelchair-bound mom, but also all of Neeta's young students (don't ask how) to Johnny's lair. A truly chaotic free-for-all ensues, with much leaping, whipping and punching on the part of all parties, and, at its peak, Johnny produces a pair of rapiers and engages Raja in a nicely staged swordfight that rages across the entire expanse of the hideout. This whole sequence reminded me a lot of the cast-encompassing fight at the end of the original Casino Royale for all it's everything-and-the-kitchen sink absurdity. And while the intention obviously wasn't outright parody, it's hard to imagine that it wasn't conceived and conducted with a bit of a tongue-in-cheek attitude. In any case, it probably goes without saying that the movie comes through with a climax that is wholly appropriate to all of the fevered insanity that has preceded it, and which will disappoint no one who has been thrilling to that insanity throughout its running time. As both Keith and I have alluded to elsewhere, exploring Bollywood's past can be a bit of a blind slog for those of us English speakers committed to plumbing that cinema's less reputable depths, especially given the dearth of written material that has anything more to say than how great Mother India and Sholay are. (Which they are, of course, but that's beside the point.) We've all kissed our share of frogs, to be sure, and many of us might have given up long ago if not for the discovery of the occasional twisted gem like Geetaa Mera Naam. After all, how could one turn one's back on a cinema that would give us so much unhinged perversity in the service of a simple morality play about the strength of family bonds? Or so much eye-rending comic book exuberance? Or so much pleather? Geetaa Mera Naam's opening title card, displayed immediately before the title itself, introduces the film as "R.K. Nayyar's Conception of a Super Hit". And R.K. Nayyar's conceptual instincts were apparently right on the mark, because the film indeed turned out to be quite popular with audiences. Sadhana would get her wish and be remembered as a heroine, even though the most indelible image to be taken away from the film might not be so much one of her heroic exploits as it would be her being whipped while wearing a white mini and go-go boots by a guy who looks like a Village People version of a medieval blacksmith. To my mind, however, that does nothing to lessen her status. Just the fact that she made this crazy movie is enough to make her a heroine in my eyes. Labels: Bollywood, Stars: Feroz Khan, Year: 1974 posted by Todd at 12:35 AM | 4 Comments Sunday, June 15, 2008Kaala Sona Release Year: 1975Country: India Starring: Feroz Khan, Parveen Babi, Prem Chopra, Danny Dezongpa, Farida Jalal, Imtiaz Khan, Helen, Durga Khote, Keshto Mukherjee, Bipin Gupta, Polson, Abhijeet, Shyam, Gurinder, Mamaji, Agha, Raju Shrestha, Sabina, Habib, Raj Pal, K.N. Singh, P. Jairaj, Satyendra Kapoor, Krishnakant, Karan Dewan, Bhagwan, Maruti, Birbal, Seema Kapoor Director: Ravikant Nagaich Writers: Harish Khatri, Ramesh Pant, V.D. Puranik Cinematographer: Ravikant Nagaich Music: Rahul Dev (R.D.) Burman Producers: Harish Shah, Vinod Shah Kaala Sona is another example of the Basmati -- or "Curry" -- Western, that Bollywood take on the Western that seems to draw more on the European model than the American for its inspiration. Of course, the Amitabh Bachchan classic Sholay, released at roughly the same time, is considered the gold standard of that genre, and Kaala Sona follows along much the same pattern. Like Sholay, for instance, it's a Western in feel rather than period, setting its action in the present day while taking advantage of some of the still relatively untamed regions lying within India's borders. Such an approach allows both films to highlight a favorite Bollywood theme: the urbanized ne'er-do-well who, in being called upon to defend a rural community from a destructive outside force, has his soul awakened to the simple and essential virtues embodied by that community. (In more recent films, that urbanized ne'er-do-well tends to be, more specifically, a Westernized product of the Diaspora, but same idea.) This is not to say that the change we see in Rakesh, Kaala Sona's protagonist, is a particularly gradual or subtle one. In fact, even given the tendency of characters in Bollywood films to go through some jarringly abrupt changes of heart, Rakesh appears to take a particularly fast track in negotiating his character arc. When we first meet him, at the film's opening, he is a shiftless playboy, waking up in his spectacularly hideous penthouse bachelor pad for another busy day of fending off the many gold-digging hoochies who are after his vast inherited fortune. This agenda has to be abruptly set aside, however, when Rakesh receives a telegram from an old family servant, summoning Rakesh to his deathbed. Rakesh makes haste to the servant's side, at which point the servant breaks the news that Rakesh's father, a land developer long thought to have died in an accident, was actually murdered by the notorious bandit Poppy Singh, and that Poppy Singh, long thought to have died himself, is actually alive and well and hiding out in a remote, mountainous region near the country's border. In the blink of an eye, Rakesh is storming the territories with gun in hand. Without the benefit of a training montage or flashback to explain his prowess, we see that, despite his pampered upbringing, Rakesh is not only very good with his fists, but also a lighting fast draw and expert marksman. These skills serve him well, as he is able to quickly and effortlessly dispatch a number of the professional gunmen who are guarding the region's perimeter. Cue the opening credits. That Rakesh is more convincing as a rugged man of action than as an effete member of the leisure class is not all that surprising, given that he is played by Feroz Khan. Thanks to my exposure to Khan in 1980's Qurbani -- and now Kaala Sona -- I've come to the conclusion that his filmography is one I definitely need to delve into further. Both films bear the stamp of, if not a great actor, then at least a very distinctive presence. Khan, in addition to being its star, was also the director of the sublimely over-the-top Qurbani and, while Kaala Sona (which was directed by Ravikand Nagaich) doesn't go quite as far, it has a similar feeling of raw pulp vitality and absurdly overheated machismo. It doesn't stray too far from the normal Bollywood conventions -- and all of the exuberant trappings that they entail -- but it clearly has a violent B movie heart beating within it, which makes for a pretty entertaining -- and, at times hallucinatory -- combination. After his guns-blazing entry within its borders, Rakesh finds the entirety of the lush Kangra Valley region locked in the stranglehold of the mysterious Popy Singh. Only the estate of the kindly Thakur Ratansing appears to offer any kind of oasis of relative calm, until Rakesh discovers that the Thakur and his family, too, have reluctantly come under the bandit's sway. The Thakur's young son (who looks suspiciously like Weng Weng from For Y'ur Height Only) has been kidnapped by Poppy Singh and his men and, in order to insure the boy's safety, the thakur's eldest daughter, Durga (the stunning beauty Parveen Babi), has been forced to assist in smuggling the opium produced by the gang out of the region. That opium is harvested and refined -- using the local residents as slave labor -- within Popy Singh's virtually impenetrable compound, located high in the mountains across a yawning, unbridge ravine. Rakesh soon meets up with a vigilante band dedicated to defeating Poppy Singh. Their leader is a strapping young buck named Shera, played by frequent Bollywood heavy Danny Denzongpa. The filmmakers capitalize on the Sikkim-born Denzongpa's exotic looks by making Shera Kaala Sona's resident version of a Hollywood-style Native American, complete with buckskin, fringe and beaded headband. It's a touch that doesn't make a lot of sense if you think about it, but serves to enhance the films' Western movie feel, which undoubtedly took priority over any concerns of authenticity on the part of the producers. In any case, the character of Shera, in addition to providing an opportunity for lots of scenes of male bonding with Rakesh, serves nicely as a love match for the Thakur's youngest daughter, which, once Rakesh and Durga are established as an item, makes for double the normal amount of courtship themed musical numbers. It is also Shera's eventual predicament at the hands of Popy Singh that emboldens Rakesh to single-handedly breach the bandit's compound in an attempt to rescue him and the Thakur's son. I've written before about how Bollywood films often have a tendency to turn into entirely different movies somewhere around their second half, and, with Rakesh's entry into Poppy Singh's compound, Kaala Sona abruptly goes from being a gritty Western to something more akin to one of those surreal old Russian fantasy films. The largely location-shot natural exteriors of the first half give way to a candy-hued sound stage artificiality, including a limitless expanse of poppy fields that appear to have been imagined by someone whose only experience of poppy fields was from watching The Wizard of Oz. This "we've got some crude matte paintings and we're going to use them" visual approach carries through until the film's final action set piece, which takes place on an extraordinarily phony looking ice shelf with flappy cloth icicles hanging from it. Of course, far from hurting Kaala Sona, this trippy turn of events simply serves to make it overall a far more memorable -- and awesome -- viewing experience than it probably would have been otherwise. And, of course, the evil fairyland setting of Kaala Sona's final act is governed in appropriate fashion, for Popy Singh, when we finally meet him in all his glory, is a freaky monomaniac in the classic Bollywood bad guy mold. Goateed and with one disconcerting, milky eye, he wears a jeweled headband that -- in combination with the long, straight hair that stops at his crown -- makes his bald pate look like a skull cap. Furthermore, his wardrobe is given an Eastern Asian flavor, no doubt with the intention of suggesting a sort of Fu Manchu character. Prem Chopra, the actor who plays Popy Singh, here bears a strong resemblance, in both appearance and manner, to the American actor Andrew Robinson, particularly in that actor's portrayal of the serial killer Scorpio in the original Dirty Harry. If that suggests to you that, with Popy Singh, you'll be getting some prime quality borderline-hysterical villainous ravings coupled with churlish random killings of underperforming minions, you would be right on the money. Kaala Sona features music by the legendary R.D. Burman, which makes for a lot of catchy and propulsive tunes, as well as some very enjoyable production numbers. Probably the best of these is the one set to the psychedelic-tinged "Ek Bar Jaane Jaana", in which Parveen Babi appears before a bunch of drunken louts as a gyrating apparition, splitting -- thanks to some simple yet effective opticals -- into multiples to form a hazy chorus line of one. But the climactic number, which pairs Babi with the always welcome Helen for some frenzied hoofing, is also a visual treat. In addition to its songs, the film boasts an instrumental score complete with some amusing Bollywood flavored stabs at Morricone-style western themes, trilling, non-verbal vocalizations and all. Having dipped into Bollywood westerns, I have to admit to not knowing just how deep the well goes. I am aware that Feroz Khan made at least one other film in the genre -- Khotte Sikkay, an apparent reworking of For a Few Dollars More -- but, beyond Kaala Sona, Sholay and that, I don't know how many films the genre comprises. But it is to Kaala Sona's credit that I fully intend to find out. There's just something about the combination of the Western genre's Spartan, rough-hewn aesthetic with Bollywood's tendency toward the exuberant and phantasmagorical that I find hard to resist. If you want to join me in this new obsession, Kaala Sona is certainly a good place to start. Labels: Bollywood, Stars: Danny Denzongpa, Stars: Feroz Khan, Year: 1975 posted by Todd at 3:03 PM | 7 Comments Tuesday, June 03, 2008Qurbani Release Year: 1980Country: India Starring: Feroz Khan, Vinod Khanna, Zeenat Aman, Amjad Khan, Amrish Puri, Aruna Irani, Kader Khan, Tun Tun, Shakti Kapoor, Natasha Chopra, Jagdeep, Bob Christo, Mac Mohan, Narendra Nath, Raj Bharti Director: Feroz Khan Writers: K.K. Shukla Music: Kalyanji-Anandji Producer: Feroz Khan Watching Feroz Khan and Vinod Khanna in Qurbani, you might conclude that their characters are simply too confident in their rugged masculinity to have any qualms about being overtly demonstrative in their affections for one another. However, if you consider that it's the knee-weakeningly gorgeous Zeenat Aman, the alleged love interest of both men, who's being wholly ignored while they engage in all their tender hugging, shoulder rubbing and cheek tugging, you might be lead to another conclusion altogether. Of course, men in Bollywood movies are famously free in their capacity for brotherly PDA. That the tendency seems to stand out in especially stark relief in this case is most likely due to the musky, grease-stained backdrop of balls-out, testosterone-bleeding action mayhem that Qurbani provides for it to play out against. In other words, Qurbani is one of those action movies that just goes that extra distance to confirm what a lot of us already thought these movies were all about in the first place. The world of Qurbani is one in which mechanic Bob Christo has a free standing brick wall in his auto body shop just so he can demonstrate the power of his fists to any doubter who happens by -- and a hay stack sits at the end of a jetty for the sole purpose of having a speeding car suddenly burst out from underneath it. Its hero is a famous motorcycle daredevil who's coupled with a famous disco diva, setting the film in a sort of idealized 1970s universe reigned over by the perfect union of Evel Knievel and Donna Summer -- which is sure to produce as its offspring either Chachi or Leif Garrett. Though the film, in keeping with Bollywood tradition, slows down during its middle third to focus on relationship drama, its bulk is so over-saturated with methed-up male aggression that it can't go five minutes without busting out into a fist fight, death-defying physical stunt or car chase. What happens in between those is more often than not a thumping, gaudily staged musical number featuring the aforementioned Ms. Aman, which makes Qurbani the one to beat if you're looking for a standout example of seventies-style Bollywood excess. Qurbani is one of a handful of films that its star Feroz Khan also directed. An actor whose screen career dates back to the early sixties, Khan was at the time experiencing a career renaissance as a he-man action star, of which Qurbani was probably the pinnacle. That the film was a fairly high profile production is evidenced not only by the number of really nice cars its producers were willing to wreck in the course of its production, but also by its all-star cast. Co-star Vinod Khanna was at the peak of his enormous popularity at the time, and Aman had recently been seen opposite superstar Amitabh Bachchan in two of his most successful vehicles of the seventies, Don and The Great Gambler. Her appearance alone, given her recent reinvention as a Bollywood action film femme fatale, serves to a good extent to establish the film's pedigree. In Qurbani, Khan plays Rajesh, a former motorcycle daredevil who has moved on to greater thrills in the world of high stakes thievery. Apprehended in the course of one of his daring burglaries, Rajesh is sent up for a three year stretch, leaving his disco singer girlfriend Sheela (Aman) vulnerable to the attentions of Amar (Khanna), a former driver for the criminal kingpin, Rakka. Sheela stays true to Rajesh, however, and Amar, though clearly smitten, accepts the situation with manly stoicism, though he and Sheela continue to maintain a close friendship. In one of those coincidences that Bollywood movie plots are almost wholly dependent upon, Rajesh, upon his release from prison, happens upon Amar in a sticky situation and save his life. The two, who have not previously met, go on to establish a deep friendship, which deepens even further when Rajesh saves Amar's life a second time. Meanwhile, a creepy/crazy brother and sister duo seek to entice Rajesh to steal back a fortune in jewels that Rakka has stolen from them. When Rajesh double crosses the pair, it leads to a situation that puts both Rajesh and Aman in mortal danger, as well as the sacrifice ("qurbani") that gives the film its title. Qurbani, for all its strengths, suffers from a bit of sloppy plotting. A couple of plot points dangle unresolved, such as connections that Rajesh and Aman each have with Rakka that are established early on without ever proving to have much purpose. In addition, the love triangle between Rajesh, Aman and Sheela, though somewhat laboriously established, never gets to bear much dramatic fruit, since the film ultimately ends up being more about the love between Rajesh and Aman. As such, the romantic obstacles that would typically be thrown between male and female leads are here thrown between our two men of action, and the dramatic tension of the last act hinges largely on whether the two will mend their friendship and fall back into each others' arms before the film's pyrotechnic finale. Because of this, Zeenat Aman's character is reduced to being both window dressing (few opportunities are missed to have her get soaked with water) and a serially-imperiled pawn in the power plays between the heavies and heroes. In other words, anyone hoping to see her take part in any of the kung fu bad-assery she did in Don will be somewhat disappointed -- until she's shown getting soaked with water, that is, at which point all previous expectations will be quickly and permanently forgotten. What benefits Qurbani is a couple instances of very clever misdirectional casting. The film features two actors who were the top heavies in Bollywood cinema at the time, yet neither are ultimately revealed to be the central villain of the piece. Rakka, for instance, is played by The Brow himself, Amrish Puri, who would go on to reach his villainous apex with his portrayal of Mogambo in 1987's Mr. India. Puri is given his typical glowering introduction right at the top of the film (rocking a Mike Brady perm and Travolta disco suit, no less), menacing Aruna Irani in the role of Jwala. However, Rakka soon thereafter disappears from the picture, and proves to be only an incidental character, while it is Jwala and her brother who ultimately emerge as the real threats to the principals. The other bad guy on hand is Amjad Khan, the actor who portrayed probably the most iconic villain in the history of Bollywood, Sholay's Gabbar Singh -- and who would, as a result, play almost identical villains in a string of subsequent Amitabh Bachchan action vehicles -- including Nastik, Mr. Narwali and Be-sharam -- throughout the seventies and eighties. Here he portrays the dogged police inspector (who, in a nice whimsical touch, is also named Amjad Khan) who first puts Rajesh away and then, upon his release, tracks his every move, waiting for his first misstep. Khan's mere presence gives the character a menacing edge, but we eventually see that the inspector, while having little faith in Rajesh's ability to reform, is more interested in justice than he is in harassment for its own sake. It's a performance that Khan clearly has fun with, playing off his own imposing demeanor with welcome injections of humor, and it's fun for us to watch as well, especially when we're treated to the actor sharing a goofy musical number with Aman (a rare spectacle, given the closest you'd typically come to seeing Khan taking part in a musical number would be him swigging whiskey from a flask while leering evilly from the sidelines). Another of Qurbani's greatest strengths, as anyone who's seen it will tell you, is its music. Scored by the team of Kalyanji-Anandji, the film boasts a hard hitting Hindi-funk soundtrack that almost makes all of those wide collars and questionably-patterned, tight-fitting flares look good. The film's songs, furthermore, are quite catchy, especially Zeenat Aman's disco numbers, which are further enhanced by their garish picturization. Aman's Sheela seems to have a new back-up band for every performance, the best of which is an all female ensemble of dancers whose incompetent miming on their instruments prefigures Robert Palmer's videos by a good few years. Once you've watched enough older Bollywood movies, it becomes apparent that their typical narrative structure and pacing don't lend themselves to the kind of wall-to-wall thrills you might expect from contemporaneous films made in, say, Hong Kong or Japan. There are definitely thrills to be had, of course, but they are often too few and far between to satisfy those viewers too impatient to wait for them. Qurbani, however, sets itself apart in that its high points are always well worth the wait, and stick with you enough to make the wait one marked more by anticipation than restlessness. Complementing this is the fact that, in the best Bollywood tradition, there is almost always an outlandish seventies outfit, garish bit of production design, over the top performance or skewed musical number on screen to keep you occupied when nothing's exploding. True, the film does suffer from a bit of the typical middle stretch doldrums, but it handily makes up for that with an out-of-control, action-packed finale, complete with a wild car chase in which Khan and Khanna yuck it up while sending countless innocent motorists to their flaming doom. I'm taking pains to point this out because I know all too well that many of you more adventurous viewers out there have already suffered disappointment at the hands of Bollywood. You've perhaps picked up a dvd because its cover bore a picture of, say, Amitabh Bachchan in shades and a bowtie carrying a scope rifle with something blowing up in the background, only to find that the movie contained therein had a couple of underwhelming action set pieces, but was mostly three hours of some guy crying about his mom. Rest assured, however, that Qurbani is not that film. Delivering on the promise of it's pulsating theme and "Hulk smash" opening titles, the film goes on to entertain the hell out of you -- all the while teaching you that it's okay for two extremely manly men to tenderly cup one another's faces in their hands while looking at each other like they're maybe going to kiss. Labels: Bollywood, Stars: Amrish Puri, Stars: Feroz Khan, Stars: Zeenat Aman, Year: 1980 posted by Todd at 1:27 AM | 2 Comments |
|
![]() |