film    print    sound    leisure    forum
company line »

shopping guide »

contact us »

get reviewed »

get published »

expand yourself »


find it »

Teleport City search allows you to search our entire site as well as our favorite sites about cult films, obscure music, literature, and swank living.


film home | a-b | c-d | e-f | g-h | i-l | m-n | o-q | r-s | t-v | w-z

Sunday, July 21, 2002

Blazing Magnum

1976, Italy. Starring Stuart Whitman, John Saxon, Martin Landau, Tisa Farrow, Carol Laurre. Directed by Alberto de Martino.

There's this funny thing about the heroes in a film: you are supposed to like them. Oh sure, you might like him or her at first. They may be cocky, arrogant, and abrasive. Any number of negative personality traits may mar their character. But at some point in the movie something will happen that allows the hero to either show their true colors or causes a revelation that results in a character about-face and process of redemption. It's not important that we don't like the hero at the beginning of the film, so long as we like -- or at least admire them -- by the end.

All things considered, it's pretty easy to churn out a likeable, if stereotypical and one-dimensional -- hero. The cliches are all time-tested, and audiences never seem to get tired of them. A catatonic chimp can write a screenplay that, if nothing else, at least gives you a generically likable hero. A few snappy come-backs, some sassing of stuffy superiors, possibly some self-sacrifice or tragic loss. Piece of cake.

It is impressive then, that the Italian cop drama Blazing Magnum has managed to create a "hero" who is so unlikeable, so amazingly repugnant, that you can't help but cheer for even the most vile of criminals to get the better of this obnoxious asshole.

The main cop in a poliziotteschi film is supposed to be a hard-ass. He's supposed to be tough as nails, and he isn't supposed to take shit from anyone. He doesn't let niceties stand in the way of his single-minded quest for truth, and he doesn't let the law get in the way of his pursuit of justice. At the same time, he has to be a remarkably human character -- prone to violence, anger, and indignation, yes, but also prone to sadness and melancholy. He does what he does because he so believes in humanity, that we are, despite all evidence to the contrary, worth defending. No one played this part better than the incredible Maurizio Merli, who could convey sadness -- the warrior with a broken heart -- with his eyes while he delivered beatdowns of the bad guys with his fists.

Stuart Whitman, on the other hand, conveys all the depth of character and world-weary street smarts as a very small chunk of curb concrete that somehow got broken off from the rest of the curb. His character in this misanthropic but still entertaining actioner is, as I said, one of the most disgusting "heroes" ever to stumble onto the screen. He's not even an anti-hero. An anti-hero is usually hero by default because, while he may be evil, everyone else around him is even more evil. Witness Clint Eastwood in any of his spaghetti westerns, or witness Sonny Chiba in Streetfighter. But Stuart Whitman's driven cop out for revenge is so much more brutal, idiotic, and evil than even the baddest of the bad guys in this film that he becomes nearly impossible to bear.

As you have no doubt surmised, Whitman is a cop on the edge who don't take no shit from no one and who rubs his superiors the wrong ways on account of his "questionable methods." You know the score with these guys. The big difference here is that you actually have to agree with the superiors on this one. The cop on the edge can always defend his action with the ol' "My methods get results!" zinger, but that doesn't even apply here, because all this cop's methods do is result in a lot of brutalized and violated innocent people.

When his daughter turns up dead, Tony (Whitman) is determined to find the murderer. His first suspect is one of his daughter's college professors, played by Space: 1999's Martin Landau. It doesn't take long for Tony (Stuart Whitman) to uncover the fact that his daughter and the professor were engaged in a variety of extracurricular activities in the fields of biology and human anatomy. In order to keep a scandal from ruining his reputation, Tony figured, the professor just killed the gal. It's a pretty tenuous line of thinking, and in fact Tony has no evidence whatsoever beyond the fact that some jealous guy saw them in a mild quarrel. That doesn't stop him from breaking into Landau's house, roughing him up, shouting at him, accusing him in public, and generally taking the harassment to a level never before seen. The guy is, pure and simple, a grade-A prick.

Making it all the sweeter is the fact that Landau is completely and totally innocent. Even after this revelation, even after learning that Landau never treated the girl with anything other than the utmost respect and tenderness, Tony still acts like an asshole and tries to beat the shit out of the professor before just settling on calling him a perverted asshole or something. I understand Tony's upset and all, but come on. I bet he kicked two puppies and tripped an old lady on the way home.

His grating brutality directed at the innocent continues throughout the movie as he traces some clues to the posh apartment of a bunch of transvestites. These transvestites are not suspects. What Tony has uncovered is that they might have run into the killer when he might have been a customer at their hair salon at some point in their careers. Armed with this righteous truth, he blatantly violates every civil right he can think of.

First he breaks into their apartment. When they show up decked out in full drag queen regalia, all they know is that some disheveled maniac with full-bodied Tim Thomerson hair has just broken into their house. When they demand he identify himself, he calls them a bunch of perverts or faggots or something and tries to kick their asses. What he doesn't realize is that these are no ordinary drag queens. These are drag queens who possess kick-ass kungfu. Even while wearing giant platform boots and tight skirts, the girls kick the shit out of Tony, who only gets the upper hand on them when he grabs a hot curling iron and rapes one of them up the bum with it. Yep, that's your hero, folks. I guess he watched Black Shampoo but failed to realize the guys who employ the same violation on poor Artie in that film were actually vile criminals, not the heroes of the film!

At this point, all I could do was shake my head in amazement at the level of hatred this film spewed forth. I'm used to crummy characters, but Tony blew my mind. I'm supposed to root for this guy? Instead, as most people no doubt did, I was cheering for the drag queens to kick his ass and shut him the hell up. Come on! What the hell kind of hero rapes people in the rear with hot curling irons? People who have committed absolutely no crime and, in fact, have had crimes committed against them by some insane cop? It'd be different if the movie depicted Tony as an increasingly unstable man driven over the edge by his daughter's murder, but it's not that clever. Instead, it just expects us to think Tony's unbridled violence toward the innocent is admirable.

Not one to stop there, Tony also bullies the blind girl who was his daughter's roommate, and then goes out to beat up some other guy, leading to what is easily one of the most insane, well paced, and energetic car chase sequences I've ever seen. It's truly a sight to behold, even though it ends with the guy finally crashing and then going, "Oh, that's all you wanted? Okay, sure," and giving Tony the information he wants.

Right wing tendencies, even fascist undertones, are a staple of the poliziotteschi genre. In the better films, like Violent Naploi, they are handled well and a balance is struck between freedom and the desire to not be a prisoner in your own home while criminals run wild and free. Many of the films even spoof to some degree these attitudes, giving us take-no-shit cop heroes who, at the same time, are friends with prostitutes and freaks and other undesirables. It's only in more pedestrian films like Blazing Magnum that the fascism becomes annoying.

I don't think, however, that this sort of film actually sets out to promote fascism. I don't think it sets out to do anything but make a fast buck. They're just painting by numbers and following the formula. Without the talent of a director like Umberto Lenzi or an actor like Maurizio Merli, the film seems a lot meaner and reactionary. But like I said, that has a whole lot more to do with simply being derivative and unimaginative than it has with wanting to promote any sort of political agenda. When confronted with a low-budget, low-intelligence poliziotteschi film like this, it's best not to read too much into the events. It's likely there is no political statement whatsoever behind the actions. They probably just wanted to make a movie with a lot of ass kicking and tough guys in it.

Eventually, Tony uncovers the horrible truth about his daughter, which won't be much a shock to anyone other than Tony and John Saxon, who stars in this movie as Tony's underling. Tony's daughter was, in fact, quite insane. A murderer and aspiring urban terrorist and thief. I'm willing to bet she picked up those traits from her dear old dad. Of course, Tony still gets to kill some people, so at least that makes him feel better. Sure the guy who is eventually revealed to be the murderer is kind of a jerk, but even he can't hold a candle to Tony. After all the killing is over and done with, I think Tony stops by and calls Martin Landau an asshole one more time just to round out his dickishness, or there is some scene where Landau says, "Can I get an apology now?" and Tony says, "Yeah, I'm sorry you're such a perverted Poindexter. I'm gonna kick your testicles now!"

And that's pretty much that. This is a straight-forward cop film that only strays from the tried and true formula in order to make its hero the most vile individual on the planet. Even the crazy-ass would-be criminal who runs wild and murderous with the daughter is a lot easier to like than Tony. Stuart Whitman brings to his fascist character all the charisma of a drunk, abusive uncle who corners you at Christmas and won't stop talking about skinning animals while he pounds down a bottle of Old Crow. He's not the funny uncle, or the quirky uncle, or the uncle who just comes over and watches a lot of football. He's the uncle who is most likely to actually take a swing at grandpa and stumble out of the room calling your mother a "goddamn whore." This is not a guy for whom you want to cheer.

Through the entire movie, all I could was hope and pray that he would fail miserably. When he discovered his daughter was actually a killer and a nutcase, it was sort of satisfying, but the only way this movie could have dealt properly with Tony would have been to kill his ass off in some horrible and torturous fashion. On that end, it fails to deliver, and the world can sleep a little more restlessly knowing Office Tony Saita is still prowling the streets making even Harvey Keitel's character from Bad Lieutenant say, "Geez, pal, maybe you should tone it down a little."

Despite the fact that this film features a main character who makes you want to take a shower, who is actually so sleazy that he'll make you want to go turn yourself in to the cops even if you didn't do anything, the film itself is actually pretty damn entertaining. The fascist leanings of the hero are so over-the-top that you can't even be offended by them after the first couple of infuriating civil rights violations. Well, maybe you can be offended by the curling iron thing, but even that is completely ludicrous. Chances are if you are the type to get offended at anything, then Italian cop films aren't your cup of tea, especially ones this totally nuts.

With that established, we can simply sit back and enjoy the carnage, and this film has carnage galore. As I already mentioned, it has ass-kicking drag queen kungfu masters. That alone warrants a positive review from me. But it's also got the amazing car chase, lots of ass-kicking and two-fisted beat-downs delivered with little or no regard to whether or not the person on the receiving end actually did anything wrong, and a good pace to the proceedings.

Alberto de Martino's direction is claustrophobic and gritty, nearly as uncomfortable to watch as the hero of the film, which makes it more interesting than it would otherwise be. de Martino was a workhorse director, like most of the Italian directors at the time, and made films in pretty much every genre there was, including Medusa Against the Son of Hercules, Secret Agent Double 007 starring Sean Connery's brother, Neil, and everyone's favorite, Puma Man.

The cast isn't bad. They're all grizzled veterans of Italian action films. Whitman is relentless grim and unlikeable as Tony, which as I said may not be what you want from a lead character. John Saxon is hilarious as his dim-witted partner who can't seem to figure anything out and is amazed when Tony makes even the most obvious of observations. I think Saxon must say "Why didn't I think of that," about eight thousand times in this movie.

Landau is more famous in retrospect, but I can't really say he was slumming it at the time. He does well enough in his role, which is to stand there and utter "Now just a minute!" as Stuart Whitman berates him endlessly. Tisa Farrow, as always, proves why she should have been the more famous of the Farrow sisters instead of ol' whats-her-name. Carol Laurre as Tony's insane killer daughter mostly just has to die, then come back in flashbacks where she screams and whirls her hair about while doing some psychedelic nude hippie dance.

Were there really that many crazy-ass killer hippies out there? I admit that, being born in the early 1970s, I perhaps missed out on some of the world's wackier events, but other than Manson and his gang, I've never heard too many stories about roving bands of murderous, drug-crazed hippies roaming the streets in search of old women to victimize and squares to freak out. I don't doubt their existence; I'm just saying there were a lot more murderous hippies in the movies than maybe there were in real life, and most of the time what the movie sold as "murderous hippies" were really just bikers. I don't think your average murderous biker would appreciate being called a hippie, and maybe that's why they started killing people in the first place. I guess it's all a moot point since the killer daughter and her killer boyfriend may have drug induced freakouts but, in the end, are really more along the lines of obnoxious prep school students than they are hippies.

This is a great movie to blow your mind as well as the minds of your friends, especially the more sensitive among them -- if you have sensitive friends. In a genre noted for mean-spirited misanthropy, it manages to take the hate to the next level. Tony Saita is the kind of cop who makes you wish for the liberal outlooks of, say, Benito Moussilini. Combine a remarkably unlikeable "hero" with a ton of gritty and fast-paced action, as well a some kungfu transvestites, and you have a sure-fire crowd pleaser.

Labels: , , , ,

posted by Keith at | 0 Comments


Monday, June 24, 2002

Cross Shot

1976, Italy. Starring John Saxon, Lee J. Cobb, Thomas Hunter, Renzo Palmer, Lino Capolicchio, Rosanna Fratello, Antonella Lualdi, Giacomo Piperno, Guido Celano, Alfredo Zammi. Directed by Stelvio Massi.

There's somethin' about John Saxon. No one can really describe it. Something, however, makes the man cool. It's easy to look at Bruce Lee or Maurizio Merli or Eddie Deezen and immediately recognize what makes them cool beyond belief, but John Saxon defies easy explanation. He's not bad looking, but he's not a knock-out of a man. He's looks sort of tough, but in the way your uncle who is big on hunting and fishing might look tough. It's a very regular guy kind of tough. Most of his movies kind of suck, and the ones that are good usually feature him in a supporting role as a minor villain or minor cop whose only job is to show to say, "Well, I'm stumped!" so the main actor looks all the more cooler when he figures things out.

And yet every time I see John Saxon's name in a movie that isn't one of the Nightmare on Elm Street films, it makes me happy. Maybe it's because Saxon's toughness is a very achievable, realistic brand of toughness. Well, up until the point where we're supposed to buy him as a kungfu bad-ass and fighting equal to Bruce Lee in Enter the Dragon. But disregarding that, there's nothing unrealistic about most of the characters John Saxon plays. He is the "everyman" tough guy, and so we can all identify with him. In a similar vein, Henry Silva is very often the everyman villain.

Like Henry Silva, and like many B-team action stars during the 1970s, Saxon spent a fair amount of time over in Europe, or more specifically, over in Italy, kicking as much ass as could be kicked in Italian cop films of the era. Cross Shot sees him in one of his rare starring vehicles -- he was almost always a co-star, sidekick kind of guy or criminal who was not as bad as the main criminal. Cross Shot also sees him fulfilling every single "cop on the edge" stereotype you could possibly think of. The chief comes down on him. The newspaper editor rails against his "questionable methods." He gets to give one of those, "you're system protects the guilty and punishes the innocent" speeches. In short, Cross Shot offers you everything you could possibly want from a generic cop movie, and manages to be pretty good while doing it.

Saxon stars as Inspector Javocella, your standard issue tough cop who would rather beat a confession out a criminal than wait for the judicial system to screw everything up and let the guilty go free. These cops never see to realize that half the time, the reason the guilty go free is because the cops who arrested them beat them up. If they stopped beating defendants up, maybe not so many would get released because the cops beat them up while they were in custody. I don't know. Just a theory. I'm no criminologist.

Javocella's arch-nemesis is the standard-issue bleeding heart newspaper editor who maybe cares about people, or maybe just wants to sell newspapers with sensational stories about police brutality. I've often wondered how many cities actually have heated wars going on between police inspectors and the newspaper editors. I guess as many as have mobs who are looking to tear down the old black community center so they can build a shopping mall. Ever wonder why these mobsters would want to be building a shopping mall in the middle of a burnt-out, crime-plagued ghetto? Sometimes I think they only used that as an excuse to pick fights with local black karate schools.

Anyway, you also have Dante Ragusa, a blind, aging crime lord who is looking to prove he's still nobody to mess with. And you have his chump son who desperately wants to prove to his domineering father that he can be a good criminal and uphold the family honor in all matters relating to drugs, prostitution, extortion, and murder. His name is Nino, and he just can't do a damn thing right. You may think it's hard to try and impress your parents by playing soccer when your father was a famous European soccer player, but imagine trying to impress your father when he is a guy who rules the criminal underworld with a iron grip and slaughters all those who stand in his way. Now that's pressure. If the Ragusas would sit down and simply talk about their feelings, maybe even throw on a little "Cat's in the Cradle" by Harry Chapin, things would be better between them.

Against his better judgment, Don Dante sends his twit of an offspring on a simple mission: deliver a letter of approval from a crooked senator allowing them to build a shopping center in some new part of town. No word on whether they had to face off against a black karate school or vigilante group led by an ex-football player, but I think we can assume they did. I always thought mobsters did stuff like smuggle guns and drugs, or just go around killing each other. But what I have learned in the movies, and what is probably true in real life, is that they spend most their time opening shopping malls and getting construction permits. Hell, whole episodes of The Sopranos dealt with the Mafia guys running a crooked sporting goods shop so they could get discount nylon jogging suits. Who would have thought that the preferred fashion of the men who rule the underworld would be unsightly lavender jogging suits? Those guys from the 1920s who wore those sharp suits and wingtips must hang their heads in shame.

Meanwhile, a young dreamer who wants nothing more in the world than to make enough money to marry his sweetheart and get out of the city decides to join some guys in a bank robbery. This is a pretty common thing in these movies. Personally, when I've needed money, I always took a job at Toys-R-Us or a movie theater. It was mundane but easy work, and very low risk. I don't know how these lazy dreamers in the movies are always stumbling across gangs of bank robbers looking for the last member of their team, or why they accept the offer, or why the robbers would offer something as important as a spot on a bank robbery gang to some lazy nobody who spends most of his time staring out at the ocean and saying, "You know, someday I'm gonna make it." Come on, if you were going to rob a bank, would you look for hardened professionals, or would you grab the first hippie with an acoustic guitar and a head full of dreams that you ran across on the street?

Naturally, the bank robbery goes terribly awry, because no one in the history of film has ever successfully robbed a bank or pulled off "the big heist." Face it, if the combined forces of Frank Sinatra, Dean Martin, Joey Bishop, Pete Lawford, Sammy Davis Jr., and Henry Silva couldn't successfully pull off a heist, what chance does some bum off the streets have? In the confusion of the botched robbery, the young guy, Antonio, panics and ends up killing a rookie cop. The robbers split up, losing all the money in the process, and Antonio ends up hijacking the first available car.

Well, what are the chances that it's going to be poor Nino Ragusa's car? That guy just never gets a break, does he? Nino gets chewed out for being an idiot, Antonio is freaked out and on the run, and John Saxon strolls onto the scene to look grim and angry. He vows to catch whoever killed the young cop -- oh yeah, and this other woman the rest of the robbers killed when they threw her out of a moving car right into the path of the car behind them. Just so we can bring everyone together into one pissed off little family, the newspaper editor shows up to write obnoxious articles about how ineffectual the cops are, which allows Saxon to rail on about how they're damned if they do, damned if they don't and so on and so forth.

Antonio escapes to the country and hides out in the abandoned shack of some relative. He knows the cops are after him, and since he is sensitive, he's distraught over the fact that he killed a man. Maybe he should have taken a different job than "armed bank robber" if this was a concern. Luckily, he has a gorgeous, understanding, level-headed girlfriend to comfort him. It would be much harder to cope if you were wrought with angst and guilt and came home every night to Judy Tenuda.

Antonio soon figures out that he has come into possession of Ragusa's letter from the senator, and soon after that finds out that Nino and his thugs are trying to kill him. Having Nino after you is not so scary, but some of these other thugs have mustaches and sunglasses, so you know they mean business. Antonio jumps from dodging John Saxon to dodging mobsters out to kill him and retrieve the briefcase. The only friend he has is the newspaper editor, who is trying to exploit the situation as much as he trying to help Antonio stay alive. The editor figures if the mob doesn't kill Antonio, the cops will do it as revenge for their fallen comrade. They devise a number of plans to meet, and each time John Saxon sneaks around and follows them, so you'd think they's stop about the ten thousandth time they have a secret meeting interrupted by John Saxon stepping out of the shadows to yell at them.

Finally, Antonio agrees to give himself up to the newspaper editor, who will then take him to the cops. Why they have this meeting in a dark, isolated alley is beyond me. You'd think if you were being chased by mobsters and were going to turn yourself in, you'd just do it at the police station instead of in a back alley full of snipers. This really makes no sense at all. Of course, John Saxon is also hiding in the shadows, waiting to arrest Antonio. This upsets Antonio, though I can't figure out why. He was going to turn himself in anyway.

Well, they go ahead and do all this on the deserted street full of mob hitmen. Antonio gets it in the back, Saxon gets the hitman, and as Antonio dies in the street, he hands over the letter from the crooked senator, giving Saxon enough evidence to put Dante Ragusa away once and for all. The newspaper editor blames Saxon's violent methods for the death of poor Antonio, even though it was the mob who shot the kid, and it was the editor's stupid idea to meet in the alley instead of somewhere safe. The film ends with Saxon and crew confronting Ragusa, who immediately goes into "I'm a sick, frail old man" mode as most mob bosses do. He'll probably get off with a slap on the wrist.

While Cross Shot is not the most violent or action-packed of the many poliziotteschi film, it's still a solid thriller with generic but interesting characters and a plot that keeps you glued to the set. You figure Antonio will probably get it in the end -- those innocent youths gone wrong always do -- but they make the journey there interesting, and by the end you're hoping that maybe he'll make it out alive after all. John Saxon is suitably grim and frustrated as the cop on the edge, though he doesn't pull it off with as much sympathy as Maurizio Merli. Of course, no one plays that part like Merli did in Violent Napoli. Although he doesn't really break and new ground with the archetype, John Saxon plays it convincingly and plays it well. In other words, he is good as always.

The supporting cast all do well in their respective roles. Antonio and Nino Ragusa are both interesting characters with whom we can sympathize. Antonio was a lost kid who got caught up in situations that quickly spiraled out of control and turned violent -- a very familiar situation for a lot of people in Europe during the 1970s, when crime and terrorism skyrocketed, and everyone felt like society was going down in flames. Nino, on the other hand, is a wretch of a human who is insulted and degraded by his father at every turn. All he wants to do is impress his dad, to hear his father say that he did good. It never happens, of course, because Dante Ragusa would never utter a kind word and has no respect for his weak-willed son. "You've never even killed a man!" he scoffs. Nino, like everyone else in the film, is desperate for some resolution to his alienation. In many ways he reminds me of the character Nick DiSalvio from Across 110th Street -- a middle-aged mobster who has really gotten nowhere in his chosen profession. Everything DiSalvio got, he got when he married the boss's daughter, and everything Nino Ragusa has, he has because his dad is the boss, sort of like George Bush Jr. Weird to think of middle management mobsters having identity crises and struggling to make something of themselves, but I guess business is business.

The newspaper editor is also a fairly typical but well-played character. He's careful not to go too over-the-top with his liberalism or take it to the extremes the character is often taken, at which time they become utterly absurd in their crusade. Here, he wants to protect the people, to stop the violence, but he's also not above exploiting it to sell papers. However, by the end he seems willing to risk his own life to help Antonio. Like Javocella and Ragusa, the editor is an ass, but not a totally irredeemable human being. The politics of Italian cop films are always a confused mess best decoded with a Rosetta Stone and secret ring found in a jar of rich, chocolaty Ovaltine. Cross Shot is interesting in that it doesn't make any calls one way or the other, but instead shows yuoth pulled asunder and destroyed by the many conflicting trens and demands of society.

Finally, you have Antonio's girlfriend. She doesn't do a whole lot other than stand by Antonio in his hour of need, but she's worth noting because she serves a much greater purpose than simply being a person to be held hostage during a Mexican stand-off (which doesn't happen to her). Like the women in John Woo films, she is representative of a sort of even-headedness, a chance at redemption men could have if only they'd stop yelling and shooting at each other all the time. She's the only one that comes across as being sane more often than she's insane, and her subtle though pervasive strength makes her a memorable character in a genre where most women are nothing more than victims or gratuitous nude shots.

All in all, the concentration on the drama over the action make this one interesting and worth checking out. Don't worry, though -- there's still enough action to keep you satisfied, including a particularly harrowing car chase in which a woman's head is crushed by an oncoming car, and a run in between Antonio and Nino in a deserted parking lot. John Saxon's action consists primarily of killing people or beating the shit out of them during interrogation.

It's no Violent Napoli, but it's still a pretty good film. It generates a fair amount of tension and sympathy for its many characters, and it has a decent amount of that ol' poliziotteschi brutal violence. It's a good way to ease yourself into a genre that has no easing in about it, and a good way to get a look at John Saxon getting to do more than follow someone else around. Not the best, but a good entry into the genre.

Labels: , , ,

posted by Keith at | 0 Comments