film    print    sound    leisure    forum
company line »

shopping guide »

contact us »

get reviewed »

get published »

expand yourself »


find it »

Teleport City search allows you to search our entire site as well as our favorite sites about cult films, obscure music, literature, and swank living.


film home | a-b | c-d | e-f | g-h | i-l | m-n | o-q | r-s | t-v | w-z

Friday, November 30, 2007

Our Man in Marrakesh

1966, Italy. Starring Tony Randall, Senta Berger, Terry-Thomas, Herbert Lom, Wilfrid Hyde-White, Gregoire Aslan, John Le Mesurier, Klaus Kinski, Margaret Lee. Written by Harry Alan Towers and Peter Yeldham. Directed by Don Sharp.

I expounded recently, in my review of Throne of Fire, on the fact that I am still a sucker for cool cover/poster art, even though I know full well that the movie being advertised is rarely as good as the illustration advertising it. So let me now explore another of my sundry weaknesses: I have a weakness for cool-sounding team-ups. It probably started back when I was a wee sprout camped out in front of the television late at night, watching old Universal horror films. Frankenstein and the Wolfman, in the same movie? Boss! And while the high concept team-ups were generally slightly more dependable than poster art, that didn't mean that they still weren't, by and large, a bit disappointing most of the time. But still, come on! Frankenstein versus the Wolfman! Dev Anand versus hippies! And in the case of Our Man in Marrakesh, Tony Randall versus Klaus Kinski. Tell me that one isn't epic sounding. And while my gullible faith in the high-concept team-up often let me down, I was certain that Tony Randall versus Klaus Kinski in a lighthearted Eurospy adventure would live up to the promise. I'm happy to say that, unlike Throne of Fire, I was pleasantly rewarded this time around.

Klaus Kinski is one of those actors whose mere presence in a film is enough to convince that I might as well go ahead and watch it. Even if the movie is no good, it's likely Kinski will be good for a laugh. He's sort of like Vincent Price in that way, and while people bemoan the fact that no one ever did a proper pairing of horror icons like Price with venerated horror film icon Christopher Lee™ or Price with Peter Cushing (they were paired in movies -- Price and Lee in The Oblong Box, and Price, Lee, and Cushing in Scream and Scream Again -- but anyone who has seen those movies was sorely disappointed by the amount of time their horror heroes spent on-screen together), I think what really would have been something to behold would have been Vincent Price versus Klaus Kinski. I can scarcely even fathom how delicious it would have been. I would have cast them as, oh let's say a mortician and a deranged count who must...oh, I don't know, join forces to save the local community center from being bulldozed to make way for a shopping mall. And there would be a scene where Kinski has to pose as a shopping mall Santa (because, you know, Santa Klaus -- har har har) and makes children cry by telling them about medieval torture methods or something. And also there's a pie fight, and a scene where Vincent Price ends up on an out of control pair of roller skates.


So where was I? Oh yes, Klaus Kinski. Putting Kinski in your movie, even for a few minutes, is enough to make me think, "This movie doesn't look very good, but it's got Kinski in it, so what the hell?" And I've seen plenty of movies where it seems like they put Klaus Kinski specifically for that reason. In the cruddy James Glickenhaus espionage film The Soldier, Kinski shows up in a throw-away role that feels like they may have just happened to catch candid footage of Kinski on vacation in the Alps and decided to work it into the movie some how. He might not even know he was in The Soldier. And his presence in Codename: Wildgeese consists almost entirely of him being a jerk while playing golf with Ernest Borgnine -- once again, quite possibly nothing more than Knski vacation video that was inserted into the movie, since I assume Klaus Kinski's vacations consisted to a large degree of banging aspiring actresses and yelling at Ernest Borgnine. Still, even at his worst, Kinski was pretty good, and at his best, he was absolutely mesmerizing. He was, of course, also completely and totally batshit insane. His working relationship with German director and fellow batshit insane guy Werner Herzog has become the stuff of legend, involving as it supposedly did, stabbing, shooting, taking contracts out on each others lives, and lord knows what else.

You know, total aside here, but as a kid, I always assumed that Werner Herzog looked like former St. Louis Cardinals manager Whitey Herzog, who to me was just a big fat guy with a tremendous wad of tobacco in his cheek, as depicted in a baseball card I had of his from the 1980s. I can't remember which year it was, but he wasn't looking too good. I was obsessed with that card, one of four that I was obsessed with. The others I remember with more clarity. There was Oscar Gamble's 1976 "Ripped from the Headlines" card from Topps, famous among me and my friends because of the mind-blowing size of Gamble's afro and his ability to tuck part of it into a baseball cap. Then there was the 1981 Topps card for Gene Richards, who we dubbed "the ugliest man in baseball" thanks to his particularly unflattering photo that year. Seriously, dude looked like a hobo who just rolled off a train and into a Padres uniform. Actually, that Topps set from 1981 is chock full of great moments (what the hell was up with Steve Trout?) Then there was the 1976 "Bubble Gum Blowing Champ" card for Kurt Bevacqua. He's just standing there with his hands on his hips, blowing a giant bubble like it's the most bad-ass thing in the world to do.


Anyway, it turns out that Werner Herzog didn't look anything like Whitey Herzog; Werner Herzog looks more like Rollie Fingers. And as for the Oscar Gamble card -- I have that shit in a frame, hanging up on my wall. No joke. As kids, we used to pretend 1981 Gene Richards was waiting under the bed and would come out and kill us once the lights were out, which leads me to think that a team-up between Klaus Kinski and 1981 Gene Richards would have been pretty cool, too. So my point is, I like Klaus Kinski, and his mere presence is enough to creep up even the most innocent and/or boring of movies. I mean, I always fall asleep during Crawlspace, but while I asleep, I have nightmares thinking about Klaus Kinski peering down at me from within an AC vent, like some sour-pussed little angel, yelling insults at me in German. And now that I know Gene Richards is in there with him -- man! There is no way I'm getting to sleep tonight.

And then there's Tony Randall. Good old neat and tidy Tony Randall. Good old effeminate (unlike the not at all effeminate Rod Taylor) Tony Randall. Good old bangin' hot chicks 'til he's 80 Tony Randall. Pitting him against Klaus Kinski seems like the perfect idea, and it pretty much is. Randall stars as Andrew Jessel, a mild-mannered traveler who finds himself on a tourist bus from Casablanca to Marrakesh along with a group of other travelers who are not what they seem. There's doddering old British guy Arthur Fairbrother (Wilfrid Hyde-White). There's less doddering old British guy George Lillywhite (John Le Mesurier). And there's scintillating Senta Berger (The Ambushers) as Kyra. One of them is a courier transporting two million dollars to local master criminal Casimer (Herbert Lom) to exchange for a case full of secret documents that are all part of some scheme to corrupt the United Nations, because lord knows the U.N. doesn't do well enough with that on its own. Casimer has the bus tailed, but due to over-zealous security concerns, he ho idea who the courier is. He just knows that everyone on the bus is lying about who they are.


Jessel winds up in Kyra's room, where the two of them discover the body of a man Kyra claims is her lover. It's right about here that Our Man in Marrakesh tips its hand and lets you know that, although it's going to have plenty of thrills and adventure, it's also going to play out with a fairly witty sense of humor. For instance, upon seeing a body with a knife protruding from its back tumble out of a closet, Jessel starts to panic and explain that he thinks there might be something suspicious about the body. Kyra uses her Senta Berger powers to convince him to help hide the body, spinning some vastly complex yarn about jealous parents, attempts to scandalize her, so on and so forth. All Jessel seems to know is that the longer he's with this woman, the more guys who pop up to shoot at him. Eventually, Jessel ends up with Casimer's cache of secret documents, and he and Kyra find themselves on the run across the Moroccan countryside, pursued by dogged henchman Klaus Kinski and aided at times by cop-hating truck driver Achmed (Gregoire Aslan) and adventure-seeking Eaton graduate turned Lawrence of Arabia, El Caid (Terry-Thomas).

Our Man in Marrakesh has a lot going for it. First, the cast is top notch, relying on the dependable talents of a host of solid British character actors. Terry-Thomas is...well, he's Terry-Thomas. You know he's going to say "splendid" and "old chap" a whole lot while grinning his magnificent gap-toothed smile. Herbert Lom, last seen around these parts hassling Jason Robards -- and rightly so -- in Murders in the Rue Morgue), plays Casimer with a mix of sophistication and desperation, never going over the top even in a movie that would have tolerated it (there's plenty of over the top once Terry-Thomas shows up). No one in this movie phones it in, and no one comes across as a stiff, as was very common in Eurospy films, especially for the hero. But Tony Randall was hardly the typical Eurospy hero, and Our Man in Marrakesh trades in the predictable rock-jawed man of action for one who is constantly confused and terrified before ultimately rising, more or less, to the occasion. Randall turns in exactly the performance you'd expect. About the only thing he doesn't pull off is the obligatory "seducing the lady" scene, but that's played mostly for laughs anyway, and considering the fact that Randall was siring new kids well into old age, one has to assume that he just knows something I don't.

Our Man in Marrakesh relies primarily on the appeal and charisma of Austrian bombshell Senta Berger to fulfill the femme fatale position, and she does so perfectly. Berger was one of my favorite dames of the 1960s, with outrageous curves and a smoky stare that would burn a hole right through a lesser man than Tony Randall. Even as the things she asks him to do for her become increasingly outlandish, I found it easy to believe that he would end up going along with her no matter what. She just has that sort of hypnotic appeal. On the opposite end of the law is Casimer's window dressing girlfriend, Samia, played by the drop-dead beauty Margaret Lee. Lee was a familiar face from all sorts of Eurospy productions in the 1960s, including many of the best and most enjoyable like Secret Agent Super Dragon, Agent 077 Fury in the Orient, Kiss the Girls and Make Them Die, and Dick Smart 2007, among others. Even though Senta is the head-turner here, there's no denying that Margaret lee's parade of mini-dresses and bikinis is more than enough to keep the eye occupied. It's just that hers is a more comedic role, designed mostly to get Herbet Lom to either roll his eyes or jump up and run off to bed.


And then there's Kinski as the head henchman Jonquil. He spends most of the movie wearing a fedora and running around while yelling at other henchmen to come with him. It's not a big role, but it's crucial, and Kinski throws himself into it with his usual manic energy. In the end, it turns out the only way to defeat him is by making him wave his arms around wildly as he falls into a pond, accompanied by pratfall music.

Spy spoofs were easy to come by the in the 1960s. In fact, most of the Eurospy films were made with a sense of humor. But then, so were most of the Bond films, so that shouldn't be a surprise. Our Man in Marrakesh is aided greatly by a spirited, witty, fast-moving script that perfectly balances thrills with laughs. It makes sure you are smiling, but not at the expense of wowing you with frequent chases, fist fights, and scenes of Tony Randall sliding off of rooftops. The action and comedy culminate in a finale that sees Casimer and his army of thugs pitted against Jessel and Achmed's army of street hustlers in a hurricane of guns, swords, curved knives, and guys falling into ponds.

Our Man in Marrakesh comes to the world courtesy of the team of director Don Sharp and writer-producer Harry Alan Towers. If Sharp and Towers are a duo that sounds familiar to you, that's because the same men brought us the fabulously campy and energetic Face of Fu Manchu just a year earlier. British producer Towers was famous for throwing lots of money at somewhat ridiculous concepts, sort of like a British Dino De Laurentiis, except that Towers would also throw tiny amounts of money at stuff, too (thus the Fu Manchu films directed by Jess Franco). Sharp, aside from directing Face of Fu Manchu and Brides of Fu Manchu for Towers also directed the excellent occult thriller Witchcraft, one Hammer's better vampire outings, 1963's Kiss of the Vampire and then went on to direct episodes of The Avengers.


Between these two men, they give Our Man in Marrakesh a more ambitious scope and A-list feel. Sharp brings the same polish, crisp pace, and playful energy to Our Man in Marrakesh that he would bring to The Avengers and many of his other films, while Towers throws his weight and cash around enough to score a great cast and beautiful location work -- or anyway, I assume it's beautiful location work. Since the best you can hope for right now is a relatively washed out looking old print of this film, you have to infer how great it would look if it wasn't all tattered. Suffice it to say that Towers and crew make their most of the local color, taking us on an action-packed tour of Morocco. On top of that, the "no one is who they seem to be" plot works pretty well without ever becoming irritating or obvious. You really don't know exactly who is who until the very end. Even the "mistaken briefcase" complication that could have been a tired old "oh no, not this again" device works out pretty well. Plots in Eurospy films are usually either terrible, or just completely loopy. Our Man in Marrakesh has a plot that is actually quite good -- the difference between English spy films and continental spy films, I reckon, where the focus was more on the outlandish.

However, I do have to point out one rather glaring gaffe in the film. It comes when Tony and Senta are fleeing from Casimer's men and the police. They burst into an open air market where the entire crowd is standing perfectly still on their marks. After a couple seconds of Tony Randall scrambling around, the crowd suddenly starts milling about. Although it's nothing more than a missed cue and a failure to edit it out of the film, it also lends the film a really bizarre, surreal couple of seconds.

So Kinski and Randall didn't let me down. I had a blast watching this film. It's too bad Sharp didn't stick around to direct more spy films. He obviously had a knack for it. Although I hadn't heard very much about this movie, and there are almost no reviews online or in print (the indispensables Eurospy Guide is the only mention of it I found, and the only reason I even knew that it would be something worth looking for), I was completely satisfied. Randall makes for an excellent everyman hero, and he's supported by an able cast who act like they care rather than acting like they're above the material...like you, Jason Robards. For shame!

Labels: , , ,

posted by Keith at | 4 Comments


Friday, June 25, 2004

Aguirre, The Wrath of God

Release Year: 1972
Country: Germany
Starring: Klaus Kinski, Daniel Ades, Peter Berling, Alejandro Chavez, Daniel Farfán, Justo González, Ruy Guerra, Julio E. Martínez, Del Negro, Armando Polanah, Alejandro Repulles, Cecilia Rivera, Helena Rojo, Edward Roland.
Writer: Werner Herzog
Director: Werner Herzog
Cinematographer: Thomas Mauch
Music: Popol Vuh
Producer: Werner Herzog and Hans Prescher
Original Title: Aguirre, der Zorn Gottes
Availability: Buy it from Amazon


There are a lot of directors who work with that special someone of an actor forging a partnership that becomes legendary within the cinematic world. Martin Scorsese had Robert DeNiro. Spielberg seems to have Tom Hanks. John Ford had John Wayne. And German director Werner Herzog had Klaus Kinski. If you know anything about Klaus Kinski, this may seem a bit of a raw deal for Herzog. After all, as far as anyone knows, Tom Hanks has never tried to knife Steven Spielberg to death on the set of a movie, and John Wayne never insisted to Ford that he was the reincarnation of Jesus or the famed violin virtuoso Paganini. On the other hand, it's equally unlikely that Spielberg has ever returned a knife fight with his own conspiracies to murder his favorite leading man. Although one has to question the authenticity of some of the wilder tales about the working relationship between the two men, there's no doubt that some of it was indeed true and they had the sort of relationship that could be described, if one wanted to be tactful about it, as "dynamic."

The defining factor in the relationship between Herzog and Kinski was that Kinski was, to use a scientific term, bat-shit crazy while Herzog, in turn, was crazy as a shithouse bat. Yet somehow, you throw the two together, and the result was sheer brilliance etched from utter lunacy.

For my money, and I'll admit up front to being no big Herzog expert, they are at their finest in the raving study of greed, madness, and the lust for power that is Aguirre, The Wrath of God. Thrown together in the jungles of South America to make a film about the spiraling madness of a Spanish Conquistador hell-bent on finding the fabled city of gold, El Dorado, Kinski and Herzog drove each other and those around them so berserk that the locals hired as extras were even offering to discreetly murder Kinski, who they completely and totally despised with every inch of their being. To the benefit of the film, these boiling emotions of hatred, frustration, and madness were exactly what the script called for, and thanks to Kinski's raving insanity, it's likely those around him had very little acting to do to push themselves to the point at which they needed to arrive.

Beginning on Christmas day (though this doesn't necessarily mean you'd want to consider this a Christmas movie), in the year of our Lord 1560, Aguirre is told more or less through the journals of a monk accompanying a band of Conquistadors on their march across the South American continent. Finding themselves subjugated and mercilessly slaughtered by these men from across the ocean, the Incas formulate the only sort of revenge they have at their disposal and concoct a story about the lost city of El Dorado, where gold practically flows through the fountains and there are amassed piles of riches beyond the dreams of even the greediest Spanish invader. To the Incas' credit, they place El Dorado, "somewhere over yonder" in a general direction that will take any would-be glory-hunters through the most treacherous terrain in perhaps the whole of the world. So, though defeated and humiliated, it must have provided at least some small degree of satisfaction to the Incas to watch groups of Conquistadors head down the mountains to the Amazon to die agonizing deaths and the hands of hunger, disease, and violent jungle Indians.

One such expedition is that of Aguirre, a commander whose lust not so much for gold as for power and dreams of establishing an empire that dwarfs that of his native Spain drives him first to mutiny and then to a veritable "death march on the river" as he drives his men deeper and deeper into the inescapable heart of the Amazon. It's not unlike Heart of Darkness, except that instead of traveling down the river to madness, madness comes along for the whole ride. It would seem, also, that Aguirre would have been a major influence on Walter Hill's Southern Comfort (1981) or Francis Ford Coppola and Apocalypse Now (1979), which might be one of those things that is common knowledge if I ever sat down and watched Hearts of Darkness. Actually, the better comparison is to Samuel Fuller's Big Red One, which takes the whole of the European theater in World War II and shrinks it down to a microscopic size.

With Aguirre, Herzog creates a sort of anti-epic. Certainly the story of a doomed Spanish expedition through the jungles of the Amazon in search of a city of gold that does not exist is the sort of plotline that could easily expand to the size of an epic, but Herzog, partially constrained as always by budget but primarily for artistic reasons, restricts the story to a claustrophobic size. The vastness of the Amazon jungle is whittled away until all that remains is a world as large as the raft on which the Conquistadors prop up themselves as easy targets for natives concealed in the lush greenness rising up like walls around them. Most of the movie takes place on this raft, with only tenuous forays onto the banks, and never then very far for as much as the Spaniards hate being trapped on the raft, they fear the jungle that much more. Confined to such a small space, and with no voice of reason to reel him back in to reality, Aguirre's passion for conquest, his unrelenting desire for grandeur and power, pushes his far over the edge, until even as the last of his men lie starving and bleeding to death on the crumbling decks of the raft, he still imagines that he will rule the whole of the South American continent and launch an armada to seize territories now held by the Spanish crown, establishing himself as the greatest ruler of the largest empire of all time.

It is darkly ironic, tragic, and almost comedic in the blackest sense of the word that his delusions of glory just around the next river bend reach their apex as he stands alone, aimlessly adrift on a raft covered by cavorting monkeys.

Although Kinski's Aguirre is at the center of the tempest, this is not a story of one man's quest for glory and victory at the expense of his protesting men. Indeed his men are all too willing to follow him into the jungle and straight into madness in pursuit of the promise of wealth and power. When the wiser Ursua (Ruy Guerra), ostensibly the leader of the band, decides that it is a doomed expedition and all should turn back to meet up again with the greater body of the Spanish army and return to civilization, Aguirre's soldiers are all too willing to comply in mutiny against Ursua. Even as they find themselves picked off one by one by natives or simply dying of starvation, none but a very few of the soldiers recognize the insurmountable madness that assures their failure. Even the clergyman Carvajal defers to Aguirre, partially out of fear but mostly because he, too, dreams of glory. Where the men's glory is gold and Aguirre's is power, Carvajal's glory is the glory of God and in the conversion of the South American savages to Christianity.

Though everyone is guilty aboard the raft, the film is obviously commanded by Kinski, who is allowed to channel all his bug-eyed insanity into his damned and unsympathetic character, though never so much as to push it wildly over the top. Herzog and and Kinski may be two insane men making a movie about insane men, but Herzog keeps the film tightly focused and controlled, slowly paced and never prone to scene-chewing explosions of craziness. Never does Kinski outright rant and rave and knock things over. He is, rather, far more reserved with his insanity, and far more chilling. When action scenes do come, they are exceptionally brief. This is, after all, not a sprawling war epic but a character study and exploration of the power of greed to corrupt, blind, and drive mad.

Herzog's conclusion is hazy, as the film leaves Aguirre in total defeat but still very much alive. He has lost everything and everyone around him, but still he goes on, certain that his destiny leads to nowhere but fame and power and immortality. He has learned nothing, enjoyed no moment of revelation or repentance or realization. Even the death of his own daughter, the one potential moment for the audience to perhaps feel a pang of sympathy for this madman, seems to affect Aguirre not in the least, or at least not enough to shake him from his delusions. Like the drunk driver who causes a car wreck in which everyone is killed yet he himself walks away unscathed, Aguirre remains.

I believe some people mistakenly go into Aguirre thinking it an adventure film. Such a notion is certain to result in disappointment. Herzog is, after all, something of an arthouse director, and he works on a low budget. Instead, this is a deconstruction of the adventure film, a psychological dissection of a larger-than-life character whose aspirations and dreams soar to the heights of what might be achieved even by a madman in an epic, even while he himself is mired in the hopelessness of the reality of the situation. There is no moment of heroism, no rousing rescue or battle. There are, instead, long, deliberate takes and beautiful cinematography. There are pauses, slow pacing, and an almost total lack of a musical score. A single dreamlike synthesizer theme occurs from time to time, but other than that the only music in the movie is the pipe playing of one of the native slaves. Herzog doesn't want to excite you; he wants to engage you, or more accurately, to ensnare you and drag you along on this expedition. His narrative, although slowly paced, also keeps the viewer off-balance and unable to completely collect one's thoughts. Characters are killed without comment by silent assassins from within the jungle. There is no fanfare, no death scene. We simply see them alive one minute and dead a few minutes later. Carvajal's journal entries, which serve as the basis for the structure of the story, become more random and eventually cease altogether and he himself succumbs to jungle fever. Never has hard, edgy realism seemed so surreal.

Kinski is, it goes without saying, superb. Who better to play a megalomaniacal madman than an actual megalomaniacal madman? Apparently, at some point Kinski was being his usual difficult self, and Herzog got a decent performance out of him by pointing a gun at Kinski's head and threatening to blow his brains out. There was no doubt in Kinski's mind that Herzog would do it, and for that matter, there was no intention in Herzog's mind not to do it if Klaus didn't do his job. Much of the remainder of the cast is comprised of locals who were hired more or less off the street, though the part of Ursua was played by Ruy Guerra, a prominent director in South American cinema.

Herzog's in-close direction works well with the overall story and creates the necessary atmosphere of claustrophobia and irritation. It's no small feat that Thomas Mauch's cinematography drags so much beauty out of such a confined space. Though he allows himself some sweeping shots of the river and the raft traveling down it toward its unsavory fate, his true gift is for staying close and using people and small moments as sources for brilliant, beautiful, and often frightening images. Something as gigantic as the Amazon River and the jungles around it beg for indulgent helicopter shots of lush green canopies with craggy mountain peaks jutting up from them, of great gorges and valleys and waterfalls. But Mauch never lets you see more than what the men themselves can see: the impenetrable jungle-choked banks, the muddy water, fleeting glimpses of bow-toting natives, and each other. What he does with such a reserved palette is astounding.

Aguirre, in short, is a trip straight to hell. It is a dip in the pool of lunacy. And as far as "arthouse adventure" goes, you'll find no film finer. All the pieces, cracked as they may have been behind the camera, fall into place to create a lush, haunting tapestry. The separate madnesses of Herzog and Kinski may have driven them to the brink of murder, but the film is all the better for it, and somehow they manage, as they often did, to turn that friction, that hatred and lunacy and love, into a breathtaking work of art.

Labels: , , , ,

posted by Keith at | 2 Comments


Sunday, September 15, 2002

The Soldier

1982, United States. Starring Ken Wahl, Steven James, Peter Hooten, Klaus Kinski, Alexander Spencer, Joaquim de Almeida, William Prince, Ron Harper. Directed by James Glickenhaus.

The Cold War produced a lot of great films, or at least a lot of enjoyable ones. It also produced some godawful dreck, though even some of that dreck was at least entertaining. Cold War paranoia films took on many forms. In the 1950s, there were a lot of those "realistic" atomic war movies that consisted mainly of a group of people sitting around in a bar discussing matters until an atom bomb fell and blew everyone up. The more creative films let giant red ants or some such creature stand in for the commies. Some of the more outlandish entries even had secret plots by the Chinese to tunnel under the Pacific Ocean and pop out in California ready for an invasion.

During the 1960s, the Cold War sci-fi film gave way to straight-up espionage thrillers inspired by the success of the James Bond films that always involved the Reds trying to steal some terrible device we never should have invented in the first place. Luckily, there's always a square-jawed G-Man on the case, ready to dish out some beat-downs and bed some Eastern Bloc babes. The best Cold War films of the 1960s were most definitely coming from Italy, Spain, and Germany. The Eurospy film was born, and it was probably one of the greatest achievements of the Cold War era.

When the 1980s came, Ronald Reagan rekindled the Cold War with a fire in his eye he'd not had since the days he was gleefully ratting out his co-stars in Hollywood and accusing them of being Commies during the Senate Un-American Activities Committee. Reagan made the escalation of the Cold War the primary focus of his eight-year administration, allowing education to falter and the economy to languish in disrepair. On the one hand, his crackpot brinksmanship seemed like it just might be the end of us all. On the other hand, he did bankrupt the Soviet Union and cause the downfall of European communism, thus ending the Cold War it seemed he was so likely to heat up. History is funny like that.

In the midst of the rhetorical sparring between Reagan and his Russian counterparts, Cold War paranoia films enjoyed renewed popularity. This time we were often blowing up the whole world then driving around in dune buggies after the dust settled. Although post-apocalypse films were the most noticeable and flamboyant, more than a few cloak and dagger thrillers slinked onto the screen as well. Unfortunately, a lot of those were geared toward kids and always featured a plucky young protagonist furiously pedaling his BMX bike away from pursuing Russian agents. I may be a lot of things, but a fan of insipid kiddy action films is not one of them. Even when I was a young tot, if I was watching an action film, I wanted blood and explosions, and if possible, ninjas and boobs. It was generally unlikely that I would get my requirements fulfilled by a movie starring Corey Haim or Henry Thomas riding their bikes to freedom.

Luckily, a few films emerged that satisfied my appetite for movies far more adult than I probably should have been watching. I remember very vividly the night I first got to watch James Glickenhaus' The Soldier. My friend Dan (then known as Danny) had this older brother named Dave who liked to do typical big brother stuff like hide out in the woods and howl like a werewolf (or a regular wolf, I suppose) to get us scared. It rarely worked, and it was odd that he'd go to such extreme and goofy measures to spook us since we were far more afraid of him simply delivering a good-natured pounding to us.

When he wasn't teaching us important things like how to endure an Indian burn or a red belly, he was a pretty cool older brother (or maybe it just seemed that way since I could always go home; Dan had to stay there and pray for the day his brother would have to go back to college). He was the one who let us hang out and watch The Soldier. While I remember the whole night with rather bizarre clarity, about the only thing I could remember from the movie itself was a scene where some guy sneaks into an apartment and tries to strangle some other guy with a wire. The other guy blocks it with his arm, but the wire still cuts through his sweater and causes a decent amount of blood to flow. I have no idea why that scene is the one I remember, but there ya go.

Since everyone my age builds their live around reclaiming their childhood and indulging themselves by purchasing every toy they were never able to get when they were ten, I figured it might be a good idea to track down a copy of The Soldier and give it another go-round. I mean, I remember that it was bloody and full of spies. That's enough to warrant at least one more look. Not too long ago, I would have gone into this film with some degree of trepidation. Would it still seem as cool to me now as it did nineteen years ago? However, after watching countless films from my youth that I should have grown out of, I discovered that my tastes have, for better or worse, changed very little since then. I still like the most godawful juvenile crap, and that part of the brain that makes you outgrow cheap barbarian movies and corny sci-fi remains as undeveloped as the part that should have me buying a house and starting a family instead of worrying about completing my Michael Caine spy thriller collection and tracking down a Fidel Castro action figure.

So given my short-comings when it comes to taste, I abandoned any misgivings a sane person may have harbored and dove headlong into the heart of this Cold War actioner. I wasn't really disappointed either, but I rarely am. I mean, if Space Hunter and Death Stalker aren't going to disappoint me, a film has to really be bad for me to regret wasting my time with it.

The Soldier stars Ken Wahl - fresh off his turn in 1981's Fort Apache, The Bronx -- as The Soldier, a CIA operative who is so tip top secret that only the director of the CIA (and maybe the President) knows he even exists. As you expect from such a movie, The Soldier is the guy you call when all other options fail, when the task at hand is impossible, so on and so forth. Maybe if they trained all their operatives this well, we wouldn't need those "final option" guys, because the first option guys could actually get the job done. Maybe if the CIA stopped relying on twelve-year-old kids on bikes to outwit Russian spies, there'd be less need for The Soldier.

When we first meet The Soldier, he's blowing away some terrorists in super slow-motion with ultra-wet bloody squibs. All while Tangerine Dream drones on in the background. So far, so good except for the fact that you can clearly see the squibs detonating and emitting a little puff of fire. Maybe they're using some of those explosive-tip bullets. Of course, this scene has nothing at all to do with anything else in the movie. It just shows us that The Soldier is a bad-ass, and the movie has really over-filled its squibs - something of which I always approve.

The actual plot kicks in when three terrorists - yep, three - hijack a shipment of weapons-grade plutonium that is being shipped on the back of an open-bed truck in a container clearly identifying it as weapons-grade plutonium, and with only one car (an Oldsmobile) to guard it. Oh, and a Southern cop somewhere else up in the hills. Now, I'll be the first to admit that I've never transported weapons-grade plutonium anywhere. Consumer grade for the kitchen, sure, but never weapons-grade. Nor have I ever been in the military in a position to be privy to the particulars of transporting such a cargo. Still, even with my ignorance fully fessed up to, I'm pretty sure they don't do it in a clearly-marked open-bed truck with only two guys in an Olds to guard it. Surely they'd do something like hide it amid a convoy of heavily armed Piggly Wiggly trucks full of well-trained soldiers. And surely they wouldn't stop for anything, even a topless woman hitchhiking or a broken down car. But the terrorists in The Soldier don't even need the topless hitchhiker, because this truck will stop for dang near anybody.

When you only have a couple slow-witted guys guarding the deadliest substance on the planet, it's no surprise that it only takes three terrorists to steal it. When the single cop finally shows up for support, he draws his gun and does the whole, "Freeze right there, mister!" routine. Now just as I've never been in the military, I've also never been a cop, but I'm pretty sure that even in today's skittish anti-cop atmosphere it's considered A-OK to come in with guns a-blazin' when you're approaching a group of men who you know gunned down two US soldiers, blew up a car, and are currently crawling around on top of the truck you know contains plutonium. No need to be diplomatic about things. Maurizio Merli would have immediately started kicking in teeth and bashing people's heads with the hood of a car. Hell, he'd let you have it with both barrels blazing just for flipping off an old lady. Of course, I suppose I could be wrong. If anyone in the military would like to confirm that James Glickenhaus is correct, and we truck around nuclear weapons with an escort of two Plymouths (one of which disappears), then I'll apologize, revise this review, and promptly move somewhere with a little more security when it comes to transporting the stuff that can blow up entire cities.

Now that they have the plutonium, the terrorists whip up an atom bomb and plant it somewhere in Saudi Arabia, demanding that Israel withdraw from the occupied West Bank. If Israel refuses, the terrorists will set off the bomb, thus contaminating over 50% of the world's oil supply and thrusting civilization into a state of panic and anarchy. Israel refuses, which frankly seems sort of prickish. I mean, I know you're all proud of holding onto a useless hunk of desert and all instead of just giving it to the people who live there, but this is the whole world we're talking about. Couldn't they just take it back later on? What's so great about the West Bank anyway? I hope that if something this goofy ever happened in real life, Israel wouldn't be nearly as rude about it as they are in this movie. Maybe Glickenhaus was once snubbed by a Hasidic Jew, so he decided to make Israel out to be a bunch of dicks in his movie.

Not wanting to see the world cast into chaos, the United States begins military preparations to force Israel out of the West Bank. Given our current relations with Israel in which we let them do pretty much anything no matter how adversely it affects us, this may seem sort of odd. Keep in mind, however, that the US and Israel were not always buddy-buddy. When Israel was carved out of the Middle East by European countries, it was populated almost entirely by refugees from Eastern Bloc nations. In other words, Communist nations. The US was supremely suspicious of Israel, which at the time seemed much closer to a Socialist nation than a democratic one. Anyway, what did we care? It was a problem for Europe and the Middle East to work out amongst themselves. It wasn't until it dawned on the United States that Israel had a lot of strategic value as a base and as a place to test new weapons that we figured it might be worth buddying up with them. So now we have the mess we have today. If only we had a man like . . . The Soldier!

Not wanting to see the world torn asunder, nor wanting to see the US go to war with Israel, the CIA sends The Soldier in to do what he must do, however it must be done. Of course, if he gets caught, the US government will deny his existence, et cetera. You'd think after about the nine hundredth time someone heard that speech, they could just skip it. This isn't his first mission. He knows the "deny any knowledge of you and your actions" spiel. If they just gave it to them the day they graduated from "super duper spy training" school and added, "And this applies to everything you do from here on out, starting . . .now!" they'd save everyone a lot of time.

Meanwhile, over in Israel, a hot female Mossad agent is torturing Iceman. Seriously. Sure, it's just a ruse to get someone to talk, but doesn't anyone notice that the guy pretending to get tortured has simian-like features and a forehead that slopes like a Neanderthal in order to hide the blood packets the Mossad installed in it to make his interrogation and execution seem realistic? Palestinians may not be up on all the latest techniques from Stan Winston, but I think even the untrained eye can spot a guy with three inches of latex protruding from his forehead and making him look like some of your more involved Star Trek: The Next Generation aliens. About the only reason this sequence even exists is to introduce the chick, and the only reason she exists is so she can sleep with The Soldier later on for no real reason.

While The Soldier prepares for his mission by playing Konami light gun games, the terrorists pass the day eavesdropping on the CIA. After building a bomb out of a light bulb, the terrorist infiltrates CIA headquarters and plants the dastardly device in the office of the head of the CIA. Let me do this one more time: I've never been a member of the CIA, but I have been by their office in DC for a tour once a long time ago. I seem to remember them having security. You know, being the CIA and all. Yet this guy gets past all their security simply by throwing on a granny dress and a gray wig and pretending to be the cleaning woman. Wouldn't security recognize the fact that she has man scruff and a wig that isn't on properly? And wouldn't they know who was and was not supposed to be cleaning the director's office? Surely even the CIA wouldn't fall for the old "the regular cleaning lady is sick, so I'm taking her place" bit. Actually, given what we've learned in recent months about how the CIA and FBI operate, I guess they could possibly fall for a trick involving a European terrorist masquerading as the lady from Mama's Family.

Something I've always wondered is how terrorists always manage to get a job as part of the cleaning or maintenance crew at wherever they need to plant stuff for later on. Take Shiri, for instance. It's one of my favorite action films, but how the heck did all the terrorists get jobs at the stadium they'd be attacking later on? Did they have a contingency plan in place just in case they were told that the stadium wasn't hiring anyone? Why are there always just enough employment opportunities for the terrorists to sneak in however many people they need to do the job? Similarly, even if the guy from The Soldier had been masquerading as a cleaning lady long enough to bug the office, how did he get the job to begin with? I assume the CIA screens everyone heavily, even their janitorial staff. Didn't they catch that this cleaning lady was actually a man who, until a few months ago, had been living in Poland or East Germany or something? It seems that no matter how screwed up the CIA may be, they'd at least catch that one.

So what I'm learning here is that The Soldier is slightly less believable and more bone-headed than even the most outlandish Eurospy films. I mean, I'm willing to accept a few plot contrivances to help move things along, but this movie is really pushing things. Luckily, it's countering the colossally inept plotting with a lot of slow-motion shooting and blood-spurting bullet wounds. Just don't mistake this for anything even remotely resembling intelligent regardless of how much the dreary Tangerine Dream music may make it sound like an arthouse experiment.

The Soldier eventually goes to meet up with Klaus Kinski at some ski resort for no real reason, at least not one I remember them telling us. If The Soldier had watched any movies before taking this assignment, he'd know that you can never trust Klaus Kinski. He'll always betray you or crawl through the ductwork to watch you undress. Maybe The Soldier figured the guy did give the world Nastasia Kinski, so he'd give him the benefit of the doubt. How a guy as creepy looking as Klaus contributed to making Nastasia is as great a mystery as how a greasy little guy with a crappy haircut like Dario Argento could have had anything to do with the production of Asia Argento.

The Soldier and Klaus meet at a ski resort for no other reason than it's a convenient place to have the ski chase and shoot-out that's become required for all spy films since James Bond first popularized them. Seriously, how many spy films have ski chases and shoot-outs? Bond seems to have had one in almost every movie since On Her Majesty's Secret Service. Heck, even next generation spy movies like XXX knew enough to have a ski chase. But at least they make some perfunctory attempt to justify it in the story. Here, they just go to the ski resort for absolutely no reason. And then Klaus Kinski immediately betrays The Soldier, whom he seemed to have been friends with up to about this point.

So they have a big ski chase, which is admittedly pretty cool. The Soldier even does a 720 while firing an Uzi. Unlike the real world, where this would be an incredibly idiotic thing to do that would result in you hitting no one while everyone was free to take potshots at you, in the world of poorly-conceived Cold War action films, you can do the same stunt in slow motion, allowing you to nail half a dozen fast-moving gunmen on skis while at the same time being able to completely dodge all their attempts to shoot you. Eventually, The Soldier is able to punch one of the gunmen, which causes him to confess the entire plot to The Soldier, revealing that it's not terrorists at all who are behind the atom bomb threat. It's the Russians!

Now wait just a minute here.

The Russians? Okay, I know it's the Cold War, and the Russians are responsible for everything bad that happens, even the decline in ratings for Battle of the Network Stars, but come on! The Russians need oil, too. I know they have some of their own, but surely even Russia can't benefit from casting the bulk of the world into a state of anarchy. I mean, it is going to affect them as well, like having unruly Eurotrash neighbors who smoke hasch and blast dull trance albums all night. This is silly even for Cold War Russians. And why are they putting on this whole stupid show with making Israel vacate the West Bank? Why do they give a rat's ass? Are they pissed because so many Jews left Russia and moved to Israel? If Israel had agreed to pull out of the West Bank, would the Russians just go, "Well, we didn't expect that. Guess we better go turn off that bomb like we promised." What's with the dog and pony show? Why don't they just set the bomb off and be done with things? I've seen better plans hatched by the kids down the street who were trying to take over the Little Rascals fort, and all those plans involved dressing up like pirates and flinging Limburger cheese at each other.

In order to alert the CIA to the fact that it's those dirty, no-good Commie pinkos behind the plot, The Soldier must break into a military base to use the phone. Why? Who knows. You'd think after all this time he'd have a better way to contact the one guy who knows who he is. For some reason, the head of the CIA is sitting in the dark in his office, and only turns on the lamp with the exploding bulb when it's convenient to the plot. Now The Soldier is on his own, with no allies save for the crack team he assembles to help him pull off a scheme even stupider than the one dreamed up by the Russians.

The first guy he recruits is "the black guy." Since this movie was made before Ernie Hudson was a big star, the black guy is played Steve James, who played "the black guy" in every movie requiring a black guy before Ernie Hudson became the official black guy of Hollywood. Anyone who is a fan of crappy action films recognizes James, who's probably best-known for his role as "Kungfu Joe" in I'm Gonna Get You, Sucka!. James was almost always relegated to playing sidekick to some lead-footed white hero, which was ironic since James was a better fighter and actor than pretty much everyone to whom he was forced to play second fiddle. He was definitely one of the great fixtures of action cinema until his untimely death from pancreatic cancer in 1993.

He'd already worked with James Glickenhaus in 1980 on the "'Nam vet gets revenge" flick The Exterminator. In The Soldier, he's the guy who sneaks in and does that attempted wire assassination to Ken Wahl. Of course, after some fighting, they just laugh and embrace, glossing over the fact that had The Soldier not reacted in time he would have been decapitated. And even though he did react in time, he still has an inch-deep gash in his forearm. Do people, even highly trained people, really do this "trying to kill my buddy as a good joke" thing? Rough housing is fine and all, but most people draw the line at attempted murder, even if it's all in good fun. It's like Kato constantly attacking Inspector Clouseau. Most people would just sneak up and give their buddy a wet willie or something, not try to slice their limbs off.

The Soldier assembles the exact same crack team that is assembled for every movie of this nature. There's the black guy, the drunk, the chick, and the guy who doesn't want to be there. Together, they hatch a scheme in which the rest of the team will commandeer a nuclear missile silo while The Soldier drives around Berlin in a Porsche for no discernable reason. The job of the guys in the silo is to threaten to nuke Moscow unless they drop this whole scheme with irradiating the Saudi oil fields. To show they mean business, The Soldier will drive fast and jump a sports car over the Berlin Wall.

That's their plan? First of all, taking over the missile silo is ridiculously easy. It must have been on the same base that ships nuclear materials in open-bed trucks with no armed escort. Or it's the same base that can be infiltrated by a precocious bike-riding pre-teen who made his own clearance cards. Seriously, even though it's adults doing the espionagin', their plans are even more ridiculous than what any spy-thwarting youngster would have devised. I mean, we don't want to lose the oil, so instead we'll start World War III and destroy the whole world? At least the Russian plan could have resulted in Russia itself surviving and being a society where everyone wears burlap sacks and hoes the fields all day. I mean, they were pretty much there already. But The Soldier's plan makes even the oil field scheme seem like a good idea.

This is the kind of crap that probably sparked the events we saw in Red Dawn. I always wondered why the Russians would launch an unprovoked attack on the United States, and why they'd have a bunch of sun-loving tropical island boys from Cuba invade a small town in Colorado. Now we know they were pissed about the stupid crap The Soldier was trying to pull. The Cubans probably just wanted to see snow and shoot at C. Thomas Howell. Who doesn't want to shoot at C. Thomas Howell?

Talk about a lunkheaded movie. When a stupid action film aspires to be nothing more than a stupid action film, it's usually not bad. You know what you're getting, after all. What's far more entertaining, however, is when an action film tries hard to be smart and the effort just makes it ten times stupider than it would have been without the delusions of intelligence. Chimps could hatch better plots than Glickenhaus has concocted for this mess. Nothing makes any sense even by Cold War standards when lots of things countries did seemed to make no sense. Even Ronald Reagan, who damn sure had some fruitcake ideas, would have dismissed these schemes as a bunch of junk. Why would the Russians want to catapult the whole world into a state of total chaos? Oh sure, because they're evil. Even Tom Clancy wouldn't devise a plot that inane.

And what about The Soldier's plan to prevent it from happening? Why did he have to have his guys break in and take over the missile silo? All he does is meet up with The Russians in East Berlin and say, "We're going to blow up Moscow if you blow up the oil," and they take him at his word. They are terrified by the revelation that The Soldier now has a missile pointing at Moscow. Was it somehow a shock to the Soviets that we had missiles pointing at them all ready to go? Who did they think we were pointing them at? His whole plan is the brinksmanship equivalent of spending a million dollars to catch a guy who stole a hundred dollars. Rather than breathing a sigh of relief that the crisis has been averted, you just sort of sit there and go, "That's it? Really? Man, I'm glad the Cold War's over."

The film isn't helped by the plodding Tangerine Dream score, which seems totally out of place in an action film. Moody synthesized new age music hardly communicates a sense of urgency, so even at the points where the film is well-paced and action-packed, it seems slow-moving and dull. Sometimes a score that seems contradictory to the onscreen action can end up working quite well. This is not one of those times.

Speaking of dull, it seems like Steve James is the only one doing any acting. The concept of having more than one facial expression or tone of voice seems lost on Wahl, who glides through his performance as The Soldier with somnambulistic dreariness. Was he even aware of the fact that he was making a movie? Klaus Kinski is fine, as he always is, but he's only in the movie for a tiny bit, long enough to justify listing him on the movie poster to snare any of the types of people who might be snared by Klaus Kinski's name on the marquee. Everyone else turns in performances that could be called "below average" had Ken Wahl not set the bar so low. Compared to him, the other actors seem as low-key as Cesar Romero playing The Joker. Not that the script gives them much to work with.

With so many things going against this film, it's no surprise that I thoroughly enjoyed it. It's a miserable failure as an intelligent espionage thriller, but as a crappy action film it succeeds marvelously. There's a lot of shooting, and when people get shot the blood really gushes. Ken Wahl (or his stunt double) gets to have a ski hill shoot out. He also gets to jump an expensive sports car over the Berlin Wall -- score one for capitalism, baby! A lot of things blow up, and there's one of those scenes where a fight breaks out in a cowboy bar and the band just keeps on playing as if it's nothing out of the ordinary (I think that joke was old even in 1982).

Although I feel there's too much poorly used slow-motion (made worse by Tangerine Dream's meandering synth score), at least there's a lot of action, and some of it is even fairly exciting. Despite making a number of action-oriented films, Glickenhaus just never got the hang of it. For his next movie, 1985's The Protector, even Jackie Chan couldn't help Glickenhaus figure out how to stage a compelling action set piece. That The Soldier has any action at all worth watching is a bit of a miracle, but it's a welcome surprise. The ski chase is good, as are a number of bloody shootouts and car chases, though you'll be left wondering what sort of lame Porsche is unable to outrun an Army jeep.

The horrendously thought-out plot adds to the charm. At least they tried to make something smart. They simply didn't succeed. But they did make something that is more entertaining than it is disappointing. Better spy films have come and gone, but The Soldier has enough gratuitous violence and bad writing to keep it on the list of fond memories I've been able to relive. If you want your thrills delivered with brains and wit, you'd best look elsewhere. If you want them delivered with bloody squibs and asinine writing, then The Soldier just might be the man for the job.

Labels: , ,

posted by Keith at | 0 Comments


Tuesday, February 13, 2001

And God Said to Cain

1969, Italy. Starring Klaus Kinski, JoaquĆ­n Blanco, Antonio Cantafora, Peter Carsten, Lucio De Santis, Guido Lollobrigida, Marcella Michelangeli, Luciano Pigozzi, Giuliano Raffaelli. Directed by Antonio Margheriti.

You know things are going to be weird when Klaus Kinski is your hero. Without even trying, Kinski is one of the creepiest stars to ever grace the screen. Never mind that he, like another creepy liittle guy by the name of Dario Argento, managed to apply his gene pool to an absolute wonder of a daughter (in this case, Nastasia Kinski). When Klaus steps into a scene, it immediately acquires a sinister edge. Being able to exude that sort of subtle influence is quite an accomplishment, though it must make him a real downer at parties.

Spaghetti Westerns generally rely ont he age-old "vengeance seeking stranger" plot. A mysterious wronged man rides into town and starts offing the evil men responsible for the injustices he has endured. Something like 95% of all Spaghetti Westerns adhere to this formula, which was pretty fun for a while. But you can only watch so many gunslinging angels of death before you start wondering if maybe they shouldn't try something else.

Well, that something else isn't And God Said to Cain, which is about a vengeance seeking stranger. The stranger in this case is a guy named Gary (Klaus Kinski). I know, I know. Gary isn't a very heroic or tough name. I bet in all the annals of cinema you would be hard pressed to find many heroic Garys (or is that Garies?). Not that there's anything wrong with being named Gary. It's a fine name. But it's not like being named "Maximillan Savagewood" or "Jack Deth."

Gary is doing hard time for a crime he didn't commit. When a presidential decree sets to releasing convicts who are veterans of the Civil War, Gary gets his ticket to freedom and hops on a stagecoach ridin' headlong into the bloody red sun of revenge. How's that?

The guy who framed Gary for a robbery is now living the posh life as a rich guy, which is par for the Spaghetti Western course. No one ever sets up their friend and then generally has a bad time of it. No, they must always go on to lives of gluttonous prosperity so the hero can come and shoot their bourgeois ass dead. And that's what Gary is going to do. Of course, in another convention of the genre, the evil robber baron type has a noble and honest son who is unaware of his father's treachery and dark past. Oh yeah, there's also a wicked deceitful woman and a crazy old coot.

In fact, Spaghetti Western formula requires that the old coot and a beautiful but lower class Mexican woman help our hero out. And they sure do. You're life is pretty good if at every turn you have the help of a beautiful Mexican woman or a crazy old coot. You just know everything is going to be okay as long as you have the senorita and some jig-dancing, grizzled old bearded codger in red ass-flap jammies.

So far there's nothing to set this film apart from the rest of the pack. It plays it pretty much by the book, with one interesting twist. Gary arrives to deal out deadly justice on the night of a big storm and tornado. He uses guerrilla tactics, stalking around in the shadows and burial catacombs beneath the town, popping up from time to time to give his shotgun a workout and fill the bad guy's lackeys full of lead. Occasionally, he takes time out from his stalking and killing to ring the church bell, much to the annoyance of the bad guys and probably anyone else within earshot.

The storm and catacombs lend the film a more gothic, almost horror setting, which is appropriate for the creepiness that Kinski can't help but exude even as a protagonist. In fact, adding elements of horror and surrealism is how directors tried to keep the vengeance seeking stranger plots going while providing a new twist, and for the most part I'm a fan of the move. No one, and I mean no one, can do spooky imagery like the Italians, with the exception of French surrealist-horror director Jean Rollin.

Of course, you can't talk about any Spaghetti Western without mentioning the music. Even the worst Spag Westerns often have amazing scores. And God Said to Cain has a decent soundtrack by Carlo Savina, though it's nothing that really sticks in my head. Kinda bluesy sounding in a lot of spots.

The horror elements, along with a brisk pace and solid acting make And God Said to Cain a thoroughly enjoyable, if not entirely outstanding, piece of cinema. It doesn't stray too far from the formula, and it has no interest in sub-plots or anything beyond "Klaus Kinski is going shoot them," but even a generic plot can be great fun when done well, and it's done pretty well here. The horror elements and lurking about in the church lend the film a differentiating element that make the movie among the more enjoyable vengeance seeking stranger films around.

Labels: , , ,

posted by Keith at | 0 Comments