Monday, February 27, 2006Violent Naples
1976, Italy. Starring Maurizio Merli, John Saxon, Barry Sullivan, Elio Zamuto, Maria Grazia Spina, Silvano Tranquilli, Massimo Deda, Guido Alberti, Pino Ferrara. Directed by Umberto Lenzi. Written by Vincenzo Mannino.
Click here for Man with a Moustache Month Roll-Call This post brings us full circle, back to the beginning of the article and the film that sparked my initial interest in poliziottechi and the tough Italian cops with big, thick moustaches that have served as the defining characters for Teleport City's Man with a Moustache Month. If we do this again next year, maybe we'll focus on Indian or Filipino films, two national cinemas that have traditionally and still enthusiastically embrace heroes with moustaches. I didn't initially mean for this month to focus solely on poliziottechi films, but it sort of turned out to be a brief introductory history to the genre, regardless of my original intentions to also review at least one 1970s Burt Reynolds films. After all, what would a moustache month be without Burt? But one thing led to another, and I didn't want to write about Violent Naples without tracing its roots back to High Crime, or without covering Violent Rome, the first film to introduce Maurizio Merli as the quintessential poliziottechi cop. And then it seemed like good form, before moving on to Violent Naples, to touch on director Umberto Lenzi's first foray into the genre, in the form of Milano Rovente. So now, finally, we've come to the beginning again. Violent Rome was good but not great. Milano Rovente was much the same, only slightly less so. It seems inevtibale, at least looking back, that Umberto Lenzi would end up directing a poliziottechi film starring Maurizio Merli. The intersection of careers finally happened in Violent Naples, in my opinion the best of all the many poliziottechi that came out during the 1970s. This was, as I stated (I think -- perish the thought I would go back and reread my own material for confirmation), the first poliziottechi I saw, and to say it blew me away would be a mild understatement. My initial review was so half-assed, however, that I vowed on the grave of my long lost twin brother who was killed by Communist agents in Vietnam, to one day rectify the situation and rewrite the review. Also, to bring down Communism and avenge my brother's death. On the second count, I can say, "Mission accomplished." Now it is time to finally turn my attention to the first count. ![]() I started my career as a cult and obscure film aficionado by growing up on Godzilla, Mazinger, and kungfu instead of Sesame Street, Smurfs, and Disney films, though I did see a smattering of each of those as a wee one. I think it was Pinocchio that initially put me off Disney films. You see, the first film I remember seeing in a movie theater was Jaws, and I adored it. Oh ho ho! The shark is biting Quint in half? What a grand old time this is! Very shortly thereafter, I went with my mother to see a re-release of Disney's Pinocchio, and spent a considerable amount of time screeching like a banshee with a stubbed toe as I crouched and hid in the aisle, terrified beyond belief, as I was, by the big, aggressive whale. My parents then vowed to only let me see movies in which salty sea captains are bitten in half amid a vibrant splash of blood, and forever protect me from seeing things like a cartoon whale with angry eyebrows drawn on it. Years later, I still get a shudder down my spine any time I walk by a Carvel (the ice cream parlor or James) and see Fudgy the Whale staring back at me...waiting...waiting... My third movie was one of the Herbie films, but all I remember about that was a scene where they're driving across a lake or ocean and some guy is taking a shower atop Herbie. I do seem to also recall regretting that no shark showed up to bite him in half, but I hear it wasn't meant to be that kind of film. Some couple of decades after becoming conscious of my status as a film fan, it's very difficult to wow me. It's easy to please me. Hell, put a guy in a ninja suit or a go-go dancing woman on screen, and you've pretty much got my vote. Throw in some ass-kicking midgets and you got a classic. But it's been rare lately that I am totally blown away by anything anymore. Happily, we seem to be entering a golden era of truly batty films finding exposure on DVD thanks to companies like Mondo Macabro and plenty of others, and I am constantly assured by the fact that no matter what I see, there is always something else waiting in the wings to say, "You thought that was insane? Wait 'til you see this one, baby." Yes, in my dreams all weird cult films refer to me as "baby." What's your point? Umberto Lenzi's Violent Naples -- also known as Napoli Violenta and Violent Protection (not to be confused with Violent Professionals) -- is one of those films that altered my perception of cinema significantly. I'd never seen anything like it, or rather, I'd seen things like it, but never anything quite so dramatically over-the-top. Violent Naples opens with Maurizio Merli reprising his Violent Rome role as Inspector Betti, freshly transferred down to sunny, one assumes given the title, violent Naples. He isn't in Naples five minutes before he stumbles upon a group of young punk car thieves just begging him to slam a car hood on them and bounce their skulls off a windshield a couple of times. After all, he wouldn't want to show up for his first day at his new job empty-handed. The film establishes a savage tone from the opening scene and never relents in its grim study of cops and criminals gone mad. Merli's main goal, and the main plot of the film, is to bust up the protection rackets. But that doesn't stop him from beating the ass of pretty much every other type of criminal he crosses paths with. And the crime in Naples is rampant. Rapists, fencers, thieves -- you name 'em, he's probably stomping on their head and yelling such memorable lines as "You make me want to box your ears in!" A dapper bank robber (Elio Zamuto) proves to be a particularly irksome thorn in Betti's side, as every time a heist occurs, the thief walks in mere moments later to sign in with his parole officer, thus supposedly exonerating himself from any suspicion -- well, from any suspicion except Betti's, causing the grim inspector to run his own high-speed experiment through the streets of Naples to see just how quickly a man could flee the scene of a crime and make it to the police precinct. In fact, in Violent Naples world, it would seem that roughly 90% of the population of Naples is actively involved in mugging, raping, murdering, roughing up, or stealing from the other 10%, who were apparently transplanted there expressly so they could be victimized by the rest of the population. Now, I've heard plenty of stories about how everyone in Naples in a con artist, thief, and all-around criminal, but Violent Naples goes to great lengths to take the complete insanity of crumbling urban centers in the 1970s and ratchet the madness up well past the breaking point. Amid the chaos, Betti befriends a streetwise young kid, the son of a mechanic who refuses to pay protection money to the local thugs. He's even been rallying the people to stand up for themselves and not be bullied. Betti first encounters the kid when he sees him slowly crossing the street, holding up traffic, and pretending to be a cripple. When the kid gets to the other side, he laughs and flips everyone off before running merrily down the street. This delights Betti to no end. And in case you're wondering, why yes, a film like Violent Naples pretty much does guarantee that at some point, sweet sweet irony will result in the kid becoming an actual cripple. I said the movie was good; I never said it wasn't somewhat heavy-handed. Lenzi showcases a tight, relentless pace that I think remains unmatched by any film in the genre. Along with From Corleone to Brooklyn and The Cynic, The Rat, and the Fist (both also starring Maurizio Merli), this is the best film he's ever made, and as I said in the review of Milano Rovente, it's a shame Lenzi isn't known for these films instead of the slapdash splatter stuff that came later in his career. His command of mood, and his ability to infuse every scene with both tension and pathos is amazing. It's because the film takes the time to generate sympathy with the characters that the tension becomes so heightened. These aren't character studies or anything, but the script by Vincenzo Mannino wastes no time in creating archetypal characters that quickly become easy to identify with. Mannino was one of the most reliable poliziottechi screen writers, having previously worked on scripts for both Violent Rome and High Crime. Violent Naples takes the strong points from each of those films and blends them into a truly enthralling mix of outrageous action and high melodrama. He'd go on to pen the scripts for Italia Mano a Armato, which is the second film in the Commissario Betti series that began with Violent Rome (and sadly, I haven't seen it yet), and From Corleone to Brooklyn, not to mention writing the script for Ruggero Deodato's completely loopy Raiders of Atlantis. Beyond Lenzi's frantic direction and Mannino's solid script, this movie belongs to Maurizio Merli. His portrayal of the hero with a broken heart, the cop on the edge, is as picture perfect a performance as you're ever likely to see in an action film hero. Every expression, every line drips with seething rage that betrays a sorrowful belief in compassion and justice at its core. Merli gnashes his teeth, grimaces, and exudes world-weary grimness at a level that will never be matched. He always seems five seconds away from having steam shoot out his ears accompanied by the sound effect of a steam locomotive's whistle. He's over the top, but in a way that matches the material perfectly and makes you notice the many strengths while being crazy enough that you miss the weak points. It's been said that Merli took the role very seriously, that he never approached it with anything but the utmost seriousness, and the acting job definitely benefits from the force of his conviction. So into his role was Merli that he often went (they say) a bit overboard in the fight scenes as well as the dramatic scenes, throwing extras and stuntmen around with such force that more than a few injuries resulted. Another actor might have been tempted to wink at the camera from time to time, to engage in a little good-natured camping up of the material. But not Merli. From beginning to end, through all his teeth grinding and fist shaking, you have no doubt that this man believes fiercely in Commissario Betti, and that ferocity comes through in the role and propels the film. He's also helped by a superb supporting cast which includes familiar workhorse John Saxon as a seedy businessman who ends up, more or less against his will, helping Betti take down the protection rackets. Saxon is always a dependable performer, even if like most working actors he's appeared in a colossal number of stinkers. Other dependable stalwarts include Barry Sullivan as a slimy mafioso behind the protection game, Luciano Rossi, and Pino Ferarra (who also starred in a movie with one of my all-time favorite titles: Ubalda, All Naked and Warm starring my undisputed all-time favorite cult film actress, Edwige Fenech). No one lets the film down, and even our child actor is tolerable (but just barely). But let's not forget the action. Umberto Lenzi pours on the thrills thick as molasses in January, and he films and edits the action sequences with an expert hand. Violent Naples delivers an almost uninterrupted orgy of brutal violence. Fistfights, shoot-outs, car chases, tram chases, the shaking of young punks by determined police inspectors -- there's plenty of fist-shaking action to get the blood pumping. Some of the violence is, as is common for the genre, gratuitous, gruesome, and over-the-top, but none of it is of the splatter variety. Everything is possessed of that gritty 70s realism that makes even the most unbelievable moments seem perfectly acceptable and more intense than if they'd happened in a film with more vibrant colors or less grainy film stock. Free from the glitz and shiny sheen that would undermine action films in the 1980s, Violent Naples -- like many of the action films that defined the "ultra-violence" trend that began with Dirty Harry -- feels completely and believable and understated even when it's being completely fantastical and over-the-top. There's very little in the way of subtlety on display in Violent Naples. This isn't the film for understated nuance or hidden meaning. This is bloody melodrama played on the grand scale, holding nothing back. When a moment is symbolic, Violent Naples delivers it wit a heavy-handed thud to make sure you get it. But everything is played with such earnestness that it remains compelling despite the blunt delivery. The final scene marks the best moment in Merli's tragically short career (when the police film fell out of vogue in the 1980s, Merli devoted himself to physical fitness, but died at the age of 49 of a sudden heart attack during a game of tennis). Betti, disgusted with everything he has seen in Rome and Naples, decides to throw in the towel. Burned out and disillusioned, Betti turns in his badge and heads for the airport. He's sick of trying to work inside a corrupt system, one that allows you to yell the required line, "This damn system is designed to protect the guilty and punish the victims!" He's tired of the pain, the frustration, and the ultimate futility of the brutal war he wages every day. He's heading for a new life in the sun and a chance to simply relax and forget it all. Until he sees that little kid again, once again limping slowly across an intersection and wincing with pain as he holds up traffic. Only this time, he's not pretending to be maimed. Betti stares at the boy as he struggles through the crosswalk. When the light changes, Betti flashes a devastating look of battered, world-weary grimness (his signature expression) and turns the car around. Back to the precinct. Back to the fight. It's not an especially unique or unexpected sort of ending, but Merli's expression during this final moment amplifies its power considerably. Like the classical warrior with a broken heart, try as he might, he can't turn his back on a world in need. Bloodied and saddened, he must continue. And it is in this moment that the underlying compassion that fuels this and many of the best poliziottechi shines through. Because it's not about power -- Betti has had it made perfectly clear that a man like him has no power, will never have power, and will never ultimately beat those who do have the power. Betti can't turn his back on the world because, although it has broken his heart, even though the struggle may be futile, it's still worth fighting for. As he heads back into the maelstrom accompanied by the superb score from Franco Micalizzi, it's hard not to get carried away by the raw emotion of the moment. For my money, what little of it I have, action films simply don't come any better than Violent Naples. And moustaches and grim cops don't come any better than Maurizio Merli. Labels: Director: Umberto Lenzi, Poliziotteschi, Stars: Maurizio Merli, Year: 1976 posted by Keith at 3:03 PM | 1 Comments Friday, February 10, 2006Violent Rome
1975, Italy. Starring Maurizio Merli, Richard Conte, Silvano Tranquilli, Ray Lovelock, John Steiner, Daniela Giordano. Directed by Marino Girolami. Written by Vincenzo Mannino.
Click here for Man with a Moustache Month Roll-Call Enzo Castellari and Franco Nero, working with Dirty Harry as their inspiration, established the template for both the look and attitude of the genre that would soon become known as poliziotteschi, or simply enough, tough Italian cop films. High Crime remains one of the best poliziotteschi films, and one of the best action films of the 1970s, but it was in the wake of High Crime that the genre would find it's signature star and, eventually, it's star director. As mentioned previously, Maurizio Merli was a good-looking young actor who experienced a bit of a career boost based on the fact that he bore a decent resemblance to megastar Franco Nero. As such, whenever someone wanted to make a sequel to or a quick knock-off of a Franco Nero hit, Merli would get the call. This first happened when Nero departed the popular "White Fang" adventure series and producers decided to carry on without him. Merli inherited the part, with producers hoping that after he grew some ragged mountain man scruff and threw on a frosty parka hood, no one would notice it wasn't Franco Nero until it was too late. When High Crime broke, it was only a matter of time before someone got the bright idea to port Maurizio Merli into the type of tough cop role that movie helped create. Despite, at the time, not enjoying the same level of success as Franco Nero, Maurizio Merli was more than just some cheap knock-off Bruce Le/Bruce Li -- at least they didn't change his name to Franko Nero or Franco Niro or something. Merli was a solid actor with the same sort of rugged, dashing good looks. His moustache was at least as good as -- and quite possibly superior to -- Franco Nero's. But what really made him an excellent choice for the poliziotteschi genre were his eyes. Now bear with me for a moment as I wax philosophic about ass-kicking Italian cops from the 1970s. ![]() Although the character is often summed up simply as "the tough cop" or alternately "a cop on the edge," such simplistic descriptions conjure up, from our vantage point in the new millennium, a far shallower archetype that fails to embody or communicate the complexity that inhabited the character at its inception during the early 1970s. Keep in mind that in between the years of Dirty Harry and Inspector Belli, and where we stand now, we have a colossal wasteland known as the 80s and 90s, which took the basic concept of the good cop on the edge, drained it of any meaning, and transformed it into a bug-eyed, farcical lampoon; a stock character divorced from the vitality and meaning that it had when it was first created. After so many movies of that quality, we tend to think of them more than we think of the early progenitors of the character, when we mention the "cop on the edge," and it's easy as a result of our proximity to the low end of the bell curve, to forget that the character wasn't nearly so devoid of value, wasn't nearly as goofy and cartoonish, during the 1970s. This purer, old-school "tough cop" is a far more difficult character to portray, and it takes a class actor to understand the role, then bring it successfully to the screen. It takes understanding that the character's toughness doesn't emanate entirely from his ability to box in the ears of young punks who deserve it; the toughness, rather, is rooted not just in the character's sense of two-fisted machismo, but also in the character's sadness. The poliziotteschi protagonist is the proverbial warrior with a broken heart. He has taken on the good fight, stood up for the world, and the world has broken his heart. It has shown him the ugliest of its many sides. It has ravaged and crushed him. And still, the warrior forges on, the sadness in his heart becoming a source of inspiration. He has seen the worst in people, but his compassion, buried under anger and gruffness and frustration, compels him forward. He is a cop on the edge because he must stand at the lip of the abyss and stare into it. He carries the weight of compassion on his shoulders, and no matter how often the world breaks his heart, he soldiers on, simply because he cares. This is the mitigating factor for the poliziotteschi inspector and the poliziotteschi film in general. The cop on the edge is angry. He's bitter, perhaps even cynical. But these things are not his motivation. They are not the fire that keeps him going. It's his compassion, and his sadness, that keeps him on the street. It's easy to look at the poliziotteschi film and see little more than a glorification of brutality, vigilante justice, and right-wing paranoia -- aspects of the films that have always seemed difficult to square with the fact that many of the men writing and directing them were famously liberal in their views and presented us with cops with as much disdain for "the system" as the shaggiest of hippies. Sometimes, this dichotomy arose simply because the writer-director was goofing off, trying to make something so fantastically fascist that no one could possibly take it seriously. Other times, however, hints of fascism were disarmed to some degree by the fact that the poliziotteschi inspector wasn't fueled by a desire for authority or violence. He was fueled by an honest sense of justice and compassion for the victims, and in his quest to right the wrong, he sometimes lost focus on the lines of civility that should not be crossed. Often times, the poliziotteschi cop is as frustrated by and marginalized by the legal and political system as the thugs and terrorists he pursues. It is the sense of compassion for the innocent that keeps the inspector from tumbling over into the abyss and becoming what he has sworn to oppose. Violent Rome attempts to tackle many of these concepts, though ultimately the end philosophical result is only partially developed and never fully sorted out. This was Maurizio Merli's entry into the poliziotteschi, playing Commissario Betti, directed by seasoned pro Marino Girolami -- who happens to be the father of Enzo Castellari. Action begins with a botched public bus robbery that results in chaos and, eventually, murder -- alerting the viewer before the credits have even finished of the two things this film is going to deliver in spades: mean, nasty violence and ham-fisted melodrama. For example -- the person murdered just happens to be a newlywed, and the other half of the union is waiting to meet them at the next bus stop. Violent Rome, obviously, isn't going to be a subtle film in how it presents on-screen action and violence or in how it shamelessly manipulates emotion and sentiment. The crime introduces us to Merli's Commissario Betti, the picture-perfect poliziotteschi cop in a thick turtleneck, flared slacks, and a wide-collared trenchcoat. Like Franco Nero, he sports a bushy mane of blond hair and a thick 70s cop moustache the likes of which would make Tom of Finland swoon. As with most poliziotteschi, Violent Rome consists mostly of Maurizio Merli driving around and kicking ass. He'll box the ears of any hooligan with whom he crosses paths. Thieves? He'll beat your ass! Assholish drunken teenagers who turn to murder? He'll beat your ass twice then kick your teeth in. Rapists? He'll beat your ass three times, and then once more for good measure. Then he'll shoot you. As is also always the case, his somewhat extreme methods bring him into conflict with lawyers and police superiors, allowing him to give the requisite "These are the only methods I know/Your system stinks and protects the guilty while letting the innocents die" speech that is de rigueur for all "cop on the edge" type films, but no one can deliver the speech like Maurizio Merli. The street-level violent criminals chafe his hide plenty, but it's the decadent and corrupt officials sitting at the top, happy to let the world rot while they reap huge profits from the chaos with total disregard for how many innocent people are slaughtered in the process, that really steam Betti. Eventually, he encounters so much bureaucratic red tape and so many sleazy criminals protected by wealth and political connections that Betti simply hands in his badge and refuses to be an instrument of such a corrupt institution. In vowing to enforce the law, he thought he would be upholding justice. Instead, he was simply a cog in a machine that protected people with enough cash to buy protection while leaving everyone else hung out as food for the wolves. He joins an organization of private citizens who are just as fed up with the lack of action by the officials. Merli and his vigilante group are pretty successful in kicking the ass of criminals the cops can't or won't go after. Of particular interest to the group is a circle of thugs protected by the politically and financially powerful families. But Merli cares not for social status. No amount of money can buy your way out of having him kick your ass. The actions of the group make them prey as well as predator. In a particularly nasty scene, the aging founder of the group is beaten mercilessly and forced to watch as a gang of thugs rape his daughter. Merli's best friend is exposed as an undercover and crippled. Merli himself becomes the target of frequent assassination attempts. But then, no one figured it would be an easy fight. If it was, the police would have done it. Violent Rome is a brutal, cynical, often mean-spirited film populated by a wealth of despicable villains and set in a city where, apparently, every single street was the location of a shoot-out, mugging, or rape. It pushes the boundaries of on-screen violence and questionable taste even further than High Crime. The scene in which vigilante group Sartori (Richard Conte) is forced to watch his wife gang-raped is particularly evil, and this is the sort of movie that will let a crook gun down a group of singing school children simply because he hopes it will preoccupy the cops chasing him. Violent Rome is easily one of the meanest poliziotteschi, but the levels of naked violence it attains are so overwhelming so as to propel the film into a comic book like state where the violence ceases to have much more than a "holy crap, I can't believe they just showed that" impact. There's not enough time put into most of the characters to illicit any sort of emotional response from the brutality, so it exists more as a guilty Grand Guignol exercise in outrageous excess. Compared to High Crime, which managed to mix genuine sympathy for a character (the browbeaten commissioner) with highly effective cinematography and music to generate honest emotional involvement with the violence, Violent Rome comes across as a more over-the-top, but also clumsier study of the same territory. Part of the problem is that Violent Rome lacks a cohesive narrative. There is, somewhere, an actual case, but the movie is structured as a series of disconnected and independent episodes that have, binding them together, nothing more than the fact that they serve to make Betti madder and madder. The supporting cast is half-heartedly developed as well, with no single quality foil ever emerging to plague Merli, meaning that it lacks the tapestry of involving characters that make better poliziotteschi compelling. And, most bald-face, Girolami shamelessly rips off the ending of his son's superior film almost shot-for-shot. Violent Rome's weaknesses are evident primarily because the bar was set so incredibly high by High Crime. It was inevitable that most of the films rushing out of the gate wouldn't attain the loftly level of artistry and meaning that Castellari infused in his film. Violent Rome, had High Crime not existed, would be a solidly enjoyable and gritty action film. The direction is workmanlike, the acting is, for the most part, acceptable, and the script, while episodic, is still logical and engaging. The violence is so crazy, so mean, and so offensive at times, that almost becomes parody. Still, it's not a movie for those who are offended by a guy with a moustache and a gun beating the crap out of people. What elevates Violent Rome is Maurizio Merli. His performance as Inspector Betti is phenomenal, and it has a lot to do with why this film was a huge success -- though gratuitous ultra-violence never hurts, unless, I suppose, you are the victim of gratuitous ultra-violence. Merli's Betti is an outstanding character, and he walks the line expertly between compassionate and devastatingly grim. Although the final scene is a direct rip-off of High Crime, it manages never the less to be very effective. High Crime sets the boundaries for what little success the poliziotteschi cop may enjoy. At the end of the movie, he has perhaps busted up the criminal ring he was pursuing, killed the chief villain, but other criminals wait in the wings to fill the void without pause. And the poliziotteschi hero stands on the street and realizes that, in achieving his goal, he has lost everything. Friends, family, hope -- he has had it all taken away from him, or he has sacrificed it all. Whatever may be the case, the end result is that he is left with nothing but his broken heart. Realizing this, often while staring at the grave of a loved one, he will sigh, let his shoulders droop for a fraction of a moment, then straighten himself, tighten the belt on his overcoat, and head back to the precinct to continue the fight. Merli would continue the fight. Violent Rome, although a weaker film than High Crime, established Merli not just as a guy imitating Franco Nero, but as a megastar in his own right, who had taken a stock character and made it uniquely his own. Although what Betti does may be questionable, Merli's conviction in the character and his charisma as an actor make you believe, and they engage you in a way that the rest of the film never manages to do. As such, Violent Rome is not the best poliziotteschi, but it remains essential for a proper understanding of the genre because it introduces Maurizio Merli into the mix, and because, while not perfect, it's still a ripping good action film. So now we have the template, and we have the actor who would become the face of the poliziotteschi film. What he needed now was to hook up with the right director. Although common sense would have you assume that would mean Maurizio Merli working with Enzo Castellari, common sense would be wrong in this case. Because the genre's best director would turn out to be a guy named Umberto Lenzi. Continued... Labels: Poliziotteschi, Stars: Maurizio Merli posted by Keith at 5:39 PM | 5 Comments Tuesday, January 15, 2002Convoy Buster
1978, Italy. Starring Maurizio Merli, Olga Karlatos, Massimo Serato, Nello Pazzafini, Mario Feliciani, Mimmo Palmara, Marco Gelardini, Attilio Duse. Written by Gino Capone and Teodoro Corra. Directed by Stelvio Massi.
It's rare that I will watch a supposed tough action film star and feel compelled to yell, "You da man!" In fact, I can't think of any point in my life that I would feel compelled to yell that. But I will get close in the case of Italian action star Maurizio Merli, for whom I will nod, smile, and quietly say, "You are a bad mother fucker, Maurizio." The sum total of movie stars I consider to be "bad mother fuckers" is small. Pam Grier is a bad mother fucker. Bruce Lee is a bad mother fucker. Jet Li is cool, but he's not a bad mother fucker. And you know they say that cat Shaft is a baaaad mother ... shut your mouth! They pretty much stopped making bad mother fuckers in the 1970s, with only a precious couple being made since then. By far the number one, if not only, bad mother fucker of the 1990s is Takeshi Kitano, a Japanese actor (among other things) who, in many ways, reminds me of one of the greatest bad mother fucker of them all, Maurizio Merli. Merli is best known, at least to readers of this website, as the star of one of my very favorite films, and one of the best action films ever made, Violent Napoli. In that, he played a tough as nails police inspector who beats ass on every criminal within a hundred mile radius. In Convoy Buster, he makes a dramatic departure. This time around, he plays a tough as nails police inspector who beats ass on every criminal within a two hundred mile radius. The basic lesson you learn from any of these poliziotteschi films is don't fuck with Maurizio Merli. It's like those When Animals Attack videos. If you put your head in a lion's mouth while you shove a wolverine up its ass, there's a good chance either the lion, the wolverine, or both will take your soft pink simian hide to wilderness school. Similarly, if you threaten Maurizio Merli, he will kick you in the teeth, break your nose, and look like a million bucks while he's doing it. I don't remember his character's name in this movie, and I'm too lazy to look it up, but in any poliziotteschi film, there's a 75% chance that the main character's name is Inspector Nico. Anyway, Merli plays the baddest cop in the crime-torn city of Rome, circa the mid 1970s. When he isn't beating the shit out of criminals, and it's rare that he isn't beating the shit out of at least some criminal (probably even when he is taking a shower), he spends most of the movie doing what all rogue cops are required to do, which is give angry impassioned speeches about the sorry state of police affairs and society. You can pretty much sum up each of these conversations with the following bit of dialogue. "Inspector, your methods are too controversial." "My methods get results!" "Your methods get us in trouble with the press, with citizen's groups -- do you know I was getting chewed out by the mayor all morning." "I'm sorry about your political problems. I have a bigger problem, and that's this system. Your system protects the guilty and punishes the innocent. Citizens are prisoners in their own homes while criminals and lawyers run wild." "Damnit, inspector! You go too far! You work for the judiciary system!" "I work for justice, not for the system." At which time, the inspector will walk out, leaving the beleaguered chief to eat the dust of righteousness. Slight variations may occur, but the spirit is always the same. Cliche as they may be, no one delivers the "indignant public servant" spiel as Merli. He don't take no shit from The Man. Merli always plays an interesting figure. He works for the system without being part of it. In Violent Napoli, I compared him to John Shaft or Kojak, and the comparison still stands here. Probably more like Kojak than anyone else -- the warrior with a broken heart. The man who wants to help society, to protect the innocent, but is frustrated at every turn by corruption, incompetence, politics, and bureaucracy. His role as Rome's number one ass kicker gets him on a lot of Mafia shitlists, and before too long, Merli finds he can scarcely walk down the street without someone trying to assassinate him. When he mistakenly shoots and kills an innocent man he thought was an assassin, Merli realizes he'll never be the victor in a place as twisted and corrupt as Rome. He vows to never fire his gun again, resigns his position, and leaves the city. He takes a post in a small town by the ocean, where the biggest crime seems to be the occasional drunken ass grabbing by some local louts. Once Merli kicks their asses across Europe and back, they fall into place and everything seems good. He even gets himself a fine woman. Life, it would seem, couldn't be more perfect. At least until Merli starts snooping around some strange happenings down at the fishing docks. He soon uncovers a gun smuggling operation right in the middle of his idyllic ocean hamlet and, with weary dedication to his job, realizes he must break out his ass kicking shoes one more time. The convoy he busts, incidentally, has nothing to do with Kris Kristoferson. It's the string of trucks that drive to the beach to pick up all the illegal guns. Make no mistake about it, though, if I found out there was a movie where Maurizio Merli did beat the unholy Hell out of Kris Kristoferson, I'd be first in line to see it. Convoy Buster isn't as vicious as Merli's Violent Rome but it's a better movie, and it's not as good as Violent Napoli but it's a little less brutal. Merli shines, as usual. I compared him to Takeshi Kitano earlier. Both men make similar movies and play similar characters -- tough, quiet guys who can do more acting with a simple flicker of the face or move of the eye than most stars can do with their whole body. Both men are subtle and understated, but when the time comes for fisticuffs, explode in violent whirlwinds. I think any fan of Kitano films like Violent Cop and Hana-Bi should definitely be sinking their teeth into Maurizio Merli films like Convoy Buster and Violent Napoli. Violent Napoli is his best film, and one of the bets action films of all time, but Convoy Buster runs a close second. It is packed with tons of action and violence, a fast pace, and a healthy dose of wit and charm. The message here is a somewhat bleak one. Merli leaves Rome to escape the corruption and violence only to discover it can exist anywhere so long as people are willing to turn a blind eye and put up with it. Even in victory, the inspector learns a harsh lesson and is forced to reload his gun one last time, much like Ling the swordsman in Swordsman II, who was a man who simply wanted to retire to the mountains to sing and drink but kept finding himself pulled into the petty squabbles and power struggles of the world, forced to draw the sword he swore he would never again use. One thing is certain. Put together a force including Ling, Kojak, and Maurizio Merli, and the world would be a better place. They may sigh about it and mourn the state of the troubled world, but they'll still find time to beat you silly. Labels: Country: Italy, Poliziotteschi, Stars: Maurizio Merli, Year: 1978 posted by Keith at 12:36 AM | 0 Comments |
|
![]() |