Tuesday, November 20, 2001The Executioner (Henry Silva)
1974, Italy. Starring Tomas Milian, Laura Belli, Henry Silva, Gino Santercole, Anita Strindberg, Guido Alberti, Ray Lovelock. Directed by Umberto Lenzi.
You know, you think you've seen it all, and then along comes something like this to make you realize the world still has so much to offer you, so much worth living for. After Violent Rome, I thought I'd seen the paramount in cinematic cynicism and poliziotteschi brutality. Ha! I was just being primed for this little baby, which like most poliziotteschi films, actually caused me to howl with wild abandon and run around the living room. I was even tempted to climb up through the skylight and do a suggestive dance on the snowy rooftop, but then I figured my Hasidic neighbors would not be as happy about that as I was. For starters, reviewing The Executioner allows us to right a fairly heinous wrong. Frankly, I'm a bit astonished that we got this far at Teleport City without ever reviewing a film featuring Henry Silva. It's something of a miracle, really, to review so many 1970s B-movie actioners and not run across Henry Silva. It's like reviewing 1970s/1980s made-for-tv movies and not mentioning Clu Gulager, or doing a website that reviews only films made for the Lifetime Network, yet never reviewing a film that either stars Meredith Baxter Berney or is about a woman who is pursued by an abusive ex-husband but no one believes her (and that woman would probably be played by Meredith Baxter Berney). Silva is one of those guys few people can name, but everyone can recognize, sort of like Al Leong and Eddie Deezen. Maybe those three should make a movie together. Boy, that sure would be something. So get this -- if Teleport City ever becomes one of those internet sensations you read about in the papers, and I become fabulously wealthy, I will take my first several million and make a movie starring Henry Silva, Al Leong, and Eddie Deezen. And you know, since I'm a relatively nice guy, I'll throw Tim Thomerson and Antonio Fargas in as well! Silva was in hundreds of films, usually playing a crazy-ass (not just crazy, but crazy-ass) villain or henchman. This is probably because, much like Christopher Walken, Henry Silva looks absolutely psycho when he does the angry face, and he looks even more psycho when he tries to look happy or sane. He's also a character who, like Tim Thomerson or even Vincent Price, can usually deliver a performance that is far better than the movie around it. With a good publicist or agent, Silva could have probably been a big star. Instead, he took damn near every role that came his way and became one of the most beloved and respected character actors in the vast realm of B-movies, which is where we want him, and where we ourselves would all be happiest. I mean, would you rather hang out with Ben Affleck and Bruce Willis, or would you rather hit the town with Henry Silva and Eddie Deezen? Whoa, there is something infinitely bizarre about the thought of a night on the town with Henry Silva and Eddie Deezen. I want that. I want that. If you want to ever get me a present, buy me a night on the town with those two. I promise I'll bring a camera. So finally, with this review, the glorious Henry Silva can take his rightful place alongside other B-grade (and lower) staples like John Saxon. Now all we have to do is get a Tim Thomerson film done, and we'll have most of the bases covered. Normally, when a recognizable American star shows up in an Italian film, it's to make a quick buck and is what we like to call "slumming." But given Silva's body of work, which include such spectacles as the mega-expensive mega-flop Mega Force, you can hardly call his career in Italy slumming. Weirdly enough, some time in the 1970s or early 1980s, this film was released theatrically in the United States and sold as a horror/monster movie! I guess if you look at murderers and thugs as monsters, then yeah, that's correct, but I don't think anyone is trying to sell The Godfather as a horror film, or Goodfellas as a monster movie. Yet this film was retitled Almost Human and sold to audiences as a scary monster movie. That's even weirder than adding the word "ninja" to kungfu movies that have no ninjas on them, just so you can cash in on the early 1980s ninja craze. Eventually, they just pissed everyone off, gave up, and the film was called The Executioner, which actually fits the bill (the original Italian title was Milano odia: la polizia non puo sparare). I knew from the credits this was going to be a good one. A violent Italian cop film starring Henry Silva and Tomas Milian (Hit Squad) and directed by my man Umberto Lenzi (Violent Napoli, Cannibal Ferox). And hey, a kick-ass score by Ennio Morricone to boot! Lenzi sure as hell knows how to make an action-packed cop film, and he didn't let me down here. Milian, clean-shaven for once, plays Guilio, a three-time loser with a vicious psycho streak. During a bank robbery, he blows away a cop for no reason in particular, which sort of pisses off his cohorts. They kick his ass and severe their ties with the nutcase. Actually, they kick his ass twice, I think, because in a poliziotteschi film, you never kick anyone's ass just once. Milian decides to start his own little gang made up of a bunch of small-time hoods who have bought into his frequent bragging. When a cop happens by one night while Guilio is stealing money out of a vending machine, he stabs the guy to death. Jeez, that's his answer for everything. The murder brings tough Milan cop Henry Silva onto the scene to survey the aftermath, which is pretty much all he does throughout the entire movie. Milian stands in the crowd that eventually gathers around the scene. After that is done, Milian and two buddies decide to kidnap a rich man's daughter and hold her for ransom. Milian steals his girlfriend's car for the job. I just have to mention a quick little something about Milian and the girlfriend. They have a love scene, and god damn it, Tomas Milian wears the same little cherry red bikini briefs that disturbed me so in Hit Squad! What is it with this guy and bright red underwear? Let me tell you something, whether you are straight, gay, bi, male female -- skimpy red underwear simply look better on women than they do on Tomas Milian. How many other movies feature Milian cavorting around in his red underwear? They should put a parental advisory sticker on these films: "Warning! Contains scenes of Tomas Milian prancing around in little red bikini briefs." He also steals some machine guns from an old guy in the usual "Actually, I don't think I will pay for them" type scene. You'd think that after about a billion gun smugglers have been shot by crazy clients, they'd stop selling them the guns and the bullets at the same time. But no, every damn time, they give them loaded guns so they can get shot instead of getting paid. A day later, Henry Silva shows up to grimly survey the scene. Guilio's gang consists of a quiet tough guy and a nervous young guy who doesn't want things to get out of control. Pretty much your standard issue gang. The kidnapping goes exactly as Guilio (Milian, remember) wants it to, in that they get to machine gun the girl's boyfriend, then chase her to a mansion in the woods where they get to torture, rape, and murder partygoers (male and female alike -- Guilio makes some snooty rich guy take a close-up look at those little red underwear). Then after they get done with the massacre-ing, they hang the corpses from the chandeliers. Obviously, this exceeds the whole "getting out of control" thing the young guy was worried about, so Guilio just feeds him some drugs. Sure enough, Henry Silva shows up after the fact to go, "Looks like our man was here." With the rich girl tied up in some old river front shack, Guilio decides to confess the multiple murders and kidnapping to his girlfriend so he can then kill her for knowing too much. He goes through friends pretty quickly. If you think that a day after her murder, Henry Silva shows up to grimly survey the scene and pronounce that it does indeed look like their man was here, well give yourself a prize. But nothing too expensive or nice, because it really wasn't that hard to figure out. When Silva finds out she was Guilio's girlfriend, he tries to think of something to connect Guilio to the kidnapping and murders. When he remembers seeing Guilio in the crowd at that totally unrelated stabbing incident, he realizes that Guilio is indeed the murderer. Yeah. Yeah, I know. If you don't really follow the train of thought there, you're probably sane but not very in touch with the whole "cop on the edge" style of investigation. Unfortunately, Guilio has an ironclad alibi. He blackmails his old pals from the bank robbery, telling them that if they don't cover for him, he'll rat on them about the bank job. If they play along and say he was with them all night, he'll give them a load of the ransom money. So they go along, but they still kick his ass anyway just because it's an Italian cop film. Guilio takes enough time out from his killing to set up the whole ransom thing. Once the old rich guy agrees to pay the ransom, Guilio kills the daughter because, well, he's crazy. The young guy protests, so Guilio kills him too. And then the quiet tough guy protests Guilio killing the young guy, so, you guessed it, Guilio kills him too. He then grabs some of the ransom money and, shoots Henry Silva in the leg, and disappears into the night without anyone ever actually seeing him. So there you go. The cops have absolutely zero evidence against Guilio. He has an alibi and absolutely nothing to connect him to the kidnapping and murders. His girlfriend was dead, but she was drowned in a car wreck (which he forced, of course), so there's not even anything to connect that death to all the murders. Silva being convinced that Guilio's being in the crowd gathered around the murdered cop makes him inarguably guilty of the other crimes is, at best, totally insane and off-the-wall. The cops have absolutely no reason at all to even have the slightest suspicion about Guilio. So what happens? Silva limps up to Milian, who is minding his own business at a sidewalk cafe, and blows him away. The end! No, really! I swear! Every shred of common sense, not to mention evidence, screamed that Guilio was innocent, but Silva shoots his ass dead anyway. Why? Because it's a poliziotteschi film, that's why! I knew that, at some point, Silva would blow Guilio away. Poliziotteschi films are downbeat and violent, but the criminal always gets wasted in the end. There was no question that Silva was going to eventually kill Guilio, but I thought they would at least make some sort of effort to make Guilio appear guilty. But no, even though we all know he's a murdering bastard, the cops don't have any reason at all to suspect him. I mean, they could have had one of his girlfriend's friends identify him as having been in her car the day she was killed. They could have found the machine gun. Something to make them think he might be guilty. They find nothing, but Henry Silva kills him anyway because he was in the crowd at that cigarette machine incident, thus proving beyond any shadow of a doubt that he was also the mastermind of a series of brutal murders and kidnapping. Well, unless you are a sane person possessed of taste, you can't help but love a movie with sort of cockeyed reasoning. And if you were one of the aforementioned sane people with taste, it's hardly likely you'd be patronizing a website devoted to weird personal stories, punk rock music, and films about midget spies, murderous cops, and kungfu fighters. So with your Teleport City passport firmly in hand, you are invited to partake in the relentlessly violent, totally ridiculous smorgasbord of death-dealing that is The Executioner. It's not as good as Lenzi's Violent Napoli, but it's still a wild trip. The politics come in the form of some speeches Milian's character makes about how unfair it is that fat cats sit perched atop a mountain of wealth while the rest of us grovel in the mud for some meager scraps. Of course, that doesn't really make Guilio a likable or a sympathetic villain in the least. He's vile the whole way through, which, in this era of smarmy politically correct villains with no guts, is pretty nice. And nothing politically ever really justifies Silva's actions in the end. It's not like his investigation was sabotaged by bureaucrats or corrupt officials. I think he got to give the whole "cop on the edge" speech about how the system protects the guilty, but that's actually required by law in a film like this. Basically, his character was pissed that Milian pulled off the more or less perfect crime, even though he picks Milian out as the guilty one at more or less random. But hey, no one ever accused the Italians of making sense, at least not by our standards (ummm, as if Armageddon made any damn sense). What they do make, or at least what Umberto Lenzi has made here, is a brutal, violent, wildly entertaining action film that is sure to offend many, and generally, if a film is offensive, it gets our seal of approval. The logic is so inane and the motivation so absurd that we can't help but approve of everything that happened with the exception of once again seeing Tomas Milian in his little red underwear. So what lesson can we walk away from this movie having learned? Don't linger around in the crowd gathered round dead cops. If Henry Silva walks toward you with his hand inside his coat, don't wait around to see what he's going to do. That we are all equally as likely to be shot by Henry Silva? Don't be in a gang with Tomas Milian. Honestly, the political and social content of this film is so wildly skewed that it fails to really make any sense. A police state is bad but criminals are worse? You would think with all the speeches about how the rich constantly oppress the poor that they would try to make Guilio out to be more likable. Instead, he is nothing more than a murderous thug who hides behind a veil of rhetoric and ... wait a sec ... yep, I got it! In various reviews, we've talked at some length about groups like The Red Brigade and other terrorist organizations (check out the Violent Rome review) running wild in Italy during the 1970s. For the most part, they were gangs of thugs and murderers who tried to distinguish their crime by dressing it up in the rhetoric of a Communist revolutionary group. Red Brigade, indeed. They, like most groups, were nothing but criminals. They used politics to justify their bloodlust, though they most likely would have been criminals with or without the political disguise. It's no different than when murderers cite religion as their aegis and motivation. Milian's Guilio is just like the terror squads running rampant in Italy. He justifies his brutality with talk of a working class revolution, of the lower class rising up to fight against the rich. Guilio's rhetoric is exactly like the bullshit espoused by groups like The Red Brigade. And just like them, Guilio's speeches are total crap. He's a rapist and a murderer, and nothing else. Not a revolutionary; just a thug. He uses the class struggle, which was also at the forefront of Italian social life at the time, as a convenient excuse for his psychopathic desire to rape, kill, and hurt others. Lenzi exposes him for what he is, stripping away the romantic notions of being a freedom fighter to expose the cold-blooded sicko beneath. Of course, that still doesn't really lend much justification or credibility to the actions of Silva's cop character. But it does make some sense of the movie anyway, which has just become that much cooler now that I've had my little epiphany about its meaning. See, all those film theory classes didn't go to waste after all! Now I'll learn your asses some shit about mais en scene! No wait! I take that analysis back! The true lesson to be learned from The Executioner, besides the fact that Italian cop films are bad-ass through and through, is that if you are an arms dealer, you should not sell the guns and the bullets at the same time to crazy people, because they won't pay you. They'll just shoot you. And then Henry Silva will come by and stare grimly at the aftermath. Labels: Director: Umberto Lenzi, Poliziotteschi, Stars: Tomas Milian, Year: 1974 posted by Keith at 12:39 PM | 0 Comments Sunday, November 11, 2001Companeros
1970, Italy. Starring Tomas Milian, Franco Nero, Iris Berben, Jesus Fernandez, Jack Palance, Gino Pernice, Giovanni Petti, Giovanni Pulone, Fernando Rey, Lorenzo Robledo, Claudio Scarchilli, Karin Schubert, Gerard Tichy, Victor Israel, Simon Arriaga, Francisco Bodalo, Jose Bodalo, Eduardo Fajardo, Alvaro de Luna. Directed by Sergio Corbucci. Available on DVD (Amazon).
No genre is so simple that it's well suited by being made a genre, just as no individual member of a race is justly served by being made part of said race. But in the quest to classify or define easy descriptions, these broad-sweeping categories are the best we people can come up with. It is a concept that dismisses any sense of variation or individuality, and while I admit that generalization is often a necessity for making it through everyday life, it's also a big part of why we tend to miss out on so much wonderful stuff. Take the Spaghetti Western, for example, or the Western, since that's how most people tend to see it. I can't even begin to process the number of people I've spoken to who hate Spaghetti Westerns even though they've never seen one. They equate the Western with polished American films, with John Wayne or Gene Autry, or they simply hate country music, thus they hate cowboys, thus they hate Westerns. An entire genre of film is thus dismissed despite the fact that there are hundred of films that break the mold, that would prove entertaining to these people if they could only get over the fact that the people in them are from the wild west. But whatever. There's no convincing some people. And if they decide not to like Rio Bravo or The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance even though they've never seen them, well ultimately that's no concern of mine. Among cult movie fans who are open enough to delve into the Western genre, most immediately take a shine to a subgenre within that greater umbrella: the Spaghetti Western. So named because of their European (primarily Italian) origin, many of the films that are thought to be the great classics of the American Western are in fact the work of our European neighbors. Once Upon a Time in the West, A Fistful of Dollars, and For a Few Dollars More -- films that have come to define the Western to many people. All three are the work of Italian director Sergio Leone. Spag Westerns often prove unpalatable to fans of the classic Western with it's clear-cut good guys and bad guys, with it's ultimate family-value wholesomeness. Spag Westerns are a different breed of Western altogether. Much grittier, much more violent, and much more likely to blur the lines between good and evil. American Westerns are replete with tales of bad men who become good, who seek and eventually find forgiveness and redemption for their evil deeds. In Italian Westerns, however, it's generally not so cheerful an outcome. More often, rather than bad men becoming good, it's good men turning bad, or even more often, men who are neither good nor evil, but exist above such classifications, often as the embodiment of revenge. The most common plot in Italian Westerns is the "vengeance seeking stranger" model: a man who has been wronged in some way returns as a mysterious, emotionless loner seeking revenge on the men who did him the injustice. They usually center around some sort of frame-up or murdered lover, and very often both. Today It's Me...Tomorrow, You is an example of an average but enjoyable entry into the genre, but far and away the greatest example of the vengeance seeking stranger is Charles Bronson's mysterious "Man With a Harmonica" in Sergio Leone's epic Once Upon a Time in the West. Well, you can only make so many movies about vengeance seeking strangers before people start to get tired of the formula. This is what started happening toward the end of the 1960s with the Italian Westerns. Society was in an upheaval, especially in places like America (which was being torn asunder by the Vietnam War) and Italy (where revolutionaries and terrorists had turned the cities into virtual war zones). Simplistic tales of revenge were beginning to lose the audiences, and so a new type of Western was born: the revolutionary Western. They were usually set during the Mexican Revolution but obviously reflected the tumultuous modern times as much as they did the turn of the century. They generally dealt not just with the revolution, but with people struggling to come to terms with the rapidly changing world around them. Just as the end of the 1960s was seen as a wild time full of fast and out-of-control change, so too were the late 1800s, as the wild west slowly began to die, giving way to the industrial revolution and modernization of America and Mexico. Sam Peckinpah's brutal Wild Bunch has been seen by many as the punctuation mark that ended the golden era of the Western, bringing it to full maturity from the singin' cowpoke films of the 1930s through to the gory, bleak revelation that the wild west was a place populated not by sequin-wearing crooners, but by murderers, thugs, opportunists, and innocent people caught in the cross-fire. Peckinpah's bloody opus about the death of the old ways and the men who lived by them may be the best known of the revolution Westerns, but it is by no means the sole inhabitant of the sub-genre. Nor is it alone in its brilliance. Sergio Leone clocked in with the good but flawed A Fistful of Dynamite, but for my money, the Italian productions that rank alongside Peckinpah's masterpiece are Quien Sabe? (aka A Bullet for the General) and Companeros. Both films have quite a bit in common. For starters, the hero is Mexican, or rather, he's supposed to be Mexican. Usually, he's really Italian, but for the sake of illusion, we'll call him Mexican. Whatever the case, it's quite a departure from American films. With rare exceptions, Mexicans and Native Americans were portrayed in US productions as either murderous bandits in need of exterminating or as helpless cowards. To see Mexicans as the heroes in these two films is refreshing. The second similarity is that in both films, the heroes start out as morally ambiguous only to eventually blossom into full-fledged freedom fighters. They spend much of the movie telling themselves they are not involved. In the end, they emerge as both heroes and leaders. Sharply different characters than the old vengeance seeking strangers. Both films rely heavily on characterization. Many Spaghetti Westerns rely on the character as archetype rather than the character as character. The vengeance seeking stranger need only squint and kill. In these movies, however, since they are about discovering things inside oneself, it's important that the characters be written and acted in a way that makes the transformation believable, engaging, and moving. The characters must be human, complete with flaws, humor, confusion, and the whole range of emotions. In Quien Sabe?, that task fell on veteran actor Maria Gianni Volare, and he pulled it off wonderfully. In Companeros, Tomas Milian proves every bit Volare's equal in talent. And finally, both films feature fair-haired Americans/Europeans as both foil and sidekick. Companeros is among my favorite films. It's fast-paced, brilliantly acted, wonderfully scored (by legendary Italian composer Ennio Morrocione), and superbly written. Franco Nero, who made a name for himself as the coffin-toting killer in the excellent Spaghetti Western Django, and later embarrassed himself in the goofy but influential Enter the Ninja stars as Yolaf The Swede, a gun running hustler making a buck amid the turmoil of the Mexican Revolution. Tomas Milian, the Cuban-born actor who made a name for himself as an actor in Italy, plays Basco, a ruffian who hangs with a seedy general who claims to be championing the cause of the common man when in fact he's little more than a thug doing his best to amass a fortune for himself. It's probably no coincidence that Cuban-born Milian looks a hell of a lot like famous Cuban revolutionary Che Guevara, a man who used to have a political meaning before being turned into a trendy t-shirt and pop marketing phenomenon in the United States. It probably is a coincidence that Milian starred in one of the many rip-offs of Franco Nero's classic Django, a surreal and often silly film called Django, Kill!. Occupying the same town as Milian and his gang are a group of true revolutionaries who believe in educating the people, non-violent protest, and the teachings of a distinguished professor named Xantos who is really championing the cause of the people of Mexico rather than using it as an excuse to get rich or flex his muscle. The students and revolutionaries are lead by the fiery Lola (played by the absolutely stunning Iris Berben). Here's another marked difference between the revolutionary Western and the older vengeance seeking stranger films, as well as another similarity between Companeros and Quien Sabe?. In the older films, women were little more than murder or rape victims, window dressing and symbols of redemption (not unlike how they would be used in the films of John Woo later on, who was obviously influenced by Italian Westerns). In the revolutionary Westerns, woman are on much more equal ground. In Quien Sabe?, a woman is more or less the second in command of Chuncho's gang, and in Companeros, Lola plays the intelligent and passionate leader of the intellectual revolutionaries. In true little boy form, Basco (Milian) develops a crush on her, and expresses it by endlessly tormenting her in childish ways, including cutting off her hair (she looks great with short hair, though!). The scumbag general gets a hold of Xantos' safe, which contains a valuable treasure upon which Xantos was going to build his revolution. The general hires Yolaf to open the safe, but Yolaf soon discovers it can't be done. He must get the combination from Xantos, who isn't likely to give it, not to mention that he's currently a prisoner in the United States. His crime? Nothing really. But the US was profiting heavily from the confusion in Mexico, and if Xantos was able to lead a well-educated, organized opposition, then the war could be over before America had made every cent it could off the blood of others. Thus, Xantos remained an unwilling guest of Uncle Sam. Yolaf and Basco are sent to "rescue" the general, even though they can't stand one another. It's the classic buddy movie, but the chemistry between Milian and Franco is great. Matters are complicated when John, a one-handed killer with a pet Hawk arrives. John is played by the legendary Jack Palance, and he turns in a performance that is just over the top enough to be psycho and amusing, but not so over the top that he seems hammy. He reminds me of vincent Price when Price hit a role on all cylinders. John smokes pot, freaks people out, and was once crucified, though his Hawk pecked his hand off in order to save him. With John and his lackeys hot on their tail, Basco and Yolaf spring the professor and high tail it back to Mexico. Along the way, Basco and Xantos continuously argue and debate revolution and education. By the end of their journey, Basco is having second thoughts about his allegiance to the general. When the general orders the mindless slaughter of unarmed students in order to force Xantos to give up the combination, Basco's mind is made up. He joins Lola and asks Yolaf to do the same. He's not exactly wild about the idea. But Yolaf is the classic reluctant brigand, much like the later Han Solo. He has no interest in revolution, or so he tells himself. Yet when it comes down to it, he finds himself taking up arms alongside his companero, Basco, in a seemingly hopeless fight with the general's forces. In the end, Yolaf can't shake the desire for treasure. Xantos fortune was less than exciting, so Yolaf decides to steal the statue of the local saint, right when Basco is awkwardly professing his respect and love for Lola. Basco is enraged by Yolaf's sacrilege, and the movie draws to a close as it opened, with the two companeros staring one another down on the train tracks, ready for a showdown. It's rare that an Italian Western is "charming," but stars Nero and Milian make Companeros just that. They temper the film's politics and violence with ample humor and a great repoir. Watching Nero buried up to his neck about to be trampled by horses, but still struggling to maintain his suaveness is classic, and Milian shines as the scruffy revolutionary who discovers the true nature of revolution. People were shocked by Jack Palance' comic ability when he made the film City slickers, but anyone familiar with the man knows he can tongue-in-cheek it with the best of them (how can you take yourself toos eriously when you played the mighty space wizard of Gor in Outlaws of Gor. He shines here, alternately creepy and hilarious. This movie, much like Quien Sabe? has tremendous spirit and energy, which is what really puts it ahead of the pack. I enjoy Italian Westerns, but it's rare I enjoy myself while watching them (and I don't mean the same way i enjoy myself while watching a certain other genre of film), but I did just that with Companeros. It's a fun movie. The feel of it reminded me of My Name is Nobody, by far the wackiest of the Italian Westerns. There's just no over-stating how great this film is. Political films often become dry and boring, with the movie grinding to a halt so characters can sit for hours on end discussing issues. Not so here. It manages to be intelligent and still stay action-packed. The evolution of Basco is engrossing and believable. And let's not forget the music. The score is as important to a Spaghetti Western as the script itself. Ennio Morricone turns in another excellent piece of work. The theme song is great -- it will make you want to start a revolution of your own, or at the very least, you will be like me and sing along even though you don't know the words. I just mumble some and then yell, "Companeros!" whenever the time is right. Director Sergio Corbucci does a wonderful job bringing everything together. though less known in the US than fellow Spaghetti Western director Sergio Leone, Corbucci is just as important to the genre as Leone. If you pick the best movies of the genre, there's a good chance on of these two men directed it. Companeros works on every level: as an action film, a romance, an adventure, a political film, and as a human story. You can't really beat that, can ya, companeros? Labels: Director: Sergio Corbucci, Spaghetti Westerns, Stars: Franco Nero, Stars: Tomas Milian, Year: 1970 posted by Keith at 4:59 PM | 0 Comments |
|
![]() |