Monday, July 17, 2006Delinquent Girl Boss: Worthless to Confess
1971, Japan. Starring Reiko Oshida, Masumi Tachibana, Yukie Kagawa, Meiko Tsudoi, Yumiko Katayama, Yoko Ichiji, Reiko Maruyama, Junzaburo Ban, Tonpei Hidari, Nobuo Kaneko, Tsunehiko Watase. Directed by Kazuhiko Yamaguchi. Buy it now from Amazon.com
Man, it's amazing what a little foul health can do to your burning desire to review somewhat obscure girl gang movies in which Japanese chicks in bell bottoms show off their boobs and stab chumps with switchblades. I don't get sick very often, as my strict diet of fruit, salmon, whey protein, and hard liquor in excessive quantities keeps me pretty fit. And I was on an even stricter diet during the World Cup that consisted of hot wings and a couple pints of Newcastle every single day during lunch. During that time, I increased my base lifting weight by fifteen pounds, lost eight pounds of fat and an inch off my gut, and awoke early every morning with an abundance of energy and zest for life. So despite what some of you may think, my vigorous and healthy lifestyle keeps me in good shape. However, the past week saw the temperature in my office average right around 55 degrees. As a Southern man with a passionate lust for warm temperature and the blazing kiss of the sun, this turned out to be rather on the chilly side. Coupled with plenty of rain and a lapse in my lunch diet on account of the World Cup advancing to the stage where there weren't games every afternoon, these conditions conspired to wreak havoc with the back of my throat, and while I successfully fend off the occasional virus, there's only so much I can do to combat a simple irritation of the body that results in one's protective mucous glands kicking into high gear, resulting in a stuffy nose and an inflamed throat. A shot of whiskey does wonders to soothe such inflammations, but as my place of employment is narrow-minded and backward and generally bigoted against my traditional backwoods remedies, I was forced to forego the bottle and rely instead on the nauseating, sweet-and-sour-sauce colored poison known as Dayquil. Disgusting, but it got the job done and made me feel nearly as good as a shot of Wild Turkey (not to mention eliciting the same basic facial contortions upon downing the shot). To date, however, I have resisted the urge to see what happens when I mix the licorice nastiness of NyQuil with the licorice goodness of absinthe -- but I don't think that's a temptation I can resist for too terribly much longer. Still, Dayquil highs, sore throat and stuffiness lows, and a couple looming deadlines at work meant that my initial plans to kick off Girls Gone Wild month were foiled, and instead I spent the first ten days of July sitting on the couch with a tissue shoved up my nose, watching England blow it and Italy fake-foul their way to victory, then being stunned as two of the top contenders for winning the Tour de France were suspended from the race (opening the door wide for my big-ass fur-coat-and-cycling-shorts-combo wearing man, Floyd Landis, to win it all this year) as I struggled in a medicinal haze to proofread directions for configuring one's Windows 2000 machine to access the university network via dial-up modem. As much as it pains me to say it, writing up Delinquent Girl Boss: Worthless to Confess got lost in the madness. But here I sit now, health irritations receding, the World Cup naught but a memory of French guy headbutting some mouthy Italian in the chest, and the Tour de France on a rest day. My deadlines still loom, and indeed their shadow hangs heavier than ever and I am, as all good writers tend to be, woefully behind schedule in completing my assigned tasks. But sometimes, you just need a break from the grind, and on a day like today, there's not much I can afford to do other than blow off a little artistic steam by finally launching Girls Gone Wild month with a review of the aforementioned operatic girl gang opus. I should probably kick things off with a concise history of Japanese girl gang movies, of the "pinky violence" film, and of violent Japanese youth subcultures in general. But the truth of the matter is, I wasted something like 600 words already telling you about my stuffy nose and taking thinly veiled swipes at the drama queen nature of the Italian World Cup soccer team (my friend Jon, whose veins coarse with the garlic-rich blood of the Italian strain, prefers to describe them more complimentary as "like watching a Puccini opera"). And honestly, what's more relevant to the discussion of a Japanese girl gang pinky violence movie: a discussion of the roots and history, cinematic and social, of the genre, or my random thoughts about Italian soccer and congestion medicine? Anyway, we touched briefly and in our typically half-assed fashion on the subject in our review of Stray Cat Rock: Sex Hunter, so I'll refer you to that review for starters (not that it has much to offer), and Patrick Macias, one of our favorite bloggers and the author of the entertaining survey of Japanese pop cinema, Tokyoscope, is apparently fervently writing a book on the subject as we speak, so I'll leave it to the man who is actually getting paid to do research to do the research, and you shall have to wait with sweating palms for him to complete what will undoubtedly be yet another highly entertaining book if you want the whole story.
And now, having established that I'm not going to spend much time on the history of the pinky violence films, allow me to spend some time on the history of pinky violence films, as well as a brief history of everything from Takakura Ken and the Abashiri Prison films to Nikkatsu Studio to psychotic director Teruo Iishi. So I am way behind schedule, but at least I'm doing my best to give you your money's worth. Things in the Japanese film industry were chugging along during the 1960s. The gradual erosion of restrictive post-war regulation of the Japanese film industry by occupying American forces (samurai and yakuza flicks were banned, as was just about anything that would "inspire the Japanese spirit") meant that writers and directors were coming out of a long creative hibernation and finally getting to flex their brains again. Inoshiro Honda and Toho Studios were cranking out a steady stream of highly enjoyable fantasy, science fiction, and monster movies built on the foundation of the enduring success of Godzilla. Akira Kurosawa was making movies that no one would watch until Americans started discovering them in the 1970s. Takakura Ken and Akira Takarada were burning up screens as Japan's two biggest matinee idols. Japan had yet to befoul the world by making M.D. Geist. All in all, not a bad time to be a film fan. As Japan continued to distance itself from the wreckage of World War II and rapidly match the prosperity of the United States, more and more people started buying and watching television sets. As it had done in the United States some years before, this trend sent the movie industry into a panic, and not without good reason. Profits declined, attendance dropped, and back then, they couldn't blame it on Internet downloading. The solution many film companies came up with was simple enough, and matches in many ways what cable channels like HBO have done: if you need to compete with broadcast television, do so by packing your features with the kind of stuff you can't put on TV. This means, as you can guess, more sex, violence, and people calling each other "cocksucker." Suffice to say that in the 1970s, cinema censorship laws became increasingly lax both as a way to help salvage the industry and simply because the natural trend after severe restriction is usually toward greater leniency, Japanese studios started cramming more violence and tits into their movie. In other words, they started making the sort of films about which Teleport City can get enthusiastic. Shintoho opened the gateway during the late 50s and 60s by continuously pushing the envelope on crime and action films centered around female protagonists and seedy environments. Nikkatsu Studio blazed the trail with a series of films that became known as "Roman Porno" films -- though disappointingly, these are not a bunch of Japanese movies about decadent ancient Romans; it was just a shortening of the phrase "Romantic Porno," because saving yourself the second it takes you to pronounce the one additional syllable in "romantic" adds up to several seconds over a lifetime, or several minutes if you are in the industry and thus more likely to be saying "romantic porno." Nikkatsu was one of Japan's first film studios. During World War II, the consolidation toward the war effort of Japan's limited resources resulted in Nikkatsu becoming part of Daiei Studios, probably most famous to readers of Teleport City as the eventual home of Gamera. After the war, Nikkatsu returned to its independent status, but Daiei got to keep all the production facilities. Nikkatsu had to start from scratch, and they financed the rebuilding of their studio by relying heavily on distributing foreign films rather than making their own. Audiences that still had to deal with the aftermath of the war looming outside their door (if indeed they still had doors) were ravenous for any form of escape, and American administrators were much happier to see Japanese audiences flocking to American westerns and action films rather than reviving their own films.
When Nikkatsu had built up the capital it needed to finance the establishment of new facilities and begin production again, it opted to look to the foreign films it had been distributing with great success as inspiration for their own films, rather than returning as most studios had to the standard set of pre-war genres (some of which, as mentioned, were banned by Allied administrators). Thus, American and French new wave films became the models Nikkatsu would look to, which meant the resulting films were considerably different from anything else being made in Japan at the time. The new Nikkatsu was built around a core of stars, and it began attracting the attention of filmmakers who were interested in experimenting with film and making movies that other, more traditional studios, weren't willing to chance. Thus, Nikkatsu soon became the home of people like the maverick director Seijun Suzuki, whose films were often so inventive and outlandish that even liberal Nikkatsu sought to reel him in by slashing his budgets and forbidding him to use color film stock -- a move that resulted in Suzuki making Branded to Kill, the most off-beat and cracked-in-the-head films in his repertoire (at least until he remade it as Pistol Opera). Although well-respected now, Suzuki's films weren't exactly the sort of thing that could save a studio. Quite the opposite, frankly. As the film industry crisis grew more pressing throughout the 60s, Nikkatsu decided that it was time to ramp up the nudity. Thus the birth of Roman Porno. The term was meant to differentiate the Nikkatsu films from straightforward pornos, which have always existed in the underground and, during the 1970s, were really starting to make their mark on society in a much bolder and more mainstream fashion. The Nikkatsu films, by contrast, still boasted a budget, recognizable actors, and even respectable writers and directors. Of course, they were still sleazy melodramas full of gratuitous nudity, too, and that's what made the m special. The Nikkatsu films tended to explore increasingly bizarre sexual territory, delving frequently into the world of S&M and rape. They were also cheap and easy to make and helped keep the studio afloat when so many other, less daring (or sleazy, or opportunistic, if you prefer) studios were tanking in the great industry collapse that plagued the 70s. A similar crash took out the British film industry around the same time (Hammer Studios being one of the most famous casualties), and the attempt to salvage operations by increasing the levels of sex and violence in the films was pretty much a world-wide phenomenon. Also badly in need of an injection of life, Toei Studios decided to jump on the sex and violence bandwagon, though they tended to take a decidedly different approach than the Roman Porno movies of the infamous Nikkatsu. Toei was doing well with a variety of action-oriented films, so they decided that they should stick with the action movies, but jam them with more nudity and even greater amounts of violence. Thus was born the pinky violence film. Once Toei established the framework, plenty of other studios followed it. Even Nikkatsu flirted with it when they made their Stray Cat Rock films with Meiko Kaji before committing themselves almost entirely to Roman Porno movies. These pinky violence movies tended to exist within an established number of settings: they were either turn-of-the-century female samurai/gambler movies (Sex and Fury, Female Yakuza Tale, and the Lady Snowblood movies starring Meiko Kaji and based on manga by Kazuo Koike -- the man who brought Lone Wolf and Cub to the world) derived from less sexual but scarcely less violent precursors like the Crimson Bat and Red Peony Gambler films; or they were "girl gang" or "juvenile delinquent girl" (sukeban) movies. From time to time, a women-in-prison film would get thrown into the mix, the most famous being the Female Convict Scorpion movies starring Meiko Kaji (if you're going to watch Japanese exploitation films, you'd best get used to seeing her name). For the most part, though, girl gangs ruled the roost, because they were easiest to film. They didn't require period sets or costumes. Directors could shoot guerilla-style at various locations around Japan, usually without worrying about casting extras or getting permits (which is why so many of these films -- Delinquent Girl Boss: Worthless to Confess included -- feature shots of the characters walking down the street surrounded by onlookers gawking directly at them or into the camera). And you could make the same movie over and over with only a few tweaks to keep it interesting (this movie has a gang of girls just out of reform school; that movie has a biker gang; and so on). What made these exploitation films interesting is...well, no. Tits and violence made them interesting. But what made them intellectually interesting is that they became the playground for a lot of inventive directors who felt the more traditional films hamstrung them and wouldn't allow them to explore wild new directing styles and story content. So amid the boobs and bloodshed, you often got films with highly creative and ground-breaking direction, as well as plots that tackled all sorts of subjects (violence against women, Japanese racism, war crimes, et cetera) still considered taboo in the Japanese mainstream. Sometimes the messages were there as cheap justification for the exploitation. Sometimes, the exploitation was there to make the message easier to express. Whatever the case, it made for some completely wild films that offer up all sorts of potential for discussion. For the most part, these films remained unseen by all but a few hardened tape traders in the United States, who would suffer bad VHS dupes and no translation just for a chance to see the psychedelic madness of 1970s Japanese pop exploitation. Luckily, the relative cheapness of DVD over VHS, as well as an increasingly receptive group of Japanese studios (previously, they were notoriously antagonistic toward foreign distribution and charged insane prices to license their titles -- something anime companies still like to do), the hitherto untapped reservoirs of Japanese yakuza and pinky violence movies are finally seeing the light of day in the United States. For fans like me, the efforts of companies like HVE, Kino, Diskotec, and Panik House are enough to bring to the eye a sweet, sweet tear of joy. Finally, I have something other than the three-hundred different budget DVD versions of Sonny Chiba's Street Fighter and Legend of the Eight Samurai. In 2006, Panik House released the only DVD besides Space Thunder Kids that I've purchased in the past year (Netflix and the purchase of a new car and thus new car payments have combined to quell my once lusty DVD buying habit): The Pinky Violence Collection. Collecting four notable girl gang movies (and one audio CD) into an eye-blistering hot pink package stuffed with liner notes from author Chris D. (author of Mavericks of Japanese Cinema), it was pretty easy for the set to convince me to part with my cash during one of those Deep Discount DVD sales. Delinquent Girl Boss: Worthless to Confess is the first of these films we will be sampling, although it turns out that while it is certainly a great film, it's not exactly what you might call indicative of the trend as a whole (neither, for that matter, was Stray Cat Rock: Sex Hunter). As with the Stray Cat Rock: Sex Hunter, Worthless to Confess is part of a series of films that, to date, have only seen the one film released (when oh when do I get the rest of my Stray Cat Rock movies? I just can't get enough Meiko Kaji in a big, floppy hat like those psychedelic trolls used to wear). In the case of the Delinquent Girl Boss films, Worthless to Confess is the final in the series, though it would seem that, at the very least, this film is a self-contained adventure that has very little carried over from the earlier films. I don't know if the other three were more connected to one another, but the point here is that you really don't need to go into this film worried that you haven't seen the previous three, except in the capacity of really wanting to see the first three films because you figure they're probably pretty cool. These Zubeko Bancho films were considerably less sleazy than most of the pinky violence films, and the women in them are treated with much greater kindness than you'd see in films like, oh let's say Terrifying Girl's High School. Unfortunately it's hard to make statements about th Zubeko Bancho series as a whole, having not seen the rest. There's not a lot of information floating around about them. I'm not a casual fan by any stretch of the imagination, but I also fall fairly short of "dedicated scholar." I guess I'm a lazy scholar. I haven't put forth the effort to track down and watch all the films in the series (I can't even find cast and credits list for the other movies. Hell, can't even find a complete list of titles for the series), so remember that the bold, sweeping statements I make are based pretty much entirely on seeing this one, final film in the series. What can't be gleaned from it has been cribbed from various liner notes and the scant other resources I managed to turn up. I don't want to stray too far into the realm of plot synopsis, but I do want to lay out the opening scene of this film, as it sets a thematic tone for everything that comes after. We open on a group of juvenile delinquent girls at reform school movie night, where they are supposed to be suffering through a documentary about the flora and fauna of the Hokkaido region. However, the projectionist has been convinced by the girls that he should show one of Takakura Ken's Abashiri Prison films instead. As the girls go nuts over seeing yakuza matinee idol Takakura Ken leaping about in the Hokkaido snow, slicing chumps down with his trusty katana, prison officials try to figure out what kind of nature documentary this is. Once they figure out Hokkaido's Great Outdoors is actually one of the Abashiri Bangaichi movies, they pull the plug, resulting in a modest riot of shoe and panty flinging.
Opening with a salute to the Abashiri Prison series means rather a lot to this sort of film. The most obvious is the simple act of homage. During the 1960s, Takakura Ken was one of the biggest (perhaps the biggest) stars in Japan, thanks in large part to his frequent appearances as a noble yakuza fighting battles full of honor and humanity. The Abashiri Prison series was his long-running string of films that all seem to start with him as a yakuza freshly released from Abashiri Prison with visions of "going straight" only to get caught up in some sort of gangland turmoil so that the film can end with him going back to Abashiri Prison as some trumpet-heavy closing theme song wails in the background. I believe if you totaled all the films, Takakura Ken served 1,700 years in Abashiri Prison over the course of the series. Like most movies that become pop culture phenomenon, the first Abashiri Prison film wasn't meant to be very much more than a quick, cheap yakuza film. But something about the movie and it's story of a man who proudly clings to the tradition of yakuza nobility and honor even as the world around him descends into cynicism resonated with young Japanese audiences, who perhaps saw it as a metaphor for Japan's struggle in the wake of World War II. Here, after year of waiting, was a film that grandly celebrated these mythical Japanese qualities. Folks ate it up, and a franchise was born. Most of the Abashiri Prison films were directed by a guy named Teruo Ishii, who directed a series of sci-fi and crime films during the 50s and 60s. In 1965, he helmed Abashiri Prison, and suddenly he was one of the most successful directors in Japan. But since Japan didn't really embrace the auteur theory or create cults of personality around directors, you can't really say Ishii became a superstar. Still, he was successful enough to throw his weight around the studio a bit, and he followed up a successful string of Takakura Ken yakuza films by doing what any good director would do: going completely off the deep end and indulging in a career full of increasingly bizarre, sick, and twisted sex and violence films that include titles like The Joy of Torture, the still-banned Horror of a Deformed Man, Hell's Tattooers, and a couple Yakuza Punishment films. Ishii's film's pushed the envelope for the amount of deviant sex and weirdness a director could cram into his films, and his late 60s work definitely kicked down the door and made Nikkatsu's Roman Porno films viable. Oddly enough when everyone was enjoying the fruits of the tolerance for perversion and sex that Ishii helped sow, Ishii himself opted to shift gears yet again, working primarily on a parade of Sonny Chiba karate films (including Street Fighter's Last Revenge, the superb Executioner, and Karate Inferno). In 1973, he contributed to the pinky violence trend by directing Female Yakuza Tale, a sequel to director Norifumi Suzuki's Sex and Fury (both starring Reiko Ike -- whose name you'll be seeing pretty much as often as Meiko Kaji's). Ishii remained sporadically active throughout the 80s and 90s before dying in August of 2005. While he may not have the name recognition of, say, Akira Kurosawa or Inoshiro Honda, you can't really fault a guy whose final film was titled Blind Beast vs. the Dwarf. But during the 60s, the attention all focused on the star, and it was Takakura Ken and his movies that served as the template for yakuza films throughout the 1960s, until Kinji Fukasaku turned the genre upside down in Battles without Honor and Humanity, the film that dared postulate that maybe not all these yakuza guys were noble anti-heroes with swank theme songs; that many of them were, in fact, wretched scumbags and cowards. Curiously, the yakuza seemed as enthusiastic about this portrayal as they'd been by the Takaura Ken films of the previous decade, probably because as weasely and pathetic as most of the characters were, at the end of the day there was still Bunta Sugawara up there on the screen, standing tall and looking cool and letting all the junior yakuza types fancy they were like him rather than like the squealing, flailing goofballs that comprise most of the cast of characters. Worthless to Confess definitely features more of the latter type of yakuza, though the girls in the movie are considerably more honorable than the gents, but where Kinji Fukasaku's films are relentless deconstructions of the yakuza myth, Worthless to Confess is more of a "between two worlds" look at yakuza who are undeniably like Fukasaku's cowardly, backstabbing scumbags but exist in a world that acknowledges the existence of the Takakura Ken yakuza movies that created (or at least helped perpetuate) the myth in the first place -- sort of like making a zombie movie set in a world where zombie movies exist. Ken represents the image to which the yakuza strive, while Kenji represents the reality of what they achieve. And somewhere caught in the middle of it all, the women in the movie are more Takakura Ken than the yakuza around them, and like the matinee idol, star Reiko Oshida lives a life that follows the Abashiri Prison pattern of getting out, trying to go straight, getting caught up in turmoil, and ultimately winding up right back in the same place you were at the beginning of the movie. Oshida (who has very few film credits to her name, unfortunately, but was a member of the cast of Playgirl, a TV show about a cast of swingin' crime-fightin' chicks) plays Rika, a small-time delinquent serving a sentence in a women's reform school where she meets a variety of other inmates, including a woman named Midori (Yumiko Katayama, another Playgirl alumnus), whose boyfriend is a small-time yakuza punk (though like all small-time yakuza punks, he thinks he's a major player) and whose father, Muraki (yakuza film mainstay Junzaburo Ban, who was also in the Akira Kurosawa film Dodes'ka-den), is a kindly auto mechanic. When Rika gets out, she takes a job in the old man's garage and discovers that Midori is bleeding her father dry in an attempt to pay off her deadbeat boyfriend's ever-escalating gambling debts. The local yakuza are keen to see the guy get in so much debt that Midori will pressure her father to sell his garage, and Rika is keen to protect the old man and try to straighten Midori out. Needless to say, in order to do so, she'll have to reassemble the old gang from reform school.
Now the following may be a bit of an odd stretch anywhere but Teleport City, so please bear with me for a moment, and if the point I'm trying to make eventually caves in on itself and ends up making no sense at all, then please just regard this whole harebrained paragraph and move on to something more worthwhile ("something more worthwhile " not necessarily meaning the next paragraph). A while back, we reviewed a bunch of sleazy cheerleader sexploitation films (The Cheerleaders, Revenge of the Cheerleaders, and The Swingin' Cheerleaders -- oh, and goddamned H.O.T.S. but I was trying to forget about that one). Now, most of these movies offered little more than cheap titillation. H.O.T.S. didn't even offer that. The Swinging Cheerleaders, however, was directed by Jack Hill, who also directed a couple of our favorite Pam Grier movies (Foxy Brown and Coffy), as well as a whole slew of other grindhouse and drive-in theater staples like Switchblade Sisters, The Big Doll House, and Spider Baby. While Jack Hill did indeed ply his trade in the realm of exploitation cinema, he also brought a certain flare to the material that lifted his films several notches above the rest of the pack. His scripts were better, his actors were better, and his overall sensitivity toward telling a decent story was better. The Swinging Cheerleaders delivers what you'd expect from a movie with a title like The Swinging Cheerleaders, but it also delivers a genuinely decent story in the mix, and compared to the other cheerleader movies, is a lot less sleazy and sexually explicit. Similarly, a lot of the pinky violence films that hit the market during the 1970s weren't aiming to do much more than cram as much T&A and violence onto the screen as they could get away with. And really, just like there's nothing wrong with seedy cheerleader sexploitation movies, there's nothing wrong with Japanese girl gang movies that really don't want to do more than pack the screen with boobs and bloodshed. However, there were also certain movies that managed to fulfill the basic demands of the genre without indulging in the excesses of their contemporaries and while filling in the sex and violence gaps with better stories and better characters. Delinquent Girl Boss: Worthless to Confess is definitely the Swinging Cheerleaders of the pinky violence trend. It has the T, has the A, and has the violence, but not in the doses that other films (including other films in the Panik House collection) boasted. Instead, it boasts a more complex plot, more sincere melodrama, and more likeable characters. It's a more ambitious movie, and a better one as a result (keeping in mind that greater ambition doesn't always equate with a greater movie -- right, Chronicles of Riddick?). For starters there's Reiko Oshida. Meiko Kaji and Reiko Ike were the queens of Japanese exploitation cinema during the 1970s (populating a lofty dais alongside Pam Grier from the United States and Chen Ping in Hong Kong), but you'd be hard-pressed to find a cuter, more personable, and more charismatic leading lady than Reiko Oshida. Meiko Kaji looked dangerous, mysterious, and alluring. Reiko looks like the cute girl next door who just took a few wrong turns here and there, but is basically sweet and likeable even if her wrong turns means she also affects a take-no-crap toughness. The character Rika is instantly likeable and, unlike many of the anti-heroines in these films, never really does much that make her the least bit unlikeable. She gets out of prison, smiles, and helps people out. It's a shame Oshida didn't make more movies, girl gang or otherwise, because she emanates an immediate and undeniable warmth. Plus, she's just as engaging once she's "pushed over the edge" and breaks out the red overcoat and katana for the film's outrageous finale as she is as the sweet girl who just wants to build a decent life for herself. The film perpetuates this impression by steadfastly refusing to make Reiko Oshida drop her drawers -- something practically unheard of for the lead in a pinky violence girl gang movie. But the director (who was also the scriptwriter) was adamant that her lack of nudity was essential to the overall success of the story, and he fought tooth and nail to keep his vision intact. What nudity there is in the film is handled by co-stars Yumiko Katayama (who plays Midori) and Yukie Kagawa (who plays Rika's pal Mari). While Rika's lack of nudity is used as one more way to make her seem different and more innocent than the rest of the cast, it should be noted that none of the girls who lead sexy and promiscuous lifestyles are looked down upon because of their choices. Mari ends up working in a scummy nude modeling club, but the scumminess is seen as entirely belonging to the assholes who go there and treat her poorly. For the most part, sexual liberation and freedom is treated as being OK. Oshida is buoyed by a spectacular supporting cast. Yukmiko Katayama, who also didn't have much of a career in film before or after this movie (she appeared in one other pinky violence film, Criminal Woman: Killing Medley, which also appears in the Panik House collection), is wonderful as Midori, the most complicated of all the women. She's the more classical pinky violence anti-heroine in that she does a lot of questionable things before finally being redeemed in time for the big showdown. Her boyfriend and the yakuza are suitably slimy, and you spend most of the movie in eager anticipation of the comeuppance you know is going to be delivered unto them. The rest of the cast performs with solid skill. Pinky violence regular Tsunehiko Watase plays a truck driver who falls for Rika and gets to be the only really decent or dependable guy in the whole movie. Mari's husband is a sickly yakuza who also happens to be the truck driver's brother. He's not a bad guy, but he's a load on his brother and wife, and although he dreams of taking Mari away and starting a clean life, he also can't divorce himself from the delusions associated with being a yakuza. He just has to prove himself, just one time, then he can go. Unfortunately, he ends up being told to prove himself by killing Midori's father (unaware, however, that he is her father). There's also a Lou Costello-type assistant mechanic who is there for comic relief that is neither especially funny nor especially painful -- which is about the best you can hope for when it comes to comic relief. And finally, Nobuo Kaneko hams it up royally as the fey yakuza Boss Ohyu. Nobuo is probably best known for playing the even more cowardly and spineless Boss Yomimori in Kinji Fukasaku's Battles without Honor and Humanity series. He also shows up in some Seijun Suzuki films. Anchored by a quality cast and a sparkling leading lady, screenwriter/director Kazuhiko Yamaguchi is able to delve into deeper territory than is visited by the average pinky violence film -- in much the same way as Stray Cat Rock: Sex Hunter. Themes of "female empowerment" and liberation are often grafted onto these films as an easy way to deflect some of the criticism and charges of misogyny that dog such exploitation fare. Usually, these feminist messages are disingenuous and no more meaningful or sincere than when a male scriptwriter uses a female penname to write a porno film, so that the producer can go, "How can it be degrading to women? It was written by a woman?" Now, you know me, and you can probably guess that the honesty of intention in a feminist message isn't exactly something that plays a big factor in helping me decide whether or not I like a movie. However, it is nice to come across the occasional movie that does indeed manage to be both exploitive and pro-woman. The women in Worthless to Confess are all basically good people. They're treated with respect from beginning to end, and the movie doesn't indulge in any of the leering rape nudity that show sup in so many other pinky violence movies. Rika and Midori both find themselves on the receiving end of some yakuza torture and sneering, but it is relatively restrained by pinky violence standards, and cut short before anything really nasty happens. There is also no weird sex in the movie. One character is alluded to as being a lesbian, but for the most part the characters who do have sex, have pretty normal sex -- which is distinctly abnormal in a pinky violence film. Worthless to Confess is also unique in its portrayal of the family. In most pinky violence films, families are ridiculously dysfunctional; full of shrieking psychotic mothers, incestuous fathers, or parents who simply don't give a damn about anything. Worthless to Confess gives us a kindly and respectable father figure, though, and Rika and her gang really don't want much more out of life than to find a place they can call home and a group of people to whome they can refer to as family. For once, the family and father figure is OK rather than all twisted and weird. At the same time, most of the men besides Midori's dad and the truck driver are scheming, backstabbing scumbags. The only men who can be trusted are the hard-working, regular Joes -- the truck drivers and the auto mechanics of the world (though Midori's dad has a great twist in his story that reveals him to be a little more than just a simple, hard-working auto mechanic). Most can't be trusted or, at the very least, can't be depended upon. If they aren't slimeball yakuza tripping over pachinko machines and getting their asses handed to them in fights by Rika, then the men are asexual girlie men. Gang girl Choko, for instance, is married to a nice but ineffectual goofball who cowers behind her at the club when yakuza start throwing their weight around. He spends much of the film in an apron and head scarf, making food and drinks for Choko and her pals. There's really not much action in this movie, but you don't even notice since the characters are so engaging. The first fight scene doesn't come until the forty-five minute mark, which is very different from, say, Girl Boss Guerilla, which can't go more than five minutes without some chick pulling off her shirt and starting a knife fight. Variety is nice, of course, so while I certainly appreciate a movie like Girl Boss Guerilla, I can also appreciate the more reserved approach of Worthless to Confess. Of course that reserve goes out the window the second Rika and her girls throw on hot pants and go-go boots, break out their swords, and slice their way through a pop art club full of whimpering, worthless yakuza assholes. If Worthless to Confess lacks the nonstop insanity of many of the zanier entries in the world of pinky violence, it makes up for it with a finale that is off-the-charts awesome, doubly so since the movie has spent the last eighty minutes or so making you actually care about what happens to these women. The sight of Reiko Oshida and her crew walking down the street in formation wearing blood red trenchcoats, which they throw off to reveal their battle outfits and katanas as they explain their intention to slaughter every goddamn yakuza in the club, is an absolutely fantastic procession of images. Yamaguchi's handling of bad-ass female characters manifested itself elsewhere in his career as well. He directed Etsuko Shiomi's Sister Street Fighter trilogy, which is all about a tough gal sticking it to The Man. He also directed a few Sonny Chiba karate films and something called Wolfman vs. the Supernatural, which I feel like I really need to see. It's obvious that Yamaguchi favored action and plot over sex and titillation, and while I have no problem with any mix of those three elements, his focus on developing characters and telling a more complete and complicated story means that, while Worthless to Confess is not the most outrageous or the most typical pinky violence film, it is one of the very best and most enjoyable. I really hope the other films in the series find their way onto DVD soon. Labels: Action: Pinky Violence, Action: Yakuza, Country: Japan, Year: 1971 posted by Keith at 7:12 PM | 0 Comments Friday, March 24, 2006Devil Came from Akasava
1971, Germany/Spain. Starring Soledad Miranda, Fred Williams, Horst Tappert, Ewa Stromberg, Siegfried Schurenberg, Walter Rilla, Paul Muller, Blandine Ebinger. Directed by Jess Franco. Written by Paul Andre, Ladislas Fodor, Jess Franco. Purchase from Amazon.com
If you run a site like I do, full of the sort of vitamin-packed goodness that has kids in rolled-up jeans and coon skin caps throwing their glasses of rich, chocolaty Ovaltine over their shoulder with reckless disregard for the public good, in order that they may get to Teleport City's most recent post that much quicker on their rickety soapbox scooters, then there are certain inevitabilities you have to face. For instance, you're probably going to write about Zombie Lake sooner or later. You're probably going to know more about the careers of Wings Hauser and Michael Pare than any sane person would. And, sooner or later, you're going to have to review a Jess Franco film. Franco is a looming monolith that casts a long shadow over the cinematic landscape, a monolith constructed purely out of sheer force of volume. This Spanish-born director, who has worked in Spain as well as Italy, France, Germany, and on occasion, the United States, has made roughly seventy-three million films since the 1960s, and he shows little sign of letting up. In fact, if you break down the cinema of the world based on number of productions per nation, Jess Franco alone qualifies as a sovereign film-producing state, falling just below India but well above Hong Kong and the United States in terms of number of films produced per year. Like any good European cult film director, Franco has worked in every genre conceivable, and perhaps more than a few you of which you wouldn't want any conception whatsoever. Horror, adventure, espionage, thriller, comedy, even a hardcore film or two -- Franco has been there, done that, and most likely in a way that is imminently interesting and often thoroughly unwatchable. How he manages to capture two mutually exclusive reactions is one of the great mysteries of Jess Franco's career, and likely the main reason people keep coming back to his films despite being bored stiff (or in the case of his saucier films, bored but not stiff) by every one of them they've ever seen. There's really no effective way to describe Jess Franco to the uninitiated. He is something they will simply have to discover ont heir own, n small bits and pieces, perhaps completely unaware of the fact that they are learning things about Jess Franco, until the day they wake up and realize they understand him, though they may not like him, and they certainly won't be able to articulate their comprehension to others. If anyone tries to puzzle you with one of those Zen koans, your reply should be to simply show them a Jess Franco film. The thing that makes Franco so unique among the legions of oddball Eurocult directors is that, although he's certainly working in exploitation, he has a very definite artistic vision in even the worst of his films -- and believe me, "the worst of the films" describes the bulk of his film work. Beneath the avalanche of half-assed productions and trashy films, however, lingers the haunting realization that Franco is actually possessed of a tremendous amount of talent in certain respects, making him not unlike guys like Jean Rollin or Ray Dennis Steckler. Steckler, as an example, has never made an especially good film, though he certainly has his moments. But if you sit down, sad as this may found, and really study The Incredibly Strange Creatures Who Stopped Living and Became Mixed-Up Zombies, there's quite a bit about that film, especially in the realm of cinematography and the ability to create an exceptionally eerie atmosphere, that is quite accomplished. French director Jean Rollin was the same way. He was a master of the quirky, off-kilter mood.
But where guys like Rollin, Steckler, and Franco fall down is in the fact that they are so driven by a vision, however cracked it may be, that they attempt to control as much of the film as possible. This means, on the one hand, that they are able to truly put an auteur's stamp on each film. It also means, unfortunately, that whatever weaknesses they may have (for Rollin and Franco, being of the European cult school, this usually manifests itself in the script and pacing of a film, when they bothered with a script) are significantly augmented by the exclusion of outside voices. Franco is left to wallow in his own vision, and thus in his own excesses, often allowing a film to completely lose focus in favor of dwelling on tiny bits and pieces that fascinate him but simply don't resound with audiences. Franco had his talents -- Orson Welles, of all people, considered Franco a kindred spirit and employed him as a cameraman and second unit director, if I'm not mistaken (and I might be). Thus, watching a Jess Franco film is like going on an archaeological dig. You turn up a lot of useless junk, but from time to time, particularly if you are digging in the mud of cinematography, lighting, costuming, mood, and music, you turn up some real choice pieces. It is traditional, for anyone setting out to write their first review of a Jess Franco film, to begin with his highest profile cult movie, Vampyro Lesbos, a movie that has managed to enter the annals of cult film history based purely on the strength of its title. It is a fine movie with which to begin, because it showcases pretty much every Jess Franco quirk and obsession, not to mention the fact that it boasts a performance by sultry Eurocult beauty Soledad Miranda, who until her untimely death, served as Jess Franco's muse (after her death, Franco would wander lost for a spell until finding Lina Romay, an actress whose willingness to do pretty much anything made her the perfect match for Franco -- she still appears regularly in his films, all these decades later, and often still totally in the buff).
Somehow, I just never got around to reviewing Vampyro Lesbos, just as somehow, I've managed to go all these years without reviewing, as far as I can remember, a Jess Franco film. Well, the latter I can rectify here and now, but as for the former, I'm afraid that the wheel of fate has been spun and landed on a lesser-known, at least until it's recent DVD release, film called The Devil Came from Akasava, though it came out the same yearas Vampyro Lesbos and also stars Soledad Miranda in (and out of) eye-popping outfits and features plenty of Jess Franco trademarks, though none will be so obvious as his undying commitment to the zoom lens. Coming out in 1971, The Devil Came from Akasava (which is based on a story by mystery writer Edgar Wallace) was a bit late to jump the Eurospy bandwagon of the 1960s, which Franco had previously entered with his thoroughly ridiculous and highly entertaining Danger! Death Ray. Still, when a movie is this utterly strange, we can forgive it showing up to the dance a little late, especially since it shows up clad in silver boots and a see-through black tunic thing. Our action, if you want to call it that, begins in the fictional country of Akasava, where a geologist discovers the fabled Philosopher's Stone that can turn any metal into gold. The only problem with the stone is that exposure to it causes one's face to fry. Oh, and it also turns you into a zombie. So, right away, we're going to have zombies, spies, and Soledad Miranda striptease performance art? I guess you can see why Franco has his admirers. No sooner has the geologist found the stone than he is getting shot at. He manages to deliver the stone to Doctor Thorrsen (German cult movie mainstay Horst Tappert, who would work with Franco on a regular basis during the 1970s), but it isn't long before someone show sup to off the assistant geologist and steal the stone. Then Thorrsen himself mysteriously vanishes while, at the same time, back in London, a mysterious man in the shadows who may or may not be Alfred Hitchcock is lurking behind the curtains in Thorrsen's office, just long enough to kill a man sneaking in to try and crack a safe. How's that for intrigue?
It's enough to get sexy British intelligence agent Soledad Miranda assigned to the case, and like any good female operative, she ascertains that the best way to approach the case would be to travel to Akasava and immediately get a job as a stripper in one of those arty, weirdly-lit strip-jazz clubs that only exist in Jess Franco films yet exist in every Jess Franco film. Here is the first, most noticeable, and most enjoyable of Franco's reoccurring obsessions. It kills the man to go ten minutes without inserting a performance art striptease at a jazz club full of swirling lights and candy colors. The man should have made a Bollywood film at some point in his career, because he shares the same affection for cutting to the musical number and the hot dancing girl, regardless of whether or not it has anything at all to do with the scene before or after it, or with the movie in general. Thing is, though these scenes were often gratuitous asides, it's obvious that Franco (himself an avid jazz fan and musician) adores them. They are shot and choreographed beautifully, and Franco's taste in groovy sixties cocktail lounge jazz is impeccable. I've certainly had worse times at the movies than watching Soledad Miranda dance (if you want to call it that; it's more a series of stylized poses -- "voguing," I suppose) while breezy lounge music from some of Europe's most accomplished composers of swanky bachelor pad music go wild. Miranda teams up with Fred Williams as Rex Forrester, a detective from Scotland Yard, who all things considered, seem a little out of their jurisdiction operating in a fictional African nation, but jurisdictional squabbles are really the least of anyone's concerns in a movie with magic stones, Lugers, zombies, and avant-garde jazz-strip clubs. Together, at a very languid and meandering pace, they get around in one way or another of working on the case at hand, tracking down Thorrsen and recovering the stone. Like most Franco films, The Devil Came from Akasava walks to it's own idiosyncratic beat, and it takes its sweet time getting anywhere, allowing Franco to linger on whatever catches his fancy. Luckily, mor etimes than not, that's Soledad Miranda, the sort of women who make sit perfectly clear how a man could be instantly smitten and totally obsessed by a single glimpse. In the world of Eurocult starlets, Edwidge Fenech has always been my favorite, but Soledad Miranda, with dark hair and dark eyes and an engaging yet reserved personality, is the kind of intoxicatingly beautiful woman over whom men willingly destroy themselves. She certainly had that effect on Franco. And film of his in which she appears is about her, even if she isn't the main character, and Franco shoots her like a work of art. One is sort of blinded by her beauty, but even if her presence alone wasn't enough to overshadow the rest of the cast, it wouldn't matter, because there's really not much to this film. Franco populates his film with a cast of experienced B-movie actors, all of whom turn in exactly the performance you expect from a band of such professionals -- which is to say, some are good, and some are just weird. Besides, Soledad, the real star of the film is the zoom lens, which Franco employs with almost gleeful abandon, zooming slowly, zooming rapidly, on any and every thing that happens to catch he camera's eye. It gets disorienting after a while, as the mere act of walking down a hallway seems to justify Franco zooming in and out. Often called the cheap man's dolly shot, the zoom can be petty brutally abused. Witness the deadly "slow zoom" of any number of home vacation movies. It seems like a good idea when you are doing it, like the "slow pan," but when you have to sit through a shot that takes a full two minutes to zoom into some detail, all you can do in the end is curse the day your father ever learned what that button did. Still, there are times when a director or cinematographer can use the zoom to great effect. For example, whenever a cool guy walks into the room in a kungfu film. You just know you're getting a fast zoom in on his face, which can be really disconcerting if the character happens to be played by Lo Lie in the mid-to-late 1970s, when his case of Greasy Uglies was in full effect. Jess Franco, however, seems to zoom as often as possible, very rapidly, usually with no discernable reason other than to keep the shot moving. The end result is that a rather run-of-the-mill trashy James Bond knock-off like The Devil Came from Akasava becomes suddenly hallucinatory. Creating a dreamlike atmosphere is the primary goal in many European cult films, but while we expect it from a vampire or zombie or ghost film, seeing the same technique applied to a straight-forward spy thriller is really odd. Pleasant, though, and along with Soledad Miranda, it's that quirky approach to filmmaking that saves an otherwise dull spy film from going on the scrapheap alongside clunkers like Agent for H.A.R.M.. There's nothing particularly exciting about The Devil Came from Akasava. The action, when it does come, is pretty clumsy and not the least bit thrilling. The espionage isn't particularly engaging, either. But the film appeals to me never the less, perhaps because I can sympathize and relate to Franco's weird pacing and personal quirks. There are times when I simply can't struggle through one of his films -- A Virgin Among the Living Dead remains to this day one of the most excruciating chores to finish that I've ever failed at completing -- but The Devil Came from Akasava is much breezier, eye-catching and fun, helped in large part by Franco's dwelling on Soledad Miranda, a goofy spy plot, and some really good Euro-lounge cocktail music, which gets better when it's employed at really inopportune times that should be tense and exciting save for the breathless "la de do za zu!" female vocals accompanying the action. The Devil Came from Akasava is probably one of Franco's more accessible film from the 1970s, when he really started getting weird. He even appears (as he often does) in a small role. But the film belongs to Soledad Miranda, and she remains the over-arching reason to watch. She made three films in 1971, all with Franco: this, Vampyro Lesbos, and the Lesbos follow-up, She Killed in Ecstasy. It was shortly after completing the filming of The Devil Came from Akasava that she was killed in a car wreck. Like Franco, we were all the worse off for her tragic passing. As far as cheap Eurospy films go, this one clicks nicely into the middle of the pack, though Franco's offbeat direction and Miranda's presence lift above other middle-of-the-road spy films. I have a weakness for goofy spy films, though, so be forewarned that not only to do I go into The Devil Came from Akasava with a higher Franco tolerance than many, I also have a soft spot for European spy capers. So The Devil Came from Akasava is definitely not the sort of spy film I'd recommend to everyone, but I would recommend it to a select few, and you know, if you are looking to dip your toe into the Jess Franco pool, which is deep and wide and rather choked with weeds and surface scum, I think it's a more accessible starting point than Vampyro Lesbos, though really, what you should do is set aside a night and just watch all three Miranda-Franco films from 1971 in a row. That'll do some glorious damage to ya, right there. Labels: Director: Jess Franco, Espionage, Eurospies, Netflix Diary, Series: Edgar Wallace Krimi, Year: 1971 posted by Keith at 11:01 AM | 2 Comments Friday, January 20, 2006Bay of Blood
1971, Italy. AKA Twitch of the Death Nerve. Starring Claudine Auger, Luigi Pistilli, Claudio Camaso, Anna Maria Rosati, Cristea Avram, Leopoldo Trieste, Laura Betti, Brigitte Skay, Isa Miranda, Paola Montenero, Guido Boccaccini, Roberto Bonanni, Giovanni Nuvoletti. Directed by Mario Bava. Written by Mario Bava.
I'm going to have to cram a bunch of history up front in this review, so if you already know most of it, please forgive me. I feel it sets the stage properly for those among you who aren't nerdy enough to have a vast and swelling knowledge of the ins and outs of British censorship efforts, Italian slasher-thriller movies, and the joyous day those two tastes were plunged together into a scrummy treat known as the "Video Nasties" list. Let me first take back to a time when Samantha Fox was still a fox and the world was just beginning to discover the pleasure of home video systems. England has always had a somewhat contentious relationship with cinema censorship, and certain types who like to get upset over idiotic things were worried about the fact that the rules governing the rating, licensing, and editing of films for release to British theaters had not been written in a language that would allow them to be applied equally to films distributed on video. This little lapse in the foresight of censorship laws to anticipate the invention and subsequent wildfire-like spread of VCRs meant that films previously cut or banned could be legally (more or less) distributed in uncut format on videotape. Certain newspapers (The sensationalist Daily Mail being the leading culprit) in need of a moral crusade over which to express their burning outrage and indignation began a crusade against the potential free-for-all of home video, dubbing the sick and disgusting movies one could acquire for home viewing the "video nasties," since movies that benefited from the loophole were presumably packed with sex and violence and swarthy Italians stabbing each other in the eye. Having nothing better to do that day, and perhaps looking for something that would take the edge off less important problems, like the IRA putting bombs in garbage bins and mailboxes, the cause was embraced, thereby turning a bunch of films it was likely no one wanted to see in the first place into overnight legends and must-have taboo items. With a few swift strokes of the quill pen (I assume they still use those in England), a whole stack of awful movies got to plaster their oversized 1980s boxes with the phrase, "Banned in the U.K." For most of these movies -- the bulk of which were horror films from the United States and Italy which were considered so heinous in their content that they would fray the very moral fabric of youth Britannia -- there was no better advertising than being placed on the instantly-infamous Video Nasties list. Whatever revenues were lost by having British borders sealed against their intrusion was undoubtedly recouped via the spike in interest the banning caused elsewhere. The Young Ones did a whole episode revolving around efforts to obtain one of the movies on the Nasties list, and The Damned wrote a song about it. However, listing the Video Nasties as "banned" is slightly misleading. At the time the list was created, film censorship was handled by the courts, and a certain standard had to be met for a film to be eligible for censorship or outright banning. The Video Nasties list was actually a list of films the public prosecutors thought would be worth pursuing in court. So they were not so much banned as they were "potentially banned," with excessive sex, violence, or more importantly, sex-related violence being the primary focus of moral disgust. Just getting on the list was enough to effectively keep a film out of England, though, because no company wanted to invest money in releasing a tape that could potentially be confiscated a couple weeks or months later. Anyway, that's how I understand the history of the list. I may have taken a misstep here and there, so please alert me if I have. Reading through the list can cause one to take pause and wonder what sort of criteria went into developing the titles that appear on it. Some of them make sense. If you're going to ban a sick and perverse film, you can't do much better than have Cannibal Holocaust as your poster child. But other titles seem straight out of left field, with nothing in them that could possibly justify a banning under the guidelines set up by the BBFC for a country where Benny Hill could still conjure up random gusts of wind that would make a buxom lady's dress blow off, thus causing her to run around in fast motion wearing nothing but her knickers while Benny fluttered his eyelashes. Sure, some of the movies were gory, but really, where was the danger to morality in a movie as ludicrous as Lucio Fulci's Zombie or Luigi Cozzi's Contamination? And how did a movie like Tobe Hooper's Funhouse make the list? Or Dario Argento's Inferno, easily one of the least gory films he'd made? The big problem with the list, it was revealed, was that not only did it make a bunch of crappy, boring films (and some genuinely good ones) instant must-see "classics" of shock cinema, but the titles on the list were often placed there by people who had never seen the actual movie, or had simply run across a picture of the box art, or had gotten the movie confused with some other movie. It was a complete hodge-podge with no real research put into it. And like most attempts to ban or censor horror films, it only increased interest in the movies that made the cut, so to speak. Fulci's Zombie, Sam Raimi's Evil Dead, and Umberto Lenzi's Make them Die Slowly benefited hugely from inclusion on the list. I distinctly remember the giant boxes in the video store for both Zombie and Make them Die Slowly celebrating the banning of the films in England. Most of the movies on the list have since been released in the UK uncut on DVD, but having been place don the Video Nasties list will forever remain a badge of accomplishment for many of the titles. Heck, for some of them, it's about the only good thing they have going for them. Can you imagine fighting customs agents, smuggling in a video, risking fines and imprisonment, then sitting down to discover all your effort resulted in a movie as godawful boring as Funhouse? Among the titles on the list was Mario Bava's 1971 proto-slasher film Bay of Blood, known these days in the United States as Twitch of the Death Nerve. Bava, as you should know, is considered more or less the godfather of the Italian horror films, and one of the legendary greats of the genre as a whole. Any list of the best horror films of all time compiled by someone who knows about movies made before 1995 or so is pretty likely to contain at least one, and possibly several, Mario Bava films: gothic horror films Black Sunday (aka Mask of Satan) starring Barbara Steele, Kill, Baby...Kill!, or The Whip and the Body starring Christopher Lee; or perhaps his more modern horror films like Twitch of the Death Nerve and Blood and Black Lace. Bava's visual style was defined by his affinity for moody, hallucinatory atmosphere and candy-colored phantasmagorical lighting and remains to this day a major influence on filmmakers. With Blood and Black Lace, he pretty much created the Italian giallo film -- murder mysteries and supernatural thrillers that drew heavily from pulp novels and relied heavily on shocking murders and a highly stylized visual approach. Since Bava was from an older generation of filmmaker, he tended to restrain himself when it came to sex and gore. There was titillation, to be sure, and plenty of violence. But nudity was rare, sex scenes were non-existent, and bloody gore almost never made an appearance. Even as other filmmakers embraced increasingly lax regulations about what they could show on screen, Bava -- like his contemporaries at England's Hammer Studios -- stayed his hand. At least until 1971. Perhaps it was the fact that Bava had been saddled with a string of unsatisfying projects, thus filling the venerable director with frustration he needed to vent. Maybe he just thought the time was right. Or maybe he felt that the script for Bay of Blood was witty and funny enough for people to recognize that the excess was there to create an almost comic book-like sense of the absurd that couldn't possibly be taken seriously by anyone. Whatever the motivation, Bava decided to pull out the stops for Bay, which has ended up with more titles than I care to list. I'm sticking with Bay because it's the shortest. The film opens with serene shots of a wooded lake. As the credits role, it becomes evident that we're following the flight of an insect. As the credits wrap up, the fly suddenly and without reason drops dead. It's a foreshadowing of what's to come -- that anyone, and any time, is going to die in this film; that they will, in fact, be dropping like flies. Mimicking this opening is the next scene, which consists of an old woman in a wheelchair puttering about her fancy abode. Her daily routine is rudely interrupted when a man appears and strangles her with a noose, leaving her dead and dangling in a doorway. One would assume that the remainder of the film would revolve around various players attempting to discover the identity of the murderer, but Bava short-circuits that expectation by immediately panning up and revealing the killer's face -- then promptly has the killer murdered by yet another killer. I don't know if you would call this "playful," but it is an indicator that Bava is going to infuse this film with a little more humor than might be expected in a film with a title like Bay of Blood. From there, the story proper kicks in. After the old woman's death, the home and accompany murky lake are up for grabs by a cast of potential heirs, all of whom descend upon the house ostensibly for the sorting out of the will, but mostly so they can plot, connive, and be murdered by the mysterious assailant. Most of the cast is of a nasty disposition, and all of them have various things to hide. The twists and turns in gialli are often, oh let's say, either far-fetched or completely uninteresting, but Bava keeps viewers guessing and interested in the identity of the killer -- or killers, because it seems more than one person is bloodying their axe at this remote paradise. There's not much point in going through the machinations and revelations of the plot, since listing who stabs who inthe back (sometimes literally) doesn't have the same impact of simply lying back and watching the bloody delerium unfold on the screen. Suffice it to say that no one is especially nice, not even the odl woman we see murdered int he very beginning. It's possible that the symbolic fly from the credit sequence was a nice enough fellow, but then given the fly's tendency to vomit it's filthy eggs onto the top of your sandwich, it's likely that the fly was as much a scheming jerk as everyone else. Bay is a strong film, though not my favorite Bava outing (I prefer Kill, Baby...Kill! and Blood and Black Lace). Still, it's one of the best giallo films ever made, and it also has the somewhat dubious honor of being considered by many to be the first "slasher" film. For my money, establishing the first slasher film is a tricky proposition -- why is this a slasher film and Blood and Black Lace not? Whatever the case, it certainly means the slasher film was boiling long before the previously cited "first" slasher film, John Carpenter's Halloween. Without a doubt, Halloween was the impetus for the flood o' blood that spilled during much of the 1980s, but the Friday the 13th films have pretty much become the poster children, however bad most of them may have been, for the whole genre. There's not much doubt in my mind that the template for the F13 films was lifted wholesale from Mario Bava's much smarter, cleverer Bay of Blood. Bay establishes all the essential genre cliches that would be mercilessly flogged some ten years or so later. You have the remote, wooded location and a seemingly complete lack of police force. You have the diverse group of generally unlikable characters. You have most of those characters getting murdered by sometimes outlandish methods, then piled up in some central location for someone else to stumble across. And perhaps most important of all, you have the founding of the "get naked, then get killed" pattern that became the lifeblood, so to speak, of the entire slasher genre. Bava flirted with nudity in previous films, but it was generally incidental -- who would make a movie with Edwige Fenech, for instance, and not get her naked for at least a couple shots? With Bay of Blood, however, Bava went further with nudity than he had before, though it's still nothing compared to what we'd be seeing in the coming years from other Italian thrillers. But what's more important is that the film sets up the pattern: a woman gets naked, either for sex or for skinny dipping, and moments later they get skewered. Much has been made of the psychological implications of this tendency, that it is a manifestation of a repressed and/or oppressive male reaction to female liberation, arguments like that. In many of the later slasher movies, I don't doubt this one bit. It's mean-spirited venting, scenes written by frustrated horror writing nerds who weren't getting lucky with naked women of their own, so they take their frustrations out on female characters, and then in turn provide both titillation and some sort of grim, twisted satisfaction for the portion of the viewing population that shares their sentiments. With Bava, however, the entire premise seems less sinister, but that may just be me. What makes Bay of Blood markedly different from the slasher films it would inspire is the undeniable sense of humor that pervades everything. It's a twisted sense of humor, no doubt, but it's obvious that Mario Bava is out on a bit of a lark with this film, and as such there's really no point to getting especially upset or unnerved by any of the implications. Bava has always, in my eyes, been a slightly less controlled and more visually daring peer of Alfred Hitchcock, and Bay feels similar in many ways to late-era Hitchcock, or a particularly edgy Agatha Christie novel. There are plenty of other elements that set Bay of Blood apart from the pack it eventually unleashed. For starters, Mario Bava is a much better director than just about everyone else who made a slasher film, many of whom were helming one of their first films when they slid behind the camera to shoot the carnage in the woods, or wherever their film may have been set (it was probably the woods). But Bava was a veteran director, cinematographer, and writer by 1971, with some four decades of experience under his belt. His visual flare and stylistic approach shines through. He also has the good sense to populate his movie not just with a bunch of more or less anonymous, pretty throw-away non-actors who do nothing more than serve as fodder for the killer, but also with a cast of seasoned vets who know their way around a movie and lend it an element of maturity that is sorely missing from the teen slasher films of the eighties. Bond fans will be pleased to stumble across Thunderball Bond girl Claudine Auger in the film. Me? I'd be happy to stumble across Claudine Auger just about anywhere. So Bay of Blood is neither your typical giallo or your typical slasher film. It's something much smarter and better composed than the bulk of films it inspired, as is often the case. It was Bava's last great film, though I might be willing say second-to-last, as Lisa and the Devil is pretty spectacular and by far his weirdest film. Bay is mean but not exactly mean-spirited, clever without being irritating, and really just sort of nastily funny. One gets the feeling that Bava really relished the opportunity, after infusing so many of his films with a humanist compassion toward the lead characters, to simply cut loose and let a bunch of conniving, spoiled schemers really have it. So why did it make the Video Nasties list? You'd have to ask whoever put it on there, but my guess would be the mix of bare breasts and bloody mayhem caused it to be placed in the crosshairs. But it's just as likely that the box art set someone off, or that one of the people compiling the list was trying to sell some bayfront property and thought a title like this might hurt their chances. Whatever the case, while the Video Nasties list is nothing more than an oddity of eighties entertainment paranoia that has been largely forgotten except as the butt of jokes, Mario Bava and Bava's Bay of Blood have been rediscovered by a new generation thanks to DVD, and Bava's influence and importance to filmmaking continues to be explored and exalted. Labels: B-Masters Roundtable, Director: Mario Bava, Horror: Giallo, Horror: Slashers, Year: 1971 posted by Keith at 1:26 PM | 0 Comments Saturday, September 18, 2004Murders in the Rue Morgue Release Year: 1971Country: United States Starring: Jason Robards, Herbert Lom, Christine Kaufmann, Adolfo Celi, Maria Perschy, Michael Dunn, Lilli Palmer, Peter Arne, Rosalind Elliot, Marshall Jones, Maria Martin, Ruth Plattes. Writer: Christopher Wicking and Henry Slesar Director: Gordon Hessler Cinematographer: Manuel Berenguer Music: Waldo de los Rios Producer: Louis Heyward Director Gordon Hessler is back for another AIP Poe adaptation, this one cleverer than most in the way it incorporates the Poe elements into the film. As we saw with The Oblong Box and many others, it was common to take the title of a Poe short story or poem, apply it to the film, then have not the slightest thing to do with the Poe story of the same title in the plot. Murders in the Rue Morgue takes the title from Poe's story, but instead of adapting it or discarding it, sets its action around a theatrical production of Poe's Murders in the Rue Morgue that becomes plagued with murders and yet another vengeful disfigured madman who was buried alive. According to Hessler, this was done because Murders in the Rue Morgue had already been made into a movie, and everyone knew how it ended. Thus there was no suspense in the film - not that Hessler was all that great at creating suspense anyway. Murders in the Rue Morgue is also a good example of how important Vincent Price was to the success of these films. His special talent was making bad movies good, and making boring scenes interesting simply because he's so much fun to watch. Even The Oblong Box, which is heavy on Price sitting there and talking, is made more enjoyable simply by virtue of the fact that Price is doing the talking. By all accounts, he should have been the man in the lead for Murders in the Rue Morgue as well, but contract disputes led to him taking time away from AIP, or so the story goes. The contract dispute was settled, but Price came back and went to work on The Abominable Dr. Phibes rather than on this next Poe adaptation with Hessler. For all I know, though, he could simply have been to busy with Phibes to do this picture, and contract negotiations never came into it. Whatever the case, The Abominable Dr. Phibes is considered by many including myself to be a deliciously macabre horror classic. Murders in the Rue Morgue, on the other hand, is regarded as something less than classic, when it is regarded at all. It's another in that long line of "not bad, not great" films that manage to satisfy people who are predisposed to like a particular type of film (in this case, gothic horror) but certainly won't win over any new fans.
With Price unavailable, AIP went shopping for a new leading man and hooked Jason Robards, fresh off his stint with Sergio Leone in Once Upon a Time in the West. Robards was a real catch of a lead at the time, but he looks about as thrilled to be in this film as I would be to find myself the winner of Celine Dion's complete discography. That is to say, not very. I like Jason Robards a lot, but it seems that he considers Murders in the Rue Morgue to be the type of film that was beneath him. I'm never a big fan of the "this type of film is beneath me" attitude. Hey man, work is work, and it's not like the people who sport this attitude have artistically impeccable resumes. Instead of just giving it their all and turning in a memorable performance - the kind that can make a bad movie good, the kind we'd expect from a man like Vincent Price - too often these stars half-ass their way through the film just to collect the paycheck. Robards is never bad in this film, but neither is he ever engaging. He looks bored, and his performance lacks the conviction and enthusiasm it requires to work. He plays Cesar Charron, the most American Frenchman you'll ever hear. Didn't Robards know that when playing a foreigner -- any foreigner - you're supposed to fake a British accent? Cesar is the lead actor and manager of a Parisian theater troupe performing their stage version of Poe's ghoulish tale. Things get going quick. If nothing else, Hessler could make an interesting start of his films. The actors discover that the man who was supposed to be playing the ape in the play was murdered, and the murderer himself had donned the costume and done the entire performance himself. You'd think a backstage murder followed by the murderer going on stage to rave reviews would be enough to cause a postponement, but I guess the show must always go on. It's soon revealed that the murderer is Rene Marot, played by Herbert Lom, who starred in Mysterious Island and Hammer's version of Phantom of the Opera, which is fitting since this film has more to do with Phantom than with Poe's story. It could be that Lom got the role because he already had himself a mask. Yes, as with The Oblong Box, our murderer is an unhinged madman with a disfigured face. It turns out that Marot was once a member of Cesar's acting troupe, but after an accident resulted in real acid rather than prop acid being splashed on his face, he ended up killing himself. Or did he? Well, no, of course he didn't, because there he is a-killin' his former stage mates. But why? And how did he survive burial? And how does all this tie in to the bizarre nightmares Cesar's wife, Madeline (Christine Kaufmann) has been having, in which a masked man whirls an ax around and around before chasing her down a hall until she sees a corpse fall from the rafters? And what's with the midget? Answering these questions is how the film passes its running time.
As was often the case with Hessler's Poe films, the story is either complex or convoluted, depending on your mood, and there are a lot of disparate plot threads that have to be woven together by film's end. The film's ambitions perhaps outreach its ability to deliver, but it still makes for an interesting experiment and attempt to do something just a little bit different. There are a lot of dream sequences. Well, no. There's one dream sequence, repeated over and over, sometimes with a little more information added here and there as the film attempts to unravel the central mystery. Murders in the Rue Morgue has fewer scenes of people sitting around talking about the plot than previous Hessler Poe adaptations. The nightmare is effective, and the strange slow-motion scenes of the masked tuxedo-wearing killer whirling a giant medieval ax over his head is suitably spooky. Hessler also makes good use of the shadows and all the billowing cloaks and capes one is afforded in a period production, but overall the film is too brightly lit and lacks the chilling atmosphere of AIP's better Poe films or Hammer's gothic horrors. Outside of the dream sequence and a few shots around a carnival, Hessler's direction lacks direction, if you know what I mean, and it really fails to create any sort of impact or identity for the film. European genre regular Adolfo Celi (Thunderball, Danger: Diabolik!) is on hand as the captain of the most useless police force in France. I mean, Marot manages to stroll up and kill a man with a vial of acid while Celi and the the cops are standing not more than three feet away and looking right at him. Then they can't even catch the man, presumably because he does "billowing Jack the Ripper cloak" running to confuse them. One would think that an acid-scarred madman in all black and wearing a ceramic mask would attract attention, even in France. On several occasions, the police prove utterly incompetent at catching Marot, even though all it seems like they'd have to do is stick their hand out and grab him. He doesn't exactly keep a low profile. He keeps coming back to the theater. He keeps murdering members of the cast. How hard can it be? He even manages to evade police while dressed as a monkey despite the fact that they knew from the beginning of the play that he was on stage yet again as the ape, having murdered yet another cast member who was supposed to play the ape. And still he manages to escape. In another scene, police corner Marot and his assistant, the diminutive Pierre Triboulet (an excellent Michael Dunn) in an old crypt/theater. Marot escapes yet again, and then they just seem to sort of let Pierre go free despite the fact that he's obviously an accomplice, an accessory to murder, a kidnapper, and also guilty of perpetrating annoying Punch and Judy puppet plays on the citizens of Paris. If one is going to worry about the inability of the police to catch a dwarf who is standing right next to them or successfully nab an acid-scarred murderer kneeling before them, one may as well go on and wonder why, as monkey actors keep getting strangled, no one ever thinks to cancel the show or, for that matter, post any sort of security back stage even when they know Marot is going to be back there skulking about. I mean, it's really not that good of a play they seem to be putting on, so what's the harm in taking a few nights off while your cast is being stalked and killed?
You may be worried that the change of venue from England to Paris (although the film was actually shot in Spain) means no bawdy ale house shenanigans. Well, you'd be wrong. Have faith in AIP. Jason Robards still finds time to visit a brothel full of can-can dancers and, yes, patrons hollerin' and groping women and waving mugs around in the air. Unfortunately, the brothel scene showcases another of the film's many weaknesses, in this case it timidness. No gratuitous nudity? Not even in the bawdy ale-house scene? In France? Are you telling me those repressed Brits are willing to doff their blouses in the peasant pub, but those liberated French women are going to remain modestly clothed? What crazy kind of world is this? For that matter, Marot's murders are fairly tame in comparison to other AIP and Hammer films of the time. I guess there's only so much you can do with acid, but even when the ax comes into play, the camera is atypically shy in lingering over the grue. The goriest setpieces come in Cesar's stage show, where they're firmly established as Grand Guignol and "just part of the act, folks," thus lacking any real sense of shock. If I'm going to be pretentious enough to use the term Grand Guignol, then I want to apply it to the film itself, not to the play within the film. The film's twist ending is telegraphed about half an hour too early, but it's still a decently interesting ride before you arrive at the big revelation. Once again, the horribly scarred face of the killer is not all that terrifying, but it's not built up as such as much as Edward's face in The Oblong Box, so that's no real disappointment. No, the only real disappointment in Murders in the Rue Morgue is how substandard the whole thing ends up being, thanks largely to Jason Robards' disinterest in everything around him. His boredom infects the viewer and makes an already dubiously boring film even more so. As I said, this is the sort of film that could easily have been saved by Vincent Price, but without his services, and with a leading man who couldn't care less whether or not he was on screen, Murders in the Rue Morgue is dragged down by the weight of its own plot. With no conviction, with no sense of horror communicated by Robards, the movie is sapped of any tension it might have otherwise generated. All of Hessler's Poe films suffered from the same problem: his inability to pace a film or keep the entire thing interesting. With Vincent Price in the lead, you could cover, more or less, for that deficiency. Without Price, you mostly just spend the entire movie missing Vincent Price. It's a shame, too, because despite Robards throwing his little fit, the rest of the cast is pretty good. Celi is as he always is, only this time with one of those fake upturned Poroit mustaches the French so adored at the time. Michael Dunn is wonderful and mysterious as Pierre. He's actually more interesting than any of the principal characters, and one wonders more about his never-told back-story than the story that becomes central to the plot's resolution. The French period costumes are good, and the carnival-theater setting is sometimes interesting, but never as sinister or effective as is should be. Despite some promise and some quality moments scattered throughout more mundane events, Murders in the Rue Morgue is really nothing more than a good example of something that might have been. It's not good or bad enough to be striking in any way, and so remains a minor effort in AIP's Poe canon, and if it is remembered at all, it will be as "the one that would have been good if Vincent Price had starred in it." Labels: Director: Gordon Hessler, Horror: Poe, Netflix Diary, Studio: AIP, Year: 1971 posted by Keith at 11:38 PM | 0 Comments Thursday, September 16, 2004Blood from the Mummy's Tomb Release Year: 1971Country: England Starring: Andrew Keir, Valerie Leon, James Villiers, Hugh Burden, George Coulouris, Mark Edwards, Rosalie Crutchley, Aubrey Morris, David Markham, Joan Young. Writer: Christopher Wicking Director: Seth Holt and Michael Carreras Cinematographer: Arthur Grant Music: Tristram Cary Producer: Howard Brandy Availability: Available on DVD from Amazon. Someone must have gotten the memo and said, "Jesus, another mummy movie?" After three Hammer mummy movies, which in turn had followed some nine thousand or so Universal mummy movies featuring the vengeful bag o' rags known as Kharsis, the general consensus was that the world pretty much had all the movies it needed in which some expedition disturbs a tomb, gets yelled at by a guy in a fez, and then gets stalked by the mummy looking to avenge the desecration of the tomb. Even in as few as three films, Hammer Studio seemed to be flogging a dead...I don't know...Pharaoh or something. Though their first film, The Mummy starring Peter Cushing and Christopher Lee was spectacular, subsequent Hammer mummy movies bore essentially the same plot, and I do mean "bore." Curse of the Mummy's Tomb, the second of Hammer's mummy films, remains missing on DVD as of this writing, and thus can't be fit into the Netflix queue. However, my intention is to eventually (before year's end, anyway) do a round up of all the Hammer horror series films that are missing from Netflix so that I can plug all the holes and have a complete look. This means that just in time for Christmas, or maybe Halloween, you can look for us to bridge the gaps by reviewing Brides of Dracula, Dracula Prince of Darkness, Scars of Dracula, The Mummy's Curse, and The Evil of Frankenstein. And I guess Dracula AD 1972 if I can manage to find a copy. Hammer's third foray into mummy fun, The Mummy's Shroud, we've already discussed. Which brings us to 1971, and Hammer is in a bad state. There had been a rocky string of films, and it seemed obvious that the studio was losing its way, or had lost its way and was already flailing blindly in the darkness. Despite the dire straights in which Hammer found itself, they managed in the early 1970s to shoot a number of surprisingly good films that saw the company trying to break new ground in much the same way they had decades previous. Two of the three "Karnstein" vampire films -- Vampire Lovers and Twins of Evil are quite good films, even if their middle piece, Lust for a Vampire is somewhere more on the rotten end of things. Vampire Circus was highly enjoyable and unique. Frankenstein and the Monster from Hell wasn't the best in the series by any stretch of the imagination, but it was a serviceable film that would have been greatly improved if only the monster hadn't been so silly looking. And then there was Blood from the Mummy's Tomb. For their forth Egyptian adventure, someone at Hammer realized that no one wanted to see the same film a fourth time, especially since each subsequent mummy movie had declined considerably in quality. So certain changes were to be made. First and most obvious there was no mummy, at least not the shambling cloth-wrapped mummy one would expect. Second, the script, based on a story by Bram Stoker, did contain a curse, the violation of a tomb, and the deaths of all who entered said tomb, but there was no vengeance for the desecration. In fact, the expedition, it turns, out, was guided there purposely by the entombed princess within. And rather than being set in the usual 1860-1910 range of dates that encompass most of Hammer's gothic horrors, Blood from the Mummy's Tomb sports a modern setting. This was disastrous for the Dracula films, but it worked well for the mummy since there was no real effort to beat people over the head with funky music and bell-bottoms and guys using crazy hepcat lingo. It just meant that someone drove a car and wore a turtleneck sweater. Perhaps the most striking difference between Blood from the Mummy's Tomb and the previous two films was that it was good. Quite good, in fact. Not The Mummy good, but still plenty enjoyable, and a major high water mark for the company's often dismal output during their final decade. That Blood from the Mummy's Tomb is such a unique and enjoyable film is all the more impressive given the fact that it became known as one of those "cursed" films. It's too bad they'd already used up the "curse" title for the second film. The trouble started with Peter Cushing, who in an attempt to return some degree of prestige to the flagging mummy movies had been cast as one of the archaeologists who finds himself pitted against an ancient Egyptian princess' desire to be reincarnated using the body of his own daughter. With only a day or so of filming under his belt, however, Cushing's wife grew extremely ill and he dropped out of the production to be by her side. She died shortly thereafter, and Cushing was in no mood to be making mummy movies about dead women trying to return from the tomb. Hammer was more than willing to let their main man grieve, and so he was replaced by Andrew Keir, a fine and distinguished actor who had worked with the company on such productions as Dracula, Prince of Darkness and Viking Women, and was probably best known for playing the title character in Quatermass and the Pit. He'd also worked alongside Cushing in one of the Dr. Who movies, Dalek's Invasion Earth: 2150 AD. So even though losing Cushing was a blow, Keir was a top notch replacement who, if not possessed of as much recognition as Cushing, was still a familiar and well-respected face. Unfortunately, that wasn't the last tragedy to befall the film. Director Seth Holt, an imaginative director with a unique style, died during filming. He'd been in a state of increasingly poor health attributed largely to his weight and drinking, and it finally caught up with him. He was replaced by Michael Carreras, the son of Hammer founder James Carreras. Michael's directorial role call is not what one might call impressive. Impressively bad, perhaps, although entertaining in spots. But suffice it to say he wasn't exactly the studio's star director unless you're idea of Hammer at their best was Lost Continent and Prehistoric Women. Nepotisim? Perhaps, but I guess they figured with Curse of the Mummy's Tomb under his belt, they might as well call him in and let him direct the bits of Blood from the Mummy's Tomb that remained unfinished upon Holt's death. To Carreras' credit, his work blends seamlessly with Holt's, and there is no obvious point where the two directors' styles diverge. The story revolves around the ancient Egyptian princess Tara (the indescribably lovely Valerie Leon), who is sort of put to death in a half-assed fashion for being just being kind of all-around wicked. The method of execution seems to be to put some BBQ sauce in her nose, then cut off her hand, the reasoning being that if her body remains incomplete, then she can never rise from the tomb to inflict her evilness on society again. You'd think that rather than just chopping off a hand and throwing it to the jackals, you'd also do the head, maybe a leg. You know, make a thorough job of things. As it is, not only do they only chop off her hand, that same hand manages to kill a jackal and then go on to summon a sandstorm and rip out the throats of all the murderous priests. This movie will feature a lot of gory blood-gushing neck wounds, by the way. In terms of gore, it's quite extreme for Hammer, which I guess is an odd statement that deserves some quick clarification. In the 1950s and early 1960s Hammer was notorious for pushing the limits of what constituted acceptable onscreen gore. However, the revolution they began eventually passed them by, and by the time of Blood from the Mummy's Tomb, Hammer films seemed quaint and somewhat reserved compared to what was being pulled in other films. Blood from the Mummy's Tomb isn't a gorefest, but the gushing neck wounds are pretty extreme, and the finale of the film features a really juicy stabbing. Blood from the Mummy's Tomb was also one of the first Hammer films (Vampire Lovers, I believe, was the first) to feature nudity even though the earlier films had often been criticized for being too sexual. The nudity here is very quick, a flash of breast and rear, and apparently a body double stood in for Valerie Leon. Visions of the execution plague young Margaret (also Valerie Leon) thousands of years later. Her father was part of an expedition that unearthed the bizarre tomb of Tara, who stuns the archaeologist by being perfectly preserved and looking no older than the day she was killed. Things get weirder when they discover her corpse and severed hand still bleed, but they're not able to get too freaked out since she also seems to be working some mojo from beyond the grave that puts the archaeologists under her spell. Each of them takes one of her sacred items, and when the items are united on her birthday, her spirit will return to earth and possess Margaret. Unfortunately, Margaret is already falling under the spell of the ghostly princess - who, need I even mention, looks exactly like Margaret. See, her father gave her this big, ugly, unsightly red ring that allows Tara to dominate the mind of Margaret. The initial indication that Margaret is being possessed comes when she enthuses as to the beauty of the ring - a piece of jewelry so unspeakably ugly that not even Sammy Davis Jr. would wear it. Other characters exalt the aesthetic virtues of the ring as well, until eventually you get the idea that the script is trying desperately to make us believe in the beauty of the ring despite the obvious evidence to the contrary on screen, like how movies about brilliant writers will try to convince you of the writer's brilliance by having everyone state the writer is brilliant, even though excerpts from their writing that appear in the film suggest that the writer is, in fact, of a skill level far below that required even for an author of books whose covers are adorned by illustrations of Fabio dressed as a pirate. Although most of the members of the expedition resist Tara's demands, that just results in Valerie summoning up ghastly forces to inflict more neck wounds. Don't know what it is with this movie and neck wounds. Every death scene seems to end in a neck wound with blood a-pumping and the person clutching their throat and making the bug-eyed, "I have a neck wound!" dying face. I don't know what would have been riskier - to make another mummy movie with another mummy seeking more vengeance, or to make a mummy movie in which there is no mummy, and the story is more about possession and ghosts and psychological horror. Whatever the case, Hammer took the more original risk, and it paid off. Blood from the Mummy's Tomb is a slower paced film, as most of the mummy movies were, but because it relied more on mood and psychological tension, the movie never feels as draggy as the previous two films. And if nothing else, watching Valerie Leon stalk around in tight-fitting skimpy nightgowns is more fun than watching more cloth-wrapped lumberers lumbering about. What makes the film work, aside from it being different than any of the mummy movies that came before it, is the quality of the cast. Chris Wicking's script certainly helps, but it's the commitment of the cast that makes it work. Of course, that's the case for just about all the Hammer films, and more than a few hammy scripts were saved by the fact that the cast commits to it entirely and makes you believe. Blood from the Mummy's Tomb isn't a hammy script, but the fact that the cast is into it makes it even better. It keeps the pace feeling fast during the slower dialogue scenes. Keir was the biggest name in it. Valerie Leon had small parts in a lot of those Carry On films the British seemed to love so much, but this was one of her first starring roles. The rest of the cast is comprised of character actor stalwarts and a few attempts at injecting some new blood into Hammer. Everyone works quite well. Hammer also handles the modern setting well - certainly better, as I said in the beginning, than in their other attempt to update a series property, Dracula AD 1972. The present-day setting never intrudes on the gothic-style horror. The art direction for the Egyptian scenes is better here than it was in previous films as well, with things looking more authentic and less like brand new props. I would gamble that the leisurely pace of the film will turn off a lot of viewers, especially those expecting thrill-a-minute mummy fun. But then, I reckon those people have never been big Hammer horror fans anyway. Blood from the Mummy's Tomb isn't a scary film. It doesn't instill in the viewer a sense of dread the way Hammer films at their best do. Instead, it achieves a very dreamy/nightmarish atmosphere, disturbing but never shocking save for the parts where blood spurts out of something. It has a very continental feel to it, if you dig my meaning. And if you don't -- it lacks the clinical precision of Hammer and other British horror films and instead sports that more ephemeral Italian feel. The offbeat atmosphere fortells the even more continental approach of Hammer's final horror film, To the Devil...A Daughter, with the chief difference between this film and that one is that Blood from the Mummy's Tomb is odd and enjoyable while To the Devil...A Daughter is odd and wretched. It's a shame that Hammer didn't take more risks with unique material during the 1970s instead of going the route they went, which was to film the same things over and over but with lower budget, lesser actors, and more boobs. I mean, the more boobs part was fine, but it still shows that rather than being a trend-setter, Hammer had become a trend follower desperate to attract attention to themselves in whatever way possible. Granted the entire British film industry was in a bit of a moribund state at the time. But rocky though the 70s may have been for Hammer, Blood from the Mummy's Tomb is a stand-out that, while perhaps not keeping pace with the company at its best, certainly makes for solid b-movie material. Labels: Horror: Mummies, Netflix Diary, Studio: Hammer, Year: 1971 posted by Keith at 7:12 PM | 0 Comments Sunday, July 25, 2004Macbeth
1971, United States/Britain. Starring Jon Finch, Francesca Annis, Martin Shaw, Terence Bayler, John Stride, Nicholas Selby, Stephen Chase, Paul Shelley, Maisie MacFarquhar, Elsie Taylor, Noelle Rimmington. Directed by Roman Polanski. Buy it from Amazon
So this is what a Playboy-produced film used to look like. You know, back before they modeled themselves after their brainless FHM style spawns and were still at the very least attempting to inject some cutting edge material in between the shots of naked women with badly feathered 1970s hair. I know the joke is old and tired, but you know there used to even be something worth reading in that magazine. Not so much these days, from what I can tell. I have many vices, but Playboy ceased to be one of them round about the time it forsook that dapper jet-set lifestyle and became just another frat boy publication. And Playboy films? Don't even get me started. Yeah, I've seen one or two. They're awful, brainless, completely uninteresting erotic thrillers full of silicone-swollen blondes, inane plots, and no artistic value whatsoever, which I know seems like a silly criticism to level at Playboy films until you consider for a moment that there, for a brief spell in the 1970s, Hugh Hefner decided to throw the Playboy name and money at Roman Polanski's stylish, intelligent, and brutally grim adaptation of Shakespeare second bloodiest play. So what's happened? Well, the death of any desire to better ourselves, for the most part. We'd rather wallow in the lowest common denominator, and those who supply us with our swill see no reason to challenge a population that doesn't want to be challenged. So Playboy becomes Maxim with pubic hair shots and Playboy films become chintzy erotic thrillers. So let's pretend, as we so often do here, that the present never happened. I have no idea what moved Playboy to finance Polanski's dark vision of Shakespeare, but we're all the better for their temporary foray into the world of gory arthouse cinema. Macbeth is a dazzling film, one of the best in the filmography of a director who seems to have an inordinate number of high points in his cinematic career, even if his personal life has been somewhat, shall we say, more questionable. This particular film comes fast on the heels of Polanski's then-wife Sharon Tate being murdered by that crazed bunch of hippies calling themselves the Manson family. I think we've mentioned this somewhere before. Oh yeah, most likely in our review of Wrecking Crew the Dean Martin spy caper that starred Sharon Tate. If you don't know the basics of the story, get yourself to a library (they still have those, right?) and look up the facts. All-around madcap guy Charles Manson sends a bunch of his freaks out to commit some murder, and it would seem when you string everything together, that they got the wrong people. That's what happens when you send a bunch of blessed-out hippies to do your murderin'. Manson's grudge was against music producer Terry Melcher, who aside from being the son of Doris Day, was a music producer who had rejected a bunch of demo recordings Manson sent out to him when Chuck was trying to become a musician. The house in which Sharon Tate and other party guests were attacked by Manson's band of loonies had belonged to him up until just a few months prior, so the general idea is that Manson was looking for some artistic revenge and just didn't know the guy had moved. So it's pretty obvious that when Roman Polanski started working on Macbeth a short time after his wife's murder, he wasn't in the best of moods. It certainly shows in the final product, a film so relentlessly grim, bleak, and full of corruption and evil that it almost crushes the viewer with its gloomy weight. Even Shakespeare's original play, itself already a macabre and darkly violent tale, pales in comparison to the ferocity of Polanski's version. Beneath the grimy, enraged exterior lurks what may be the director's best film, however, a movie of shocking brilliance and beauty despite the ugliness on parade. Polanski sticks closely to the source material, or closer than is usual for an adaptation of a Shakespearean play. Jon Finch stars as Macbeth, the Scottish warrior who receives a telling prediction about his future as ruler of the land and so is driven into an increasingly violent cycle of madness as his own ambitions result in a self-fulfilling prophecy he does not even understand until it is far too late. Really, you should have read the thing by now. I'm not exactly the greatest fan of Shakespeare, but the man did pen some wonderful tales and Macbeth is one of his best. If you haven't read it, then all I have to say is, "How the heck did you graduate from high school?" Teleport City is a firm supporter of literature and the classics, just as we are a supporter of the classics of film. So get thee to the bookstore and pick up a copy, and get A Midsummer Night's Dream and Titus Andronicus while you're there. The latter isn't exactly good, but you'll simply revel in what has to be one of the most shockingly violent and over-indulgent plays of its time. When he encounters a group of witches one fine, rain-soaked and overcast Scottish day, Macbeth is told he will become king. When predictions start coming true, Macbeth is encouraged by his equally ambitious wife (Francesca Annis) to help fate along a bit by murdering the current king of Scotland, Duncan. One murder becomes several as Macbeth attempts to use bloodshed to control the increasingly out-of-control spiral into madness that consumes both him and his wife. Before too long, his own madness results in a revolt being mounted by the rightful heir to the throne and Macbeth's one-time friend MacDuff (Terence Bayler). But since the coven of witches ensure Macbeth that no man born of a woman can harm him, he remains as cocky as he is stark raving mad even as armies amass outside his castle walls. Cinematic adaptations of Shakespeare are often tricky. People tend to either want to "adapt it to modern times" a la the ten billion or so adaptations of Romeo and Juliet, or they stick so slavishly to the play that they might as well just have made a play instead of a film. Polanski was one of the first directors to really find that balance between play and film (Franco Zeffirelli had accomplished much the same thing in 1968 with his wonderful true-to-the-source adaptation of Romeo and Juliet). He sticks to the proper setting and costumes, and the dialogue is from the play. But he also makes terrific use of the scope format, only his second time working with a widescreen presentation. The windswept, overcast landscapes are suitably gloomy and overwhelming. The bubble with mist and menace and almost become a character unto themselves. Desolate beaches, muddy moors, decaying castles - the Dark Ages never quite looked so dark. But just as Polanski is really sinking into all this bleakness, he'll do something unexpected with a vibrant splash of color and a rich purple-orange sunset which, combined with the medieval-meets-experimental music of the Third Ear Band, lends the film the surreal, macabre atmosphere that is imperative to its success. But hey, we're not talking Roger Vadim here, who was all visual and nothing else. Polanski not only commands the visual composition of his film; he turns in a superb script and some incredible performances from his cast, lead most notably by Jon Finch as Macbeth. He allows his character to teeter on then plunge into madness without ever allowing him to go over the top or chew the scenery. His performance lacks any sense of the cartoony or ham-fisted. He is, instead, desperate, lusty, and increasingly frantic and detached from reality. Matching him step for step is Francesca Annis as Lady Macbeth, and the supporting cast though sometimes difficult to keep track of (owing to the armor, bushy hair, and dirt all over everyone) is wonderful. But then, they've given a near flawless script with which to work, one that manages to deliver pure Shakespeare without sounding stilted or phony. Even the more flowery passages of prose that they have to deliver sound completely natural. And viewed within the context of the year in which it was made, Macbeth's reoccurring criticism of the corruption of political power, of cover-ups and deceit and the suffering of the people so a few bigwigs can extend their overlong period of political power, seem especially potent. 1971 was, after all, the year Watergate broke, and the violent, almost apocalyptic turn the so-called Summer of Love took must have also influenced Polanski's approach to the film just as it was reflected on a microcosmic scale by Manson's murderous hippies. Luckily, our politicians these days are much more forthcoming and open and honest, and so I'm sure the biting and angry political commentary of Macbeth is outdated and even quaint. Umm, right? Sets and costumes are also wonderful. Perhaps someone more informed about such things could point at a particular piece of armor and scoff at the fact that a Scottish king of this particular era would never have worn that particular breastplate, but for my money, everything was absolutely stunning. The castles and landscapes are as gorgeous as they are monstrous, and Polanski's attention to detail is admirable. Nnote, for example, the opening scene of the witches on the beach. As they walk away, they leave no footprints. It's almost something you don't notice, but is ultimately another fine example of the amount of work Polanksi and his crew put into creating this sinister and supernatural nightmare. And, to be frank, one can't help but see shades of Macbeth's look and feel in 1975's Monty Python and the Holy Grail. It was there, however, used for creating a slightly less intense and dark atmosphere. Just, you know, slightly. Being Macbeth and all, it's a fairly violent affair. There's a fair amount of gore on display, and for once, no one can trot out that "tame by today's standards," especially given how bloodless so many modern films have become, addicted as they are to flashy MTV visuals and cartoon style violence and CGI trickery. Macbeth's bloodshed packs an impact even today, and although influenced not just by the play but also by Polanski's own foul mood, this level of violence was just part of a greater pushing of the envelope for both sex and violence in a mainstream, intelligent film that occurred in 1971. It was the same year we saw the release of Kubrick's A Clockwork Orange and Sam Peckinpah's Straw Dogs, among others. Macbeth isn't exactly full of violent conflict, but violence remains a character constantly onscreen even when it isn't overtly exerting itself. There are, as in the play, several gruesome murders and Polanski's lens does not flinch in showing the deeds. It must have been almost cathartic for the man in a way. And the ghastly finale as Macbeth and Macduff hack mercilessly away at one another (but then, is there a merciful way to hack away at someone?) culminates in some truly grisly stuff, but you have to expect that in both the play and this movie. Sexually speaking, Polanski's film is quite tame. Perhaps having Playboy and Hugh Hefner as executive producer required him to inject some naked female flesh into the proceedings, but given the way in which he accomplishes this possible contractual obligation, those looking for cheap titillation will be confounded. Of the film's two nude scenes, one involves a coven of dirty, aged, and often deformed witch hags. The other involves a nude sleepwalking/dream scene with Lady Macbeth, who for the most part remains artfully cloaked in her own long hair. Then, I guess the nudity wasn't all that out of the ordinary. Zeffirelli had shown rear nudity in Romeo and Juliet much to the delight of me and my entire 8th grade English class when our teacher showed us the film and forgot about the nudity. Of course, nowadays that would be national news and various blowhards would have "Talking Points" soundbites about it. Back then, it was just sort of, well, it's a well-respected film and work of art so who cares about a bare bum? I think of things like this any time people trot out that "tame by modern standards" nonsense, since we're far more restrictive and timid now than we were in the 1970s and even 1980s. From what I've read, some English classes also watched Macbeth in school, and that must have really traumatized the kids, more because of the violence than the sight of a bunch of naked old women. Maybe this movie is why Playboy decided from now on they'd stick to thrilling films like, The Girls of Spring Break, 2002. Macbeth was a box office failure upon its initial release, but subsequent audiences have revisited the film and found it to be, as I found it to be, a breathtaking masterpiece. Polanski's career as a director cuts across several genres, and here in a single film seems to be his entire career. Macbeth is an historical drama, an action film, an art film, and a horror film, and it is all these things without seeming schizophrenic or disjointed. Thank the original author for part of that phenomenon, but thank Polanski for knowing how to stitch it all together so seamlessly. Macbeth is a play that deserves to be read (or better yet, see performed), but in my admittedly skewed opinion, even more so it is a movie you absolutely must view. Labels: Historical Epics, Netflix Diary, Year: 1971 posted by Keith at 11:26 PM | 0 Comments Tuesday, January 08, 2002Godzilla vs. the Smog Monster
1971, Japan. Starring Akira Yamauchi, Toshie Kimura, Hiroyuki Kawase, Keiko Mari, Toshio Shibaki, Yukihiko Gondo, Eisaburo Komatsu, Haruo Nakajima, Susumu Okabe, Tadashi Okabe, Wataru Omae, Kenpachiro Satsuma. Directed by Yoshimitsu Banno. Buy it from Amazon
So this is what happens when Godzilla writers drop acid and watch a bunch of Matt Helm films. I think I am in the minority in liking this film, which is easily the weirdest damn Godzilla film ever made, and also the hippest. It has more scenes of wild, sexy go-go dancing Japanese girls in white boots and psychedelic mini-skirts than any other Japanese monster movie. Add crazy-ass psychedelic backgrounds pulsating in the back (those ones that are always superimposed over Jimmy Hendrix performances), and you have a serious kaiju freaka. Body painting, swirly catsuits, man you just can't go wrong with this stuff! Godzilla films often have a subplot involving man's disregard for nature. In fact, Japanese sci-fi in general is all about upsetting the balance of the planet. Funny stuff coming from the one nation that refused to stop slaughtering endangered whales and still likes to buy mass quantities of powdered endangered species for use as aphrodisiacs. DID THEY LEARN NOTHING FROM SPECTREMAN!?!!? Godzilla Versus Hedorah is the most overtly political of all the Godzilla films, with the possible exception of Godzilla's Revenge. Some movies chose to serve you the ideology in small, subtle ways. Godzilla Versus Hedorah serves it to you as a giant monster kicking over buildings and spewing acid onto hippies. Normally, this would be a good thing, but this must have been some of that brown acid everyone was warned about. I guess a light, subtle touch has never been a staple of the Godzilla franchise. So what we have here is a monster born of sludge and industrial waste. Hedorah actually looks a lot like that disastrous food item some Japanese company tried to market a few years ago. It was made of reconstituted sewage and was supposed to be full of nutrients. The only problem was that they didn't disguise the origin, and no one wanted to eat a black-green fruit roll-up that was once in someone's ass. Anyway, Hedorah looks liked that. Hedorah can also transform into three states -- flying Hedorah, stomping Hedorah, and swimming Hedorah. The flying Hedorah spreads deadly acid clouds as it flies. This doesn't sit well with Godzilla, now firmly planted in his superheroic "defender of humanity" personae. So one night he strolls into town to take on the gooey gob of evil. No one seems to notice the two monsters. I mean, there's no evacuation, no mass hysteria, no sirens or jets or anything. Did they sneak into the city? How can you not notice Godzilla fighting a sludge monster in the middle of town? In fact, this film dispenses with a number of traditional Godzilla elements -- there is no evacuation scene. No Akira Ifukube soundtrack. No aliens or fairies. Most of the monster action takes place at night. It's a weird feeling Godzilla movie, very different and strange. But you still got the little kid in micro-shorts, though this one isn't so bad. On the Ichiro scale, he only rates a 5, at best. But Godzilla isn't strong enough! Is it possible that man's carelessness and irresponsibility have created an environmental monstrosity even Godzilla can't handle? Hedorah splits and takes to eating factory pollution, since pollution is what gives Hedorah it's nourishment. This actually seems like a benefit of having a Hedorah around. But it keeps squirting acid on people, and you just can't do that, not even in the 1970s. Some go-go dancers, Bohemians, and hippy kids decide to have a big dance on Mount Fuji to summon good vibes and make Hedorah disappear. Of course, Hedorah comes by and squirts acidic sludge on everyone. Important lesson there -- you can't combat environmental destruction with good intentions or pointless songs. You've got to take an active role. Art is not enough to make the world right. It takes physical work. Luckily, Godzilla is there to be the Earth First to their hippy peace circle. He's ready to kick pollution's ass, and this time he has some back-up in the form of the Japanese military and the scientist who discovered the origins of Hedorah. Now, if you've learned one thing from a Godzilla film, it's that he can magically have bestowed upon him powers that help him beat his enemy, like in Godzilla Versus MechaGodzilla when out of nowhere he has the power to magnetize his body. Well, that's nothing. In this one, he uses his atomic breath to actually propel himself backwards through the sky. Yes, using his breath as a jet engine, he can fly! This is the one and only movie where Godzilla goes airborne in any fashion beyond Rodan picking him up and dropping him on stuff. When you see it, you will know why. I don't care what the critics say! I love Godzilla Versus Hedorah in all its puzzling, heavy-handed glory. It has tons of monster action, a weird "drunken super Godzilla" theme song, weird animated bits, more monster action, cute beatnik girls in go-go boots and body stockings, and a flying Godzilla! It has that "Save the Earth" theme song. It certainly doesn't have the same tone or look of other Godzilla films. The color is more muted (and Godzilla films would become garish in their use of color as the 1970s progressed). It has funky music. It has a message about taking care of the Earth, and about man's responsibility for cleaning up his own mess. If you expect someone else to do it for you (Godzilla) or just write songs about it and dance, you'll be set upon by a monster. Only when mankind rolls up it's collective sleeves and plunges their hands into the heart of the mess can progress be made. Nerd note: the Hedorah monster is played by Kenpachiro Satsuma in his first "role." He would go on to be the man in the evil monster suit for many other Godzilla films. He moved on to play Godzilla itself in all the new films, and has even invented a style of karate based on the movements and exercises he must do to properly function in the bulky monster suit. He calls it "Godzilla kempo." Labels: Country: Japan, Science Fiction: Kaiju, Series: Godzilla, Year: 1971 posted by Keith at 4:26 PM | 1 Comments Saturday, March 03, 2001Honey Britches
1971, United States. Starring Ashley Brooks, George Ellis, Trudy Moore. Directed by Donn Davison and Fred Olen Ray.
Honey Britches has so many things going wrong for it that you can't help but look at it as a work of fine art. I mean, this is the sort of movie you watch and think to yourself, "Gee, with some formal training and more money, this director could be as good as Hershel Gordon Lewis." The film opens with "credits painted on a wooden fence," which I soon found to be the most popular opening credits style for ultra low-budget hicksploitation films, usually accompanied by banjo music or random sounds of pig squealing -- sometimes both. It is during these credits that you realize the theory about the director one day being as accomplished as HG Lewis are just fantasies, because up comes the name Fred Olen Ray. Well, up comes his name in certain versions. In other versions, his name does not appear, and we'll explain why in a few seconds. Fred Olen Ray, of course, would become synonymous with utter crap and boobies, two things we here at Teleport City fully support. But he would make them so dreadfully dull! He would pretty much create what is probably the best known gaggle of scream queens, including Brinke Stevens, Michelle Bauer, and Linnea Quiggely -- all names any self-respecting bad movie fan should recognize. Fred's biggest contribution to the world was probably the film Hollywood Chainsaw Hookers. I like to think of him as the Andy Sidaris of horror films, and hey! Both of them have an affinity for Julie Strain. Suffice it to say, despite this long career, Ray never quite achieved the level of sophistication found in even your weaker HG Lewis films. Actually, it's worth pointing out that Fred Olen Ray didn't actually direct most of the movie. He just bought a movie directed by a guy named Donn Davison, shot a couple more minutes of footage (apparently featuring a very broken down, senile John Carradine, though I have not seen a version with him in it), and added his name to the credits. Now, you may think that maybe that's a rude thing to do, but you have to think about a guy who would watch Honey Britches and think to himself, "Holy shit! This film is brilliant! I have to get a piece of the action!" After the credits, we go immediately to the "plot specific radio," a staple of all crappy movies and television shows that feature castaways and the Harlem Globetrotters. Which reminds me -- that Tom Hanks movie Castaway might have been more shocking and interesting if he'd walked over to the other side of the island and found Meadowlark Lemon and the Skipper cruising around in a coconut powered car. Call me a stickler for tradition, but if your castaway movie doesn't feature multiple Gilligan jokes, then you obviously don't know what the hell you are doing. The radio is broadcasting a story about some jewel robbers in New York City. You may ask yourself why radio stations all over the world are apparently broadcasting around the clock about some diamond heist that took place in New York. What do the yokels in some backwoods North Carolina town care about some robbery in New York? Do New York radio stations broadcast stories around the clock about some Nitro, West Virginia farmer who robbed a convenience store and might be heading toward New York City? Anyway, when you meet our gang of crooks, you'll wonder how the hell they robbed a diamond store in New York when it's obvious they couldn't even successfully rob a fourth grader of lunch money. First, you have the weird guy who leads the gang. He looks like a sleazy English Lit teacher, or that television inspector from the "Bomb" episode of The Young Ones. For some reason, he fakes a really bad British accent through most of the movie. Or maybe it was real. I don't know. Either way, what the hell was the point of pretending to be British? It has nothing to do with the movie other than allowing him to say things like "old chap." I guess the easy way to make someone sound brilliant is to make the British. Then, even when they are spouting inane dialogue and being outsmarted by pig farmers, they still at least have that sophisticated accent. Right away you should question this guy's intelligence, because here's the gang he has assembled. There's the incredibly tall, skinny, bored glamor girl in high heels and fancy furs. What the hell kind of bank robbing outfit is that? Some people, when they rob places, wear combat gear and terrorist masks. I don't know if anyone has ever attempted to rob a store in high heels. Then you have the angry Southern guy who hates everyone. Why would you even have this guy in your gang? I mean, the whole concept of putting together a gang for a heist is that you get people who can work together and who know what they are doing. None of these people seem like seasoned criminal masterminds. Why would you put together a group that has never robbed anything before, and furthermore, all hate each other? Anyway, rounding out the pathetic band of criminals is the Southern guy's abused bimbo girlfriend. Again, need I even comment on the wisdom of including a moronic bubble-head in your gang? Come on! You know your gang sucks when everything they do seems like it should be accompanied by the Three Stooges theme. So there you have it. A fake British guy, an angry redneck, a lanky Cher look-alike (or proto-Julie Strain), and a buffoon. Great team. Those guys in Heat have nothing on this gang. Obviously, this gang would never succeed, so none of the robbery is actually shown. How the hell do these four rob a diamond store in Manhattan and then make their getaway in a plane? Let's examine this for a minute, because I'm feeling particularly spiteful. If they are stealing diamonds, they are either in Midtown or down near Canal Street where all the Chinese and Hasidic diamond stores are. All of these stores have hardcore security, especially in 1971 when crime was running rampant in the city. So somehow, these four idiots overcome the various alarms, armed guards, locks, et cetera and get some diamonds. Whether they are in midtown or on Canal Street, the closest police stations are about a block away, which means the cops would be all over them before they'd even made it out the front door. So let's give them the benefit of the doubt. These four goofballs, armed apparently with a single six-shot revolver, manage to elude the police. They then have to hop into a car and, of course, speed away for about five seconds before getting caught in traffic. But let's say they get lucky and the streets are miraculously empty of careening taxis and double-parked delivery trucks. The gang escapes the city in a small single-prop airplane, which means they had to fly out of one of two small airports that actually service small private planes. One is in Long Island, the other in New Jersey. Both are about an hour away from Manhattan and require driving over crowded bridges or through tunnels. It would take all of five seconds to completely block any escape route -- and their escape route would be very obvious. In short, this scheme has a 100% chance of failing even if it was pulled off by seasoned veterans or members of the Rat Pack. But somehow, these folks did it. Impressive. Of course, all of this would prove positively ludicrous had they been able to afford to show it, so when we actually meet our merry band, they're tooling down country roads in an old jeep listening to the plot point radio. Conveniently, the radio then goes on to explain how they ended up in the jeep. They then proceed to crash their plane in the mountains of North Carolina, or was it Virginia, and steal a jeep in broad daylight in front of dozens of witnesses who then report the incident to the police, thus completely giving away their location. To complete the circle of extreme idiocy, the jeep runs out of gas. This who sequence is just painful. It's sort of funny that anyone ever thought these would be believable or compelling criminals, but it's also just painful to watch. It reminded me of this exercise I had to do in a script writing class back in college. We were charged with writing a new final scene for Silence of the Lambs, something that happens after Clarice Starling gets the last phone call from Hannibal Lechter. Keep in mind, this was years before Hannibal. One guy wrote a scene in which Clarice goes to South America to track Hannibal down. After about five pages of her walking around, she goes to get some ice cream, and of course, Hannibal has killed the real ice cream man (presumably played by Clint Howard) and is disguised as a store clerk. He ends up decapitating Clarice Starling and, as the movie fades to black, utters the memorable line "Quid pro quo, Clarice!" It was, at the time, utterly awful. It was one of the most awful things ever written, the sort of thing that makes you wish you were doing something more pleasant, like listening to Quentin Tarantino talk for hours about how cool stuff is as you are hammered in the groin by an elf singing the various musical numbers from the Rankin Bass Hobbit cartoon. At least that would make a funny story afterward. Of course, this was before Hannibal, remember, which may have made the guy's script seem less pathetic. The professor, a high school drop out who looked a lot like Walt Whitman and wore a rawhide vest to class every day actually howled when the guy was finished reading his scene. He grabbed the script, and I kid you not, tore it in half, threw it across the room, the proceeded to dance on it with wild abandon while shouting, "This is the worst piece of shit I've ever read!" That scene would have been much more interesting than what the kid wrote. The whole thing was one of the most uncomfortably hilarious moments in my life, and the entire concept behind Honey Britches is actually even worse. What's really sad, and at the same time sort of poignant, is that I have no doubt writer Barbara Morris Davison put her heart and soul into the script. She worked her ass off. The guy who wrote the script in which Hannibal Lechter kills Clarice Starling while dressed as an Ecuadorian ice cream man thought his script was the greatest idea the world had ever seen. He was so excited about it, so amazed by how wild and cool it was. He was utterly crushed when the professor literally tore it to shreds. Likewise, I'm sure when she typed the words "The End," Barbara lit a cigarette, leaned back in her chair, and thought about how great the script was. She was excited because it was something she did herself, something she completed, beginning to end. Yeah, that's impressive, but it's also sad to think about someone putting their heart and soul into something that just plain blows -- much like this website! When the jeep runs out of gas, Phillip the Fake Brit showcases his superior intellect once again by deciding to push the jeep to the side of the road and cover it with branches. The perfect crime! Except that it's just sitting in a wide open area underneath a big pile of suspiciously out-of-place branches forming a rudimentary dome-shape. It's about as inconspicuous as neon-clad yodelin' cowboy at a goth club. We are soon introduced to our next lovable character, a portly, bearded moonshiner named Harlan who loves to scream "Jezebel!" and "Sinful harlot!" at the sassy town hooker while making the "indignant puffy face" and emitting Ted Knight-esque mumbles any time she zings him with a suitably sassy comeback to his ranting. Someday, I'm going to make a movie about a hooker who isn't smart as a whip and her best friend, the homeless guy who did not used to be a literature professor or famous concert cellist. People only tolerate Harlan's Bible-thumping hellfire because he's the best moonshiner in the county, which is a claim to fame not unlike the one in Raiders of the Lost Ark in which Indiana Jones proclaims, "Sallah, you're the best digger in all of Egypt." For me, that line is as famous as Sting's awkward singsong "I will kill him!" from Dune and Warwick Davis' amusing, "You ahhhr great!" from Willow. Harlan looks sort of like what James Earl Jones might look like if he had a spotty gray beard and had gone on a week-long binge drinking excursions culminating in being thrown in a river, swept miles downstream, and then plucked out of the waters by Fred Sandford who thinks to himself, "I'm gonna make this guy look like my good friend Grady!" Anyway, the big shock is that although Harlan goes on and on about the wages of sin and the glory of God, he is really a dirty bastard who loves to peep at women and lick his chops like a dog eying a steak. Meanwhile, our gang (their names, for the record, are Phillip, Kurt, Karen, and... ummm... the tall lady. Since their stereotypes are much easier to remember than their names, I will call them the Fake British Guy, the Angry Southern Guy, Bubbles, and Cher) has gotten lost in the woods and stumbled upon a backwoods babe hanging up the laundry. In case you were worried, yes she is barefoot and wearing one of those cute little sundresses that maybe covers the majority of her upper thigh. I grew up in a relatively rural part of Kentucky, so how come all the women I saw out back doing laundry were wearing polyester pantsuits or lumberjack clothes? I have to admit that the stereotype of the sexy country gal is one I'm pretty happy with. Maybe it's a function of my background. Doesn't much matter to me. I think if I could be any stereotype, I'd choose the sexy country gal in her little mini-dress or ultra-short cut-offs. Read into that change of sexuality what you will, but I'm willing to bet that given the opportunity to spend some time as a sexy woman, most guys would jump at the opportunity even if they would never admit to it. I would, however, have to be a sexy country gal of the lesbian persuasion. I may be open minded, adventurous, and sometimes even a bit experimental, but there is no attraction in me to a sweaty romp in the hay with some big lug like Johnathan Tull -- a name you will become very familiar with if you watch enough hicksploitation films. Okay, weird sexual fantasies about being a buxom backwoods beauty aside, the gang of disturbingly successful yet totally miserable thieves meet up with Sally Lou, or Mandy Sue. It was really a name like that, and I just can't remember. She's friendly, of course, because of Southern hospitality, and invites the weary travelers to take a rest while she waits for her new husband to come home. Of course, her husband will end up being Harlan, because why the hell else would we have met him at the beginning of the film? I should note the rather impressive acting job done by the very tall, skinny woman I refer to as Cher. She's apparently going for an atmosphere of blase sophistication, like she's so slick that nothing in the world impresses her. She gets across this characterization with subtle methods like droning all her lines in a monotone voice and prefacing every comment with a sigh. It's funny once, annoying after about the hundredth time, and absurdly comical round about incident number five thousand. She and Karen... err, Bubbles -- the dumb one -- strip down to their skivvies to go down to the swimmin' hole. The country girl jailbait bride has never seen such brazen hussiness! Maybe it didn't occur to her that she was wearing a little dress short enough to be illegal in certain counties. Harlan returns and bellows about sin and his wife's wanton ways when he finds the fellas hanging out in the living room. Everything is cleared up when the city gals return, allowing Harlan to ogle them and wag his tongue about five inches from their breasts. How this guy maintains his religious facade while behaving this obviously is beyond me. I guess everyone is plastered on Harlan brand moonshine, so perception is not at its highest. Complicating matters is the fact that Harlan has discovered the cleverly hidden jeep and claimed it as his own. Frankly, those idiots deserved to lose their jeep. Harlan agrees to allow the city slickers to stay with them until they can regroup themselves and figure out what to do about the jeep Harlan doesn't want to return to them. Kurt the angry Southern guy also wants to give him enough time to score with Harlan's sexy bride, figuring that beneath her naive country exterior is a wanton hillbilly whore. He also figures that Harlan, although he may look like a poor old doofus, probably has a fortune in moonshining money buried somewhere out in the yard. You'd think the guy would be happy with millions of dollars worth of diamonds, but whatever. What's more fun to say you have -- a bunch of diamonds or jars full of buried moonshine money? I thought so. Kurt bullies the others into going along with his scheme -- to take over Harlan's moonshine business and make a killing while they wait for the heat on them to cool off. In the meanwhile, he does indeed manage to unleash the pent-up sexual frustrations of Harlan's wife after discovering she only married the guy because her father lost a bet. Those backwoods savages! The bored Cher chick catches Kurt in the sack with his new country gal and, ever the pissy bitch, decides to tell Karen. Once again, you have to wonder what sort of idiot Phillip was for ever thinking these petty, bickering morons would be good accomplices in his heist. I really hate Phillip. I mean, Kurt is obviously the most despicable character, but I really hate Phillip. What a moron. In our era, he would most definitely be the CEO of a dotcom start-up. Kurt also explains the concept of diamonds to the dim-witted hillbilly gal, and promises to take her away from all the pigshit and condescending, hypocritical moralizing of Harlan. I guess this was actually a nice thing to do, but he makes it as sleazy as possible. When she finds out, Karen freaks, and in an attempt to calm her down by beating the shit out of her, the country gal accidentally kills her with a moonshine jug. If you are a fan of high art, as I am, you should be a bit shocked that it's taken nearly an hour in a wild hillbilly action film from the 1970s to get to the first cat fight. These sorts of things need to happen early in the film, and then they need to happen often throughout the remaining running time. I'm not saying every one of them needs to end with someone getting hit in the head with an unbreakable jug of hooch, of course. But we need something to relieve the monotony of scenes like the dramatic "Phillip walks to the other room" sequence, or the scintillating "Harlan drinks the moonshine" scene. Phillip is mildly annoyed by this whole turn of events and expresses his annoyance by making it a point to sigh as often as possible. While they are busy burying Karen, Harlan and his idiotic sidekick in the moonshining business decide to make a very slow getaway, which happens when you leave people unguarded. They manage to overpower and stick Kurt in the belly with a pitchfork, which you knew was probably going to happen at some point. Kurt really deserved this, since the series of events goes something like this: Kurt pulls a gun on Harlan, which causes Harlan to make funny faces. Being the quickest wit in the sticks, Harlan cleverly says, "That sure is a purty gun! Is it real? Can I take a look?" at which point Kurt smugly hands the gun to Harlan for a closer inspection of its beauty. Anyone that dumb deserves to be stabbed in the throat by a fat, lip-smacking moonshiner. Harlan and his pal run over Cher as they make their escape in the truck, with Phillip following very slowly behind them. The entire backroads chase scene is set to ass-kicking bluegrass music, which might have been fitting if the vehicles ever hit speeds above a leisurely twenty miles per hour. You'd get a more exciting chase scene out of those little motorized power vehicles for children they sell at Toys-R-Us. Harlan and his buddy run out of gas, and take off on foot through the woods. I say "take off" in the same sense that a slug takes off. Phillip, luckily, is not exactly the fastest guy in the world. What follows is one of the few foot chase scenes that is actually done beginning to end with everyone walking. Phillip seems to be about five feet away from Harlan but can neither catch him nor successfully shoot the big lumbering blob of flesh. Really, the only thing that could have made this whole rotten scene any better would be if they undercranked it and redid the whole thing to the Benny Hill theme song. Harlan's friend manages to step in a bear trap, and Harlan abandons him. I should mention that whenever something sinful happens, the movie cuts to a fiery Southern preacher screaming out some hellfire and brimstone type stuff. Phillip shoots the guy in the trap, and continues to walk very casually after Harlan, who has fallen offscreen and had to fashion a crutch out of some nearby twigs. He prays to God to protect him, citing the many times he has yelled at people in God's name. I guess it works, because when Phillip comes strolling up, Harlan bests him in one of the most scintillating hand-to-hand combat scenes I've ever seen. It's definitely obvious that the finale of Jackie Chan's Police Story was inspired by this breakneck display of agile fisticuffs. Actually, Phillip runs out of bullets, Harlan tumbles around, and Phillip ends up impaled on a branch. Upon returning to his home, Harlan is enamored by the diamonds and proclaims aloud his intention to ditch his wife, dig up his moonshine money, and move to the big city. She's pissed, and rightfully so, so she grabs Kurt's gun, blows Harlan away, and presumably grabs the diamonds for herself and heads for the big city, presumably Charlotte, North Carolina. The final shot is a freeze frame of Harlan, the religious hypocrite, giggling and clutching a bunch of diamonds while, in official "frilly Biblical font" we get the caption "The Lord giveth, and the Lord taketh away." Thus, we learn the wages of sin are death, and a false religious man like Harlan will get his just desserts same as all those big city thieves. Okay, points for the morality play, and at least attempting to communicate some sort of message, but couldn't we have gotten there with a little less casual strolling through the woods? Okay, problem number one. You feminists can take me to task for this, but where's the nudity? I mean, how can you make a movie called Honey Britches, feature a bombshell as a naive scantily clad country girl, and not have any nudity? Aren't there laws against that? I mean, I think you get one breast shot during her cavorting about with Kurt, but come on! This movie promises sex and action, and it delivers both with about the same level of energy as that woman playing the bored chic lady delivers all her lines. This movie actually suffers from not being sleazy enough. It's sleazy, thanks to Kurt's abuse of women and his rather rough seduction of the country gal, but it's also pretty tame. It's sleazy enough to insult the easily insulted, but it's not sleazy enough to make it a wild ride that will shock or please cult film fans. Call me perverted -- and you wouldn't be the first -- but I could do with a little more action, a little more gore, or a little more nekkidness. All three, or any of the three. Something -- anything -- besides another scene of Harlan walking across the yard! The action is, of course, pathetic. Laughably bad, even worse than the kungfu choreography in Relic Hunter. The shocking gore is nothing more than the "slap some red paint on 'em" style of gore that was extremely common in films of this era and of this budget. The acting is passable only because everyone plays such an over-the-top stereotype. The dialogue is the real killer. It's horrible, and it comprises about 90% of the movie. Most of the action is explained to us over the radio. People talk about what they've just done (usually offscreen), what they are going to do, and what they would like to do, but they almost never actually do anything. If your idea of hot action is a fat guy walking through the woods in between ten minute scenes of a guy faking a British accent and saying things like, "I wish I had a bloody cup of tea," then you're set. With all that is so horrible in this movie, I still found myself laughing my ass off the whole way through. I mean, it's rare these days that we get to see such an all-around example of total incompetence, but here you go. The drive-in theaters used to be full of movies of this nature, and God do I miss them. I mean, there's something basic and honest about a movie this bad. It's bad, yes, but it's bad in such a pure way. Bad movies these days are bad because the Hollywood types simply don't give a shit. As long as they get a killer compilation soundtrack and a shitload of special effects, they don't care. What makes films like Honey Britches enjoyable -- and I use that term loosely -- is that the people involved really thought they were doing something good. They worked hard at it, and they put a lot of energy and effort into it. They simply failed miserably, but there's something admirable and likeable about that. Having worked on a number of truly awful movies myself that seemed hilarious at the time, I can relate, and as such, any movie as bad but as honest as Honey Britches makes me happy. Plus that country girl in the little dress doesn't hurt. She's a real mind-blower, and I like that she outsmarts them all, not that this bunch of clods couldn't be outsmarted by a very small pebble. This is the sort of movie that erupts in wild explosions of banjo music for even the most trifling bit of action. I guess much like the viewer, the banjo music has to take what it can get. Thus a slow stroll to the outhouse is punctuated with fiery banjo bravado. It's really no more out of place there than in the incredibly poor final "chase" scene. To be fair, a lot of the music itself isn't that bad if you dig bluegrass, which I do, what with me being a dumb Southern cracker and all. I'm sure it was all royalty-free library music Donn Davison found in some studio down in Florida, but it's fun enough to almost fool you into thinking something interesting is happening when, in fact, it's just Harlan going out to the shed to check on something. Ultimately, what endears this horrid piece of cinema to me and makes me smile when I think about it is... well, okay. It's the country girl. But it's also the fact that this movie is basically one step above a home-made shot on video piece of work. This was a bunch of people sitting around in some overheated north Florida home going, "You know what'd be boss? To make a movie!" So Donn got his wife to write him something, because you know she always dreamed of being a writer, and they called in favors from friends and local community theater rejects (I suspect that's where they got the guy who insists on faking a British accent for no reason), conned some local businesses into giving them some cash, and presto! Honey Britches was born! As always, my weakness for admiring these kinds of projects always biases me in their favor. Additionally, sexy hillbilly women, blustering moonshiners, and truly stupid criminals are a recipe for a fun time no matter how bad the film may be. Of course, downing some moonshine yourself before watching might make things more enjoyable. Labels: Rednecks, Year: 1971 posted by Keith at 4:04 PM | 0 Comments |
|
![]() |