film    print    sound    leisure    forum
company line »

shopping guide »

contact us »

get reviewed »

get published »

expand yourself »


find it »

Teleport City search allows you to search our entire site as well as our favorite sites about cult films, obscure music, literature, and swank living.


film home | a-b | c-d | e-f | g-h | i-l | m-n | o-q | r-s | t-v | w-z

Thursday, November 20, 2008

Saazish

Release Year: 1975
Country: India
Starring: Dharmendra, Saira Banu, Dev Kumar, Helen, David Abraham, Paintal, Madan Puri.
Writer: Ranjan Bose, Ramesh Pant
Director: Kalidas
Music: Jaikishan Dayabhai Pankal,
Shankarsinh Raghuwanshi
Producer: Kalidas


At some point, online emoticon technology will advance to the point where there is a little smiley face thing that perfectly expresses the sentiment of me shaking my fist toward the heavens and yelling, "Dharmendra!!!" And when that technology exists, I will insert it into this and several other reviews, because it seems like every time I pick some weird subgenre of exploitation film to find a Bollywood version of, when I find it, it ends up starring Dharmendra and being sort of disappointing.

Take, for example, my long quest to find a Bruce Lee exploitation film from Bollywood. Eventually it turned up in the form of Katilon Ke Kaatil, starring Dharmendra and well-known Bruce Lee impersonator Bruce Le. It also ended up being sort of disappointing, even though, in addition to a showdown with Bruce Le, it also featured Dharmendra fighting a sasquatch dressed as General Ursus from the Planet of the Apes movies. I know, I know. I too thought there was no way a movie featuring those ingredients -- not to mention Dharmendra in drag -- could be disappointing, and while Katilon Ke Kaatil is well worth watching, it also managed to let me down a little. This is probably unfair. I don't know why I assumed a Bruce Lee exploitation film from Bollywood would somehow be awesome when almost every other Bruce Lee exploitation film was crappy. In the end, though, it was a decent enough movie, with lots of fist fights and guys getting punched through random piles of bricks.


Similarly, I've been on an even longer quest to find the movie Saazish, though for a long time I didn't know the name of the movie for which I was searching. You see, way back when, or at least several years ago, there was a mini-explosion of interest in Bollywood music outside fo the Indian community. This was happening mostly amongst club DJs from the UK and continental Europe, some with Indian backgrounds, others without, but all interested in mining the rich vein of breakbeats present in the ultra-funky, ultra-swanky Bollywood music of the 60s and 70s. The end result for those of us who weren't European club DJs was a series of CD releases of dubious copyright legality from various labels documenting the music that had become suddenly so popular in modern dancehalls and discotheques. This coincided with a curious surge of Hollywood stars claiming to love Bollywood and want to do a Bollywood picture. Most of that ended up being "jump on the bandwagon" bullshit, though. The closest anyone came to making good on the lip service was Will Smith, who at least showed up on whatever they call American Idol in India (umm, my guess is Hindustani Idol) to sing and pal around with the judges. The flare-up of Bollywood awareness in American pop culture even seeped into such strange places as rap music, when several stars used Bollywood breaks for their songs (including the fine rump shaker "Shake Ya Bum Bum" -- that's right! I know Li'l Kim songs), and the inexplicable use of "Chaiyya Chaiiya" from Dil Se as the theme song to Spike Lee's Inside Man. The whole thing only lasted about a year -- a little longer in the club scene -- but it was fun at the time.

And we got some cool CDs out of it. One of the coolest was "Bombay the Hard Way," from Motel Records. It was a mix of music from masala action films of the 1970s. Some were remixed. Others, like the theme from Don, the DJs knew better than to mess with and so are presented in their original, unaltered form. This CD was the reason I ever bothered to start exploring the world of Bollywood action films. Around the same time, Pete Tombs' Mondo Macabro book came out with chapters on Indian horror and fantasy films, and while that was also a major impetus as well, it was the bad-ass theme song from Don that really convinced me to set my sights on the sub-continent.


Not too long after, Motel Records came out with a second volume, called "Bombay 2: Electric Vindaloo." On the cover of the CD were a number of screenshots, one of which featured a dude with a blue head and a Mandarin-collared jacket. He wasn't doing anything special, other than just standing there, but I guess if you are a guy with a blue head and a Blofeld jacket, you don't have to do much on top of that to be special. I recognized him instantly as Fantomas, or some Bollywood variant thereof, though it took a little longer for the reality of the matter so sink in: somewhere out there was a Bollywood Fantomas film.

I should probably save a full history of Fantomas for a review of an an actual Fantomas film, but as fate would have it, I'm getting to this movie before any of those, so some introductions is in order. To do that, we have to travel back in time a little bit to the golden age of pulp fiction, when the pages of fantastically lurid adventure magazines were filled with the exploits of men like The Shadow, The Spider, Doc Savage, and Fantomas. Tracing the origins of modern pulp fiction can be tricky, and most claims one makes are instantly debatable. But for a lazy man like me who likes to make wild shit up off the top of his head and pass it off as research, it goes something like this: in the beginning, or at least in 1844, there was The Count of Monte Cristo. You could argue that The Odyssey was the first true work of pulp fiction, but then, you can argue pretty much everything, so for the sake of brevity, let's start this particular timeline with Dumas' thrilling tale of a guy who learns to be the most super-duper cool guy in the universe, then uses his newfound skills to mess with people who pissed him off. Dantes becomes a master of disguise, a master fencer, master boxer, and thanks to a fortuitous turn of events while unjustly imprisoned, has a veritably inexhaustible amount of wealth to finance his many exploits. It's a pretty good book, and if you haven't read it, you really should. Or at least pick up the "Illustrated Classics" mini-version or something. In the character of Edmond Dantes, it's easy to find a number of traits that would find their way into the many pulp and comic book characters of the early 20th century. Heck, Batman's Bruce Wayne is basically just Dantes without an accent mark in his name.

In 1907, as the pulp era was getting into the swing of things, France was introduced to the character of Arsene Lupin. Lupin was the classic gentleman thief, a character archetype that would be reincarnated over and over again in such varied forms as The Saint, that movie where Cary Grant steals stuff, the guys from both generations of Oceans 13, and of course, that delightful Hans Gruber. Like many film fans, I delight in the stereotype of the gentleman thief, though in my darker hours, I wonder how many gentleman thieves there have actually been through the ages. I think the era of gentlemanly thievery may have passed when thieves stopped stealing precious jewels and works of art and started stealing credit cards and social security numbers. I mean, you can't steal someone's credit card number, then rakishly hop up onto a window sill, shout "Tally ho!" as you give them a jaunty little salute, and swing out the window on your grappling hook. Things were just more fun when "identity theft" meant the thief donned a fake handlebar mustache, adopted a phony German accent, and sold himself in high society circles as Baron Ascot Von Fancypants, heir to the Fancypants fortune.

Into the mix, round about 1911 or so, came Fantomas, another French master thief and master of disguise. Like Lupin, Fantomas immediately caught on with the public, and a huge number of Fantomas stories were published throughout the early 20th century.


The pulps were full of similar outlandish characters. Some were heroes, some were lovable rascals. A few were actual villains. Pretty much all of them had skills beyond those of us average chumps. It wasn't long, then, until such characters found themselves parading across the relatively new medium of the motion picture. In serials and shorts, most of the pulp heroes and villains started showing up on movie screens. The ruler of the roost at the time was the creation of German director Fritz Lang. His name was Dr. Mabuse, and the inspiration behind that character seemed to be the question, "What if a guy had all that awesome cunning and intellect of the heroes of Dumas and the pulps, but he was a total dick?"

I have yet to see the silent era Fantomas films, but I'm working on it. So until then, let's skip ahead. World War I. Weimar Republic. Jesse Owens, World War II. Comic books. Captain America punches Hitler. My grandpa Harley starts thinking Truman is a jackass. That should bring us up to the 1960s, right? So after a period of hibernation, the pulp characters of the early half of the 20th century are suddenly resurrected in the form of Italian and French comic book -- or fumetti -- characters and films based upon those characters. In the interim, the United states had been the stewards of the pulp characters, sustaining them largely through radio dramas and comic books. In American comic books, however, the bad guy was usually the bad guy, and the good guy was the good guy. There were very few anti-heroes, and even Batman was smiley and joking around while fighting guys like that cat who put pennies in people's ears.

In the 1960s, however, Italy took over with a splashy, much more adult-oriented blending of old pulps with the wildly popular James Bond books and movies. The results were fumetti, and guys like Diabolik and Kriminal ran wild. The big difference this time around was that while the old pulps had been split pretty evenly between heroes and villains, and American comic books from the era always sided with the good guys, this new breed -- nourished as it was on the growing counter-culture distrust of authority figures -- saw the villain as hero. Diabolik, for example, would murder and steal to get what he wanted, but we still rooted for him because he was just so much cooler than the square authority figures around him -- and that includes squares on both sides of the law.

It was only natural that someone would revive Fantomas and translate him into the modern jet-set, Eurospy style of film. A series of French films were thus commissioned starring the mysterious master criminal behind an expressionless blue mask. As with other films of the era, Fantomas is nominally the "bad guy," but it's never in doubt that we are rooting for him rather than the police. This time, Fantomas had an awesome underground layer, expertly designed and decorated as all 1960s villain lairs were, and a cool car. It's not surprising that such an iconic figure would be "borrowed" for productions in other countries. Thus, Fantomas appears in flagrant violation of copyright law in the 1969 Turkish film Iron Claw, The Pirate. He would show up again in 1975's Saazish, matching wits with Dharmendra, and eventually winding up as a screencap on the cover of a CD.


The problem when I got the CD was that I knew immediately I wanted to see the film, but nowhere in the CD packaging did they credit the movie from which the shot was taken. Since most of these CDs were released by one-off labels who disappeared shortly after issuing the album, Motel Records was gone by the time I contacted them to see if they could shed any light on the topic. I turned then to the Internet, but after a few years of asking about "that blue headed guy on the cover of Bombay 2: Electric Vindaloo," I'd received nothing but suggestions that turned out to be dead ends. At the time, the coverage of these types of films was considerably thinner than it is today. Well-written resources on Bollywood film were hard to find, and those that did exist concentrated almost entirely on new films or old dramas and romantic comedies.

A few years ago, though, a number of sites began cropping up that were more willing to explore the battier side of Bollywood, thanks in large part to such films becoming more readily available on DVD. This meant a whole new generation could rediscover films that, even if they'd been wildly popular at one point, had lapsed into obscurity since then on account of there being no medium other than the theater in which to see them. It also helped that coverage of Bollywood films was expanding outside the boundaries of India. This is not meant as a slight on India or on Indian film historians. But when you are in the thick of something, you tend to tire of things much faster than people who are coming to the game with new eyes. Academics concentrate on the "important" films. Working film writers within India were there to write about current films and scandals. Neither population has much vested interest in dusting off memories of a movie where Dharmendra jumps a horse over a castle wall.

Covering goofball exploitation films has always been the domain of dedicated fans and niche professionals, and until recently, many such fans in India did not have the means to see the films or communicate to others about them. The culture for supporting this sort of "scholarship" has existed primarily in the United States, Europe, and Japan, where the means of producing fanzines and organizing clubs was more readily available, and where the concept of films -- even the bad ones -- as something to be preserved rather than consumed and destroyed to make way for next new product was more prevalent than in places like India or Turkey. The Cahiers du Cinemart rehabilitation of weird old genre films did not trickle down to India, where films were still largely made to be consumed then disposed of.


Things have changed a lot since then. While the state of writing about old Bollywood genre films is still in its infancy, it has advanced in leaps and bounds in the past few years, and it's even advanced considerably since last I complained about this very topic -- which must have been round about the last time I reviewed a Dharmendra film. This has happened for a number of reasons, not the least of which is the growth of the Indian middle class, the rise of DVD and VCD, and the introduction of the Internet as a cheap alternative for publishing that removed the cost and organizational overhead of producing a fanzine, newsletter, or film club. It also has a lot to do with the spread of Indian culture and art throughout the rest of the world as Indians continue to immigrate or come of age in other countries. There's a whole batch of writers now who are ethnically Indian but have grown up in places like the United States and England. They're able to indulge to a much greater degree in exploring the history of a big chunk of Bollywood that was all but ignored by the academic press. For some, it's a whole new experience. For others, it's reawakening memories of loving these films as a child. Their enthusiasm draws in people from outside Indian culture, people who might be fans of crazy fantasy films or spy films but not necessarily fans of Bollywood. And they, in turn, draw in other people. And somewhere along the line, someone's dad finds out you're writing about Shammi Kapoor's pencil-thin mustache, and it brings back a whole slew of memories for him as well. And slowly but surely, Bollywood cult cinema has a network just like the one that exists for, say, Hong Kong action films or European horror movies. For the first time in a long time, you know other people who are watching and writing about Ramsay Brothers horror movies.

Most of the cult film cabalism I've been a part of I came into after a support network, however thin, already existed. With the exploration of these types of films from India, I feel like we're in the midst of creating an entirely new fandom. It's a pretty cool feeling to be in on the ground floor and to know that on any given day, I can cruise on over to Die Danger Die Die Kill, Beth Loves Bollywood, Memsaab Story, Roti Kapada Aur Rum, and a number of other sites and find yet another recently rediscovered gem written about by someone as enthusiastic about these types of films as I am. It's a pleasant change from the days when I would skulk into a hole in the wall Indian video store looking for Ramsay Brothers horror films and be met with nothing but puzzled looks of either clulessness or disapproval. The celebration of Indian cult cinema is coming of age, and it's as diverse as the country and the cinema itself. Bollywood cult cinema is emerging on the world scene and being put on context next to everything from Eurospy films to Mexican luchadore and monster movies.


Which is to say that, after years in the wilderness, a group of people were starting to emerge that might bring me closer to figuring out what movie that goddamned screencap had come from. And it finally happened one day several months ago. I had decided that the screencap was a mistake, that it was just a still from one of the French Fantomas films of the 1960s that was erroneously placed on the cover of a Bollywood music remix CD. I didn't really believe it in my heart of hearts, but it was all I could tell myself so that I could stop thrashing fitfully about in my sleep, only to wake up in a cold sweat and screaming "Bollywood Fantomas!!!!" On a whim, and because I have an addictive personality, I did one last Google search for "bollywood fantomas." Nothing on the first page. Why do I even bother? Well, I thought, might as well look at the second page of results.

And there it was. A link that said "Saazish: I think the boss is based on Fantomas." Could it be? So I followed the link, which happened to be a review from the site Memsaab Story. And scrolling down I saw...let's see. Helen's giant eye. Dharmendra in what looks like a helmet from an Italian science fiction film, a fake Chinese guy, and...my God! It's beautiful! There he was, staring back at me in all his expressionless blue-gray glory. I felt like Louis de Funes, the cop forever in pursuit of Fantomas in the movies and always one step behind the master criminal. "Bollywood Fantomas!" I cried triumphantly. "This time I have caught you!" One quick trip to IndiaWeekly, and a few days later I owned my own copy of the movie whose name had eluded me for so many years. My debt to Memsaab Story is beyond measure, though I feel it has shrunk a little since actually watching the film. Because after watching the film, all I could do was shake my fist at the heavens and angrily yell, "Dharmendra!!!" And, like Fantomas, all I could hear was his laughter, echoing in the distance as he escaped through some clever means and left me standing there, feeling a bit cheated on this, the eve of my victory.

Because the son of a bitch done it to me again.

Which is a really, really long way of saying that Saazish isn't very good. It's even more disappointing than Katilon Ke Kaatil, because Katilon Ke Kaatil was goofy and fun on top of being incompetent, where as Saazish is simply boring and poorly made. To be fair, there was probably no way it could live up to a build-up that spanned years. At the very least, though, it could have had the decency to be decent. And I guess maybe little parts of it are good, but there is so much crap to wade through to get to the good stuff that it's not really worth it. Granted, there's a lot of crap to wade through in many films, especially many Indian films. But usually it's crap with which I can deal. In the case of Saazish, however, the crap is mostly a performance by Saira Banu in the female lead that just might be the single most insipid, annoying, and grating performance I've ever seen in a Bollywood film. I would rather watch ten Johnny Levers than ever have to sit through Banu's performance in Saazish again.


My first experience with Dharmendra was the slick little espionage caper Aankhen, which among other things paired him with a woman who pursues him in the beginning of the film to the point of seeming insane. Saazish features the same basic set-up, as Banu's Sunita picks Dharmendra's Jai more or less at random and decides to mercilessly stalk and sing to him until he falls in love with her. The difference is that Aankhen starred Mala Sinha, and her character wasn't just insane for love; she was also a bad-ass spy who knew her way around a Tommy gun, took an active part in blowing up various villain lairs, and owned a gigantic floppy sombrero. By contrast, Sunita...well, she frequently shrieks, overacts with the fierce hunger of Richard Burton at his very worst, and tends to cry in the way you expect to hear from a ten-year-old, practically mouthing "boo hoo hoo!" at various points. By the halfway point, I was ready to throw my lot in with Fantomas, who was doing his best (which, to be fair, was pretty bad) to have her killed.

So here's the plot, such as it is. Sunita has just won the Miss Cosmos beauty competition, a fact that she tells pretty much anyone and everyone she meets. You might think that this is an attempt at characterization, that we are supposed to find her constant mentioning of her beauty to be a comedic character quirk. I assure you, it is not. We are supposed to find her engaging and charming. I did not. Her first task as the world queen of beauty (I beg to differ, but that's me, and opinions vary) is to go to Hong Kong and award the trophy for what is supposed to be the most prestigious auto race in Asia. Said race is realized by cobbling together stock footage of what looks to be a Le Mans race with footage from what looks to be someone's home movie of a dirt track race, then you edit in some head shots of a listless Dharmendra wearing a dorky helmet that looks like it was on loan from an Alfonso Brescia sci-fi film. When Dharmendra wins the race, Sunita decides she is madly in love with him, even though the only thing she knows about him is that he won a car race. I don't even know what that is. I mean, if she thought he was hot, then at least she would be shallow. But she hasn't even seen him as anything other than a speck on a race track wearing a dumb helmet. So that doesn't even qualify as shallow. That's just plum crazy, son.

Dharmendra seems to think so, too, but after she wears him down with her endearing antics that include following him around, shrieking like a banshee, and pretending to commit suicide, he finally gives in and takes her on the least scenic musical travelogue tour of Hong Kong imaginable, including as it does a highway junction, some dreary gray cinderblock housing projects, and a walk down the middle of a fucking busy highway!!! Lady, could his signals be any clearer??? Their mediocre day out together culminates in a cruise during which Sunita happens upon a murder in progress. As a dying man riddled with bullet holes staggers toward her, notice that the many extras seated around her remain as still as statues, staring directly ahead as if absolutely nothing is happening. The dying man mutters something about gold, a ship, and reporting to Interpol, then drops dead, leaving Sunita face to face with a bunch of gunmen who, though they are standing in the middle of the dining room waving their guns about, also fail to attract the attention of anyone else on the boat.


Sunita, rather than rushing to Jai's side (he was busy getting coffee, which must be the most delicious coffee in the world, as it causes him and everyone else on the boat to miss a murder by machine gun as well as a blood-soaked dude staggering up and down the stairs), or rushing to the nearest cop, hops off the boat, hails a cab, and badgers him until he takes her to the Interpol office, which looks to be a quaintly appointed residential living room with fancy space-age phones. Somehow, Sunita is allowed to walk right into the building and straight up to the director's office without being questioned by anyone. That's some quality security, Interpol. No wonder they got shifted from fighting criminal masterminds to shutting down bootleg DVD retailers. As soon as she arrives in the office, the phone rings. The director, who was hiding behind his desk for absolutely no discernible reason other than shits and giggles, hands it to her, as the call is for her. It seems the gang responsible for the murder has captured Jai, and if Sunita talks, they will kill him. No one stops to wonder how they knew where to call her, just as no one thinks that possibly calling someone on the phone line belonging to the head of Interpol so you can tell that person not to talk to the head of Interpol might not be an entirely secure way of doing covert business.

The Interpol guy then allows her to leave without asking her any questions or following up with the whole death threat phone call -- which he listened in on using a pair of glasses with flashing lights on the rims. Sure, they have other ways to listen in on phone calls, like picking up the other receiver, but I reckon some slick traveling salesmen sold Interpol on the stupid glasses, and they feel like they should get their money's worth no matter how stupid it is. It was probably the same guy who sold the Japanese military all those Maser cannons to fight giant monsters, but neglected to mention that they only work against gargantuas. Still, Japan has a lot of the things, so every time Godzilla shows up, they dutifully roll them out in hopes that he'll trash a few of them, allowing the Japanese Self Defense Force, if nothing else, to free up some much needed garage space.

If idiocy like this comprised the entire running length of the picture, I'd be in perfectly comfortable territory. Alas, it only lasts for about five more minutes -- as Jai meets the mysterious Fantomas -- or Mr. Han, as he's called here (let's call him Hantomas) -- and convinces the master criminal that he should be allowed to kill Sunita, since he was only with her to get at her considerable wealth. Remarkably, Mr. Hantomas agrees to this without so much as a single question. Damn. Apparently, working for Hong Kong's most infamous masked criminal is easier than getting a job at Best Buy. Back in 1992, I worked a warehouse job at Toys-R-Us, and even for that I had to take a long test and watch a bunch of videos about how stealing is wrong. Surely Hantomas can make Jai watch some videos about how stealing kicks ass, or do a background check, or something. I thought that Interpol was incompetent, but if this is the sort of master criminal they're up against, I guess it's a pretty level playing field.


Of course, one of the key components of any swingin' Bond style super-villain is his secret lair. Fantomas had a pretty swanky underground pad full or works of art and candelabras, something in between Diabolik and Doctor No. Hantomas got the cave part down, but he didn't add much other than installing a few swishing doors, some random blinking lights, and for some reason, a hidden radio. I guess that shows initiative. It's not every super villain who would go that extra mile to install a hidden radio inside a lair that was already hidden. That's like buying a safe and putting a little safe inside it that contains your Zune (because you didn't want to buy an iPod) even though the big safe is already full of jewels and bundles of cash and nude photos of Priyanka Chopra. It's probably one of those flourishes that seemed cool at the time but got to be a real hassle after a while. Every time someone wants to use the radio, they have to go through the ritual of turning the statue and opening the rock wall. Since the guys in the secret lair would already also know about the secret radio, it probably got to the point where Hantomas' right hand man, Mr. Wong, just told the guys to leave it open. That, of course, leads to Hantomas furtively going over and closing it all the time, until the two criminals descend into a petty bickering argument not unlike roommates fighting over the proper setting for the air conditioner.

Oh yeah, Mr. Wong. If you ever rolled your eyes at Caucasian guys donning fake eyelids and accents and passing themselves off as Asians in movies, rest assured that this is hardly confined to the West. Madan Puri, who portrays Mr. Wong, is about as Chinese as Bela Lugosi, the last non-Chinese guy to play an evil Mr. Wong. Turnabout's fair play, though, because it's not as if there was never a Chinese actor who put on "brown face" and played an Indian.

The thugs in Hantomas' gang don't really inspire much more confidence than their boss. Even though their order is to kill Jai as soon as he leaves, all they do is point their guns and run toward him one at a time so he can kick them in the face. At one point, they even stand around with their guns pointed at him and wait until he fishes a yo-yo out of his pocket and uses it to hit them in the face. Dudes, Hantomas bought you guns! As professional heavies, it was your obligation to learn when and how to use them. Like when the guy you are supposed to shoot is standing right in front of you, that's generally a good time to shoot him, not wait for him to fish a yo-yo out of his pocket (it takes him a few tries) and throw it at you. And seriously -- why the hell has Jai been walking around with a yo-yo in his pocket while he was on his date with Sunita?

Actually, I have to retract my criticism of their failure of three men armed with machine guns and pistols to defeat a guy with a yo-yo in his pocket, because in the ensuing car chase, we see them right behind him, but the dude firing the machine gun out the window is holding it straight out to the side of the car, meaning that he's not even firing in the right direction. This is what Hantomas gets for hiring his goons from the line outside a "Three Stooges" casting call. Somehow, that whole mess ends up with Jai throwing grenades at people. So he went on a date and filled his pockets with yo-yos and hand grenades? Dharmendra sure knows how to operate!


From here, the movie settles in for what seems like a full hour of Saira Banu turning in a performance that would embarrass a marginally talented actor in a sixth grade school play. Every facial expression, every movement, every line is delivered with the subtlety of a petulant child playing charades. And when she cries! Oh my God, when she cries! No professional actress should actually use the words "Oh boo hoo hoo!" to communicate crying. But you better get used to it, because for the next hour, it's "Oh boo hoo hoo!" and "Oh Jai, I'm so scared!" and "Why, I'm Sunita, the winner of the Miss Cosmos beauty contest. Don't you know?" It's a nightmarish slog through the middle ninety minutes of this film, and if I wasn't watching it with the intention of reviewing it, I would have given up and watched it on fast forward. Even the rare musical number offers no respite from the tedium, as these scenes offer absolutely nothing in the way of creativity or fun, unless you think it's fun to watch Dharmendra standing on some concrete steps while wearing a sweater.

I guess we're supposed to be on the edge of our seats as Dharmendra attempts to outfox Hantomas by pretending to be on the side of evil, but it's hard to get into the spirit of things when it's so obvious Dharmendra will end up being a secret Interpol guy. Seriously, after about the third time he's foiled a Hantomas hit attempt, you'd think the master criminal would stop believing the guy. Eventually everyone winds up on board a cruise ship that also happens to be full of smuggler's gold, reminding you that you've gone for most of the movie without even knowing what the hell Hantomas and his gang are even trying to do. I guess they were trying to smuggle gold, or possibly steal it, but their entire scheme seems to have absolutely no point at all. Nothing they do seems to have any connection to anything else they do. It's completely baffling to the point that I started to think this was less a criminal gang and more a dada-ist performance art troupe. Every time you ask them a question, they respond with a dance or by miming a tennis match. What are you trying to tell me, Hantomas! I don't understand!!!

Or perhaps...perhaps Hantomas is a criminal genius, and the apparent incoherence of everything he does is just a clever ploy to confound Interpol! Or perhaps this is just a piece of junk script that no one put any thought into. We may never know.

At least Helen is aboard the ship. Did that woman age at all? She's as wild, flexible, and hot in 1975 as she was in 1965, which is more than can be said for Dharmendra. Her appearance is almost as nonsensical as everything else in the film, but I've never needed much logical reason for Helen to appear. At least we can look forward to one good dance number. Or can we? Because they mostly have her hanging around in her room, half-heartedly romancing whichever guy happens to walk through the door. All Helen really does is remind you how much happier you'd be if the entire move had featured her instead of Saira Banu. Helen eventually gets a dance number, but she has to share it with Banu, which is not welcome. Being in a number with Helen does Saira Banu no favors, either, as Helen is about a hundred times hotter and makes Sairu's dancing look like Sonny Deol's. At least Dharmendra strips down to his little Elvis Presley swimming trunks for the final showdown with Hantomas and the goons, at which time it is revealed that practically everyone on board the ship is either an undercover criminal or undercover Interpol guy.


So here's what you do to make this a good movie. Watch up until Jai meets Hantomas, then fast forward to the hour-forty mark, right when the Sunita/Helen dance number starts, and finish the movie from there. Because the last thirty minutes or so is nothing but Dharmendra beating the tar out of chumps while wearing tiny little shorts. Oh yes, there will be Dharmendra buffalo shots. The entire ship erupts in a finale of kungfu fighting, machine gun waving, gratuitous backflipping, and grenade tossing. If the whole movie had been like that, it would have been the most awesome film ever made. Instead, it was about thirty minutes of cool stuff smothered by ninety minutes of stuff that, at its best, is tedious, and at its worst actually made me wish I could reach into the television Videodrome style and throttle Saira Banu until she shut the hell up. You remember how much we all hated Kate Capshaw in Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom? Well, now I have fond memories of her. Thanks, Banu. You were that bad.

To be fair, though, Banu is still less annoying than the insanely creepy comic relief guy who shows up on the boat and keeps breaking into people's cabins in order to find Helen, with whom he seems obsessed to the point of being a potential rapist-murderer. What the hell was his deal anyway? I don't even care anymore. When Mr. Wong threatens to kill the asshole, I can't help but wondering, once again, who's the bad guy here? This whole ship was full of creepy guys -- like the dude who spends all day hanging upside down and pouncing on people like a cat. Seriously, Saazish -- what the hell? At some point, I thought I might have accidentally stopped watching a spy movie and started watching something like Mansion of Madness. All this ship lacked was a madman in ragged Victorian garb, carrying a scepter made out of garbage and leading an equally ragged band of crazies like they were in a marching band.


The Dharmendra Buffalo Shot: Deal With It!

Under normal circumstances, espionage films such as these are more than enough fun to make it easy to gloss over the rough edges that are present in so many of the films: the daft plotting, the crude editing, the overall cheapness. But when a movie's virtues are as thinly spread as they are here, the foibles are impossible to wave off. Instead, every idiotic line, every bad edit, every time the shadow of the boom mic, the camera, and the entire goddamn crew shows up on the wall behind the actors, it's hard not to notice. The plot seems to have been made up as they went, and even then they weren't putting much work into it. Even by the less-than-rigorous continuity standards of Bollywood action cinema, it's an incoherent, bloody mess full of the most glaring inanities. It seems like the film's production might have been stretched over a long period, as Dharmendra's hair changes radically, sometimes in the same scene. Or maybe his ability to have sideburns appear and disappear in the same scene was part of his character's spy training. For a while I thought they got a really doughy, unflattering stunt double for Dharmendra in certain scenes, until I realized that it actually was Dharmendra. Like his hair, his level of fitness varies pretty wildly from one scene to the next. Luckily, he's in pretty good shape for his ass-kicking romp in the only booty shorts smaller than the ones being worn by Sunita.

Director Kalidas had very few film credits before this film, and even fewer after, which means at least soemthing good came of this movie. Ranjan Bose is credited for the story, and Ramesh Pant for the screenplay, but I refuse to believe this film was actually written by anyone. Pant also wrote An Evening in Paris, which is a fine film. And hell! Bose wrote The Great Gambler, which starred Amitabh and Zeenat and was all sorts of awesome. I can only assume that absolutely no one gave a damn about Saazish while they were working on it. Even the music and dancing is lame. Why the hell put Helen in your movie than have her do only half a dance? Although, to the film's credit, her outfit is the only one skimpier than Dharmendra's action man-panties.


Speaking of not giving a damn, that seems to be Dharmendra's main mode here, though from time to time he does seem to liven up a bit. By 1975, I guess Dharmendra's star was starting to fade a bit, and the new king of the scene was Amitabh Bachchan. That might go a long way in explaining why these mid-70s Dharmendra films are as bad as Amitabh's mid-80s film, when his star was in about the same place as Dharmendra's was in 1975. Just a year earlier, Dharmendra starred with Saira Banu in the film International Crook, which I have not seen. Usually, finding out that Dharmendra was in a movie called International Crook, and that Feroz Khan was in it as well, would be enough to put that film on my "must see" list. After enduring Banu's wretched histrionics in Saazish, though, I don't think I ever want to see anything with her in it again. Maybe if her character was supposed to be a spoiled brat who learns the error of her ways or is at least played for comedy, but no. This wasn't comedy or clever satire, or even stupid satire. It was just phenomenally terrible acting. I know, I know, she was in the original Bluff Master, and that's a pretty good movie, but I don't care. In all my journeys through Bollywood so far, I've never encountered an actress whose portrayal of a character filled me with such irritation. Well, congratulations, Banu. I guess someone had to be the first. I'm convinced that her career as an actress had less to do with either her looks or her talent, and a lot more to do with the fact that she married Bollywood megastar Dilip Kumar.

I went in to this movie predisposed to liking it. It was an espionage/fumetti flavored Bollywood film. It starred Dharmendra. It featured Fantomas, calling himself Mr. Han (someone must have just watched Enter the Dragon). And I spent years trying to track it down. Plus, I watch films with the intent of enjoying them. As I've written before, one of the principles behind Teleport City is that we aren't a site that exists purely to rip apart movies and complain about them. We're here to celebrate the things we enjoy, and usually, the ribbing we do is good-natured and done out of affection. Although it sounds unbelievable, I really do have better things to do with my life than watch movies I don't like. As such, it was going to take a whole hell of a lot of badness for me to not like Saazish.

Sadly, a whole hell of a lot of badness is exactly what I got. It seems rather a cold payoff for all those years of searching, as I put more work into finding and watching this movie than the cast and crew put into making it. Even measured against the bottom of the espionage film barrel, this is pretty bad stuff. And for once, I'm not going to spend an entire review poking fun at a film, then tell you to go see it. You can feel perfectly at ease skipping this one entirely. I guess if you are walking home one night and someone hits you over the head and forces a copy of this movie into your hands, then you can take it home and watch the very beginning and final thirty minutes or so and have a pretty good time of it. Just beware the ninety minutes in between, for there is a black pit from which your soul will never again emerge, and you will be forced to spend eternity in that black pit next to Dharmendra, who will shrug like he doesn't give a damn, and for the rest of your miserable existence, all you will hear is a shrill female voice whining, "Oh, Jai! Boo hoo hoo!"


Listen to this loud enough, and it just might drown out Saira Banu

Labels: , , ,

posted by Keith at | 19 Comments


Friday, June 27, 2008

The Land That Time Forgot

Release Year: 1975
Country: England, United States
Starring: Doug McClure, John McEnery, Susan Penhaligon, Keith Barron, Anthony Ainley, Godfrey James, Bobby Parr, Declan Mulholland, Colin Farrell, Ben Howard, Roy Holder.
Writer: James Cawthorn, Michael Moorcock
Director: Kevin Connor
Cinematographer: Alan Hume
Music: Douglas Gamley
Producer: John Dark
Availability: Buy it from Amazon
Promote It: Digg | del.icio.us


For many years, England's Amicus Productions was the scrappy studio living in the shadow of and following the lead of the higher profile Hammer Studio. In fact, so closely did Amicus follow Hammer's horror lead that much of their output continue to be mistakenly labeled as Hammer Horror. Amicus often used the same actors -- including Peter Cushing and venerated horror film icon Christopher Lee -- and directors -- including Freddie Francis and Roy Ward Baker -- and went for a similar feel. There are, however, several differences. For starters, most of Amicus' horror films were set in the present day, or at least more recently than Hammer Victorian-era gothic tales. Also, having been founded by Americans, Amicus often looked overseas for established genre talent rather than sticking primarily to English stars. Thus, you get a film like Madhouse or Scream and Scream Again, both of which starred American horror icon Vincent Price. And finally, although Amicus is known these days primarily for their horror output -- and especially their horror anthology films like Dr. Terror's House of Horrors, The House that Dripped Blood, Vault of Horrors, and Tales from the Crypt -- they also produced a number of science-fiction and sci-fi tinged horror films. Hammer did this as well, at least for a little while and most successfully with their Quatermass films, but once Dracula, the mummy, and Frankenstein became established hits, Hammer pretty much jettisoned sci-fi in favor of straight Gothic horror. Amicus, on the other hand, constantly dabbled in the speculative genre.

Their first, and easily their best known sci-fi outings, if for no other reason than the association they have with one of the biggest sci-fi cult hits of all time, are their two Doctor Who films starring Peter Cushing as the mysterious time-traveler. At the time, the television series was still shot in black and white. Amicus looked toward two of the very best story arcs from the first Doctor's series (William Hartnell's stories The Daleks and The Daleks' Invasion of Earth), and redid them, only with a bigger budget and in eye-popping Technicolor. Although the movies were rehashes with some departures from the series (Peter Cushing, for example, actually refers to himself as "Doctor Who" and with no hint of being an alien -- which, while out of step for the series as we know it, was still in line with the series at the time), they were hits for Amicus, as the appeal of seeing Doctor Who in color and starring one of England's most beloved actors was a huge draw.


Amicus dabbled in sci-fi on and off in the ensuing years, with generally good results (They Came From Beyond Space), and one or two clunkers (The Deadly Bees). When the British film industry tanked at the beginning of the 1970s, small studios like Amicus were hit particularly hard. Hammer collapsed entirely, despite making some of their best horror films during the early years of that decade. Amicus limped on, however, producing some genuinely interesting films, like the bizarre and enjoyable mash-up of horror, science fiction, and Eurospy films that was Scream and Scream Again. But as the decade wore on, the belt-tightening became more and more extreme. Looking for a way to keep their craft afloat, Amicus decided to put their faith in a series of science fiction/fantasy adventure films based on the works of Edgar Rice Burroughs. It didn't work, for a number of reasons, even though the films proved relatively popular with kids and remain nostalgic favorites for people like me.

The first of these films was The Land that Time Forgot, not to be confused with The Land Before Time. Both feature dinosaurs, but only one features a shrieking caveman being torn apart by a pterodactyl dangling from absurdly visible wires.


Back in the 1970s, The Land That Time Forgot played pretty regularly on television. Although I know I saw it in the theaters (it was distributed in America by AIP, whose infusion of cash as co-producers was the only thing that enabled Amicus to get these final films finished), my memories are of watching it on television, and fairly frequently at that. These days, now that I have progressed from being a five year old with the mentality of an eight year old, to being a thirty-six year old with the mentality of...well, a nine year old if we are generous, I can see just how threadbare the productions really were. It didn't matter to me then, of course, and it didn't matter to most kids despite the fact that so many people try to project the sophistication of their adult life onto their childhood. "Even as a kid, I could tell these films were cheap," they claim, and it's almost never true. Most children view films differently than adults. When a film is cheap and boring, the cheapness doesn't really register (what do you have, at age six or seven, to even judge cheapness by) and the boring parts wash over you like water off a duck's back. You tune out when it gets boring, and all you remember afterward are the cool parts. Thus, even really crummy movies can seem relatively enjoyable, because you don't remember the dull bits; all you remember is the shrieking caveman being torn apart by a pterodactyl. Oh sure, I know some of you watched these movies with the keen eye of a wizened critic even at age six, and you turned your nose up at how juvenile they were even when you were juvenile. Well, I hope you had fun watching Kramer versus Kramer as a child, while the rest of us were watching dinosaurs fighting a submarine while Doug McClure punched cavemen in the face. I'm sure your childhood was much better off for your refined sense of cinematic value when you were in first grade.

I, of course, was hopelessly lowbrow and common as a child. As an adult, as you know by know, I am equally hopeless and lowbrow. While that means that I am still pleased by loads of cheap juvenile crap while being bored by indie films in which quirky dysfunctional families learn to accept one another, it also means that I also get to enjoy most of filmgoing experiences, shrugging off most films with an, "Ehh, that was alll right." It keeps me happy and keeps the blood pressure low, even if it deprives me of any claim to righteous fury over how base and moronic most entertainment has become. I've made my peace with this, and I'm happier rolling with the punches and genuinely enjoying films than I am being hyper-critical and getting upset about something as silly as a movie. Which means than even though I can see how floppy the rubber dinosaurs are, and even though I can see the wires on the pterodactyl, and even though I can tell the caveman in its mouth is a wind-up action doll, I still really enjoy The Land That Time Forgot.


The year is 1916 or 1917. The United States has yet to enter into World War I, which has yet to be named World War I, but we are more visible in our support of the Allied cause. In turn, Germany has announced the practice of unrestricted submarine warfare. At the start of the war, Germany operated its much feared u-boat fleet under certain restrictions in regard to the rules of good sportsmanship during a war. They would not, for example, attack civilian vessels, limiting themselves to torpedoing identifiable military ships belonging to their enemies (mostly England). As the war in Western Europe ground to a stalemate, Germany began to revise their u-boat strategy, first attacking any ships belonging to their enemies, and then any ships belonging to anyone they though might be helping their enemies (thus bring American ships under fire), and then, finally, they pretty much started torpedoing anything that wasn't German. The policy of unrestricted submarine warfare was one of the major tipping points that brought the U.S. into the war (though it wasn't the coup de grace -- that being a telegram from Germany pitching a plan to bring Mexico into the war on the side of the Germans). The Germans maintained that most of the so-called civilian ships they attacked were carrying weapons and supplies to the beleaguered Brits, who were deviously smuggling equipment from American suppliers aboard such civilian craft.

The Land that Time Forgot picks up its story during this time of expanding u-boat warfare. German submarine captain Von Schoenvorts has just finished torpedoing a ship of the type described above: civilian but suspected of containing smuggled supplies. Despite the job being well done, and although he believes in the German cause, Von Schoenvorts is in no mood to celebrate killing civilians. He'd be even less celebratory if he knew one of the civilians who survived was American entrepreneur Doug McClure, here playing a guy named Bowen Tyler, but he's pretty much just Doug McClure. Isn't he always? And we always thankful for it? McClure is adrift now, along with the one other survivor who, lucky for McClure, happens to be hot and female (Susan Penhaligon), and lucky for the script, also happens to be a scientist. I think she's a biologist, but really, she seems to be one of those classic movie style scientists who knows a lot about everything (except mechanical stuff, since she is, of course, just a girl). Thanks to my sister, herself a bilogist, I have met many other scientists and many other biologists, and they always seem to be very specialized in what they do. My sister, for example, can tell you pretty much everything you need to know about various types of bats and blind cave fish, but I think if you dropped a caveman off in her lab and asked her about him, she'd have little more to say than what could be gleaned from watching Encino Man, which is that cavemen love to party and swing from things. But Susan Penhaligon's Lisa Clayton is as comfortable finding her way around a protozoa as she is a caveman, a diplodicus, or Doug McClure. She's also handy with geography, and she probably knows a few things about botany. But not mechanical stuff. That's for the guys, and luckily, Doug McClure happens to be the son of a guy who designs submarines. But it is the early 20th Century, so perhaps science was still more generalized, like how centuries before, Sir Isaac Newton could be good at calculus, physics, and poking metal rods into his own eye sockets to see how deformation of the eyeball affected seeing.


So when it happens that a few other survivors happen by, all of them British sailors, and our merry band happens to find the U-boat that torpedoed them, they are well suited for a hostile take-over. And so begins a cat and mouse battle between the Germans and Brits plus Doug McClure, with each side trying to either out-muscle or out-sneak the other side to get the upper hand and win/lose control of the submarine. Now you might be wondering whether you're watching a movie about Doug McClure fighting dinosaurs or a WWI era submarine adventure. And indeed, the first half of this film concerns itself primarily with Great War era U-boat shenanigans. However, I never really found these proceedings to be dull, as not only do I like WWI stuff, but I also like the glimpses into the characters -- specifically von Schoenvorts (himself an amateur naturalist). When the move/counter move mini-war on the sub results in the ship ending up off the coast of Antarctica, very low on fuel and with no hope of reaching a supply ship or port -- the two sides form an uneasy alliance in an attempt to figure out how the hell to get themselves out of the mess they've gotten into. A large cave from which pours forth warm, fresh water, seems the best possible alternative, because when in doubt, why not take your submarine into a completely uncharted cave. But they do, and despite some close scrapes, they safely navigate through and into...

An amazing tropical prehistoric wonderland!


Previously, we looked at the Doug McClure fantasy adventure film At the Earth's Core, from the same production company and director, and reflected briefly on the history of hollow earth theories that inspired the various "world within the world" adventures stories like Pellucidar, the series upon which the film was based. This time around, we're tackling a theory that had a very similar evolution from scientific theory to discredited crackpot theory to fodder for pulp sci-fi and adventure writers. And once again, tracing the origins of such beliefs takes us far back in time. As with the caves and earthquakes, fissures and sinkholes, that most likely let primitive man to conceptualize a world below the surface of the earth, so too can we assume that the birth of the idea of the arctic as a place of magic comes from it being an equally impenetrable and difficult to understand region. In the days before performance fleece and Russian ice breakers, the remote, freezing north must have been nearly as impenetrable as the depths of the oceans. But men ventured there, from time to time, and when they did, who knows what things they beheld -- augmented, of course, by the old timey storytellers' penchant for bullshit.

Early accounts of Greek thinkers theorized that, because the northern stars didn't seem to rotate around the earth in the same fashion as other stars, that they must be above an equally unusual land. Although polar exploration was likely out of the question, the Arctic circle itself was well within reach of ancient man, provided he brought enough furs and mukluks. But the Greeks simply made up their own stories about this curious place to the north, beneath the Arktos constellations. They "theorized" -- perhaps with the aid of Dionysus -- that this land existed above the north wind, and thus was pleasant in climate if you survive the curtain of murderous cold that surrounded it. The land was, furthermore, once populated by advanced beings known as the Hyperboreans who, being lucky enough to live in such an awesome world, were basically gods. However, the toil of a perfect existence eventually wore them down, and out of boredom, the Hyperboreans drown themselves.


In 330 B.C., someone actually did bother to set out for these mysterious northern lands. Greek astronomer Pytheus purportedly sailed north of the British Isles and discovered there a land he dubbed Thule, where during the Summer Solstice the sun did not set. Pytheas attempted to continue his harsh northward trek, but the ship was turned back by an impenetrable wall of what he referred to as "sea lungs." Fantastic at the time, we can today understand the basic truths behind Pytheas' accounts. Thule could be any of the lands north of Britain: The Shetlands, the coasts of assorted Scandanavian countries. Non-setting suns in these regions at certain times of the year are understood and accounted for. And sea lungs are, more than likely, massive icebergs and floes.

Long after Pytheas journey tot he north, more and more stories began to filter down, often from early British and Norse sailors. These stories, given the average ancient sailor's penchant for bullshitting as well as any other storyteller, became increasingly fanciful. Aside from the ancient Greek idea of a lush tropical paradise beyond the curtain of cold, these early explorers added pygmies and various monsters to the mix. In the late 1500s, England mounted official expeditions to the region, largely in hopes of laying claim to it as part of the empire. It was even claimed that King Arthur, the quasi-mythical father of what was then modern England, mounted expeditions to the arctic regions. The early Elizabethan efforts, while both brave and groundbreaking, did little to advance the cause of the northernmost world being within England's sphere of influence. It turns out that the chief problem with exploring the Arctic is that most of the people who try it die of starvation and exposure, provided they aren't frozen or drowned when their ships hits an iceberg. Or simply go mad when they find their ships iced in and unable to free themselves. But despite all that, it was during this era that England established tenuous toeholds in places as far north as the Baffin Islands.


Exploration picked up again in the 1800s. This time it was ignited by stories of a navigable "northwest passage," a sailing route clear of ice than would allow ships to sail over the top of the world, thus saving untold months that had to be spent sailing around the giant continents that got in the way of easy sailing between, say, England and India. This time, they weren't just shooting for the arctic regions; they were aiming for the very Pole itself. Not surprisingly, a science fiction writer beat them to it. Although little of it made it into subsequent -- and more familiar -- film versions, Mary Shelley's original novel, Frankenstein, is concerned to a large degree with an ill-fated arctic expedition, the captain of which seems bitterly and ironically disappointed that there isn't any mystical tropical paradise to greet them at journey's end; there is, instead, only more and harsher cold. It is on this expedition that they encounter another ill-fated arctic traveler, Victor Von Frankenstein, traveling with his now infamous creature. While most film versions of the story concern themselves purely with the creation of the monster of Frankenstein's Jacob's Ladder-strewn laboratory and the eventual destruction of the creature by torch-wielding peasants storming the castle, the book actually ends with the creature escaping toward the North Pole, presumably going there to die.

Exploiting the fervor over dramatic leaps in exploring the world during the 1800s and relying on the old myths and legends, the science fiction and pulp writers of the era began cranking out a number of stories about the discovery of strange lands at the top and bottom of the world. Most of these fell within the realm of what we can today classify as "lost worlds" literature. As the remote corners of the earth became less remote, new discoveries of ancient civilizations were happening with stunning rapidity. Most dramatic among these was the excavation of ancient Egyptian sites, but similar excavations and scientific expeditions were taking place everywhere from the heart of the Amazon Jungle to the steppes of Mongolia. Scientists were having a field day, and so too were the writers of fantastic fiction. In 1838, Edgar Allan Poe entered into the game with The Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym of Nantucket, a fictionalized account of a man's incredible adventure at the South Pole and of the mysterious creatures he encountered. Incredibly, the story was thought for a time to be a work of non-fiction.


When explorers finally did penetrate the top of the world, thus dispelling any myths about tropical islands or gigantic holes leading to an advanced society of learned elders who dwelt inside the earth, it did little to, well, dispel myths about tropical islands or gigantic holes leading to an advanced society of learned elders who dwelt inside the earth. H.P. Lovecraft wrote a pseudo-sequel to Poe's work, entitled At the Mountain of Madness, which proffers the hole into which Pym fell into lead to a land populated by his now famous shoggoths. A group of German mystics founded something called the Thule Society in 1912, combining the more or less believable accounts of Pyhtean's voyage north with the more fantastical old belief in the Hyperboreans, then layering on top of that a healthy dose of master race B.S. and anti-Semitism. According to the Thule Society, Thule wasn't just a name for some existing northern land before such places had names known to Greeks. It was, in fact, an actual island, one populated by the super-advanced Hyperboreans who, like the Atlanteans (and the Muu-ians, and the Lemorians, and the Seatopians), perished when their island paradise sank into the sea. However, a few Hyperboreans escaped and became the German race, condemned to live out their lives on the European mainland amid all the Jews and other inferior races who wore pants and stuff, instead of the silver lame mini-tunics with golden shoulder pads and tiaras, which is what I assume all super-advanced inhabitants of lost continents wore. The Thule Society eventually went on to be a Nazi farm team, and no one ever addressed the fact that while the Jews may have been inferior, at least their continent never sank into the sea.

You would think that something as daft and racist as the Thule Society would have finally put the "mystic arctic" theories to rest. But then, you'd be underestimating the strong desire in people to believe really ridiculous shit. In fact, post World War II, theories about secret paradises above the Arctic Circle enjoyed a resurgence, with the claim now added that the North Pole was a base for UFOs piloted not by space aliens with an affinity for anally probing Midwestern farmers, but by Nazis who had escaped after Word War II and rediscovered ancient Hyperborean technology, allowing them to build experimental flying saucers to be used when the Fourth Reich rose up and conquered the world. Once again, pulp writers had a field day. These days, despite the fact that commercial flights pass over it and young women ski across it, and rich people drink champagne and go there on giant Russian ships to look at polar bears, conspiracy theories about secret UFO bases, gateways to the hollow earth, and lush tropical paradises at the North Pole still enjoy a surprisingly high degree of popularity, with all the evidence to the contrary dismissed as "a government cover-up." Such theories were lent further fuel when, in 2004, researchers began digging up fossil evidence that at some point (we're talking hundreds of thousands of years ago) the Arctic enjoyed a subtropical climate. That this would have been long before the dawn of man is of little consequence, the Hyperboreans of course being a totally different race. Unfortunately, arctic researchers have turned up little more than the fossilized remnants of plants. To date, they have found no ray guns, UFOs, or silver lame mini-tunics.


Now amid all of this (1922, to be exact), Edgar Rice Burroughs wrote the story The Land that Time Forgot. And many years later, a nearly bankrupt Amicus Productions sent Doug McClure to the fantastic tropical lost world of Caprona, where he and the combined German and British crew soon discover the land is positively crawling with dinosaurs -- and dinosaurs from various epochs. They also discover cavemen who, like the dinosaurs, seem to be in varied states of evolutionary advancement. Through her incredible ability to interpret caveman grunts and chest slapping, as well as her ability to look through a microscope with von Schoenvorts, Lisa is able to divine the mysteries of Caprona. It seems that evolution in this lost world occurs not over a period of millenniums, but within the span of a single lifetime, with great evolutionary steps being taken as part of a mysterious metamorphosis. The further south one travels, the more advanced the humans become. While Lisa and von Schoenvorts are fascinated by this biological phenomenon, and while Doug McClure seems happy to pal around with a caveman and shoot dinosaurs, most of the sailors on both sides are keen to get the hell out of Caprona so they can stop being eaten by dinosaurs and return to the safety and luxury of World War One. When they discover crude oil, they discover the means of their escape. However, like all lost worlds, this one is menaced by a restless volcano that could blow at any minute.

As with Kevin Connor's other adventures based on the works of Edgar Rice Burroughs, The Land that Time Forgot is low-budget and crammed with tons of really awful special effects. In 1925, Harry Hoyt and Marion Fairfax's silent film version of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's The Lost World became the first "lost world" movie, and it was said at the time that the special effects work of Willis O'Brien (who would later go on to do the effects for the original King Kong) were so good that audiences at the time would be completely fooled into thinking the film was a documentary with actual footage of actual living dinosaurs. I don't know how many people did believe the dinosaurs were real, but it's safe to say that the effects in 1925 were far better than the effects we see in 1975. The Land that Time Forgot isn't quite as bad as, say, Mighty Gorga bad, but they are pretty terrible.

On the other hand, they are colorful and hypnotic. As a kid, I was fascinated by them and not phased by how shoddy they were. As an adult, I still think they are fun. And what the movie lacks in quality it more than makes up for in quantity, because once the u-boat arrives in Caprona, all vestiges of the rather serious World War One maritime adventure vanish, and the dinosaur and caveman attacks come more or less non-stop. As McClure and his buddies venture further and further south, the evolutionary mysteries of the lost world become even more puzzling. So do the geographical mysteries, because although it is assumed that they have hiked days away from the lake that is their base, everyone seems to be able to job back to the submarine within a matter of minutes.


The cast, comprised mostly of the usual British stalwarts, is solid. McClure turns in his usual performance, but that's really all I ever want from him. Yet again, he's a regular Joe who runs up against the fantastic and deals with it mostly by punching it in the face. Some people don't care for McClure's style. I'm not among those people, but even if I was, I'd have to admit that his final "we are so fucked" expression as he watched the submarine disappear is incredible. Connor's direction is, also, about the same as always, meaning that he correctly positions the camera and shoots his scenes, but never adds very much character to the film. I sort of prefer that style of direction to the overbearingly tricky "look at me and how clever I am" style of self-indulgent direction we see today. Connor recognizes that his movie is colorful and full of crude rubber dinosaur, and you don't add much to the formula by zooming the camera around and doing lots of crazy editing.

Although I'm sure this film benefits in some degree from my own nostalgia regarding it, the end result is the same. I really like it. It's one of those rainy Saturday afternoon matinee films that seeks to do little more than entertain you. Aside from plenty of fun dinosaur and caveman adventure, The Land that Time Forgot offers up really one of the most downbeat and apocalyptic endings of any movie aimed at kids. As McClure tries to rescue Lisa from a band of slightly more advanced cavemen (naturally they kidnapped her), the volcano erupts (also naturally). As they struggle to make it back to the submarine, the truce between the Germans and the Brits finally starts to break down. Von Schoenvorts, the sentimentalist, wants to wait for McClure and Lisa. His first mate, a realist, wants to leave before it's too late. In the end, no one wins, as pretty much everyone guns down everyone else, and the cave collapses, crushing the submarine and the few in it who were still alive. McClure and Lisa are stranded in Caprona, with nothing to do except follow the land's mysteries ever further south, until at last they reach what is, for all intents and purposes, the end of the world. There, they toss a message in a bottle into the raging Antarctic seas, hoping against all hope that someone, someday, will find it, believe it, and come rescue them.

And unfortunately, someone did.

Labels: , , , , , ,

posted by Keith at | 7 Comments


Sunday, June 15, 2008

Kaala Sona

Release Year: 1975
Country: India
Starring: Feroz Khan, Parveen Babi, Prem Chopra, Danny Dezongpa, Farida Jalal, Imtiaz Khan, Helen, Durga Khote, Keshto Mukherjee, Bipin Gupta, Polson, Abhijeet, Shyam, Gurinder, Mamaji, Agha, Raju Shrestha, Sabina, Habib, Raj Pal, K.N. Singh, P. Jairaj, Satyendra Kapoor, Krishnakant, Karan Dewan, Bhagwan, Maruti, Birbal, Seema Kapoor
Director: Ravikant Nagaich
Writers: Harish Khatri, Ramesh Pant, V.D. Puranik
Cinematographer: Ravikant Nagaich
Music: Rahul Dev (R.D.) Burman
Producers: Harish Shah, Vinod Shah


Kaala Sona is another example of the Basmati -- or "Curry" -- Western, that Bollywood take on the Western that seems to draw more on the European model than the American for its inspiration. Of course, the Amitabh Bachchan classic Sholay, released at roughly the same time, is considered the gold standard of that genre, and Kaala Sona follows along much the same pattern. Like Sholay, for instance, it's a Western in feel rather than period, setting its action in the present day while taking advantage of some of the still relatively untamed regions lying within India's borders. Such an approach allows both films to highlight a favorite Bollywood theme: the urbanized ne'er-do-well who, in being called upon to defend a rural community from a destructive outside force, has his soul awakened to the simple and essential virtues embodied by that community. (In more recent films, that urbanized ne'er-do-well tends to be, more specifically, a Westernized product of the Diaspora, but same idea.)

This is not to say that the change we see in Rakesh, Kaala Sona's protagonist, is a particularly gradual or subtle one. In fact, even given the tendency of characters in Bollywood films to go through some jarringly abrupt changes of heart, Rakesh appears to take a particularly fast track in negotiating his character arc. When we first meet him, at the film's opening, he is a shiftless playboy, waking up in his spectacularly hideous penthouse bachelor pad for another busy day of fending off the many gold-digging hoochies who are after his vast inherited fortune. This agenda has to be abruptly set aside, however, when Rakesh receives a telegram from an old family servant, summoning Rakesh to his deathbed. Rakesh makes haste to the servant's side, at which point the servant breaks the news that Rakesh's father, a land developer long thought to have died in an accident, was actually murdered by the notorious bandit Poppy Singh, and that Poppy Singh, long thought to have died himself, is actually alive and well and hiding out in a remote, mountainous region near the country's border. In the blink of an eye, Rakesh is storming the territories with gun in hand. Without the benefit of a training montage or flashback to explain his prowess, we see that, despite his pampered upbringing, Rakesh is not only very good with his fists, but also a lighting fast draw and expert marksman. These skills serve him well, as he is able to quickly and effortlessly dispatch a number of the professional gunmen who are guarding the region's perimeter. Cue the opening credits.




That Rakesh is more convincing as a rugged man of action than as an effete member of the leisure class is not all that surprising, given that he is played by Feroz Khan. Thanks to my exposure to Khan in 1980's Qurbani -- and now Kaala Sona -- I've come to the conclusion that his filmography is one I definitely need to delve into further. Both films bear the stamp of, if not a great actor, then at least a very distinctive presence. Khan, in addition to being its star, was also the director of the sublimely over-the-top Qurbani and, while Kaala Sona (which was directed by Ravikand Nagaich) doesn't go quite as far, it has a similar feeling of raw pulp vitality and absurdly overheated machismo. It doesn't stray too far from the normal Bollywood conventions -- and all of the exuberant trappings that they entail -- but it clearly has a violent B movie heart beating within it, which makes for a pretty entertaining -- and, at times hallucinatory -- combination.

After his guns-blazing entry within its borders, Rakesh finds the entirety of the lush Kangra Valley region locked in the stranglehold of the mysterious Popy Singh. Only the estate of the kindly Thakur Ratansing appears to offer any kind of oasis of relative calm, until Rakesh discovers that the Thakur and his family, too, have reluctantly come under the bandit's sway. The Thakur's young son (who looks suspiciously like Weng Weng from For Y'ur Height Only) has been kidnapped by Poppy Singh and his men and, in order to insure the boy's safety, the thakur's eldest daughter, Durga (the stunning beauty Parveen Babi), has been forced to assist in smuggling the opium produced by the gang out of the region. That opium is harvested and refined -- using the local residents as slave labor -- within Popy Singh's virtually impenetrable compound, located high in the mountains across a yawning, unbridge ravine.




Rakesh soon meets up with a vigilante band dedicated to defeating Poppy Singh. Their leader is a strapping young buck named Shera, played by frequent Bollywood heavy Danny Denzongpa. The filmmakers capitalize on the Sikkim-born Denzongpa's exotic looks by making Shera Kaala Sona's resident version of a Hollywood-style Native American, complete with buckskin, fringe and beaded headband. It's a touch that doesn't make a lot of sense if you think about it, but serves to enhance the films' Western movie feel, which undoubtedly took priority over any concerns of authenticity on the part of the producers. In any case, the character of Shera, in addition to providing an opportunity for lots of scenes of male bonding with Rakesh, serves nicely as a love match for the Thakur's youngest daughter, which, once Rakesh and Durga are established as an item, makes for double the normal amount of courtship themed musical numbers. It is also Shera's eventual predicament at the hands of Popy Singh that emboldens Rakesh to single-handedly breach the bandit's compound in an attempt to rescue him and the Thakur's son.

I've written before about how Bollywood films often have a tendency to turn into entirely different movies somewhere around their second half, and, with Rakesh's entry into Poppy Singh's compound, Kaala Sona abruptly goes from being a gritty Western to something more akin to one of those surreal old Russian fantasy films. The largely location-shot natural exteriors of the first half give way to a candy-hued sound stage artificiality, including a limitless expanse of poppy fields that appear to have been imagined by someone whose only experience of poppy fields was from watching The Wizard of Oz. This "we've got some crude matte paintings and we're going to use them" visual approach carries through until the film's final action set piece, which takes place on an extraordinarily phony looking ice shelf with flappy cloth icicles hanging from it. Of course, far from hurting Kaala Sona, this trippy turn of events simply serves to make it overall a far more memorable -- and awesome -- viewing experience than it probably would have been otherwise.




And, of course, the evil fairyland setting of Kaala Sona's final act is governed in appropriate fashion, for Popy Singh, when we finally meet him in all his glory, is a freaky monomaniac in the classic Bollywood bad guy mold. Goateed and with one disconcerting, milky eye, he wears a jeweled headband that -- in combination with the long, straight hair that stops at his crown -- makes his bald pate look like a skull cap. Furthermore, his wardrobe is given an Eastern Asian flavor, no doubt with the intention of suggesting a sort of Fu Manchu character. Prem Chopra, the actor who plays Popy Singh, here bears a strong resemblance, in both appearance and manner, to the American actor Andrew Robinson, particularly in that actor's portrayal of the serial killer Scorpio in the original Dirty Harry. If that suggests to you that, with Popy Singh, you'll be getting some prime quality borderline-hysterical villainous ravings coupled with churlish random killings of underperforming minions, you would be right on the money.

Kaala Sona features music by the legendary R.D. Burman, which makes for a lot of catchy and propulsive tunes, as well as some very enjoyable production numbers. Probably the best of these is the one set to the psychedelic-tinged "Ek Bar Jaane Jaana", in which Parveen Babi appears before a bunch of drunken louts as a gyrating apparition, splitting -- thanks to some simple yet effective opticals -- into multiples to form a hazy chorus line of one. But the climactic number, which pairs Babi with the always welcome Helen for some frenzied hoofing, is also a visual treat. In addition to its songs, the film boasts an instrumental score complete with some amusing Bollywood flavored stabs at Morricone-style western themes, trilling, non-verbal vocalizations and all.


Having dipped into Bollywood westerns, I have to admit to not knowing just how deep the well goes. I am aware that Feroz Khan made at least one other film in the genre -- Khotte Sikkay, an apparent reworking of For a Few Dollars More -- but, beyond Kaala Sona, Sholay and that, I don't know how many films the genre comprises. But it is to Kaala Sona's credit that I fully intend to find out. There's just something about the combination of the Western genre's Spartan, rough-hewn aesthetic with Bollywood's tendency toward the exuberant and phantasmagorical that I find hard to resist. If you want to join me in this new obsession, Kaala Sona is certainly a good place to start.

Labels: , , ,

posted by Todd at | 7 Comments


Wednesday, December 12, 2007

Strip Nude for Your Killer

Release Year: 1975
Country: Italy
Starring: Edwige Fenech, Nino Castelnuovo, Femi Benussi, Solvi Stubing, Franco Diogene, Lucio Como, Erna Schurer.
Writer: Andrea Bianchi and Massimo Felisatti
Director: Andrea Bianchi
Cinematographer: Franco Delli Colli
Music: Berto Pisano
Original Title: Nude per l'assassino
Availability: Buy it from Amazon


You wouldn't think that a movie with a title like Strip Nude for Your Killer would turn out to be among the sleazier, trashier, less redeemable Italian thrillers -- or giallo -- but what do you know! Strip Nude for Your Killer turns out to be among the sleazier, trashier, less redeemable Italian thrillers, and if you know anything about gialli, you know that sleaze, trash, and irredeemability are practically requisites for the genre. Strip Nude for Your Killer is also probably not the best film to use as a primer on the tropes and history of gialli, but at the same time, perhaps the fact that it slavishly caters to the lowest common denominator expectations of giallo films and never exhibits much in the way of style or ambition beyond fulfilling the base formula requirements make it the perfect, if not respectable, candidate for the following brief -- and possibly wildly inaccurate in spots -- history of what fans loving refer to giallo.

Giallo is, like pulp fiction in America, a loaded and often misrepresented concept that takes on various attributes and boundaries depending on who is doing the defining. Pulp, for example, was used to cover everything from romance to cowboy to crime to sci-fi and horror stories, though in time it became more specifically identified with crime and fantastic literature. And then, in the 90s, pulp started being used as a description of outrageous action cinema from the 70s, applied interchangeably with "cult film," "drive-in movie," and most recently, "grindhouse." Pulp thus became an adaptive term, and even though it no longer meant what it used to mean, just as "drive-in movie" could have been any movie (I saw Jaws and Star Wars at the drive-in in the 70s, after all) but now has a very specific exploitation-oriented definition, "pulp" has an agreed-upon (more or less) pop culture definition that most people live with.


The history and evolution of giallo in Italy is very similar. Giallo originally referred to a series of pulp novels published by a company called Mondadori. The name "giallo" arose from the bright yellow covers that identified books as part of the series. As with American pulps of the same era (the first giallo was printed in 1929), the subject matter of giallo varied wildly, but in time they seemed to settle down into a steady pattern relying predominantly on murder mysteries, horror, and lurid tales of wanton sauciness. From time to time, the stories of well-established and well-respected mystery authors like Edgar Wallace and Agathie Christie showed up as part of the giallo series. Thus, like pulp, giallo became a much more specific phrase, irritating some (as does the abuse and rampant application of the descriptor "pulp").

Making any claim regarding which film was "the first" of any type of film is pretty silly. No matter what you pick, someone is going to find an earlier film that fulfills the same basic requirements of whatever genre you've chosen, and then they'll start claiming that movie was the first. Sort of like, "who was the first punk rocker," a debate that includes everyone from Iggy Pop to Joey Ramone to the MC5 to Mozart. Or, to relate it to film, there's the endless debate over "the first slasher film." With "first" being nigh impossible to nail down, what becomes more important is the first film to act as a major cultural touchstone. So, while nailing down "the first slasher film" may be almost impossible, nailing down "the film that inspired the slasher movie boom of the 80s and defined the tropes of that trend" is much easier.

The exact same problem exists in determining "the first giallo movie." Considering that Edgar Wallace and Agathie Christie books were part of the giallo series, you could reasonably argue that one of the movies based on those was the first giallo. What is more pertinent, again, and at least for our purposes here, is to define the film where the giallo trend really arrived, and the film that served as the template for the movies that would follow this trend. Regarding this, most people agree that it's Mario Bava's 1963 thriller The Girl Who Knew Too Much (which even features the lead character reading a giallo novel), with a major assist from Bava's Blood and Black Lace in 1964. It is in these two movies that we see most of the "rules" of the genre established, sort of like how George Romero's Night of the Living Dead certainly wasn't the first zombie film, but it was the zombie film, and it set forth a template that is followed to this very day. Bava's two early murder mysteries laid the foundation for what would come after them. And of course, just to dirty the martini further, from that start point forward, you can spend plenty of time endlessly debating which films are or are not gialli, or which films are or are not zombie films. So on and so forth. After all, us film nerds gotta debate something, and some of us are tired of arguing about whether or not Star Wars was awesome or sucked.

One for the Ladies

Bava's two movies give us the framework and the common themes that define giallo: the unreliable eye witness and the general unreliability and subjectivity of observation, the international jet set flavor (including frequent use of American and British leads), the obsession with fashion and photography (another form of observation) and the industries that exist around each, prolonged and often fantastically complex murder sequences, highly stylized lighting and cinematography, and perhaps most famous of all, the black-gloved killer.

Giallo simmered through the 60s, but it was in 1970 that things really exploded. That year, a former scriptwriter and assistant director named Dario Argento made the film The Bird with the Crystal Plumage. Here, what started with Bava became crystal clear and fully realized. From 1970 on, the always zealous Italian exploitation market began cranking out all sorts of films that fit the giallo bill, more or less. Adding a dose of 1970s libertinism to the Bava formula, the giallo directors of the 70s were able to heap on more gore, nudity, and general sleaze. The films also showcased an increasingly cynical viewpoint of the morality of man, often featuring victim characters who were only marginally less rotten than the mysterious killer. Some of these films were incredibly good. Some wallowed in their own filth. A few were just plain awful, but most were enjoyable in a wild Grand Guignol fashion that demanded you abandon logic, accept often wildly improbably plot twists and resolutions, and concentrate instead on the imaginative style and outlandish setpieces. In other words, if you are going to be upset about disappointing revelations and idiotic, illogical behavior on behalf of the victims, giallo is not the genre for you to play in, and you will find little, even in the best films, that will convince you otherwise. These films take place in a world that appears similar to ours and involves characters who resemble humans, but ultimately, the world of the giallo film and the people who inhabit it resemble humans and the human world only superficially. Gialli operate under their own set of rules, and dealing with it can often be irritating -- especially since that leads to the age-old battle over when something is an intentional artistic vision and when something is just incompetent crap.

In the case of Strip Nude for Your Killer, the debate is pretty one-sided. This movie is definitely incompetent crap. It's largely unimaginative, always seedy and mean-spirited, and laughable in its attempt to build the central mystery. That said, it's also horribly fun in a way you should be maybe just a little bit ashamed of, and it stars the queen of 70s giallo and one the most perfect and beautiful women to ever walk the planet, French Algerian actress Edwige Fenech.

One for the Ladies

To be fair, Strip Nude for Your Killer may be scummy, but it wastes no time letting you know exactly where you stand, as the first shot is a full frontal nude shot of a woman in a doctor's office, legs up in medical stirrups, with a doctor's face firmly planted between her legs. If this image -- and keep in mind that it is quickly revealed she's in the middle of an abortion -- offends or insults you, then it's best to just skip ahead to some other movie. I recommend Dario Argento's Deep Red. It's really good, and as far as gialli goes, it's pretty clean. At least it doesn't start off with a close-up of a chick getting an abortion. From this auspicious opening salvo, Strip Nude for Your Killer has the woman suffer a heart attack, causing the doctor and his pal to bring the woman back to her home and leave her in the bathtub in hopes that the police will just chalk it up to a heart attack without noticing the abortion thing.

From there, the film picks up at a photography studio staffed primarily by snide, condescending people who all seem to hate each other. Among them are star photographers Carlo (Nino Castelnuovo) and Magda (Edwige Fenech), who are involved with each other though Carlo is by no means a one-lady man. The other cast members all have names too, but there's not much point in remembering them since, 1) they're all basically the same character, and 2) they're all going to die anyway. And sure enough, it doesn't take too long before someone is stalking the employees of the studio and killing them off. Signature murders include the stabbing of a woman who, upon realizing a prowler may be in the house and all her co-workers are getting murdered, investigates while completely nude except for a pair of clunky platform clogs; and then there's the one where, after charmingly attempting to rape a co-worker before going impotent, we get ample shots of an enormously fat man in his sagging tighty whities and black dress socks, clutching a deflated blow-up doll in one hand and a kitchen knife in the other while he cries uncontrollably. Tasteful!

Eventually, the cast is whittled down to a few potential suspects, including Carlo, Magda. Carlo and Magda take it upon themselves to investigate the murder, though it's possible on of them is actually the culprit, and for some reason, any time they turn up a clue, they make a big fuss about how they couldn't possibly go to the police with it, even though there's no actual reason they couldn't go to the police beyond the fact that the giallo film depends on the concept of the amateur sleuth, and writer-director Andrea Bianchi sort of blows at writing stories. When the killer is finally revealed...well it's best for this movie and for many gialli to master the use of the phrase, "Oh, come on!" Strip Nude for Your Killer isn't quite so bad as to have the killer be someone that hasn't been in the movie until the point they are revealed to be the killer ("Why, it was his brother we've never seen all along!"), but it's really close. And there's plenty more "Oh, come on!" moments to keep your eyes rolling. Like the part where Magda goes to retrieve film from Carlo's studio that presumably has pictures of the killer on it. While there, the lights go out, and Magda hears someone else sneaking around. So, knowing that everyone who works at your studio is being murdered, knowing that you have a piece of evidence that could reveal the killer, and knowing that the killer knows you have this and also knows where it is, when you are in this place, and the lights go out all of a sudden, do you instantly think, "Goodness, it is entirely likely this killer who has been stalking us has now arrived here!" Or do you think, "Aw, it must be a blown fuse!"

One for the Ladies

In fact, there are three distinct points at which you will need to master the use of "Oh, come on!" if you are ever going to get very far into the world of Italian murder mystery horror fun. The first is used pleadingly and comes when you engage in the following exchange with a friend:

You: Let's watch Strip Nude for Your Killer.
Your Friend: That looks like crap.
You: Oh, come on!

You will also find the phrase handy to use in a sort of "just roll with it" use. For example:

Your Friend: Wait! Why can't they go to the police? Man this movie is idiotic.
You: Oh, come on!

And finally, there is the point at which you and your friend can finally agree on the proper application of the phrase. This comes at the end, when the killer is revealed to be someone you can't even remember if they were in the movie before. It is here that you can both roll your eyes and exclaim, "Oh, come on!"

Strip Nude for Your Killer definitely requires a healthy sense of humor to get through. Director Andrea Bianchi does not possess the stylistic flourishes that make many other bad gialli worth watching even when their plots are of dubious merit. What Bianchi lacks in terms of inventive direction he attempts to make up for with sleaze, and at least on that level, he's a Viking. Before you even start the movie, you can guess what sort of ride you're in for. And while some titles may make lascivious promises the movie can't keep, Strip Nude for Your Killer definitely is not one of them. I mean, here's a film that plays a botched abortion for cheap titillation and ends with a joke about a guy strangling his girlfriend and sodomizing her against her will. Oh, the hilarity! In between, you get near frequent male and female nudity (often in the form of people you never wanted to see nude), plenty of slasher gore (usually in the form of the aftermath of a murder), and an all-around level of scumminess that becomes so thick it takes on the properties of camp excess. I'm sure John Waters would appreciate the ludicrousness of it all. It's that gleeful willingness to reel about in the muck with such reckless disregard for even the most frayed threads of decent taste that keep Strip Nude for Your Killer from being offensive. It's far too idiotic to be taken with that degree of seriousness. This movie is like stumbling upon a hobo jerking off behind a dumpster. Sure you can get offended, but honestly, what's the point?


One of the fun things about gialli is that they actively invite psychoanalysis. Regardless of how shoddy and shallow the product may be, if it just follows the template close enough, it can piggyback on the psychological groundwork of Bava, who himself was nodding to Hitchcock. It's like buying meaning wholesale, or shopping at Hot Topic instead of making your own punk clothes. For example, I have no doubt that Bianchi had absolutely nothing to say with Strip Nude for Your Killer. He wanted to make a sleazy murder mystery and get Edwige Fenech naked as often as possible, plus show a fat guy in saggy underpants. And that's exactly what he did. But because, by 1975, so many gialli had been made and the cliches of the genre were so well established, he didn't have to put any thought at all into having things us film nerds could pick up on in our never-ending quest to artistically justify even the basest and greediest of crap. Strip Nude for Your Killer is rife with the standard giallo themes, the most obvious of which is the deceptive nature of observation. You could even justify the tasteless opening by saying that Bianchi is intentionally duping the audience into thinking they're getting a bit of cheesecake right off the bat, only to spoil it by introducing a dramatic and tragic revelation regarding the nature of the nudity we are observing. You would, I think, be full of shit if you did this, but it's still fun.

Later in the film, the roll of film with the killer's identity is brought into play, under the assumption that a photograph of a murder in progress is irrefutable proof. Once again, however, very little is what it appears to be. Edwige spends much of the movie poring over photographs of the victim, an old magnifying glass plastered to her face as a visual homage to the dime store detective novels from which the giallo film grew (and also as a fine example of how magnifying glasses aren't designed work). In Strip Nude for Your Killer as in many other far superior gialli (specifically Dario Argento's Bird with the Crystal Plumage and Deep Red), the protagonist spends a great deal of time examining and re-examining something that seems perfectly clear but is later revealed to hold a significance no one recognized. Bird with the Crystal Plumage is one of the most obvious indictments of the notion of eye witness, but Deep Red is my favorite for playing off the lead actor, David Hemmings, and his role as a photographer obsessed with the grainy, minute detail of a photo in Anonioni's Blow Up. In the case of Strip Nude for Your Killer, Bianchi is obviously just copying what he's seen before, but it's still kind of fun and one of the reasons bad gialli are often still enjoyable to dissect.

Bianchi is no stranger to sleazy thrillers. His filmography includes Cry of the Prostitute, The Malicious Whore, and Burial Ground, infamous for casting an obviously older midget as a child, and then having him bite off his mom's breast while she lovingly breast-feeds him. I ain't talking no Harry Earles looking guy, either, where you could almost believe the illusion that he was a little kid (still way too old to be breast feeding though, at least off his mom). No, this was more like a cross between Dustin Hoffman and Chris Kattan. Anyway, Bianchi isn't much of a director, and whatever style exists in Strip Nude for Your Killer is most likely the product of Bianchi aping those who came before. The direction is competent and professional, but not much else.


Of course, for most viewers, there is one big reason, at least above the simple blanket "because it's Italian giallo," to watch Strip Nude for Your Killer, and that's the appearance, usually nude or in little more than panties and an unbuttoned men's dress shirt, of Edwige Fenech. Fenech was a staple of both Italian sex comedies and the giallo film, and she brought to the game a wicked combination of actual acting talent, comedic timing, a willingness to drop her robe for pretty much no reason, and some of the most devastating good looks I've ever seen. She split her time evenly between exceptionally great gialli like All the Colors of the Dark and other films with director Sergio Martino, and dodgy nonsense like this and The Case of the Bloody Iris. She was always game, though, and never looked to be half-assing it, even when her primary role was to show half her ass. In Strip Nude for Your Killer, she's about as close as you're going to get to a likable character, even though she's kind of condescending and nasty to people. But when you're surrounded by the likes of mean-spirited S&M lesbians, a guy who thinks anal rape is hilarious, a fat crying guy who also thinks rape is the way to a woman's heart, and someone who is killing a bunch of people -- well, it's not hard to look like the good guy.

If you are looking for a good and proper introduction to the world of Italian murder mysteries, Strip Nude for Your Killer is not your movie. You want to be watching Deep Red or Blood and Black Lace or All the Colors of the Dark. Still, if you are already prepared for the peculiarities of sloppy Italian filmmaking, Strip Nude for Your Killer is surprisingly enjoyable. Even though it's poorly written, even though it's relentlessly tasteless (actually, because it's relentlessly tasteless), even though it has very few points you could single out as being good other than Edwige, and even though it's packed full of gratuitously seedy garbage (once again, what I mean is because it's packed full of gratuitous, seedy garbage), it ultimately comes across as harmless. I think it's because you never get an opportunity to take the thing seriously for even a minute. Compare it to, for instance, Lucio Fulci's New York Ripper, a film that is marginally less sleazy, almost as absurd, but a whole lot meaner. The hatred for mankind is palpable in that film, and if you make it through to the end, all you really want to do is take a shower. Conversely, Strip Nude for Your Killer comes across as little more than a bunch of drunk Italians wanting to make a movie with a lot of nudity in it. If you go to the shower after watching it, you're doing something, but it's not because you feel grimy and depressed. Sure, the film is mean, but it never seems serious about it or committed to its misanthropy. This could just be my perception as a horribly twisted and dark individual, but Strip Nude for Your Killer just doesn't have that visceral kick you would need to really be offended. It was preposterous anyway, and I was having too much fun reveling in the filth alongside it to worry about the many faults.

Labels: , , ,

posted by Keith at | 4 Comments


Sunday, December 21, 2003

Bullet Train

1975, Japan. Starring Ken Takakura, Sonny Chiba, Kei Yamamoto, Eiji Go, Akira Oda, Raita Ryu, Masayo Utsunomiya, Yumi Takigawa, Etsuko Shihomi, Takashi Shimura, Fumio Watanabe, Mizuho Suzuki, Tetsuro Tamba. Directed by Junya Sato. Available on DVD (HKFlix).

"Kuramochi, there's always somebody who will try this again."

So says one of the characters as the film Bullet Train draws to a close, and he probably had no idea just how prophetic his pronouncement would be. When director Junya Sato set about making this slick little thriller in 1975, it's doubtful that he knew it would become, with an adjustment here or there, one of the biggest American action films of 1994. At that time, it was released as Speed, the movie that will be forever cursed for having planted the notion that Keaneu Reeves could be an action star, which is still slightly less offensive than the notion that Keaneu Reeves could be an actor at all.

Bullet Train tells the story of a robber who attempts to extort money from the Japanese government by planting a bomb on a high-speed shinkansen, or bullet train, packed with daily commuters. The trick is that if the train drops below 80 kilometers an hour, the bomb will go off. Stop me if you've heard that one. Although the plot device between this film and the much later Speed is identical, and there's no arguing that Jan DeBont's action thriller rips off Bullet Train, the two films actually take dramatically different approaches to the same basic problem. Where as Speed was a jump-around action film, Bullet Train is a "man in the control room" suspense film the likes of which became pretty popular during the 1970s.

They say all genres of film are cyclical, and every ten or fifteen years what was popular then becomes popular once again. Take, for example, the recent re-emergence of the slasher film. If this holds true, then the "man in a control room" films are overdue for resurgence in popularity. Everyone's seen at least one of these films, the hallmarks of which include lots of nervous, sweating men in white-collar shirts gathered around the console in a control room, chain smoking as they struggle to avert some disaster on a train, plane, or pretty much anything else than can be taken over by thugs or threatened with destruction. The Taking of Pelham 1-2-3 is our favorite, but there are plenty of good examples of the subgenre, including Roller Coaster and at least a couple of those Airport movies. And, of course, Airplane! Unfortunately, its unlikely that these sorts of movies will ever see renewed interest since they focused far more on characters and suspense than balls-out action, and modern audiences simply don't seem like their willing to sit through nineties minutes of Walter Matthau smoking and talking to a terrorist over the radio. If there aren't a lot of explosions and "cool visuals," then folks these days seem to tune out, though I have to admit that I always found Walter Matthau to be a rather cool visual -- even more so if he were to start showing up in movies now!

In short, people want Speed more than they want Bullet Train, and that's their loss. I can't make anyone like anything (though I can sometimes fool them for a while, as is evident by the number of people I inadvertently tricked into watching The Star Wars Holiday Special), and if the kids these days with their phat jeans and their metal-rap cross-over bands don't want to watch cranky old men guzzle scotch while trying to talk some doomed flight down during a storm, then so be it. That leaves more room for me, and I'll be more than happy to leave more room for them at the next showing of whatever theatrically released, hundred-minute-long hip-hop video Jet Li is starring in this month.

As far as "man in a control room" movies go, Bullet Train is one of the better examples, though not as good as The Taking of Pelham 1-2-3 since it doesn't have Walter Matthau in it. It does, however, have both Takakura Ken and Sonny Chiba in it, and that counts for quite a lot. Takakura Ken is probably best known in the United States for his supporting roles in the Robert Mitchum film Yakuza, which was pretty damn good, and the Ridley Scott-Michael Douglas film Black Rain, which stunk like a week-old dead cat left out in the hot Georgia sun. I think he might have also been in some Tom Selleck movie, but I haven't watched a Tom Selleck movie since High Road to China. Those films notwithstanding, Takakura Ken is best known in Japan as one of the biggest action and crime-drama stars of the 1960s. He starred in a fistful of yakuza pics, including the popular Abishiri Prison series, as well as a lot of samurai films, including the classic Toshiro Mifune vehicle Samurai III and the Red Peony Gambler series. Throughout the 1960s, if there was a movie about some reformed criminal getting out of prison only to come face-to-face with his criminal past, chances are Ken was going to be in it.

Also during the 1960s, a struggling young martial artist-turned-actor named Sonny Chiba was busting his butt to make a name for himself at Toei Studios without much luck. Takakura Ken took a liking to the tough young up-and-comer and took Sonny under his wing, helping him out financially and giving the young actor rides home when money ran short. As fate would have it, as Ken's run at the top was drawing to a close in the 1970s, Sonny was the man who was stepping into the spotlight to assume the title of "biggest action star in Japan." With his founding of the Japan Action Club and starring roles in early karate pictures like Streetfighter and The Executioner, Sonny Chiba became the man in Japan.

Despite their friendship, Takakura Ken and Sonny Chiba had only worked together on one movie, 1963's Gyangyu 8. So it was, then, in 1975, that the two found themselves working together once again in the thriller Bullet Train, with Chiba paying respect to his mentor by playing second fiddle, and the mentor paying his respects to the student who had become the master by letting him save the day. In that way, Bullet Train is a movie of favors, especially since Chiba makes sure his own protege, the always-spectacular Etsuko Shiomi (Sister Streetfighter, Dragon Princess) has a cameo. I'm also pretty sure one of the train conductors is played by Hiroyuki Sanada (Ring, Royal Warriors, Roaring Fire), another of the Japan Action Club's top students and stars. It's like a family reunion for people who weren't actually related.

To say Takakura Ken "stars" as Tetsuo Okita is somewhat misleading, as these types of movies are very much ensemble cast affairs, with equal importance placed on the villain, the main guy in the control room, and the hapless conductor or pilot of whatever happens to be getting threatened. The way it breaks down here is that Ken is the villain, though he's as nice a villain as a villain can be who would be willing to threaten a train full of 1,500 people with a bomb. Utsui Ken, a veteran from Japan's Super Giant space series, plays Kuramochi, the main man at the control center. Finally, Sonny Chiba sweats it up and grimaces as Aoki, the conductor of the doomed train. All three men play what were fairly standard "man in a control room" characters, but they do so with great skill. The rest of the cast consists of Tetsuo's gang of accomplices, the JNR railroad suits, and panicky passengers.

Tetsuo's plan is pretty simple - use the bomb to get the Japanese government to pay him and his cronies US$5 million. Of course, no heist in the history of film has been pulled off, and one event after another serves to complicate things both for Tetsuo and Kuramochi, who has to deal with scheming police officers looking for glory and all those curmudgeonly old businessmen. Tetsuo's plans immediately start to go awry when the guy they arrange to buy dynamite from shows up to blackmail them. He doesn't know exactly what's going on, but he is smart enough to know that if someone is buying a bunch of black market dynamite, it's not because they're big Jimmy Walker fans. To complicate matters even more, the dealer is soon arrested on unconnected charges and transferred between prisons on board the very train Tetsuo and his boys are targeting.

Railroad executives are slow to believe in a bomb that can be triggered by a train slowing down below a certain speed, but when Tetsuo shows them a little demo using an unmanned freight train up north, they realize they have a big problem on their hands. What makes things even worse is that the trains are controlled by a computer that will automatically shut the train down when safety is compromised, such as taking a turn too quickly or passing too close to an exchange at the same time as another train. "Man in a control room" films often feature something like this - an automated safety feature or procedure that ultimately ends up working against the safety of the target in such extreme situations. Train conductor Aoki, sweating up a storm, has to contend with such obstacles as he struggles to keep the train above the minimum speed while, at the same time, keeping the passengers from rioting. Unfortunately for him, this isn't a time when he can solve the problem by simply ripping off someone's testicles or wheezing at them as he shatters their skull.

Back on stationary land, Tetsuo and his boys are having a time with cops following the trail Tetsuo didn't realize had been left. One of the accomplices is gunned down and another wounded during one of those ridiculously complex "money exchange" scenes that criminals always have to dream up in order to get their money without getting caught. Those things never work, but that's because complicated heists never work. Just to make certain everything is a major pain in the ass for all parties involved, the café where Tetsuo left the plans on how to diffuse the bomb for the cops catches fire and burns to the ground. Now Kuramochi is left with no idea where the bomb is, how to defuse it, or how to contact Tetsuo to tell him about the accident at the café. Finding and defusing the bomb falls into the hands of some guys with movie cameras and our man on the train, Aoki.

Meanwhile, Tetsuo discovers the problem with the café after hearing a plea over the television. He's hesitant to contact Kuramochi again though, fearing that it's all a ruse orchestrated in order to trap him. At the same time, he never had any intention of allowing the bomb to go off, so he's torn over what to do. He doesn't want to see so many people die. But the train is reaching the end of the line, and things are about to hit a fever pitch.

Bullet Train is an excellent suspense film. Everything it needs to do, it does correctly, resulting in an edge-of-the-seat movie even though you can pretty much guess, after so many similar movies, how things are going to end up. It's not that the movie is predictable; it's just that nearly thirty years after the fact, we've seen enough "man in the control room" movies to know what happens. That Bullet Train easily overcomes this and remains a suspenseful nailbiter despite fulfilling pretty much all the subgenre traditions is a testament to the fine writing and pacing of the film.

Takakura Ken is fabulous as the determined but troubled mastermind of the crime. Although he's given no more screen time than any other character, and we never get real insight into his motives, Ken's performance brings out the human side of the character and makes him much more believable and sympathetic than, say, Dennis Hopper's howling, cackling loony from Speed. I suppose Dennis Hopper is known for many things, but subtlety isn't one of them. At no point does he come across as a "madman" or someone who is out of control. He's calculating, reserved, and ultimately determined not to hurt anyone. That so many people do get hurt and all his calculations start to unravel isn't his fault; he should have known better that to hatch a complicated heist plot inside an action film! Even though the ensemble cast nature of this film means Takakura doesn't get as much screen time as would be normal for a main character, what he does get he handles so well that you really get a feel for his character despite limited dialogue.

The rest of the gang isn't nearly as well developed, but as supporting players, they don't need to be. They do their jobs well, but it would have been nice to see more development of everyone's reasons for taking part in the heist. There's not much insight, though I hear the original Japanese print was considerably longer than the print currently available in the US, so maybe some of those motivations and background tidbits are lying on a cutting room floor somewhere.

Kuramochi, likewise, is fleshed out by the acting skill of Utsui Ken, who pulls off a similar feat with his limited screen appearances. We see him a lot, but most of the time, he's hunched over a radio or a control panel trying desperately to figure out one thing or another. Utsui deftly balances the feelings of determined control and mounting desperation the situation demands. Man alive, if you could staff your control room with him and Walter Matthau, you'd be able to overcome any threat.

As the final third in the division of time, Sonny Chiba has less to do than the others. As I said before, his job is primarily to sit at the controls of the train and look sweaty and concerned. In the end, he is the one saddled with the job of defusing the bomb strapped to the bottom of the train. American audiences are used to seeing Sonny do nothing but hiss and kill people, so it's nice to see a movie that highlights his under-appreciated dramatic skills. Like his character in the movie, Sonny is able to rise to the occasion and turn in an admirable performance.

The rest of the cast is pretty much what you would expect. The cops are all gruff and out for glory. The suits are all useless. The passengers on the train are prone to random displays of wild overacting as they grow increasingly agitated that bullet train Hikari-109 is messing up JNR's generally flawless record for hitting all stops on schedule. Or maybe it was the bomb that worried them. The English dub isn't bad, though it tends to be overly dramatic in some spots and a bit dull in others. They gave Sonny Chiba sort of a wussy voice, though. Look at him. Does that man look like he'd have a voice similar to Mark Hammil? Hell no. You don't see Sonny Chiba going down to the Tashi Station to pick up some power converters, and if Uncle Owen had bullied him around, Chiba would have just pulled off the yokel's yarbles then driven the bullet train through his little domed hut.

The writing delivers for the most part, though there are some admittedly weak spots here and there. While it excels at keeping a relentless pace and sense of urgency, some of the twists and turns we get are just sort of silly. Chief among them is the thing about the fire at the café where Tetsuo has hidden the instructions for defusing the bomb. It's a pretty big coincidence that the very café where the police are supposed to pick up the instructions just happens to burn down mere minutes before they get there. The fact that the captured dynamite peddler also happens to be on Hikari-109 is a bit much, but all in all, this reliance on incredibly convenient coincidences isn't enough to derail the story, which is a fairly masterful blend of cops and robbers action and control room suspense. Had they taken Pelham-123's approach and kept the plot a bit less convoluted, they would have had an even stronger movie on their hands, but as it is delivered, my grievances are minor when measured against how enjoyable the film turns out to be.

Junya Sato's direction is quite stylish. He goes in for lots of weird angles and unusual shots, and the end result is a very interesting film to look at. In the same way that Takakura Ken and Sonny Chiba in the same movie represents what was then the old school (Takakura) meeting the new school (Chiba), in Sato's direction you can see flashes of the noirish and sometimes psychedelic cinematography of the 1960s action films mixed with the often bizarre and (perhaps even unintentionally) arty style of the 1970s. All in all, though, Bullet Train feels very much like a film from the previous decade, and in an era that was notable for excess (just look at all the wild stuff going on in any karate or Godzilla film from the 1970s) and often a lack of quality thanks to dwindling budgets, it must have been refreshing, especially for older filmgoers, to get themselves a movie that retained the lost class and style of the 1960s. The 1970s saw a renaissance in film everywhere except Japan, where the industry actually did the opposite and tumbled a bit after hitting such high points throughout the 1960s.

Bullet Train doesn't have any karate action, so if you're looking for some scenes of Sonny Chiba beating the unholy hell out of people, you're going to have to look elsewhere. While there is some police action with running about, car chases, and the firing of weapons, this isn't that sort of action film either. It's a classic, old school action-suspense film. If you dig films like The Taking of Pelham-123, then you'll likely dig this. It's high on suspense, and while the plot certainly has some contrivances, it moves along at a fast-enough pace that you won't mind. It certainly never drops bellows 80 kmh.

Labels: , ,

posted by Keith at | 0 Comments