Wednesday, November 15, 2006Streets of Fire
1984, United States. Starring Michael Paré, Diane Lane, Rick Moranis, Amy Madigan, Willem Dafoe, Deborah Van Valkenburgh, Richard Lawson, Rick Rossovich, Bill Paxton, Lee Ving, Stoney Jackson, Grand L. Bush, Robert Townsend, Elizabeth Daily, Mykelti Williamson. Directed by Walter Hill. Written by Walter Hill and Larry Gross. Buy it now from Amazon.com
Somewhere on the great big globe we call home, Michael Paré is sitting down for lunch. He's glancing around the room as he takes his seat, wondering if anyone in the restaurant recognizes him. One woman, maybe in her mid thirties, glances his way and does a quick puzzled double take, as if she is trying to decide whether or not he might be someone she recognizes. But the memory is a phantom, and a second later she shakes off the feeling and returns to her conversation. As Michael Paré orders a light appetizer from the menu, the door opens, and a lean man of roughly the same age strides up to Michael's table pulls out the chair, and sits down. He, too, glances briefly around the room and thinks, perhaps, he heard someone, maybe that hipster guy sitting with a girl in the corner, say "Wasn't that guy in The Warriors?" But he can't be sure. "How's it going, Michael?" he says to Michael Paré. "All right. How are things for you, Michael?" Paré returns, for his lunch partner is Michael Beck. The two Michaels. Way cooler and more obscure than making obvious, played out jokes about the two Coreys. Michael Beck and Michael Paré -- these two guys were both pegged at the beginning of their respective careers as the next big thing. Both sported a brooding, introspective air of mystery and toughness much like James Dean. Both were good looking, but not too good looking. And they were both pretty good actors when they inhabited a certain type of character. Beck swaggered into national consciousness in 1978, clad in a leather vest and bopping his way through one gang after another as he tried to lead his Warriors back to their home turf at Coney Island. A few years later, in 1984, Michael Paré burst onto the scene in similar fashion as the mysterious 50s rocker Eddie, who may or may not have faked his own death to escape the harsh lights of fame.
Both men turned heads, and critics were thinking that these were the guys who would be ruling the 1980s. And for a while, it looked like that just might be the case. Beck was quickly cast in a couple of big-budget starring vehicles. Unfortunately, those movies were Megaforce and Xanadu, and before Beck's star had even ascended, those monumental flops sent it crashing back down to earth. Michael Paré went from Eddie and the Cruisers straight into a couple big-budget disasters of his own: the acceptable but unspectacular sci-fi time travel film The Philadelphia Experiment and the impossible to categorize subject f this review, 1984's Streets of Fire, or as it's known by it's full title: Streets of Fire: A Rock and Roll Fable. Both films have a lot in common in that they present a highly stylized, almost fairytale like vision of an urban fantasy world. Both feature outlandish gangs with only the most tenuous reflection of anything a real gang might be like. Beck's Swan and Paré's Tom Cody are both very similar men. Both men, as well as the bulk of the other characters in each film, were more symbols than they were individuals. Both movies featured a lot of violence. And perhaps not coincidentally, both Streets of Fire and The Warriors were directed by Walter Hill. It was the end right at the beginning for both men, though, through no real fault of their own. Plenty of guys had survived bad or misunderstood movies and gone on to rule the roost regardless. But not the Michaels. For some reason, their bombs were like so many anchors lashed about their necks, and they pulled the men down into the shadowy nether regions of the movie making world and cleared the way for Arnold and Sly Stallone, who somehow managed to stay superstars despite Raw Deal and Over the Top. Beck found himself toiling in the Italian action exploitation market before settling in to a steady but uninspired career playing one-off characters on television shows. Paré followed suit and ended up in the domestic direct-to-video action and sci-fi film market. Both men were all but forgotten by the people who once heralded them as the next big thing. Well, not entirely. Both Michaels would have the last laugh, in a way. The Warriors proved to be an enduring cult phenomenon, culminating in a massive explosion of popularity around 2003-2006 which saw special edition DVDs, video games, and ugly action figures hit shelves. People who had never heard of the movie were suddenly rallying around it, and on all the promotional materials, there was the visage of Michael Beck, looking proud and defiant and kind of irritated. Michael Paré, on the other hand, became one of the biggest cult stars in Japan. His popularity continues to this day, and Streets of Fire is one of the most influential films for a huge number of modern Japanese film makers, especially those working within the realm of anime. But we'll come to that in due time. Back in 1984, I saw Streets of Fire in the theater. There was no particular reason we went to see it; we were just looking for a movie, and it happened to be playing at the right time of day. I remember my reaction was that I had no real reaction. I neither liked nor hated the film, was neither bored nor excited by it. It was all just sort of weird, and a couple days later, all I could remember about the movie was some ugly guy in overalls that looked like they were made of trash bags. Oh, and some guys in grey Commodores-style suits singing about moving sidewalks Beyond that, the movie was a vast blank in my memory, and although I told people the movie was all right, I couldn't for the life of me remember what it was about. And so Streets of Fire passed from my conscience in much the same way it passed from the collective conscience of America as a whole. In general, people seemed to have tepidly complimentary things to say about the movie, but the general public couldn't really make heads or tails of the thing. Before long, it was almost entirely forgotten. And so it stayed for me for some twenty-two or so years. But starting in 2006, the name began popping up again, partially because I started listening to some podcasts about anime, and mentioning Streets of Fire was a running joke among many of them. Then I ran across the DVD and decided it was high time I got reacquainted with the movie. But from what I could remember, which was very little indeed, Streets of Fire was not a movie to be studied in the solitary confines of one's den, a glass of fine vino nobile di Montepulciano sitting within easy reach. No, this was a different sort of movie. So I invited over friends from Krel Studios and the Ninja Consultant podcast and ordered a sixty-four count of mixed hot and BBQ wings, baked beans, and dinner rolls. The remains of my "Adirondack Trail Mix" of beers from New York state microbrewery Saranac was close at hand, and The Ninja Consultants donated a bottle of Suntory shochu to the cause (which I managed to drink half of, apparently). This, I felt, was the only good and proper way to watch Streets of Fire.
The movie wastes absolutely no time letting you now exactly where you stand. Title cards announce that the film is set in "Another Time, Another Place" which is my favorite time and place. Fist pounding rock 'n' roll spills over the soundtrack, and onto the stage steps a young Diane Lane as Ellen Aim, clad in a sexy red and black dress and bathed in splashed of red and blue neon. The song, "Nowhere Fast," was written by Jim Steinman, who wrote songs for Meatloaf, so you know what to expect. He specializes in anthemic, bombastic, and dangerously catchy songs that seem to exist in some disjointed universe comprised of throwback fifties sensibilities mixed with theatrical seventies/eighties overkill. In short, there was probably no better man in the world at the time to pen the songs for Lane's rocker songstress, because Streets of Fire exists in very much the same alternative universe. The clothes are a mix of fifties styles, only more so. Everything is slightly exaggerated, sort of like what you expect from a fifties themed stage show at an amusement park. The cityscapes are all back alleys and elevated train tracks (Hill scouted locations in Chicago, then recreated them in a more stylized fashion on sets), and no one has ever heard of a car that wasn't a Studebaker. At the same time, however, the fifties style is presented within a very eighties context. Everything is drenched in flashing neon. The stage performances -- and there are several in the film -- boast a slick eighties look. And something about the fifties style seems more like the fifties as interpreted by eighties retro band The Stray Cats. Just as Walter Hill created a fantasy New York for The Warriors, so too doe she created this sort of mythical version of Chicago (though unlike The Warriors, where New York locations are central to the plot, Chicago serves as the stylistic influence for Streets of Fire but is never named as the actual location). And just like the Warriors, this movie wastes absolutely no time in clearly communicating almost every single thing you need to know about the setting. Dealing as it does in broad Americana archetypes and symbols, it only takes this pre-credit sequence to grasp the context of the film. These images -- the elevated train tracks, diners, Poodle skirts, pompadours, leather-clad biker gangs, Studebakers -- are burned into our national psyche, and they are as integral and easily identifiable icons of American mythology as the cowboy. Hill's city is a composite of every image of "the city" that appeared in the noir films of the forties. The population is comprised entirely of poodle-skirted or pompadoured rock 'n' roll fans, cops, street gangs, and smart-aleck bartenders. It always seems like it's nighttime, even during the daytime scenes. Although there are cops around, they don't seem to have much power. Whole neighborhoods are controlled by street gangs, and no one seems to have much problem with a bunch of guys running around with shotguns. It's also a city without racial divides. The Richmond -- as close to a good neighborhood as this movie comes -- seems to exist in a version of the fifties that didn't suffer from segregation (shades of the multi-ethnic street gangs in The Warriors). Since Streets of Fire is all about American symbols and myths, this makes perfect sense since we tend to see all that was cool about the era -- the style, the music, the cars -- without seeing what was bad -- specifically, segregation and a brutal response to a burgeoning civil rights movement. Streets of Fire is the fifties we wish we had -- where Martin Luther King, Jr.'s dream was a reality and people weren't divided by race.
As Ellen Aim and the Attackers burn through the opening song, the movie cuts to scenes of an arriving biker gang. Doors are flung open, and the gang stands framed in blinding white light. As the song wraps, the gang storms the stage, kidnap Ellen, and punch Bill Paxton in the face. Would you do anything less than kidnap Diane Lane and punch Bill Paxton in the face? I didn't think so. A riot breaks out. Police cars flip over, windows get smashed, and a dude gets dragged behind a motorcycle. All this before the credits even roll (or flash, as the case may be). How you will react to the entire film can be ascertained by how you react to this pre-credit sequence. If the style immediately strikes you as corny or unbelievable, then you're not going to click with the rest of the film, because like many films and shows of the eighties (I'm thinking primarily of Michael Mann productions here), the style is every bit as important to communicating the plot as the plot itself. Without the style, there would be no story here, at least not one worth watching. Without the look, this would be just another action movie. But the look is there, however, and that elevates it into the realm of a sort of pop-art fantasy film. For me, given my stylistic sensibilities and fondness for fifties rock 'n' roll, I have to say that I think this opening sequence is one of the absolute coolest scenes in any film -- rivaling Hill's previous "coolest intro ever," which was the opening sequence in The Warriors of all the gangs traveling to Van Cortland Park up in The Bronx, accompanied by Barry DeVorzon's utterly bad-ass "Warriors Theme." Structurally and stylistically, the intro of Streets of Fire is almost identical, right down to the important of the opening song and the transition to the credits. The action proper picks up during the credits, as former soldier Tom Cody (Michael Paré) shows up and beats the crap Maurizio Merli style out of a bunch of punks in a diner. Michael Paré's "blue work shirt with the sleeves ripped off" and suspenders look is equal parts goofy and tough, but like everything in this movie, it's taking a style and extending it to right about the point where the illogical extreme begins, though nothing is illogically extreme as Bill Paxton's towering pompadour. Only Ronnie Spector's hair could ever give it a run for its money. Within the first few minutes, we learnt hat Cody has been called back to town by his sister, Reva (Deborah Van Valkenburgh, the chick from The Warriors), to rescue Ellen, who also happens to be his ex-girlfriend. To accomplish this task, Cody enlists the aid of tough girl and fellow ex-soldier McCoy (Amy Madigan), and Ellen's current boyfriend and obnoxious manager, Billy Fish (a wonderfully cast Rick Moranis). And that's it. Hill keeps his plot as lean and quick-moving as a welterweight prize fighter. There's an invigorating simplicity to the events that make up the movie. If it was remade today, the kidnapping of Ellen Aim would have to be part of some giant conspiracy involving corporations and multi-national record companies, and there would be backstabbing and double-crossing and all that other needlessly complex window dressing. Not here, though. Everything is exactly as it appears. Ellen is kidnapped by biker gang The Bombers and their leader, Raven Shaddock (Willem Dafoe, brilliant as always), for no other reason that he wants her. There is no ulterior motive, and their actions are not part of a sinister bigger plot. The bad guys start out and remain bad guys; the good guys start out and remain good guys. In between, shitloads of motorcycles explode.
What I love most about this movie -- and believe me, I absolutely love this movie -- is that every single scene, every single pose, and every single line of dialog, is so expertly staged. It's like a series of themed photographs. Hill is meticulous to the point of obsession with staging and writing Streets of Fire. The dialog is stilted and phony, but in a weird way that is totally believable. It's fifties tough guy slang, but with the rapid-fire panache of the eighties, or maybe of a really good forties film noir. So really, not so much how tough guys talked as it is how we think tough guys talked, playing once again to the concept of American mythology. Hill's rock 'n' roll tough guys stand as tall and symbolic as the cowboys of a John ford western. Every line is a carefully crafted homage to the concept of rock 'n' roll rebel. It's corny in spots, but never unintentionally so -- and even though that stilted corniness may be intentional, it's never ironic or overly wink-wink the way modern films are. Hill never makes the mistake of being self-deprecating, and instead plays the material completely straight, which allows you to smirk at how over-the-top it all is while also having to admit to yourself that, regardless of all that, it's really fuckin' cool. And don't think that it's easy to stitch together a coherent script where every single piece of dialog is a one-liner. The plot of Streets of Fire makes sense, possibly because it trades in American stock characters and iconography, but the dialog also makes sense even though there is never a single actual conversation in the entire film -- and that includes scenes where characters are supposed to be having a conversation. I wouldn't be surprised if Hill created the dialog by harvesting tough guy lines from the films of the forties and fifties and reassembling them here. While you're caught up in the fun and laughter of the ham-fisted dialog, you might lose sight of just how clever and effective it is. People have lost sight of what terms like "satire" mean -- these days, it's applied to pretty much any movie that isn't very good and thus tries to deflect criticism by claiming, "it's bad on purpose! We're goofing on the whole thing." This just doesn't fly with me. A movie like Streets of Fire is a perfect example of what satire should be. Streets of Fire is definitely a satirical look at American tough guys, action films, and rock 'n' roll rebels, but it doesn't let satire get in the way of still being a damn good action film full of tough guys and rock 'n' roll rebels. A movie with such a highly stylized approach to the sets and the dialog demands an equally stylized approach to the acting, and Walter Hill has assembled a cast that executes the job to perfection. Michael Paré oozes world-weary tough guy charm. I can't imagine anyone else in the role. Ditto Willem Dafoe, in what I think might be his first major role (he'd been in a few movies the previous two years, but never in a role this meaty). Clad in black leather and the aforementioned trash bag overalls (it was pointed out to me later that they are probably leather or rubber, but I'm sticking with trash bag) and topped with the most insane ducktail hairdo ever, Dafoe's unique look is exploited to the fullest as he hisses, grins, and glares through the entire film. If Paré is the stoic man of action, then Dafoe is his equal and opposite: the evil, scenery-chewing villain -- and man, is he ever good at it. And those names! It's actually pretty hard to come up with an action hero or villain name that works perfectly without straying into the realm of silliness (just wait until I unleash Rock Slabchest on the world). But Tom Cody? You know exactly what kind of dude he is when you hear that name. Little things like that never really get noticed, but I think it's an incredible stroke of brilliance to come up with a name that is so iconic yet still within the realm of believability. And when you see Michael Paré throw off his jacket and kick ass during the credits, you can't help but nod and go, "Yep, that's a guy named Tom Cody, all right." Same with Raven Shaddock. The name is just weird enough to be cool, but not so weird that you can't imagine some guy actually having the name. And when you see Willem Dafoe in his trash bag overalls, standing in front of the flaming wreckage of a motorcycle and snarling, "I'll be coming for her…and I'll be coming for you, too," you can't help but think the same thing you thought about Tom Cody: yep, that's a guy who would be named Raven Shaddock. Only Stringfellow Hawk and Brock Samson can compete.
As good as Paré and Dafoe are, though, this movie really belongs to the supporting characters. Amy Madigan isn't just a tough chick, she's a tough chick, and once again you can't imagine her being named anything but McCoy. And Rick Moranis? Forget it! Almost everyone knows him as the lovable loser nerd guy, but cast here as a scheming, obnoxious, condescending prick, he is absolutely brilliant. He walks that line where he's just prick enough to be a prick, but not so much a prick that you don't actually like him. As with everything about this movie, Rick Moranis knows exactly how far he can go without crossing the line. I've never seen so many characters that were both completely over-the-top yet imminently believable -- once again, I imagine, because Hill and Streets of Fire play to our archetypal expectations. Moranis may have been at his funniest in Ghostbusters, but I think Streets of Fire remains the best job of acting he's ever done. Even the lesser characters in the movie have been cast with the same degree of attention. As soon as you see them, you know exactly who they are and what they're like. In small parts as the struggling band The Sorels, Stony Jackson, Grand Bush, Mykel Williams and a "mere days before his fame" Robert Townshend look every bit like The Commodores as interpreted by a 1980s sensibility. It helps that each of these actors would go on to careers that may not make them household names, but certainly made them familiar faces to people who watch a lot of movies. It works perfectly for Streets of Fire to have so many people you see and say to yourself, "Yeah, I sort of know that guy." The same goes for Richard Lawson and Rick Rossovich as the cops. You know these guys when you see them, though you might not remember from where. But you have no doubt about them as soon as they step on screen. Bill Paxton also has a small roll as...well, the same guy Bill Paxton always plays. But man, does anyone do that guy better than Bill Paxton? When you need Eddie Deezen, you call Eddie Deezen. And when you need Bill Paxton, Bill Paxton is your man. He's got that shit-eating grin, sneering attitude -- oh, he's just the one character in every movie, but he's just so damn good at it! And his pompadour here is epic. Matching Paxton is Elizabeth Daily, who you might remember from Valley Girl or Pee Wee's Big Adventure. With rare exception, she played pretty much the exact same character in all her movies, too, and she plays that character here, but she's perfect at it. Completely irritating, but not overexposed. She's there just enough for the viewer to cheer when Cody walks in, sees her, and says, "Why are you still here?" You may be wondering why I haven't gotten around to Diane Lane yet. Well, here we go. I've always thought that Diane Lane was (and still is) one of the hottest dames to ever grace a movie screen, and she's never been hotter than she is here. Unfortunately, her character, despite being the impetus for everything that happens, is really just a supporting player. She's good when she's on screen, but her character just isn't good enough to avoid being lost amid the towering symbols that surround her. Although she's not top billed, Amy Madigan is your female lead in this movie. Diane Lane is the Helen of Troy of the story. But she burns up the stage during the musical scenes. Which is as good a segue way as any into talking about the soundtrack, which is as integral to the film as everything else mentioned so far -- obviously, considering the movie is subtitled "A Rock and Roll Fable." The score itself was composed and performed by Ry Cooder, and is exactly the sort of twanging, dirty blues-country-rock hybrid you'd expect from him. It fits perfectly with the on-screen action. Cooder's score is punctuated by several pop songs, including the movie's runaway hit, "I Can Dream About You," by Dan Hartman. Hartman may look like an eighties amalgamation of that guy from A Flock of Seagulls and that guy from simply Red (it's the floppy permed bangs), but his song here is a weirdly effective and catchy embodiment of the overall style of the movie. It's definitely eighties, but there's a throwback undercurrent to it, something that suggests Motown or old Northern Soul -- a suggestion that is increased when the song is placed within the context of the film, being performed by The Sorels in their slim-cut gray suits and Wayfarer sunglasses.
Diane Lane lip synchs a couple Jim Steinman penned theater-rock numbers with vocals by frequent Steinman collaborator Holly Sherwood. Like most of Steinman's songs, "Nowhere Fast" seems like it's comprised of three catchy songs all crammed into one, and while it never became a big hit, it's still pretty good and, as mentioned way back at the beginning of this review, fist perfectly with the tone of the film. And damned if I can get through the song without getting caught up in all the fist-banging bravado. I'm a big proponent of the idea that what's wrong with rock 'n' roll these days is that there aren't enough bombastic anthems about fiery hearts and rain-streaked streets, performed by a hot lead singer banging her fist in the air. The other stand-out performance comes courtesy of a Stray Cats style retro band called The Blasters, who perform two swing-infused rockabilly numbers at Torchy's, the rough and tumble dive bar that serves as the headquarters for The Bombers. It should be pretty evident at this point just how enthusiastic I am about this film. I can't believe I let it sit dormant in the back of my memory for so many years. Besides everything mentioned above, let me just point out quickly that it's awesomely violent. Motorcycles explode, people get thrown through windows, Cody socks Ellen in the jaw, Lee Ving from the old punk band Fear socks Rick Moranis in the jaw, Amy Madigan socks Bill Paxton in the jaw, and Cody and Raven fight each other with those sledgehammer-pick axe things railroad workers and John Henry used to use. While the movie isn't nonstop action, it is fast-paced and plenty action-packed. Hill knows how to make an action film, and he's at the top of his game, here. I'd be remiss, though, if I didn't mention other essential crew members. As this is a movie where every single little part is important to creating the over-all vibe, you can't overlook the contributions of the cinematographer Andrew Laszlo (who worked with Hill on The Warriors and perfectly captures the rain-and-neon soaked fantasy landscape) and editors Jim Coblentz, Freeman A. Davies, and Michael Ripps, who expertly cut the film to keep a high-energy rock 'n' roll beat without becoming overly frenetic or jump-cut addicted the way many modern films are. Like a good rocker, they simply know how to find the rhythm that works. Streets of Fire may have been DOA at the American box office, but something about the movie clicked with audiences in Japan. It was embraced enthusiastically there, perhaps because it plays to the same sort of aforementioned American mythology as westerns, something that appeals to the pop culture impression of America in Japan. The United states and Japan have a complex relationship with each other that isn't unlike, in my opinion, the relationship we have with England (both one-time bitter enemies who have since become close allies). Like England, Japan is both instantly recognizable as something similar to the United States, but also something somewhat exotic. If we're closer and more understanding of England, it's only because we share the same language. For decades, Japan has thrived on American pop culture, just as the States have proven ravenous for many aspects of Japanese pop culture. And both countries have a highly stylized ideal of each other that is based at least as much on fantasy and pop culture perception as it is on reality -- maybe even more so. Which is why a movie like streets of Fire would play so well to a Japanese audience. It is quintessentially American without actually being an accurate reflection of what America is really like. Like westerns, Streets of Fire is pure pulp-pop culture Americana.
Plus, it's coated in a slick veneer of neon signs and cool outfits. The art design of the movie wasted no time in becoming a huge influence on the eighties anime scene in Japan. Many television shows and OAVs drew their look and inspiration from Streets of Fire -- and some went as far as to include animated versions of the film playing in the background of a scene. The opening sequence of and many other scenes from Bubblegum Crisis draws so heavily from Streets of Fire that one enterprising anime fan edited scenes from Bubblegum Crisis to the audio from the Streets of Fire trailer, and the results are amazingly similar. And tell me that the various villains in Fist of the North Star don't owe as much or more to Raven Shaddock as they do to the guys from The Road Warrior. Heck, Megazone 23 is completely blatant about the influence Streets of Fire has over it. And the Streets of Fire influence isn't limited to anime. It seems like every hip Japanese director cites Streets of Fire as an influence on their work. Watch the opening scene in Takashi Miike's Dead or Alive. Isn't it just a more violent distillation of everything that goes on in Streets of Fire? Well, whatever. In this case, the Japanese got it right, because Streets of Fire is one of the coolest movies ever made. The streamlined story and stylized hardboiled antics might cause you to miss just how artfully put-together the package is, but even if you don't spend the entire movie dissecting it, you can do what we did, which was open a few beers, eat a lot of hot wings, and howl with sheer, unbridled joy. There seem to be some quiet rumblings that might point to a revival in interest pertaining to Streets of Fire. If any movie from the eighties deserves to be rediscovered and championed, this is it, because it's rare that a movie is this much fun. And Michael Paré, if you are sitting out there with Michael Beck in some street corner diner beneath the elevated train tracks, wondering if people still remember: hell yeah, we remember. Labels: Action, Director: Walter Hill, Rock and Roll, Stars: Bill Paxton, Stars: Diane Lane, Stars: Michael Pare, Stars: Willem Dafoe, Year: 1984 posted by Keith at 5:34 PM | 11 Comments Wednesday, August 21, 2002Breakin' & Breakin' 2: Electric Boogaloo Breakin' -- 1984, United States. Starring Lucinda Dickey, Adolfo "Shabba-Doo" Quinones, Michael "Boogaloo Shrimp" Chambers, Ben Lokey, Christopher McDonald, Phineas Newborn III, Bruno Falcon, Timothy Solomon, Ana Sánchez, Ice-T. Directed by Joel Silberg. Available on DVD (Amazon).Breakin' II: Electric Boogaloo -- 1984, United States. Starring Lucinda Dickey, Adolfo "Shabba-Doo" Quinones, Michael "Boogaloo Shrimp" Chambers, Jo De Winter, Susie Coelho, Paulette McWilliams, Ice-T, Harry Caesar, Sabrina García, Peter MacLean. Directed by Sam Firstenberg. Available on DVD (Amazon). I was always a better skateboarder than I was a breakdancer, and I was a pretty awful skateboarder. Oh sure, I had some moves I could do okay. Acid drops. That thing where you do a handplant and skate up a wall and back down. Kickflips and whatever it's called when you can spin the back of the board around to the front while you're moving. I didn't read enough Thrasher to know all the names. Not bad tricks, mind you, but there was a definite limit to my skills. Any aspirations I nursed about being a good skater were dashed by my continued inability to master the ollie, the basic building block upon which the vast majority of all skating moves are built. Without that most simple of moves under my belt, I was never going to go very far beyond, say, the skills exhibited by Leif Garret in that old Skateboard movie. And while that may be pathetic, it was nothing compared to my potential as a budding breakdancer. Despite the practice, all I really had going or me was the fact that my father owned a floor covering store that afforded me to an ample supply of linoleum squares should I ever need them to facilitate random explosions of headspinning and windmills. But the fact that I went to middle school from 1983-1986 meant that regardless of my lack of skills, I was going to give it a go anyway. There was a lot about the 1980s I didn't care for even back then when it came around the first time, and there's even more I don't care for as a part of the 1980s nostalgia wave my generation is forcing upon people now that we control programming for some cable television channels. I never liked or identified with a John Hughes film or character from a John Hughes film. I don't advocate violence toward women, or toward anyone for that matter, but I always wanted to slap the self-indulgent pout off of Molly Ringwald's face. I never got into Def Leppard or any hair metal band. Despite these things, there are many other things I'll freely admit to liking no matter how embarrassing they may be. Breakdancing was cool, and it still is, like the He-Man Slime Pit and Stomper Trucks. Hell yes, I owned parachute pants. They were navy blue and gray, and they were cool. On the flip side, tying red bandannas around your ankle and thigh wasn't cool. It was stupid, but I still did it. I never owned a pair of Tretorns, but there was a brief period around 1984 or so when I could be found from time to time wearing a pastel pink Polo shirt with the collar flipped up. I never bought a sparkly Michael Jackson glove out of the vending machine at the roller rink, but I did go to the roller rink. I wasn't half bad at rollerskating, either. Of course, at the time my real focus wasn't so much on backward speed skating as it was on backward speed skating purely to impress Danielle, the young lass who occupied the role of eternal crush for most of my middle school career. I got pretty good at backward speed skating. Never did get to go out with Danielle. So it goes. I was also an okay dancer for a preteen, something that hasn't really carried over into my adult years. Not that the standards for preteen dance were all that high in rural Kentucky circa the early 1980s. As long as you could outdance Phil Collins, you were on pretty solid turf. And I could do several times better than Phil Collins. I could do the splits and that thing where you hold one leg and jump over it with the other. God help me, but sometimes I feel the urge, some twenty years after the fact, to see if I've "still got it." I don't. I know that very well, and it's not something I have to test to know. I should stick with doing that old man mambo shuffle the guys who play dominoes all day down on the corner do when they're feeling especially wild. And yet the urge remains just below the surface to bust out the old moves, and some day it's going to get the better of me. I only hope that when that day comes, someone is nearby who can stop laughing long enough to dial 911. Despite my flashy maneuvers, success in breakdancing was like success with Danielle: elusive. Try as I might, no amount of Grandmaster Flash could propel me to a successful windmill or headspin. I could spin on my back and knees, but not for very long, and you can't spin on your knees for your whole life. At some point, you have to do the robot, and you have to be able to do a fluid wave with both your left and right arms. I had the right down pat, but when it came to the left it looked more like a half-assed robot or breakdancing moves as performed by an Etch-a-Sketch drawing. I tried to better myself. I bought a book about how to breakdance. I think I got it out of the Troll Book Order thing we all used to do. Good stuff, that Troll Book Order. Scholastically sanctioned chances to purchase Choose-Your-Own-Adventure books. Unfortunately, the breakdancing book was useless, full of pointers like "To do the headspin, first assume a position standing on your head. Begin to rotate rapidly in a clockwise direction, making sure not to lose your balance." Alfonso's breakdancing video wasn't much better. They were the street dancing equivalent to those "how to draw" books where step one is a bunch of ovals in the shape of a person, and step two is a finished Boris Vallejo painting. Well, if I couldn't breakdance, I could do the next best thing, which was sit on my ass in the basement and watch breakdancing movies. Granted I kept a pretty tight schedule what with all the barbarian, ninja, and softcore Sylvia Kristel films for which I had to make time, but I was up to the task to also fitting in guys who could pop and lock and had cool names like Jagajoo and Mr. Whippie Legs. Besides, the vast majority of these films all had something in common anyway. They were all part of the universe as envisioned by the beautiful money-grubbing scum of Cannon Films, Menahem Golan and Yoram Globus. Via their Cannon Films company, the dynamic duo of Golan and Globus mercilessly and tastelessly exploited any and every trend that could be exploited, an in fact several that were probably best left unexploited. From ninja movies to an endless parade of Chuck Norris blowing stuff up, Cannon was the film company that made Dino De Laurentiis seem high class. It's fun, at least for me, to imagine that all Cannon films took place in the same world, that while Ozone and Turbo were dancing on one side of Los Angeles, Sho Kosugi was dueling with rival ninjas a few blocks away, and Chuck Norris was at LAX boarding a plane to Laos to search for American POWs still being held by the godless forces of Communism in Southeast Asia. Needless to say, when breakdancing broke in the 1980s, the boys from Israel were there to wring every sleazy dime out of the trend that they could. But their shameless greed was often our unbridled delight. Golan and Globus may have been exploiters of anything and everything, and their movies may have been cheap, but they were also generally entertaining, especially for a crew of young middle schoolers staying up late to catch them on their friend's satellite TV dish. If trends were going to be exploited, who better than Golan and Globus? At least it wasn't Roger Corman or Charles Band. It seemed at times as if Cannon was plugged directly into the brains of young America. They knew what we wanted to see, and they gave it to us in spades: boobs, bloodshed, and Chuck Norris blowing up a rice paddy. Breakdancing wasn't flogged nearly as often as other trends, such as ninjas or chuck Norris shooting at Commies and Arabs, but the few films that were made left an impression on audiences that has grown over the years. Well, most of them left an impression. Rappin' has been all but forgotten, and forgetting is an action well-suited to any movie starring Mario Van Peebles. Krush Groove has faired so-so and will probably be helped by its release onto DVD. The three most memorable films to come from the breakdance movie trend were Beat Street, Breakin', and everyone's favorite, Breakin' II: Electric Boogaloo. Beat Street was a fairly gritty and almost realistic look at life on the mean streets of New York City, where breakdancing and much of what's recognized as urban culture was born. It was, all things considered, a pretty good film. The other two films were the polar opposites of Beat Street in terms of tone, but they're just as enjoyable on a different level. They were West Coast fantasy films that bore little resemblance to reality and had as much in common with street and breakdancing as they did with the feel-good technicolor musicals of previous decades. They had a pre-tough guy image Ice T in sequin-covered shoulderpads and a derby. The movies were corny, naive, and not in the least bit in touch with the grim reality of poverty and urban decay as witnessed in Beat Street. They were neon and glitz to Beat Street's concrete and tragedy. Breakin' was West Coast, yo, and Beat Street was decidedly East. They were escapism, and sometimes that's what people want. Our urban adventure begins in Breakin', where we meet guys whose real street names (Shabba-Doo and Boogaloo Shrimp) are cooler tan their movie street names (Ozone and Turbo). Ozone and Turbo are the baddest street dancers on the boardwalk, and that's all there is to that. Some chumps from an outfit called Electro-Rock always try to start some nonsense, but Ozone is too honorable to come down to their seedy level. The third hero in our trio is Kelly, or Special K as she becomes known, played by Lucinda Dickey, who would go on to more notorious fame when she starred in another Cannon oddity, Ninja III: The Domination. As far as I was concerned, Lucinda Dickey was just about the most beautiful woman in film during the 1980s. I know many would disagree with me, but that's because they are crazy. Lucinda looked like someone's really hot older sister, and when your in middle school you can't ask for much better than a friend with a really hot older sister. You could keep your Cheryl Teagues and your Molly Ringwald and whoever else was considered to be the bombshell of the time. Christie Brinkley, I guess. For my money, you could do no better than the adorable Lucinda Dickey with her short-cropped dark hair and alluring array of slinky Danskin outfits. In fact, the only woman who could really give her a run for her money was Beat Street's own Rae Dawn Chong. When I was eleven, I was pretty sure I was going to marry one, if not both, of these women. Breakin's plot is nothing new, and it's little more than a very thin skeleton upon which to hang a bunch of song and dance numbers. It's basically Flashdancewith cooler dancing and people, and the story is one that's been used countless times since then: the classically trained student who is in a rut until she/he infuses their discipline with fresh, cutting edge moves from the street. All problems can be solved if you simply incorporate more hip hop into them. I try to remember this when I'm cooking or doing math. Julia Stiles used it for that Save the Last Dance movie, and now there's something about a guy who gives a wild hip hop edge to the school marching band. An edgy hip hop movie about the marching band? I know that playing in the marching band is hard work. I lived in the dorms with a guy who was in the University of Florida marching band, and that's the big time as far as marching bands are concerned. They were up before dawn and had a physical workout more intense than any of the ROTC guys. It was an all day thing, and yeah, it was pretty hardcore. You had to endure the physical demands and still be able to bust out a rousing rendition of "Louie Louie" during Gator Growl. But that doesn't mean I want to watch a movie, however hip hop edgy, about the marching band and more than the member of a marching band wants to watch me incorporate hip hop moves into my use of Photoshop. As far as I'm concerned, that ranks up there with the Kirk Cameron movie about the pressures and glory of a high school debate team taking the state finals, where the debate team performed in gymnasiums full of screaming fans and cheerleaders. Despite the similarity in basic stories, there are quite a few things that set Breakin' apart from Flashdance. For one, Lucinda Dickey was a real dancer and, unlike Jennifer Beals, performed all her own moves. She was even on Solid Gold for a while. Myself, I was primarily a Dance Fever man because of that slick Denny Terrio, but once I saw Lucinda Dickey shaking it for all it was worth, I was willing to endure any amount of hosting by Rex Smith, Rick Dees, or Marilyn McCoo. Breakin' also understands that most of the people who want to watch dancing are other dancers. That's not a slight on the art form of dancing, which is impressive up to the point where hirsute hippies tumble around in abstract interpretations of "The Rage of a House Cat" while grating new age music blares in the background. Certain types of dances are meant for certain audiences, and your fellow dancers are always the ones who will understand you. I always wondered how those grizzled steel mill workers in Flashdance felt when they went down to the nudie bar after a hard day's work and ended up watching a fully clothed woman perform modern dance routines. Did they appreciate the art? The passion? Or were they just pissed about the lack of titties? Breakin' gets that people like to watch breakdancing, but cheering crowds of factory workers will not rally around jazz or tap performances. Breakin' splits its time between the trials and tribulations of Kelly and those of Turbo and Ozone. Kelly is forced to part company with her lascivious dance teacher when he puts the moves on her, and I'm not talking about Riverdance moves. Thus, she's left without a troupe for the big competition. Ozone and Turbo, meanwhile, are challenged at every turn by the evil breakdancers of Electro-Rock who menace the boardwalk by getting in people's faces and performing aggressive pop 'n' lock routines. Okay, they learned the moves from Darrin's Dance Grooves, but did they miss the message??? With great pop and lock power comes great responsibility. Kelly meets Ozone and Turbo through a mutual friend in tight purple leotards. In Ozone and Turbo, she finds true friendship and guys who can teach her the moves that will help her get back at her snotty ex-teacher. In Kelly, Ozone and Turbo see her ability to add the one thing that their street performances are missing: a really hot chick. Along the way, they will have to battle the narrow-minded attitudes of the dance community establishment, tear down the barriers between people, and show us that art, love, and gay choreography can conquer all. While the plot may lift an idea or two from Flashdance, Breakin' has far more in common with something nearly as popular in urban populations as breakdancing: kungfu films. Think about it. Lucinda Dickey's character is cast out of her school after she discovers the well-respected master is actually dishonorable and corrupt. In an effort to avenge her honor and expose the sham master, she seeks the wisdom of two roguish outcast masters who can teach her the secret style that will help her on her quest. These two masters have challenges of their own tof ace, of course, which they are able to rise above with the help of their new student. A stretch? Perhaps, but remember that the greatest martial arts star who ever lived (Bruce Lee) was also the cha-cha king of Hong Kong. Breakdancing draws a lot from martial arts moves. And perhaps most convincing of all, the first street dancing scene on the boardwalk features a young Jean-Claude Van Damme in the crowd, wearing a revealing black unitard, clapping his hands and smiling like a goofball. By all accounts, Van Damme's flexibility and aptitude at the splits comes less from his proficiency with martial arts and more from his proficiency as a dancer. Of course, judging by what you see on screen during this scene, Van Damme's dancing credentials seem to be as dubious as his martial arts credentials. So it's Flashdance for the breakdancers. It's a kungfu movie in a dance movie's clothing. What else will we discover as we peel away the layers of the onion that is Breakin'? Well, we discover that it's also a utopian fantasy film that offers a vision of the future far more appealing than any of those Blade Runner dystopias or any episodes of Star Trek: The Next Generation where the utopian society requires everyone to wear burlap smocks and be really into harvesting crops while repeating the mantra, "It's a good life, captain, and we're a simple people." Everyone in Breakin' is happy and clad in an array of colorful duds. The villains prefer to limit their evil to acts of evil boogalooin', and conflicts are settled through dancing. Everyone lives together with no hint of racial strife. Black, White, Hispanic, and even that Belgian guy all get along. Tough street dancers with banana-shaped earrings get along just fine with gay modern dance guys in package-revealing lavender leotards. In the world of Breakin', all that matters is the art, and the art can overcome anything. Compare that to Beat Street's far grittier vision of urban street life where people stab each other and die. In Breakin', the weather is always perfect, and the sun always shines. In Beat Street, it always seem overcast, gray, and chilly. Granted this was partly because the makers of Beat Street had to film through a bleak New York winter for a summer release date, while Breakin' enjoyed the balmy year-round warmth of southern California. Breakin' is all dayglo pants, mesh tanktops, and spritefully colored neon leotards hugging Lucinda Dickey's perfect curves. Beat Street is all denim and leather and dingy winter jackets. Boogaloo Shrimp wears sparkling surplus marching band coats, while Ramon in Beat Street just owns one of those dull olive drab surplus army jackets. Beat Street features hardcore raps from Grandmaster Flash about fighting The Man and dying in the gutter, while Breakin', other than a few "party people" raps from Ice-T, features music that skirts dangerously close to disco. I don't Know if Ice T was responsible for his own material, but if he was, he should be held as accountable for that as Pantera should be for that pretty boy glam metal album they made and pretend not to know anything about. Oh sure, you act all tough now, but I've seen you in your lipstick and spandex making pouty Molly Ringwald lips at the camera, just like I've seen Ice T in a shiny derby looking like Judy Garland meets Rollerball. The end result was that Beat Street, while being the better and more ambitious film, was also a box office dud. Breakin' was a huge hit, and it's following has grown as its status as one of the great cult films of the 1980s has worked wonders for its enduring popularity. And that's not a bad thing, because despite what you might think, this isn't a bad movie. Indeed, Beat Street doesn't get the respect it deserves, but the respect paid to Breakin' isn't undeserved. Does it look dated? Sure, but what's wrong with that? It was a snapshot of a particular time and crazy culture. Why shouldn't it look dated? What Breakin' lacks in realism it more than makes up for with enthusiasm from all sides. No one in the cast was very experienced with acting. Lucinda, Shabba-Doo, and Boogaloo Shrimp were all dancers with minimal exposure to acting, and each one of them manages to overcome their limitations through the use of ample energy and charm. The supporting cast is there mostly to smile and dance, or snarl and dance, or just be gay and dance. There's really nothing wrong with any of the performances, and besides, the real star of the movie is the dancing. And there's plenty of dancing to be had. Jazz dancing, breakdancing, combinations of forms, and even some odes to classics like Fred Astaire and Gene Kelly. Witness, as an example, Boogaloo Shrimp's late-night boogaloo with a broom. Astaire all the way, complete with Shabbo-doo making a reference to Astaire. The breaking on display is primarily West Coast in nature, which makes sense seeing as the movie is set in Los Angeles. Like different styles of kungfu, East and West coast breaking had a few notable differences. East coast style was defined by aggressive, almost fight-like moves and acrobatics. Head spins, windmills, things like that were primarily products of the East Coast. The West, on the other hand, favored boogaloos, robot moves, and things like that. Less aggressive, more fluid, but just as impressive. East Coast was wushu, and West Coast was tai chi. Naturally, each style used elements from the other, and it all came from a few sources. The coolest seeds from which the breakdancing plant sprung were James Brown with his electric slide and Michael Jackson back before his face fell off and he still had an afro. Jackson introduced a dance called The Robot, which was quickly co-opted by, of all things, New York street mimes. Believe it or not, the mimes are where much of modern breakdancing originated. Groups of kids in New York would see these mimes performing these robotic moves, and before too long they were incorporating them into dance. I know it doesn't sound as street tough to trace breakdancing back to mimes, but what can you do? I mean, mimes have to be good for something after all. The influence of martial arts and gymnastics soon gave birth tot he more flamboyant moves in breakdancing, and the next thing you know, we're all wearing parachute pants and listening to "Rockit" by Herbie Hancock. See, you never thought I'd be a wealth of historical breakdancing information, did you? Let that be a lesson to you. I'm full of unexpected shit. Don't try to figure me out, baby. I'm a labyrinth, and if you wander in too deep, you'll never find your way out of my leafy green corridors. Maybe some day, if you're lucky, I'll tell you some stuff about Aaron Burr or Funkadelic. Breakin' is fun. It's goofy, but it's fun. It has a certain charm to it. After all, how often these days do kids get "role models" in the movies, or movies that push a positive message? Movies like Breakin' and The Last Dragon may seem silly in retrospect, but you'd be surprised to know that they were actually somewhat effective in influencing kids to stop being such pricks. As corny as they may sometimes seem, kids really did respond to positive role models. At least some did, which is better than none. You know me. I watched porno and gore films at an early age, and I still do it from time to time. Well, not porno, because that would be wrong. Those films are in my library purely for research purposes. So anyway, I'm not one of those media watchdog types who thinks everything should be wholesome and kind. At the same time, I'm not an idiot, and I think marketing things like Grand Theft Auto and sexually explicit songs and movies to youngsters is despicable. And it's no fun, to boot. Kids should have to work for their porno. When I was young, we had to make do with glamor photography books or hide Penthouse inside Dragon magazine. I don't think Hollywood is the place for people to find role models, but int he absense of parents who give the slightest damn about the responsibility of being a parent, children will turn to all they have left, and most of that comes from film and television. So no, Hollywood doesn't have to provide kids with positive role models, but they should want to anyway. We sure could use a Shabba-Doo or Bruce Leroy or a Grandmaster Flash now. Sorry to go all old man on you folks, but the youth of America are a real tragedy, and while we can shake our heads at them and their shocking lack of intelligence and responsibility, the blame ultimately swings back around to us. My generation has proven to be a rotten bunch of parents who demand the right of parenthood while refusing to accept the responsibility. If "the kids" are stupid, it's because we made them that way. We let them grow up dumb and undisciplined. If they can't turn to their parents, if their community leaders are doing crack with a hooker in a sleazy motel, then where do they turn? Pop idols. And look at the pop idols we give them. The elder generation always sits around in their rocking chairs on the front porch and complains about how the younger generation is going to destroy us. If that happens, then my generation will have created its own Frankenstein's monster. This may seem an unevenly heavy trip to lay at the feet of everyone in the midst of a Breakin' review, but the fact of the matter is that I really feel sorry for kids today. They are given the choice of idiotic drivel or hateful rage, and no one is there to teach them about reality and responsibility. They don't even have simple, harmless fun like Breakin'. Breakin' was directed by Joel Silberg, who up until this point had worked primarily as a director on movies over in Israel. He'd go on to direct two more Cannon Films stabs at exploiting the dance world -- 1990's Lambada: The Forbidden Dance and the aforementioned forgettable Rappin'. Shabba-Doo and Boogaloo Shrimp made decent careers for themselves via guest appearances. Shabba-Doo even parlayed his success in these films into a career as a dancer with someone very nearly as adept as Golan and Globus at exploiting street trends for her own monetary gain: Madonna. Shabba-doo also had a part in Lambada, but had nothing to do with another attempt by Cannon to cash in on a dance craze, 1988's Salsa. Lucinda went on to do a couple more films before retiring and getting married to some guy who went on to become a producer for the show Survivor. Before any of that, however, the end credits of Breakin' promise us there's more crazy dance action on the way in a sequel. They must have foreseen the success of Breakin', because less than a year later, Golan and Globus returned with a new offering that would become one of the most recognizable titles in film history: Breakin' II: Electric Boogaloo. This time out, they tapped Cannon Films workhorse director Sam Firstenberg, the man who directed such films as Revenge of the Ninja, Ninja III: The Domination, the first two American Ninja films, and some of the Delta Force movies, among others. The trio of stars that carried the first film return for the sequel, which is set a few months after the triumphant close of part one. Ozone and Turbo are teaching down at the local community center, while Kelly is on the road to getting a major part in a dance production based in Paris. When the forces of greed conspire to tear the community center down to make room for a new shopping center, Kelly, Ozone, and Turbo unite to fight The Man the best way they know how: by getting everyone to dance, dance, dance! Electric Boogaloo is notable different from the first in a few key areas. First of all, it concentrates more on character development, at least to a degree. We get to meet Kelly's rich parents, who naturally disapprove of her hanging out with riff raff who wear plastic overcoats and Civil War caps. Will Kelly give up a career in Paris to help her friends fight the good fight? We also meet Ozone's vindictive ex girlfriend with big hair, who has it in for Kelly. And Turbo falls in love with a dangerously cute Hispanic chick who can't speak a word of English but does understand the international languages of romance and dancing. Rodance, I guess you'd call it. Plus, there's the whole community center plot, which is a complete throwback to the 1970s when every community center in the inner city was going to be torn down by the Mafia or city council unless the neighborhood's dancers/singers/roller skaters/karate students banded together to stop it. Nothing original, of course, and they're still using that plot to this day, but once again the energy and charisma of the cast more experienced with dancing than acting elevates the mundane plot and makes it all a lot of fun. This time around, the feel of old musicals is even more evident, as entire neighborhoods join together in song and, in one scene, the singing and dancing of our young heroes in a hospital heals the invalid and even brings a dead man back to life as sexy nurses in miniskirts shake what their mamas gave them. The power of friendship and dancing can stop bulldozers, save the children, and make grumpy old white men donate thousands of dollars to the cause before breaking out into lame "old white guy" dance moves. Boogaloo Shrimp once again has the standout scene when he does one of those "dancing on the ceiling" bits in a rotating room that, I have to admit, looks really cool. It was done later and with fewer impressive backspins and windmills by Lionel Ritchie. There's also a great scene that proves my kungfu movie theory when Ozone, Turbo, Kelly, and the kids from the Miracles Community Center (incidentally, they use the "We need a miracle" line one time too many) face off against the evil breakdancers (who, of course, join the heroes in the struggle at the very end) in a combination of kungfu moves and breaking that I guess was known as combat dancing. At least, that's what they called it in that Rooftops movie. Yeah, y'all thought I forgot about that one, didn't you? Our three leads acquit themselves well. While the spoken acting is uneven from time to time, the acting they do with their bodies is consistently top notch. And all things considered, the spoken acting isn't that bad. Lucinda Dickey looks just as cute and charming this time around as she did last time. Ozone has to play the "You don't understand the streets, and you don't understand me" card a couple times to many, but it's balanced out by Boogaloo Shrimp's performance as the impish street dancer who is discovering that his love for a cute Latina lass may be just as important to him as the dancing. There's a scene that is equal parts hilarious and disturbing when Ozone tries to teach Turbo the finer points of romancing a woman, which culminates in them fighting over a life-sized stuff female doll (we're better off not wondering why they owned that) which Turbo pretends is the Hispanic girl and Ozone pretends is Kelly. After they tear it to shreds, they laugh a hearty manly laugh and simply dance together before coming to their senses and doing that, "Get away from me, you homo!" double-take. The added complexity of Breakin' II: Electric Boogaloo could have torpedoed the movie. This is, after all, the type of movie that should be kept simple. Luckily, it works out well, and Breakin' II: Electric Boogaloo stands up just as well as the original, if not a little bit better thanks to the title. Part two's attempt to inject more social issues into the movie brings it closer to the more socially and politically charged films like Beat Street or, say, Monkey Hustle, which shares the same basic plot but features Yaphet Kotto running around in a suit all The Sting style while Rudy Ray Moore wears a chest-revealing gold jumpsuit and yells "Kick they aiy-ess!" But even more than the many other movies with the same plot, Breakin' II: Electric Boogaloo paints a multi-cultural picture where anything -- race, class, gender -- can be overcome by friendship and an impressive boogaloo. Naive, yes, but since we're in the middle of "cynical overload" here in the early 21st Century, I can't help but appreciate the innocence of the sentiment. Sometimes I have to wonder why these city council types always try to tear down these run-down but big-hearted community centers. Don't they know their metropolitan machinations are going to result in an ass whuppin' from Ozone, Rudy Ray Moore, and Black Belt Jones? All things considered, as a white kid from a rural town, I should have identified more with Footloose, but I always thought that movie was stupid, especially the part where all the religious kids who had never danced in their lives were able to bust out the wild moves all of a sudden. Yeah, I can accept Turbo dancing across the ceiling and making a broom float, and I can accept the notion that breakdancing and love can change the world, but my suspension of disbelief cannot be extended to buying Chris Penn as a slick man on the dance floor. Plus, lets face it, Lucinda Dickey was much cuter, and Turbo and Ozone were much cooler. With the Breakin' movies, it didn't matter what color you were. Everyone was welcome to wear awful clothes and have a good time. I'm not really sure how these films play to people who didn't experience them the first time around. They were big deals ac in the day, and that certainly colors my opinion of them. I can embrace them without having to save face by saying, "they're so cheesy they're cool" or any of those other post-modern condescending things that people regurgitate to make themselves feel better about liking something that might be the slightest bit silly. You folks know me. I like the movies because I like them; not because they're so bad they're good or because of any sense of irony. Breakin' and Breakin' II: Electric Boogaloo are simply feel-good, fun-loving musicals with a charismatic cast, fabulous dancing, decent music, and a positive message about believing in yourself, believing in your dreams, accepting others, and the joys of dancing up the walls of your pad in order to impress cute Hispanic girls. It's a shame too many people are too self-conscious to simply cut loose and enjoy themselves. Breakin' and Breakin' II: Electric Boogaloo offer something, like The Last Dragon, that kids don't get very much of these days: good, clean, innocent fun. And a guy named Boogaloo Shrimp. Labels: B-Masters Roundtable, Musicals, Studio: Cannon, Year: 1984 posted by Keith at 12:27 AM | 0 Comments Thursday, January 24, 2002Conan the Destroyer
1984, United States. Starring Arnold Schwarzenegger, Grace Jones, Wilt Chamberlain, Mako, Tracey Walter, Sarah Douglas, Olivia d'Abo. Directed by Richard Fleischer. Available on DVD (Amazon).
With the success of Conan the Barbarian, a genre was born. Nay, not a genre -- a lifestyle! Both Scott and I have fond memories of how these early 1980s barbarian movies shaped our lives, taught us the skill of pretending to be asleep so you can sneak in some cable TV watching, honed our talent for watching R-rated movies through the wavy lines of a scrambled premium channel. These days, they just blank it out entirely, which is sad. Where is the opportunity for victory, to meet the challenge head-on? How will kids these days train their eyes to filter out the flicker, to jiggle the switch on the cable box until you find a position that actually makes the channel come in relatively clearly? Gone are these days, blown away like sand by the winds of memory. They are, like the days of ancient barbarians themselves, merely things of the past. Gone is the thrill, the feeling of empowerment that came from being ten years old and figuring out a way to jeuryrig a cable box so that we could catch a glimpse of barbarians, boobs, and bloodshed. Damn the digital era! The days of analog were so much more adventurous. I'd like to point out that I grew up watching horribly violent and sometimes perverse films. I saw men run through on spears, heads lopped from their neck in great sprays of blood. I saw medieval orgies, monsters, and every form of brutality low-budget films could throw at me. And you know what? Not once, even during my days of punk rock persecution in high school, did I entertain the thought of killing anyone. Not once did I get the impression that it was okay to shoot my sister with a triple-bladed flying sword. Not once did I think anything at all in the movies was even remotely real. I don't want to get into a debate about whether or not violent films breed violent people, but I do want to point out that if you're not insane in the first place, and you learn the difference between right and wrong, strength and weakness, real and make-believe, it's generally fairly easy not to go on a killing spree as a result of a book, movie, or anything short of a Slayer record, which of course, always overpowers me with the might of Big Sugardaddy Lucifer. I also played Dungeons and Dragons in middle school and high school, which is why I know about Keep on the Borderlands and can reference it whenever the opportunity arises. And I never forgot that it was just a game and I wasn't really a dwarf with a magic hammer plus two. So as a public service announcement from Teleport City, let me tell all our young readers that movies are not real except for Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai. And if it is a movie based on a true story or actual person, then it's probably doubly untrue. Anyway, with the barbarian horde of imitators that followed in the sandaled footsteps of Conan, it seemed only natural that the makers of the first film would attempt a sequel. But right away, there were problems. For starters, the first film was so good because it had a huge budget (for the time) and a good director in John Milius. The guy helped write films like Apocalypse Now and Jaws. The first film also had the writing talents of Oliver Stone, who frankly, I think sucks as a director but does have some sort of writing talent buried deep within his drug-fried brain. For this sequel they scored director Richard Fleischer, whose last two movies were the lame Rocky rip-off Tough Enough (not to be confused with the Fabulous Thunderbirds song that was popular around the same time) and the abysmal Amityville 3D. There's no doubt that the man has fantasy film credentials, having done such films as 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea and Fantastic Voyage, but what do those films have in common that they don't have in common with Conan the Barbarian? That's right, they're Disney (or Disney-like) family adventures, not gory barbarian movies. Don't get me wrong, the man's done some good films, even some great ones, but it's all pretty tame compared to what people expect from sword and sorcery films. It's like hiring John Woo to direct slapstick comedies ... oops, they did that already, didn't they? Or how about Lucio Fulci directing a children's film ... oh yeah, White Fang. Or Roland Emmerlich to direct anything. Uh-oh. Okay, so the world is full of stupid ideas. Also working against the film was the taming of the barbarian genre. While the early days were highlighted by horrific gore, nudity, and brutality, by the time Conan the Destroyer limped onto the scene, things were settling down and expected to be PG-13. The days of high adventure were becoming complex and civilized. Bah! Since Arnold Schwarzenegger was becoming a household name no one could spell, he was interested in softening the brutality of the film as well. Face it, barbarians should not be family friendly. I mean, they storm your home and everything. They burn it down, dance on the ashes, and pillage your neighborhood. There's nothing family friendly about that. Of course, Arnold did make Commando a year later, which remains his goriest, most violent film to date. It also features the highest number of guys with automatic weapons shooting at a huge slow-moving guy in a wide open space yet still missing him by a Kentucky mile. Still, if you haven't seen Commando, as silly as it is, you should, because it's really one of the last over-the-top violent mainstream movies to have squeaked by before the days of censorship (or at least severe pressure) set in. In order to pull off family-friendly barbarians (and yes, I know that only a warped individual like myself would consider this movie family fare, but try to keep it in perspective based on what the first film was like), the writers decided to ditch the relatively serious epic feel of the first film and churn out a quick slapstick comedy that works more as a spoof of Conan than an actual movie. Gone are the cool sidekicks like Valeria and Subotai. In their place are a bunch of comic relief jokers lead by Tracey Walter, best known at the time as Frog from the short-lived television show Best of the West. The supporting cast also includes Grace Jones, whose popularity will forever be one of the great mysteries of the 1980s. Mako returns as the wizard, but he's played up for even more laughs than before. Gone too are the cool villains. There is no James Earl Jones with his booming voice leading an army of Spinal Tap looking warriors. It's actually uncanny just how much the two main warriors fighting for Thulsa Doom look like members of Spinal Tap. In their place we get a rather bland Wilt Chamberlain and a standard issue evil queen with a British accent. Wilt wasn't originally supposed to be in the movie, but when they couldn't find another bodybuilder with enough acting skill to stand against the might that is Arnold, they went with Wilt, which is certainly better than, say, Kareem Abdul-Jabar or Larry Bird. Wilt took time out from scoring 30,000 points in basketball and scoring with 20,000 women in bed to make this movie, and even though his character is dull as dishwater, he does a fair job with what he's given. What I want to know is why, with all the bodybuilders running around in loincloths during the early 1980s, they couldn't find one to be in this movie. I mean, sure they weren't good actors, but the Bambaata character has maybe half a dozen lines, and the rest is just swinging a big pick ax thing and wearing a nine-foot-long Bob Marley wig. About the only thing this film did right was cast Arnold in the lead role once again, and snag Basil Poledouris to do the soundtrack, though his work here, while good, falls leagues short of his majestic, powerful score for the original film. We begin with Conan and his comedy sidekick Malak (Walter) praying at the stone alter Conan built to honor Valeria, his one true love who was killed in the first film. They are set upon by a group of warriors who, of course, get soundly thrashed. The movie tips its hand right away, as this fight is a far cry from the blood-drenched, realistic fight scenes in the first film. Instead, it's a fight scene apparently choreographed by the same people who did a lot of the Monkees fight scenes. Of course, it turns out to be a test to "see if Conan is as good as they say he is." You know, people always have that test, and the guy is always as good as they say, and it results in like half a dozen guys getting killed just to test out a theory. They could do something like, "I need to know if you are as good as they say you are. Here, fight this gorilla in unarmed hand to hand combat," and if he can beat the gorilla, then he's probably pretty good. If he can't beat the gorilla, then kill him and let the gorilla go on your quest. The warriors are lead by a beautiful queen named Tamaris, and right away you can tell she's evil because she has an attractive but pointy face and speaks in a British accent even though no one else has a British accent. Conan has his Austrian accent of course, but that's not a sure sign of evil unless he also has a monacle. Queen Tamaris is played by Sarah Douglas, who has a pretty long career in cult films, appearing such hits as Quest of the Delta Knights, Puppetmaster III, Beastmaster II, and more recently as the snotty military woman in Return of the Living Dead III. She's probably best known for kicking Superman's ass while being much sexier than the hoarse-voiced, chain-smoking Lois Lane as played by Margot Kidder in Superman II. During the 1980s, if you needed a beautiful and treacherous woman, Sarah was your man. So to speak. Her primary henchman is Bambaata, played by the towering lover of ten thousand women, Wilt Chamberlain. Despite the fact that the two guys who played the main henchmen in the first film didn't utter a line (actually, I think one of them says, "You! Raaaaaarrrr!" at one point), they seem far more interesting and developed than Wilt's character here. She wants to hire Conan, the legendary king of thieves, to steal a precious jewel. How can you be known far and wide as the king of thieves? I mean, if everyone knows you're a thief, then you're obvious not very good at it. Shouldn't they not know who the king of thieves is? It's like if everyone knew you were an assassin, well then you wouldn't get very far in your profession. I don't know. I'm not really a king of thieves, so I am not sure how the whole thing works. Conan is a lot nakeder in this film than he was in previous films, relying primarily on his loin cloth over the old leather britches and furs from the last film. I know Arnold's buff and shiny, but strutting to and from in nothing but a nutsack doesn't give you many places to hide all the valuables you should be stealing as acting king of thieves ... unless those stories about what steroids do to your "manhood" are true, in which case I guess Conan has ample room in his loin cloth for a sapphire or two. But I'm not going to be the one to walk up to Arnold, no matter what he's wearing, and ask him if he has a shriveled pee-pee. Conan and Malek are to accompany Bambaata and the young Princess Jehnna on the quest. Jehnna is played by Olivia d'Abo. Devastatingly cute, of course, and best known for her role on the television show The Wonder Years as the wannabe hippy older sister, but about as interesting as, well, to be fair, the princess in the last movie. Beautiful young princesses were a dime a dozen back in the old days. The big difference is that in the first film, the princess wasn't a main character and only had about two-minutes of on-screen whine time. Olivia goes on for the entire film. Tamaris' real plan is to use the jewel to resurrect their god, Dagoth (an actual ancient god, by the way), with Jehnna serving as the virgin sacrifice along the way. Conan really isn't into the job, being a man of the world and all who likes to trod the lands of the earth beneath his sandaled feet, or something like that. But when the queen promises to reincarnate Valeria, Conan is snared. Hey, no one ever accused the guy of being a genius. he probably falls for that "watch me remove my thumb" trick also. "What sorcery is this that lets you take the tip of your thumb off?!?!" Conan's first order of business is to hook up with his old friend Akiro the wizard (Mako), who is about to be eaten by cannibals in yet another comedy bit that hearkens back to some of the finer jungle adventures of Betty Boop. This is pretty weird since Richard Fleischer is the son of Max Fleischer, the creator of such things as ... Betty Boop! Then it's off to a town where they pick up yet another member of the team, the warrior(ess) Zula (a scrawny Grace Jones). Jones, with all the muscular presence of a pipe cleaner, is a far cry from the warrior woman Valeria played by Sandahl Bergman in the first film. At least Sandahl could believably kick someone's ass. Grace Jones will forever be a waifish Stuio 54 loser puttering around on a Honda scooter with Adam Ant. Hollywood has a long history of wanting to feature a physically strong female character then casting a 90-pound model in the role. It looks goofy every time. Kylie Minogue as a street fighting bad-ass? Pencil-thin Milla Jovovich as a kungfu powerhouse? At least Lucy Lawless has a little meat on her to make the ass kicking believable. Maybe if they ever make a third Conan film, they can cast the WWF's Chyna in the lead female role. I already hear they're considering the WWF's Rocky Maivia for the role of Conan. Again, the entire entourage is there for comic relief. Sometimes it's funny, sometimes it's not, but it's certainly not as interesting or effective as the trio of Conan, Subotai, and Valeria from the first film. They were all developed and likeable. This time around Conan is almost a supporting character, and at the forefront of the action are a bunch of insufferably annoying comedy characters. The princess is grating, Malak is annoying, Wilt is just plain dull, and Grace Jones spends the movie shrieking like a wild woman. But maybe at this point I should just stop comparing it to the first film, because there is really no point. One is an epic adventure film, the other is a modest costumed comedy. Now that we have the children assembled, we can finally begin the field trip. Things immediately go awry when the princess is kidnapped by a wizard who turns into an animated bird made of mist. It's a pretty cool special effect, but it leads to the worst effect in the film, which we'll come to shortly. Conan and crew invade the wizard's crystal castle, which culminates in the wizard turning into one of the monsters from the Power Rangers. Seriously, this special effect looks on par with what I was pulling off at the time, and I was twelve years old. It looks like a halloween mask you'd buy at Wal-Mart. Part of what made the first film interesting was that the whole sorcery thing was downplayed and very much in the background. Sure, there was a weird sexy witch Conan had to sex up, and James Earl Jones did turn into a snake, but for the most part the movie drew its strength from the characters and the human bloodshed. This time it's a lot more fantastical and, as a result, a lot goofier. Anyway, Conan beats the monster in a very lame fight. Hooray. They snag the magic jewel from the wizard's castle, which Conan then learns will be used to unlock yet another treasure, a sacred horn. This is the point where Billy Dee Williams would go, "This deal keeps getting worse," but Conan's thoughts are more along the lines of, "Conan like peanuts," and "Hmm, fire hot!" When Conan is attacked by the queen's own elite guard in a nearby forest, he begins to get suspicious. Luckily, he's dumb as toast. While recovering from the battle, Conan gets drunk and utters one of the few genuinely funny lines in the whole film. Jehnna: "I suppose nothing hurts you." Conan: "Only pain." Okay, so they have their comedy bit and can now use the gem they took from the Power Rangers monster to get the sacred Horn of Dagoth. Akiro reads the writing on the wall (literally) and discovers that Dagoth is actually a right angry god who will destroy the world if brought back to life. Conan is only interested in reviving his lost Valeria. Some more sword fodder and another wizard show up to prevent them from taking the horn, resulting in another one of the funnier moments in the film, when Conan interrupts the philosophical debate between the wizards by shouting "Enough talk!" then throwing his knife into some guard's neck (bloodlessly, of course). Conan and company escape the wizard and his useless elite guard -- does anyone have an elite guard that is actually any good? -- but are soon betrayed by Bombaata, who grabs the horn and the princess (by all accounts, Wilt is well versed in the art of grabbing virgins and large sticky-up phallic things), then leaves Conan and everyone else trapped in a cave. Of course, Conan is this huge guy, so he doesn't really have a hard time moving the rocks out of the way. At this point, you can amuse yourself by pretending it's actually Conan O'Brian wearing the loin cloth and fighting Wilt Chamberlain. Or that it's Andy Richter. By this time, even Conan has figured out that Tamaris probably isn't going to actually bring Valeria back from the dead, so he and his merry band ride to Shadazar, the realm of Queen Tamaris, where they have some more comedy before finally having the big battle. It's a pretty big let-down for the most part, after the cool and gory battle that ended the original film. Oh wait, I was going to not compare the two, right? Okay, so anyway, Conan fights Bambaata, then has to fight the resurrected Dagoth, who is a pretty cool looking toothy monster. I guess they spent all the money on Dagoth, which is why that other monster looked so silly. Still, considering he is a two-legged monster that stands about fifteen feet tall and can only kill you by tearing you apart or chewing on you, I really don't see how he's going to plunge the entire world into chaos and darkness. Sure, you wouldn't want to meet him in a dark alley or a wrestling ring, but on the grand scale of things, it's going to take a single monster of average size decades to plunge even a single realm into darkness, let alone the whole world. It doesn't really matter that Dagoth will never actualize his goal, will never conquer the millions he was supposed to -- sort of like most internet companies -- because Conan is there to kick the god's ass anyway (if only Conan was present here in Silicon Alley kicking some stupid dotcom CEO ass). so he beats the monster, saves the princess, and kills all the evil people who were in need of killing. He manages to ditch his entire band of clowns by getting them posh government jobs with Jehnna's new, not evil regime. It probably makes Conan pretty happy that he can unhitch these jokers and get back to doing some serious trekking. Conan himself is offered a position of power next to Jehnna, but this is Conan, and he must trod the lands of the earth beneath is sandaled feet and all that. And as with the last film, this one ends with a promise of more adventures to come. We're still waiting. I've been pretty rough on this film, primarily because it was such a disappointment after the first film. There was really no reason to spoof the character and sell it as a sequel, but they did. Taken on it's own, the movie is a mildly amusing goofball adventure that fails to really generate much interest in itself. The characters are silly to annoying, the action is tame and uninteresting, and the music falters in many spots. It does have the same basic structure as an old sword and sandal film, but by the 1980s, we expected more blood and guts from our barbarians, and this film's attempts to be a PG adventure film undermine it. It's too "barbarian" to appeal to your average family, and it's too weak to appeal to heavy metal fans. Not everything in the film is horrible. There are a few funny moments, and the monster at the end is pretty cool, but for the most part, this is a sequel that shouldn't have been made. Still, it's much better than Red Sonja, but so is grabbing tacos out of a deep fryer. As you burn your hand beyond recognition, all you can think is why are there tacos in the deep fryer. Maybe they could deep fry has-been 1980s one-hit wonder Taco... Anyway, enough about deep frying tacos. Taken as a stupid comedy that has more in common with a Screaming Mad George film than Conan the Barbarian, Conan the Destroyer is a harmless way to waste ninety minutes of your life. Placed in the context of a sequel to Conan the Barbarian, this film is pretty miserable and cheap looking. Sure, it's not Deathstalker III miserable, and it's still a lot better than watching an Ator marathon, but the whole thing is just, well, disappointing. I hear it's mroe in tune with the kiddie-friendly Marvel comic book than the old pulp novels, and you can probably guess which one I prefer. I just don't think barbarian films should be family fare. I mean, kids have Pagemaster and all that shit. Leave our bloody barbarian movies alone! I don't watch the Disney cartoon Sword in the Stone and demand more orgy scenes. But I guess by 1984, the Reagan era was in full swing, wildly violent action films were fast dying off unless they involved the slaying of Commies. Rumors of a third Conan film are almost as persistent as rumors about a second Buckaroo Banzai film or a fourth George Romero living dead film. Given the downward spiral Arnold's career has taken with his last several movies, it might be easier now to entice him back into the role one last time. However, recent rumors about a third Conan film have the WWF wrestler Rocky Maivia taking on the role. This is all speculation as far as I can tell, but either way, it's unlikely that a third Conan film would be very good given the current trend of infusing 21st century in-your-face wit and "cleverness" into characters from times long ago. A new Conan film would be about as similar to the original as, say, the big-budget remake of The Mummy was to the original. Something about Conan battling tons of computer animation and probably doing that thing where they jump and are frozen in mid-air so the camera can rotate around them (when the hell are people going to get tired of that effect? You'd think after it showed up in a TGI Fridays commercial, it was over and done with, but X-Men seems to use it in every other scene) isn't pleasing. Perhaps Conan is best left trodding the earth and all that. Conan the Destroyer was silly enough to signal the end of the sword and sorcery genre, just as Conan the Barbarian was cool enough to signal the beginning. I guess in a way, that is fitting. Dozens more sword and sorcery films were made even after Conan the Destroyer destroyed the genre's coolest character, but those were stragglers that mostly ended up going direct to video, not unlike the legion of glam metal bands that came around in, say 1988, and just missed the boat. In a way, Conan the Destroyer is the Danger Danger or Enuf z'nuf of the sword and sorcery world. But that is another story... Labels: Director: Richard Fleischer, Fantasy: Sword and Sorcery, Stars: Arnold Schwarzenegger, Year: 1984 posted by Keith at 5:07 PM | 0 Comments Wednesday, August 01, 2001Silent Night, Deadly Night
1984, United States. Robert Brian Wilson, Starring Lilyan Chauvin, Gilmer McCormick, Toni Nero, Britt Leach, Nancy Borgenicht, H.E.D. Redford, Linnea Quigley, Leo Geter, Randy Stumpf, Will Hare, Tara Buckman, Charles Dierkop. Directed by Charles E. Sellier Jr.
Although I'm a huge fan of horror, I'm not so hot on slasher films. Oh sure, I like the original Halloween, but that's like saying Curly is your favorite Stooge, or Curly is your favorite Globe Trotter. Who doesn't feel that way? But with precious few exceptions, I have very little patience with slasher films despite having cut my b-movie teeth on them as a lad during the late 1970s and early 1980s, the golden age of such films. When it comes to horror, give me a good ghost or zombie film any day, or even a bad ghost or zombie film. With the recent glut of teen slasher films to hit the market in the wake of gratingly annoying Scream, things have been made even worse. Now you have to endure not only the age-old slasher formula, but you have to watch it being done with a ludicrously obvious "aren't we so clever" style of self-referentialism. Ha ha ha, sure it's a bad movie, but we all know it's bad, and because we tried to make a bad movie, and the movie is bad, it must be a good movie. Such is the reasoning in this era where any piss-poor flop of a movie will be repackaged as "witty satire and spoofing," and suddenly your hunk of head cheese is "smart and cutting edge." About the only thing that could make the slasher films of the 1990s tolerable is if one of them was about a fed-up horror fan hunting down and killing everyone who ever had any involvement in Scream and it's seemingly infinite number of clones. Yep, that means you, to, Wes Cravens. You think we've forgotten that you not only gave us Scream, but also have titles like Shocker to your credit as well? Slasher films have always been pretty lame, but the slasher films of today completely lack any guts -- figuratively as well as literally. One of the first things that struck me while watching Silent Night, Deadly Night, one of the sillier but also better films of the early 1980s slasher boom, was how much more you could get away with back then. I mean, we talk about how repressed the Reagan era was and how shockingly violent the films of today have become, but the truth is very much the opposite. We were living the high life in the 1980s, and the films of today, while featuring bigger and louder explosions, are relatively anemic and, well, wimpy when compared to their forefathers. Where's the grue, baby? If you're not going to challenge my intellect or bring on some scare, you better hit me with heavy doses of the red stuff. The modern slasher film is as tame as one of those muzzled bears that wears a tu-tu and rides around on a unicycle at a circus, but not even 10% as entertaining or morally offensive. Even if the slashers of old were rather rotten films, at least they had running through them a streak of serious misanthropic meanness, which was far easier to swallow than the condescending, "See, we're goofing on the whole genre because we're so clever!" attitude that has ruined the horror film and become nothing more than a crutch for people to use in justifying their lack of creativity and talent. At least the old slasher films, dumb as toast though they may have been, were bold enough to sock us with a little brutal gore. So, with that said, let's move on to our look at one of the better scary Santa films, and one of the better slasher films in general. Our film begins on Christmas Eve, that magical night, with little Billy and his family en route to visit crazy ol' grandpa in the nursing home. Unfortunately, gramps is a vegetable and doesn't respond very much to the visit. The adults go off to discuss grandpa's state, leaving little Billy to set next to the catatonic old man. Nothing says Christmas joy to a child quite like being left to sit in a room with catatonic drooling old men. But hark! Gramps is not so far gone into the realm beyond that he can't snap out of it long enough to give the "cackling old man" warning that seemed to be part of all slasher films. In every one of them, our heroes encounter some goofball old man who laughs a lot -- but in an evil way, like how you laugh at Carrot Top, not in a funny way, like how you laugh at the pain of those around you. Grandpa cackles and tells Billy that Santa may bring toys to all the good little boys and girls, but he brings swift and brutal vengeance down upon those who have offended his sense of morality. Gramps then lapses back into a state of coma just in time to not be seen by the adults, leaving Billy's opinion of Jolly Ol' St. Nick forever changed. Had the kid gone to see the abysmal Santa Claus: The Movie starring Dudley Moore as an alcoholic millionaire elf (or something), Billy would have already developed a healthy grudge against Santa. I mean, this is the guy who, when you want a new GI Joe Figure, brings you "GI Army Man," the K-Mart knock-off of a GI Joe figure. So what you get is just close enough to what you wanted, yet still so very far away, that your disappointment is far greater than if you'd just gotten some socks instead. This is what Santa does to us. Meanwhile, a guy wearing a Santa suit robs a store, murders the clerk, then promptly breaks down on a dark and deserted road. Just as Billy is really getting worked up by a rather disturbing "Santa Claus is Creepin' Around" carol about how Santa is looking in your windows and watching you masturbate (well, those weren't the exact words, but it was the gist of it), the family stumbles across broke-down Killin' Claus. Being a murderous guy and all, he promptly kills Billy's dad. Billy escapes and hides, only to witness Santa rape, mutilate, and eventually kill his mother. Only Billy and his newborn brother survive. Fade to black. And fade back in some years later. Billy and his brother are in one of those orphanages run by abusive nuns. Luckily, all orphanages run by really abusive mean old nuns generally keep at least one cute and kindly young nun on staff. Something about quotas or something, I'm told. Billy is a fairly well-adjusted young boy, at least until the time o' Yule roles around. Then he starts drawing pictures of Santa murdering people. The good nun is suspicious that Billy may still be haunted by the murder of his parents, but the Mother Superior blows that off and says he remembers absolutely nothing about it, even though it happened when he was like seven years old and it's only been a couple years. You'd think that the whole drawing pictures of Santa slaughtering people, not to mention screaming like a banshee and running away any time he catches sight of a guy in a Santa suit, might be enough to disprove Mother Superior's theory that the murders did not affect him in any way whatsoever. Her solution for his irrational fear of Santa, founded on nothing more than the flimsy fact that he once watched Santa rape and murder him mom and shoot his dad in the head, is to make him hang around people dressed as Santa all the time. In one of the film's better sequences, she tries to force a screaming Billy to sit on Santa's lap as Santa chuckles heartily. Little Billy hauls off and slugs Santa, knocking his fat ass out of the chair into into the Christmas scene. I don't know. I guess I'm easily amused, but I never get tired of that scene. Not helping Billy's mental state out any is Mother Superior's obsession with punishing naughtiness, something that Billy also remembers St. Nick doing. She relishes beating the children, and nothing makes her day more than catching teenagers having sex and whipping them but good. Billy has the good fortune of watching some teenagers go at it and get busted, thus does he learn that sex is naughty. We then skip ahead some years again, and find Billy has grown into a muscular and fine looking young man played by Robert Brian Wilson. The cute and kindly nun, who apparently does not age, gets Billy a job in the stock room of a toy store, which seems a rather stupid thing to do for a kid who sent into fits of convulsing and hysterics at the mere thought of Santa Claus. Sure things are fine through the summer because Billy does not have a deep rooted fear of guys on stilts dressed as Uncle Sam, but did they think that Christmas wasn't eventually going to roll around, or that maybe this toy store wouldn't really be into it? Billy's a good worker, but his manager is a dick. He always makes Billy do the hard work, then takes all the credit. I think we can all relate to this, and I think we also know who's going to be the first to go once the mayhem begins. Billy also gets to flirt with the right cute Pamela (Toni Nero), but of course, even though Billy is handsome and buff and polite and treats her with respect and friendliness, she shacks up with the asshole guy. Ain't it always the case? As Christmas approaches, Billy begins to get a little touchy. On Christmas Eve, the guy who was supposed to play the in-store Santa calls in sick, and everyone agrees that Billy would make a great Santa. he spends most of the day whispering to little children about how Santa will punish them severely if they do anything naughty. After hours, the staff gathers together for a late-night party, presumably because none of them have any family of their own. The asshole guy tries to put the moves on Pam, but she resists, resulting in him slapping her around and tearing her shirt off in a scene that looks just like the one between the evil Santa and Billy's mom. Unfortunately for the asshole guy, Billy sees it, and it finally pushes him over the edge. Clad in his Santa suit, he assumes the powers of retribution and punishment granted Santa, or so he sees it. He makes quick work of the asshole, strangling him with some cords, but is so far gone that he can't help but see Pamela as anything but naughty. So she gets punished as well. Being on a roll, he offs the owner of the store and the head cashier as well, all in fairly gory fashion. one thing I like about this movie more than many other slasher films is that the methods of killing, while sometimes a bit silly, never reach the level of absolute absurdity that they tended to in other films, where someone might wish that they could be a glowing star atop a Christmas tree, only to later be impaled by a glowing star atop a Christmas tree. For the most part, Billy just grabs whatever's handy, usually a hammer or an ax, and goes to town. Meanwhile, in the Donald Pleasance role from Halloween, the cute nun realizes that Billy was made to play Santa, and it's driven him mad. So she pursues him across town with the cops, always one or two steps behind him and his mayhem. The role of these characters is twofold. First, they must provide exposition on the mental state of the killer. In this, it's all about how Billy's fear of Santa and his associating Santa with murderous punishment, has driven him to kill. In Halloween, Pleasance got to ramble about talking about pure eee-ville in the eyes of a boy. Their second function is to show up at the scene of a grisly murder and mutter, "He's been here." Billy is off having a field day of death while the cops bungle to and fro. Among his many Santa stops is a home where two teens -- one of whom is a young Linnea Quigley before age and drugs took their toll -- are getting it on atop a pool table while the young girl they are babysitting lurks about upstairs wondering about what Santa will bring her. Of course, Santa is bringing a stocking full o' pain this year, and he expresses his distaste for premarital sex by impaling poor Linnea on the antlers of a mounted deer head, then takes out her boyfriend as well. The boyfriend is played by that blonde haired dude who plays the sort of snobby blonde hair dude in all sorts of films during the 1980s. I think he got his ass kicked by Ralph Macchio. The best part of this whole scene is when the little girl sees Billy as Santa sneaking out of the house. She stops him to say hi, and Billy asks her if she's done anything naughty as he slowly draws a utility knife. She assures him she is nice, not naughty. Appeased by her innocence, Billy gives her a gift: the utility knife. It's a priceless moment because Billy's face is so earnest, and whoever the little girl actress is has an absolutely wonderful look of confusion. Billy then hauls ass out to some remote sledding hill where a couple of sled-hill bullies are picking on two other kids. I first laughed at the notion of teenage tough guys who hang out on snowy hills bullying people and stealing their sleds. I grew up near all sorts of sled hills and bullies, and none of them seemed to rank ruling the sled hill very high on their list of priorities. They had more important things to do, like airbrushing a picture of a half naked elf maiden on the side of their van or learning how to play "Beth" so they could sing it to their girlfriend. The first time I encountered the sled hill bully was in the film Jack Frost, and I made fun of it. But now I see this movie also has sled hill bullies, so I have to assume that these people do in fact exist. They have to be pretty damn low on the bully scale though, the wimpy bullies that other bullies make fun of. Sled hill bullies must be the bully equivalent of Lucky the Leprechaun, who had to guard a bowl of cereal when all the other leprechauns got to guard pots of gold. Just like the sled hill bullies in Jack Frost, one of the sled hill bullies here goes sledding down the hill only to get decapitated, this time by the ax-weilding Billy. I don't know if Billy was following these two guys around hoping they would do something naughty, or if he was just crouching out there in the middle of the woods just hoping someone naughty might happen by. He could have been out there a pretty long time, and since Santa has to get all his death delivered before Christmas morning, you think he'd be more conscious of time. The fuzz and their nun figure Billy is going to head for the orphanage to kill that annoying Mother Superior. Quite frankly, though I'd never advocate the ax murdering of cranky old nuns in real life, within the context of this film, it's really difficult to drum up any hope that she'll be saved in the nick of time. In a brilliant stroke, the police issue orders to shoot on sight all people dressed as Santa, which seems like a really stupid order to give on Christmas. Sure enough, a cop staking out the orphanage drops the first Santa he spies, which happens to be some poor priest visiting the kids. Do priests really dress up as Santa? I figured they would always dismiss Santa as some Pagan devilry, but I guess getting a Christmas day visit from a guy dressed as Jesus, while more religious, isn't as uplifting for the kids. besides, you'd have to find a real sucker to walk around in a loin cloth and crown of thorns in December. The cop doesn't have much time to be wrought with Catholic guilt over having killed an innocent man, because Billy shows up soon thereafter and plants an ax in the guy. Then he moves on to Mother Superior. Billy is let in by his little brother, who weirdly enough, is still the same age he was when Billy was ten. Mother Superior, ever the cast-iron bitch, just keeps on shouting at poor Billy, even though he's dressed as Santa and carrying an ax coated with the blood of the naughty. This seems at least as smart as that drill sergeant screaming at a raving lunatic holding a loaded rifle in Full Metal Jacket, only this one is even worse because the guy is dressed as Santa. See, whether you believe in God or not, whether you feel your faith is like an aegis against all evil, one thing you should not do is insult a crazy guy dressed as Santa carrying an ax. I try to give you good advice, and this is pretty high up there. Just as Bill is about to cleave the abusive nun in two, the cops show up and blow him away. Christmas is saved! Of course, being a horror film, it has to have an open ending, so we zoom in on Billy's little bro, staring at his dying sibling, then pointing and chirping "Naughty!" The thing that sets this apart from most other slasher films is that they really try hard to make an interesting character out of Billy, and they succeed. Although it's hard to get behind his ax murderin', we can certainly understand and pity him after all he has gone through. There is a depth of character not present in most films of this nature, and not present in any films of any nature these days. There's also a pretty strong statement against the whole concept of "Catholic guilt," which keeps us ashamed of damn near everything we might actually want to do. The movie characterizes religion in the Mother Superior, who in her own way is as looney as Billy winds up being. Rather than chopping up the naughty with an ax, she abuses them mercilessly and subjects them to constant mental anguish. The one good nun we see is ineffectual against the greater notion of punishment for all sins real and perceived. If you were crazy or stoned, or just really pretentious, or in need of an essay, you could also look at Murderin' Santa versus the nuns as being symbolic of ancient Pagan traditions fighting with Christianity. As just about everyone knows, I assume, Christmas was more or less an invented holiday. Jesus wasn't born on December 25th, or so say most Biblical scholars. But Christians needed a way to convince the wild pagans of the north -- my people, incidentally -- to become God-fearin', repressed, guilt-ridden Christians like everyone else. So they made up Christmas, and put it on December 25th, a significant Pagan holiday. That way they wouldn't even have to change their day of celebration. Santa remains a symbol of Christmas' pagan roots, which is why so many devout Christians don't care for the jolly fat toymaker. You can find hours of amusing reading material about how Santa=Satan, and how Santa is just a way for drunk homosexual hobos to get little kids to sit on their laps. I'm generally not one to harsh on another's religion. I realize some people take that stuff seriously. Having been raised with no religion, and having leanings toward the wild-eyed Paganism of my ancestors kicking it up in the far northern reaches of Scotland, I'm not big on religious persecution and am willing to live and live. But I have no problem making endless amounts of fun at the twisted, hate-mongering freaks of the world who use religion as a convenient excuse to subject those around them to constant abuse and pain, whether they be Catholic, Baptist, Muslim, or Zoroastrian. These are the people who make me want to go skyclad to one of their little ice cream socials, hooting like a madman and dancing naked under the moon while twirling about a walking stick and brandishing a copy of The Hobbit or some other foul tome of Satanism. The people who use God or any diety as an excuse to hate another race, burn or ban a book, attack a person for their sexual preference, and generally bend the world to match their incredibly warped and bitter version of morality are the sword enemies of Teleport City, and we issue forth like a great muster of loin-cloth clad heathens bent on annoying these people endlessly by simply not adhering to their repressed, guilt-riddled, hateful views on life and how to live it. Hear the call! We are all around ye, and we're naked! So right here in a 1980s slasher film we have the continuing struggle of Paganism against repressive Christianity, and after centuries of being hunted, burned, hanged, tortured, and forced to convert, the Pagans finally got themselves an ax-wielding Claus. Let the games begin! The whole mythology of Santa and his role in corrupting Christians is muddied when one takes into account the plot of the Mexican movie Santa Claus, in which Santa faces off against the minions of Satan. So just who is Santa? A rogue demon all dressed in red, as much at odds with the kingdom of Christ as he is with the minions of the Dark Lord? A lone warrior playing judge, jury, and in the case of this film, executioner? Who is he, and what does he want? It becomes obvious, then, that Santa is in fact some sort of proto-vigilante, an avenging angel, very much like Charles Bronson's character in Death Wish or The Punisher in spirit, if not in attire. Perhaps, however, this film is far more subversive. A secret fundamentalist recruitment movie aiming to undermine our children's trust in Santa Claus, to teach them that he is evil, and only an out-of-shape old cop with a loaded revolver can offer you eternal salvation. Silent Night, Deadly Night also succeeds in being clever from time to time. The utility knife scene is simply hilarious in a very dry way, and the frequent allusions to the punishment of naughty people and the Christmas carols about Santa sneaking about are well-done, even if they are a bit obvious. Put in the context of this film, you begin to realize how weird the whole concept of a laughing fat man keeping tabs on you, then breaking into your home to leave you gifts or coal, actually is. Once harmless carols become far more disturbing when set to scenes of Santa knocking people off. As I said in the beginning, I was surprised to see just how much this film was able to get away with, and how pathetically tame modern slasher films seem by comparison. It'd been some fifteen years since I'd last watched this movie, and I found it pretty effective. It held up well, and pitted against the slashers of the 1990s and the 2000s, Silent Night, Deadly Night would plant an ax in their head, shove a Christmas tree up their bum, then dance gleefully about their useless quivering corpses whilst laughing heartily. Sure it's a silly film. I mean, it's about a guy dressed as Santa killing people. There's a built-in silliness in that scenario. But beyond the goofiness, there's actually a decently-constructed horror film here that takes on religious issues and manages to create a central character that is evil and all, but also invokes pity and sympathy for all that he's endured. We witness his progression into madness, and it's well done. I went into Silent Night, Deadly Night expecting to be groaning in pain throughout, much like I so on Christmas Eve when my family gathers around to chain smoke and watch golf on television all night. I was pleasantly surprised to find a fairly enjoyable slasher film that certainly had more thought put into it than most other films of the genre. Labels: Horror: Slashers, Year: 1984 posted by Keith at 4:19 PM | |